scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
JournalISSN: 0026-461X

Mineralogical Magazine 

Cambridge University Press
About: Mineralogical Magazine is an academic journal published by Cambridge University Press. The journal publishes majorly in the area(s): Metamorphism & Crystal structure. It has an ISSN identifier of 0026-461X. Over the lifetime, 7707 publications have been published receiving 139073 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The International Mineralogical Association's approved amphibole nomenclature has been revised to simplify it, make it more consistent with divisions generally at 50%, define prefixes and modifiers more precisely, and include new amphibole species discovered and named since 1978, when the previous scheme was approved.
Abstract: The International Mineralogical Association's approved amphibole nomenclature has been revised to simplify it, make it more consistent with divisions generally at 50%, define prefixes and modifiers more precisely, and include new amphibole species discovered and named since 1978, when the previous scheme was approved. The same reference axes form the basis of the new scheme and most names are little changed, but compound species names like tremolitic hornblende (now magnesiohornblende) are abolished, as are crossite (now glaucophane or ferroglaucophane or magnesioriebeckite or riebeckite), tirodite (now manganocummingtonite), and dannemorite (now manganogrunerite). The 50% rule has been broken only to retain tremolite and actinolite as in the 1978 scheme; the sodic-calcic amphibole range has therefore been expanded. Alkali amphiboles are now sodic amphiboles. The use of hyphens is defined. New amphibole names approved since 1978 include nyboite, leakeite, kornite, ungarettiite, sadanagaite, and cannilloite. All abandoned names are listed. The formulae and source of the amphibole end-member names are listed and procedures outlined to calculate Fe (super 3+) and Fe (super 2+) where not determined by analysis.

2,965 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The Na-Ca-Mg-Fe-Mn-Li amphibole group was proposed in this article, which is defined by 0.50 apfu (atoms per formula unit), with members whittakerite and ottoliniite.
Abstract: The introduction of a fifth amphibole group, the Na-Ca-Mg-Fe-Mn-Li group, defined by 0.50 < B(Mg, Fe2+, Mn2+, Li) < 1.50 and 0.50 < = B(Ca, Na) < = 1.50 apfu (atoms per formula unit), with members whittakerite and ottoliniite, has been required by recent discoveries of B(LiNa) amphiboles. This, and other new discoveries, such as sodicpedrizite (which is herein slightly, but significantly changed from the original idealised formula), necessitate amendments to the IMA 1997 definitions of the Mg-Fe-Mn-Li, calcic, sodic-calcic and sodic groups. The discovery of obertiite and the finding of an incompatibility in the IMA 1997 subdivision of the sodic group, requires further amendments within the sodic group. All these changes, which have IMA approval, are summarised.

2,389 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a simple general equation is presented for estimating the Fe 3 § concentrations in ferromagnesian oxide and silicate minerals from microprobe analyses, assuming that iron is the only element present with variable valency.
Abstract: A simple general equation is presented for estimating the Fe 3 § concentrations in ferromagnesian oxide and silicate minerals from microprobe analyses. The equation has been derived using stoichiometric criteria assuming that iron is the only element present with variable valency and that oxygen is the only anion. In general, the number of Fe 3 + ions per X oxygens in the mineral formula, F, is given by; F = 2X(1 - T/S) where T is the ideal number of cations per formula unit, and S is the observed cation total per X oxygens calculated assuming all iron to be Fe 2 § Minerals for which this equation is appropriate include pyralspite and ugrandite garnet, aluminate spinel, magnetite, pyroxene, sapphirine and ilmenite. The equation cannot be used for minerals with cation vacancies (e.g. micas, maghemite) unless, as in the case of amphiboles, the number of ions of a subset of elements in the formula can be fixed. Variants of the above equation are presented for some of the numerous published schemes for the recalculation of amphibole formulae. The equation is also inappropriate for minerals showing SP += 4H § substitution (e.g. staurolite, hydrogarnet), minerals containing an unknown proportion of an unanalysed element other than oxygen (e.g. boron-bearing kornerupine) and minerals containing two or more elements with variable valency.

1,690 citations

Journal ArticleDOI

1,571 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The use of regression diagnostics combined with nonlinear least-squares to refine cell parameters from powder diffraction data, presenting a method which minimizes residuals in the experimentallydetermined quantity.
Abstract: We discuss the use of regression diagnostics combined with nonlinear least-squares to refine cell parameters from powder diffraction data, presenting a method which minimizes residuals in the experimentallydetermined quantity (usually 20hkt or energy, Ehkt). Regression diagnostics, particularly deletion diagnostics, are invaluable in detection of outliers and influential data which could be deleterious to the regressed results. The usual practice of simple inspection of calculated residuals alone often fails to detect the seriously deleterious outliers in a dataset, because bare residuals provide no information on the leverage (sensitivity) of the datum concerned. The regression diagnostics which predict the change expected in each cell constant upon deletion of each observation (hkl reflection) are particularly valuable in assessing the sensitivity of the calculated results to individual reflections. A new computer program, implementing nonlinear regression methods and providing the diagnostic output, is described. I~YWORDS: powder diffraction, regression diagnostics, lattice parameters, computer program.

1,248 citations

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Journal in previous years
YearPapers
202354
2022125
202168
202087
201986
201854