Journal•ISSN: 0929-0710
Logic group preprint series
Cambridge University Press
About: Logic group preprint series is an academic journal. The journal publishes majorly in the area(s): Provability logic & Intuitionistic logic. It has an ISSN identifier of 0929-0710. Over the lifetime, 312 publications have been published receiving 4313 citations.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
•
TL;DR: In this article, the authors define a Bayesian approximation of a belief function and show that combining the Bayesian approximations of belief functions is computationally less involving than combining the belief functions themselves.
Abstract: An often mentioned obstacle for the use of Dempster-Shafer theory for the
handling of uncertainty in expert systems is the computational complexity of the
theory. One cause of this complexity is the fact that in Dempster-Shafer theory the
evidence is represented by a belief function which is induced by a basic probability
assignment, i.e. a probability measure on the powerset of possible answers to a
question, and not by a probability measure on the set of possible answers to a
question, like in a Bayesian approach. In this paper, we define a Bayesian
approximation of a belief function and show that combining the Bayesian
approximations of belief functions is computationally less involving than
combining the belief functions themselves, while in many practical applications
replacing the belief functions by their Bayesian approximations will not essentially
affect the result.
161 citations
•
TL;DR: In this paper, a polyadic negative quantifier is proposed to deal with non-variable binding operators in negative concord languages like French, where negation can be interpreted as an iteration of quantifiers or as absorption.
Abstract: This paper addresses the two interpretations a combination of negative
indefinites can get in concord languages like French, namely a concord reading
which amounts to a single negation, or a double negation reading We
develop an analysis in a polyadic framework, in which a sequence of negative
indefinites can be interpreted as an iteration of quantifiers or as absorption
The first option leads to a scopal relation, interpreted as double negation
The second option leads to the construction of a polyadic negative quantifier,
which corresponds to the concord reading Given that negation participates
in negative concord, we develop an extension of the polyadic approach which
can deal with non-variable binding operators The contribution of negation
in a concord context is semantically empty, which is taken to explain the
cross-linguistic variation we find in the participation of negation in negative
concord The semantic analysis is incorporated into a grammatical analysis
formulated in HPSG, which crucially relies on the assumption that quantifiers
can be combined in more than one way upon retrieval from the quantifier
store
132 citations
•
TL;DR: A formalisation of motivational attitudes, the attitudes that are the driving forces behind the actions of agents, is presented, which extends the usual state-transition paradigm of Propositional Dynamic Logic.
Abstract: In this paper we present a formalisation of motivational attitudes, the attitudes that
are the driving forces behind the actions of agents. We consider the statics of these attitudes both at the assertion level, i.e. ranging over propositions, and at the practition level, i.e. ranging over actions, as well as the dynamics of these attitudes, i.e. how they
change over time. Starting from an agent's wishes, which form the primitive, most funda-
mental motivational attitude, we define its goals as induced by those wishes that do not
yet hold, i.e. are unfulfilled, but are within the agent's practical possibility to bring about,
i.e. are implementable for the agent. Among these unfulfilled, implementable wishes the
agent selects those that qualify as its goals. Based on its knowledge on its goals and practical possibilities, an agent may make certain commitments. In particular, an agent may
commit itself to actions that it knows to be correct and feasible to bring about some of its
known goals. As soon as it no longer knows its commitments to be useful, i.e. leading to
fulfilment of some goal, and practically possible, an agent is able to undo these commitments. Both the act of committing as well as that of undoing commitments is modelled
as a special model-transforming action in our framework, which extends the usual statetransition paradigm of Propositional Dynamic Logic. In between making and undoing
commitments, an agent is committed to all the actions that are known to be identical for
all practical purposes to the ones in its agenda. By modifying the agent's agenda during
the execution of actions in a straightforward way, it is ensured that commitments display
an intuitively acceptable behaviour with regard to composite actions.
128 citations
•
TL;DR: In this paper, a modal logic for finite ordered binary trees is developed, with operators for the'mother of', 'first daughter of' and 'daughter of' relations together with their transitive reflexive closures.
Abstract: A modal logic is developed to deal with finite ordered binary trees as
they are used in (computational) linguistics. A modal language is introduced with operators for the 'mother of', 'first daughter of' and 'second
daughter of' relations together with their transitive reflexive closures. The
relevant class of tree models is defined and three linguistic applications of
this language are discussed: context free grammars, command relations, and trees decorated with feature structures. An axiomatic proof system
is given for which completeness is shown with respect to the class of finite
ordered binary trees. A number of decidability results follow.
121 citations
•
TL;DR: A data link protocol developed and used by Philips Electronics is modeled and verified using I/O automata theory and computer-checked with the Coq proof development system.
Abstract: A data link protocol developed and used by Philips Electronics is modeled and verified using I/O automata theory. Correctness
is computer-checked with the Coq proof development system.
114 citations