scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
JournalISSN: 1569-4445

Near Surface Geophysics 

Wiley
About: Near Surface Geophysics is an academic journal published by Wiley. The journal publishes majorly in the area(s): Ground-penetrating radar & Electrical resistivity tomography. It has an ISSN identifier of 1569-4445. Over the lifetime, 911 publications have been published receiving 14964 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a tool using the neighbourhood algorithm was developed to invert the one-dimensional V s profile from passive or active source experiments, with and without a priori information.
Abstract: Passive recordings of seismic noise are increasingly used in earthquake engineering to measure in situ the shear-wave velocity profile at a given site Ambient vibrations, which are assumed to be mainly composed of surface waves, can be used to determine the Rayleigh-wave dispersion curve, with the advantage of not requiring artificial sources Due to the data uncertainties and the non-linearity of the problem itself, the solution of the dispersion-curve inversion is generally non-unique Stochastic search methods such as the neighbourhood algorithm allow searches for minima of them is fit function by investigating the whole parameter space Due to the limited number of parameters in surface-wave inversion, they constitute an attractive alternative to linearized methods An efficient tool using the neighbourhood algorithm was developed to invert the one-dimensional V s profile from passive or active source experiments As the number of generated models is usually high in stochastic techniques, special attention was paid to the optimization of the forward computations Also, the possibility of inserting a priori information into the parametrization was introduced in the code This new numerical tool was successfully tested on synthetic data, with and without a priori information We also present an application to real-array data measured at a site in Brussels (Belgium), the geology of which consists of about 115 m of sand and clay layers overlying a Palaeozoic basement On this site, active and passive source data proved to be complementary and the method allowed the retrieval of a V s profile consistent with borehole data available at the same location

370 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the analysis of the dispersion characteristics of surface wave data is presented, with particular attention to reliability and resolution, and different approaches that are used to estimate and interpret dispersion properties are considered.
Abstract: Surface-wave methods (SWMs) are very powerful tools for the near-surface characterization of sites. They can be used to determine the shear-wave velocity and the damping ratio overcoming, in some cases, the limitations of other shallow seismic techniques. The different steps of SWM have to be optimized, taking into consideration the conditions imposed by the small scale of engineering problems. This only allows the acquisition of apparent dispersion characteristics: i.e. the high frequencies and short distances involved make robust modelling algorithms necessary in order to take modal superposition into account. The acquisition has to be properly planned to obtain quality data over an adequate frequency range. Processing and inversion should enable the interpretation of the apparent dispersion characteristics, i.e. evaluating the local quality of the data, filtering coherent noise due to other seismic events and determining energy distribution, higher modes and attenuation. The different approaches that are used to estimate and interpret the dispersion characteristics are considered. Their potential and limits with regard to sensitivity to noise, reliability and capability of extracting significant information present in surface waves are discussed. The theory and modelling algorithms, and the acquisition, processing and inversion procedures suitable for providing stiffness and damping ratio profiles are illustrated, with particular attention to reliability and resolution.

322 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the advantages and limitations of airborne electromagnetic (AEM) surveys compared to ground-based geophysical methods used in groundwater surveys are discussed, based on typical field examples.
Abstract: For about three decades, airborne electromagnetic (AEM) systems have been used for groundwater exploration purposes. Airborne systems are appropriate for large-scale and efficient groundwater surveying. Due to the dependency of the electrical conductivity on both the clay content of the host material and the mineralization of the water, electromagnetic systems are suitable for providing information about the aquifer structures and water quality, respectively. More helicopter than fixed-wing systems are used in airborne groundwater surveys. Helicopter-borne frequency-domain electromagnetic (HEM) systems use a towed rigid-boom. Helicopter-borne time-domain (HTEM) systems, which use a large transmitter loop and a small receiver within or above the transmitter, are generally designed for mineral exploration purposes but recent developments have made some of these systems usable for groundwater purposes as well. The quantity measured, the secondary magnetic field, depends on the subsurface conductivity distribution. Due to the skin-effect, the penetration depths of the AEM fields depend on the system characteristics used: high-frequency data/early-time channels describe the shallower parts of the conducting subsurface and the low-frequency data/late-time channels the deeper parts. Typical investigation depths range from some ten metres (conductive grounds) to several hundred metres (resistive grounds), where the HEM systems are appropriate for shallow to medium deep (about 1–100 m) and the HTEM systems for medium deep to deep (about 10–400 m) investigations. Generally, the secondary field values are inverted into resistivities and depths using homogeneous or layered half-space models. As the footprint of AEM systems is rather small, one-dimensional interpretation of AEM data is sufficient in most cases and single-site inversion procedures are widely used. Laterally constrained inversion of AEM data often improves the stability of the inversion models, particularly for noisy data. Higher dimensional inversion is still not possible for standard-size surveys. Based on typical field examples the advantages as well as the limitations of AEM surveys compared to long-established ground-based geophysical methods used in groundwater surveys are discussed. In a case history from a German island an airborne frequency-domain system is used to successfully locate freshwater lenses on top of saltwater. An example from Denmark shows how a time-domain system is used to locate large-scale buried structures forming ideal groundwater aquifers.

