scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
JournalISSN: 1934-9491

Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 

About: Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities is an academic journal. The journal publishes majorly in the area(s): Intellectual disability & Population. It has an ISSN identifier of 1934-9491. Over the lifetime, 706 publications have been published receiving 16579 citations. The journal is also known as: IDD.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Increly, the term intellectual disability is being used instead of mental retardation in the field of intellectual disability/mental retardation.
Abstract: There is considerable and intense discussion in the field of intellectual disability/mental retardation about the construct of disability, how intellectual disability fits within the general construct of disability, and the use of the term intellectual disability (Glidden, 2006; Greenspan, 2006; MacMillan, Siperstein, & Leffert, 2006; Schalock & Luckasson, 2004; Switzky & Greenspan, 2006b). This discussion is occurring within the context of competing world views of the philosophical and epistemological underpinnings of the conceptions of intellectual disability/mental retardation (Switzky & Greenspan, 2006a). Increasingly, the term intellectual disability is being used instead of mental retardation. This transition in terminology is exemplified by organization names (e.g., the American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities—AAIDD, International Association for the Scientific Study of Intellectual Disabilities, President’s Committee for People With Intellectual Disabilities), journal titles, and published research (Parmenter, 2004; Schroeder, Gertz, & Velazquez, 2002). A number of questions have emerged with the increased use of the term intellectual disability:

538 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This is the third in a series of perspective articles from the Terminology and Classification Committee of the American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities to share thoughts on critical issues associated with terminology, definition, and classification in the field of intellectual disability.
Abstract: This is the third in a series of perspective articles (Schalock et al., 2007; Wehmeyer et al., 2008) from the Terminology and Classification Committee of the American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (AAIDD). The purpose of these articles is to share our thoughts on critical issues associated with terminology, definition, and classification in the field of intellectual disability and to seek input from the field as we prepare the 11th edition of AAIDD’s Diagnosis, Classification, and System of Supports Manual (the working title). In the first article (Schalock et al., 2007), we explained the reasons for shifting from the term mental retardation to intellectual disability. Although the two terms cover the same population of individuals, we concluded that intellectual disability was the better term because it

284 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Results show that Latino children were diagnosed almost one year later than White children, received fewer specialty services, and had higher unmet service needs, and factors that accounted for differences in the number of services received were maternal level of education and thenumber of sources of knowledge about autism.
Abstract: There is greater identification of children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and, as a result, more attention to specialty services to address the challenges children with ASD face. Along with the growth in identification of ASD is a growth in the population of Latino children, yet there is some evidence that disparities exist in diagnosis and services between Latino and non-Latino White children. This study further documents these disparities and investigates the mechanisms that may contribute to them. Diagnosis and specialty services were compared between 48 Latino and 56 non-Latino White children diagnosed with ASD, and factors that contribute to differences are explored. Results show that Latino children were diagnosed almost one year later than White children, received fewer specialty services, and had higher unmet service needs. Factors that accounted for differences in the number of services received were maternal level of education and the number of sources of knowledge about autism. Findings suggest that service providers need to work to provide greater awareness and knowledge about autism, and make services more accessible to Latino families.

252 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Although transition planning had been conducted for the majority of students, few of them took a leadership role in their transition planning, and students with autism or intellectual disability were significantly less likely than students with other disabilities to take a Leadership role.
Abstract: To compare the status of transition planning for students with intellectual disability, autism, or other disabilities, we used data from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2, a federally funded, national study of the secondary and postschool experiences of students with disabilities. Results show that although transition planning had been conducted for the majority of students, few of them took a leadership role in their transition planning. Students with autism or intellectual disability were significantly less likely than students with other disabilities to take a leadership role. The majority of the active participants in transition planning were school-based personnel. We also found limited participation from other agencies/support persons (e.g., vocational rehabilitation). Students with autism or intellectual disability had more identified needs for support after school than did students with other disabilities.

209 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The status of the research about community participation and social inclusion is summarized, some debates and points of contention are summarized, emerging research issues are noted, and needed areas of research are highlighted.
Abstract: As more individuals with intellectual/developmental disabilities are physically included in community life, in schools, neighborhoods, jobs, recreation, and congregations, the challenge of going beyond physical inclusion to true social inclusion becomes more apparent. This article summarizes the status of the research about community participation and social inclusion, summarizes some debates and points of contention, notes emerging research issues, and highlights needed areas of research. It is clear that most research on these topics has been conducted with individuals who are in paid formal services, and there are great needs for understanding the community participation of individuals who live on their own or with their families, as well as researching social inclusion by focusing on the attitudes and experiences of community members themselves, not just individuals with disabilities and paid providers.

204 citations

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Journal in previous years
YearPapers
202325
202260
202135
202038
201939
201836