scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
JournalISSN: 0027-3171

Multivariate Behavioral Research 

Taylor & Francis
About: Multivariate Behavioral Research is an academic journal published by Taylor & Francis. The journal publishes majorly in the area(s): Structural equation modeling & Item response theory. It has an ISSN identifier of 0027-3171. Over the lifetime, 2074 publications have been published receiving 150720 citations. The journal is also known as: MBR.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The Scree Test for the Number Of Factors this paper was first proposed in 1966 and has been used extensively in the field of behavioral analysis since then, e.g., in this paper.
Abstract: (1966). The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research: Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 245-276.

12,228 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This article disentangle conflicting definitions of moderated mediation and describes approaches for estimating and testing a variety of hypotheses involving conditional indirect effects, showing that the indirect effect of intrinsic student interest on mathematics performance through teacher perceptions of talent is moderated by student math self-concept.
Abstract: This article provides researchers with a guide to properly construe and conduct analyses of conditional indirect effects, commonly known as moderated mediation effects. We disentangle conflicting definitions of moderated mediation and describe approaches for estimating and testing a variety of hypotheses involving conditional indirect effects. We introduce standard errors for hypothesis testing and construction of confidence intervals in large samples but advocate that researchers use bootstrapping whenever possible. We also describe methods for probing significant conditional indirect effects by employing direct extensions of the simple slopes method and Johnson-Neyman technique for probing significant interactions. Finally, we provide an SPSS macro to facilitate the implementation of the recommended asymptotic and bootstrapping methods. We illustrate the application of these methods with an example drawn from the Michigan Study of Adolescent Life Transitions, showing that the indirect effect of intrinsic student interest on mathematics performance through teacher perceptions of talent is moderated by student math self-concept.

7,973 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The propensity score is a balancing score: conditional on the propensity score, the distribution of observed baseline covariates will be similar between treated and untreated subjects, and different causal average treatment effects and their relationship with propensity score analyses are described.
Abstract: The propensity score is the probability of treatment assignment conditional on observed baseline characteristics. The propensity score allows one to design and analyze an observational (nonrandomized) study so that it mimics some of the particular characteristics of a randomized controlled trial. In particular, the propensity score is a balancing score: conditional on the propensity score, the distribution of observed baseline covariates will be similar between treated and untreated subjects. I describe 4 different propensity score methods: matching on the propensity score, stratification on the propensity score, inverse probability of treatment weighting using the propensity score, and covariate adjustment using the propensity score. I describe balance diagnostics for examining whether the propensity score model has been adequately specified. Furthermore, I discuss differences between regression-based methods and propensity score-based methods for the analysis of observational data. I describe different causal average treatment effects and their relationship with propensity score analyses.

7,895 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Dans les differentes procedures existantes pour l'evaluation and the modifications sequentielles des modeles structuraux, l'auteur s'attache a discuter celle connue sous le terme PMM.
Abstract: Dans les differentes procedures existantes pour l'evaluation et les modifications sequentielles des modeles structuraux, l'auteur s'attache a discuter celle connue sous le terme PMM. Plus generalement, les propositions de KAPLAN (1990) sont critiquees dans le detail

6,544 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Two alternatives for improving the performance of confidence limits for the indirect effect are evaluated: a method based on the distribution of the product of two normal random variables, and resampling methods.
Abstract: The most commonly used method to test an indirect effect is to divide the estimate of the indirect effect by its standard error and compare the resulting z statistic with a critical value from the standard normal distribution. Confidence limits for the indirect effect are also typically based on critical values from the standard normal distribution. This article uses a simulation study to demonstrate that confidence limits are imbalanced because the distribution of the indirect effect is normal only in special cases. Two alternatives for improving the performance of confidence limits for the indirect effect are evaluated: (a) a method based on the distribution of the product of two normal random variables, and (b) resampling methods. In Study 1, confidence limits based on the distribution of the product are more accurate than methods based on an assumed normal distribution but confidence limits are still imbalanced. Study 2 demonstrates that more accurate confidence limits are obtained using resampling methods, with the bias-corrected bootstrap the best method overall.

6,267 citations

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Journal in previous years
YearPapers
202348
202245
202199
202087
201952
201862