Journal•
Journal of International Relations
About: Journal of International Relations is an academic journal. The journal publishes majorly in the area(s): Foreign policy & China. Over the lifetime, 875 publication(s) have been published receiving 1784 citation(s).
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
Journal Article•
TL;DR: In this article, the authors analyse the constraints of UNODC on combating drug trafficking in Afghanistan, that caused a significant increase of drug rafficking in Afghanistan by 2012-2013.
Abstract: Drug trafficking is an important issue as it can be the source of the emerging of the other crimes. For several years, Afghanistan has lead the the supply of illegal opiate to the other countries in the world. As a part of United Nations, UNODC has contribute a lot of significant outputs along with Afghan Government through The Country Programme for Afghanistan. However, by 2012-2013, drug trafficking in Afghanistan increased at the highest point compare to the years before. This research aims to analyse the constraints of UNODC on combating drug trafficking in Afghanistan, that caused a significant increase of drug rafficking in Afghanistan. Descriptive-Analysis type is used in this research to describe the efforts of UNODC, then analyse the constraints of UNODC through the implementation of Country Programme. The result shows there are some external factors such as economic, socio-economic, and political, from Afghanistan, that obstruct the works of UNODC.
105 citations
35 citations
26 citations
Journal Article•
TL;DR: The G20 opens a critical lens into the nature of contested global governance at a time of fundamental reordering as mentioned in this paper, highlighting the degree to which the contestation about the nature and nature of new forms of global governance must be nuanced.
Abstract: The G20 opens a critical lens into the nature of contested global governance at a time of fundamental re-ordering. Although increasing their status. The BRICS have not made sustained efforts to influence the design of the G20. By way of contrast a number of middle powers have exhibited more assertive diplomatic styles as hosts and policy entrepreneurs. While initially left outside the summit process, some key small states worked extensively through coalitional diplomacy to gain some degree of access to the G20. This paper showcases the degree to which the contestation about the nature of new forms of global governance must be nuanced. The main route of contestation for the big rising powers has come via parallel institutional structures - notably through the formalization of the BRICS. Middle powers and smaller states, with a greater sense of the stakes involved concerning 'hub' institutionalization, have a much greater incentive to actively engage with the G20.
24 citations
17 citations