scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
JournalISSN: 0265-6736

International Journal of Hyperthermia 

Taylor & Francis
About: International Journal of Hyperthermia is an academic journal published by Taylor & Francis. The journal publishes majorly in the area(s): Hyperthermia & Microwave ablation. It has an ISSN identifier of 0265-6736. It is also open access. Over the lifetime, 3231 publications have been published receiving 87012 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This review summarizes the basic principles that govern the relationships between thermal exposure (temperature and time of exposure) and thermal damage, with an emphasis on normal tissue effects and notes the critical lack of publications examining effects of chronic thermal exposures as might be encountered in occupational hazards.
Abstract: This paper is one of several in this Special Issue of the International Journal of Hyperthermia that discusses the current state of knowledge about the human health risks of hyperthermia This special issue emanated from a workshop sponsored by the World Health Organization in the Spring of 2002 on this topic It is anticipated that these papers will help to establish guidelines for human exposure to conditions leading to hyperthermia This comprehensive review of the literature makes it clear that much more work needs to be done to clarify what the thresholds for thermal damage are in humans This review summarizes the basic principles that govern the relationships between thermal exposure (temperature and time of exposure) and thermal damage, with an emphasis on normal tissue effects Methods for converting one time-temperature combination to a time at a standardized temperature are provided as well as a detailed discussion about the underlying assumptions that go into these calculations There are few in vivo papers examining the type and extent of damage that occurs in the lower temperature range for hyperthermic exposures (eg 39-42 degrees C) Therefore, it is clear that estimation of thermal dose to effect at these thermal exposures is less precise in that temperature range In addition, there are virtually no data that directly relate to the thermal sensitivity of human tissues Thus, establishment of guidelines for human exposure based on the data provided must be done with significant caution There is detailed review and presentation of thermal thresholds for tissue damage (based on what is detectable in vivo) The data are normalized using thermal dosimetric concepts Tables are included in an Appendix Database which compile published data for thresholds of thermal damage in a variety of tissues and species This database is available by request (contact MWD or PJH), but not included in this manuscript for brevity All of the studies reported are for single acute thermal exposures Except for brain function and physiology (as detailed in this issue by Sharma et al) one notes the critical lack of publications examining effects of chronic thermal exposures as might be encountered in occupational hazards This review also does not include information on the embryo, which is covered in detail elsewhere in this volume (see article by Edwards et al) as well as in a recent review on this subject, which focuses on thermal dose

863 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Clinical data gained in these studies on magnetic fluid induced hyperthermia is summarized and one approach has been tested in clinical trials so far.
Abstract: Magnetic fluids are increasingly used for clinical applications such as drug delivery, magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic fluid hyperthermia. The latter technique that has been developed as a cancer treatment for several decades comprises the injection of magnetic nanoparticles into tumors and their subsequent heating in an alternating magnetic field. Depending on the applied temperature and the duration of heating this treatment either results in direct tumor cell killing or makes the cells more susceptible to concomitant radio- or chemotherapy. Numerous groups are working in this field worldwide, but only one approach has been tested in clinical trials so far. Here, we summarize the clinical data gained in these studies on magnetic fluid induced hyperthermia.

721 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This paper presents the first clinical application of interstitial hyperthermia using magnetic nanoparticles in locally recurrent prostate cancer in patients with biopsy-proven local recurrence of prostate cancer following radiotherapy with curative intent, to the authors’ knowledge.
Abstract: The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate whether the technique of magnetic fluid hyperthermia can be used for minimally invasive treatment of prostate cancer. This paper presents the first clini...

705 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Experimental results clearly indicate a definite superiority of even non-optimized magnetic fluids over MDP ferrites regarding their specific absorption rate (SAR), and inductive heating by magnetic fluids can improve temperature distributions in critical regions.
Abstract: The potential of colloidal subdomain ferrite particle suspensions (SDP) (‘magnetic fluids’), exposed to an alternating magnetic field, is evaluated for hyperthermia. Power absorption measurements o...

653 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The Health Council of the Netherlands (HCN) discusses the need for this, considering consistency, applicability, quantification, causality, comprehensibility and acceptability, and concludes that it seems unlikely that a change of dosimetric quantity will help us forward in the discussion on the scientific controversies regarding the existence or non-thermal effects in humans following long duration, low intensity exposure to electromagnetic fields as discussed by the authors.
Abstract: The Health Council of the Netherlands (HCN) and other organisations hold the basic assumption that induced electric current and the generation and absorption of heat in biological material caused by radiofrequency electromagnetic fields are the only causal effects with possible adverse consequences for human health that have been scientifically established to date. Hence, the exposure guidelines for the 10 MHz-10 GHz frequency range are based on avoiding adverse effects of increased temperatures that may occur of the entire human body at a specific absorption rate (SAR) level above 4 W/kg. During the workshop on Thermal Aspects of Radio Frequency Exposure on 11-12 January 2010 in Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA, the question was raised whether there would be a practical advantage in shifting from expressing the exposure limits in SAR to expressing them in terms of a maximum allowable temperature increase. This would mean defining adverse time-temperature thresholds. In this paper, the HCN discusses the need for this, considering six points: consistency, applicability, quantification, causality, comprehensibility and acceptability. The HCN concludes that it seems unlikely that a change of dosimetric quantity will help us forward in the discussion on the scientific controversies regarding the existence or non-existence of non-thermal effects in humans following long duration, low intensity exposure to electromagnetic fields. Therefore, the HCN favours maintaining the current approach of basic restrictions and reference levels being expressed as SAR and in V/m or µT, respectively. © 2011 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved.

623 citations

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Journal in previous years
YearPapers
202373
2022166
2021192
2020181
2019171
2018243