Showing papers in "Millennium: Journal of International Studies in 1999"

Territory and Translocality: Discrepant Idioms of Political Identity

Abstract: This article argues that international political theory requires better ways of thinking about the formation of transnational (or, as it is suggested, translocal) political identities in the wake of changing configurations of territory/political space. More specifically it identifies discrepant forms of political practice-typified by transnational communities, borderzone identities, and spiritualist movements-whose political practices problematise the dominant statist assumption of equivalence between territorial situatedness and political identity.

Nationalism, boundaries, and violence

Abstract: In an age of transient sovereignties, collapsing state frontiers, expanding hybridisation, ethnic amalgamation, cultural ITIlXmg, and ever-increasing communication, a remarkable interest in boundaries has sprung up. 'Boundary' and related terms have been in use since the dawning of disciplines like geography and history, yet their conceptualisation is relatively novel in other social sciences. This article will focus only on a particular, and increasingly important, variety of boundaries: those which enclose, mark, and signal ethnic belonging or membership. The concept of ethnic boundary was first formulated roughly 30 years ago by the Norwegian anthropologist Frederick Barth.' He maintained that ethnic identities do not derive from intrinsic features but emerge from, and are reasserted in, encounters, transactions, and oppositions between groups. In a nutshell, the crucible of ethnic identities are the boundaries which particular aggregates of people establish for different purposes, or simply as a consequence of interaction. Since Barth's milestone study, the concept has permeated anthropological research on the making and unmaking of ethnic identities. One of its key contributions was a focus on the subjective, self-experienced dimension, rather than on objective traits as perceived by outsiders. The opposition between ethnic boundaries and ethnic contents is the central point of the Barthian approach. The former describe the perception of ethnic identity and its limits, the latter its substance or culture. As ethnic boundaries are directly related to subjective self-perception, they are more relevant to the study of identity formation than ethnic contents. This implies that culture can change while ethnic boundaries remain simultaneously unaltered. Thus, the boundary, rather than the content, forms Cl person's or group's identity. Historical records can testify to such discontinuity, i.e., that cultural elements (content) can vary considerably throughout the centuries, even in cases in which the homeland's name or the ethnonym have persisted.

A Story Beyond Telos: Redeeming the Shield of Achilles for a Realism of Rights in IR:

Abstract: This chapter sets out to tell a story, and to do so in both an archaic and modern way, using primarily the characters and motifs of Homer’s Iliad. In a way it is, therefore, an effort loosely in the style of Horkheimer and Adorno’s use of Homer’s Odyssey, and is meant to be an antidote to the more sterile formats of a formal IR. The point of the story is that, unlike Shapiro and Der Derian’s view, a story does not have to embody a telos. The world has stories to tell, and it is the responsibility of IR scholars, not just to deconstruct them for their political animations, but to reinvent them as the basis of solidarities and the imagination implicit in successful dialogue.