239 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors summarize the state of the art in spectral induced polarization (SIP) for near-surface applications and describe which aspects still represent open issues and should be the focus of future research efforts.
Abstract: Over the last 15 years significant advancements in induced polarization (IP) research have taken place, particularly with respect to spectral IP (SIP), concerning the understanding of the mechanisms of the IP phenomenon, the conduction of accurate and broadband laboratory measurements, the modelling and inversion of IP data for imaging purposes and the increasing application of the method in near-surface investigations. We summarize here the current state of the science of the SIP method for near-surface applications and describe which aspects still represent open issues and should be the focus of future research efforts. Significant progress has been made over the last decade in the understanding of the microscopic mechanisms of IP; however, integrated mechanistic models involving different possible polarization processes at the grain/pore scale are still lacking. A prerequisite for the advances in the mechanistic understanding of IP was the development of improved laboratory instrumentation, which has led to a continuously growing data base of SIP measurements on various soil and rock samples. We summarize the experience of numerous experimental studies by formulating key recommendations for reliable SIP laboratory measurements. To make use of the established theoretical and empirical relationships between SIP characteristics and target petrophysical properties at the field scale, sophisticated forward modelling and inversion algorithms are needed. Considerable progress has also been made in this field, in particular with the development of complex resistivity algorithms allowing the modelling and inversion of IP data in the frequency domain. The ultimate goal for the future are algorithms and codes for the integral inversion of 3D, time-lapse and multi-frequency IP data, which defines a 5D inversion problem involving the dimensions space (for imaging), time (for monitoring) and frequency (for spectroscopy). We also offer guidelines for reliable and accurate measurements of IP spectra, which are essential for improved understanding of IP mechanisms and their links to physical, chemical and biological properties of interest. We believe that the SIP method offers potential for subsurface structure and process characterization, in particular in hydrogeophysical and biogeophysical studies.

239 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, two-dimensional resistivity imaging using multiple gradient, Wenner and dipole-dipole electrode arrays was carried out at two field sites in Sweden and one in Nicaragua, with the objective of confirming the practical applicability of results obtained with numerical modelling.
Abstract: Two-dimensional resistivity imaging using multiple gradient, Wenner and dipole-dipole electrode arrays was carried out at two field sites in Sweden and one in Nicaragua, with the objective of confirming the practical applicability of results obtained with numerical modelling. The results support earlier numerical modelling studies that concluded that the gradient array, using multiple current electrode combinations, has resolution as good as or better than the commonly used Wenner array. The array behaved well in terms of sensitivity to noise at the test sites, and the results obtained generally agree with dipole-dipole array results, although the latter at two of the sites gave resistivities that differed significantly from the other arrays in the deeper parts of the inverted models. A formula proposed for pseudosection plotting works well for data quality assessment, where it can be an advantage to make separate plots for each m-factor (the distance between the midpoints of the current and potential electrode pairs) or for each a-spacing. The gradient array is well suited for multichannel data acquisition, and can significantly increase the speed of data acquisition in the field and at the same time give higher data density, but it is also an attractive option for single-channel data acquisition. The Wenner array, on the other hand, is not suitable for measuring in more than one channel. Compared to the dipole-dipole array, it offers lower sensitivity to noise which may be a major advantage in real data acquisition, and the remote electrode needed for the pole-dipole array is avoided, which is often a significant advantage for field logistics.

235 citations

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Journal in previous years
YearPapers
202320
202249
202143
202044
201937
201852