Information and Organization 

TL;DR: A dramaturgical model based on Goffman's seminal work on social life is proposed as a useful way of conceptualizing the qualitative interview and guidelines for the conduct of qualitative interviews are suggested.

TL;DR: The authors argue that scholars have had difficulty grappling with materiality because they often conflate the distinction between the material and social with the distinctions between determinism and voluntarism, and outline four challenges that researchers must address before they can reconcile the reality of materiality with the notion that outcomes of technological change are socially constructed.

TL;DR: Questioning the disruptive talk associated with digital transformation, it is suggested that the institutional perspective is a prolific lens to study digital innovation and transformation and that existing institutional arrangements are pivotal arbiters in deciding whether and how novel arrangements gain acceptance.

TL;DR: This paper compares two alternative theoretical foundations upon which the study of sociomateriality can be built: agential realism and critical realism.

TL;DR: It is argued that artifact-centered assumptions about design are not well suited to designing organizational routines, which are generative systems that produce recognizable, repetitive patterns of interdependent actions, carried out by multiple actors.