Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, and Oral Radiology 

About: Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, and Oral Radiology is an academic journal published by Elsevier BV. The journal publishes majorly in the area(s): Medicine & Internal medicine. It has an ISSN identifier of 2212-4403. Over the lifetime, 4782 publications have been published receiving 41980 citations. The journal is also known as: Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology.

Position statement of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology on selection criteria for the use of radiology in dental implantology with emphasis on cone beam computed tomography

Abstract: A Position Paper Subcommittee of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology (AAOMR) reviewed the literature since the original position statement on selection criteria for radiology in dental implantology, published in 2000. All current planar modalities, including intraoral, panoramic, and cephalometric, as well as cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) are discussed, along with radiation dosimetry and anatomy considerations. We provide research-based, consensus-derived clinical guidance for practitioners on the appropriate use of specific imaging modalities in dental implant treatment planning. Specifically, the AAOMR recommends that cross-sectional imaging be used for the assessment of all dental implant sites and that CBCT is the imaging method of choice for gaining this information. This document will be periodically revised to reflect new evidence.

Oral potentially malignant disorders: risk of progression to malignancy

Abstract: Oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs) have a statistically increased risk of progressing to cancer, but the risk varies according to a range of patient- or lesion-related factors. It is difficult to predict the risk of progression in any individual patient, and the clinician must make a judgment based on assessment of each case. The most commonly encountered OPMD is leukoplakia, but others, including lichen planus, oral submucous fibrosis, and erythroplakia, may also be seen. Factors associated with an increased risk of malignant transformation include sex; site and type of lesion; habits, such as smoking and alcohol consumption; and the presence of epithelial dysplasia on histologic examination. In this review, we attempt to identify important risk factors and present a simple algorithm that can be used as a guide for risk assessment at each stage of the clinical evaluation of a patient.

AAE and AAOMR Joint Position Statement: Use of Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Endodontics 2015 Update

Abstract: The following statement was prepared by the Special Committee to Revise the Joint American Association of Endodontists/American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology Position on Cone Beam Computed Tomography, and approved by the AAE Board of Directors and AAOMR Executive Council in May 2015. AAE members may reprint this position statement for distribution to patients or referring dentists.

Diagnosis of oral lichen planus: a position paper of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology

Abstract: Despite being one of the most common oral mucosal diseases and recognized as early as 1866, oral lichen planus (OLP) is still a disease without a clear etiology or pathogenesis, and with uncertain premalignant potential. More research is urgently needed; however, the research material must be based on an accurate diagnosis. Accurate identification of OLP is often challenging, mandating inclusion of clinico-pathological correlation in the diagnostic process. This article summarizes current knowledge regarding OLP, discusses the challenges of making an accurate diagnosis, and proposes a new set of diagnostic criteria upon which to base future research studies. A checklist is also recommended for clinicians to provide specific information to pathologists when submitting biopsy material. The diagnostic process of OLP requires continued clinical follow-up after initial biopsy, because OLP mimics can manifest, necessitating an additional biopsy for direct immunofluorescence study and/or histopathological evaluation in order to reach a final diagnosis.

Risk factors for osteoradionecrosis after head and neck radiation: a systematic review.

Abstract: Objective This systematic review aimed to answer the clinical question, “What is the current risk of developing osteoradionecrosis of the jaws among irradiated head and neck cancer patients?” Study Design A systematic review of published English-language randomized controlled trials on the outcome of radiation therapy was performed via Medline and Embase databases. Data on osteoradionecrosis/bone toxicity were collected and analyzed. Results Twenty-two articles reporting on a total of 5,742 patients were selected for final review based on strict eligibility criteria. An estimated 2% of the head and neck–irradiated patients are at risk of developing osteoradionecrosis. Patients receiving adjunctive radiotherapy, accelerated fractionation without dose reduction, and chemoradiotherapy show no increase in osteoradionecrosis risk. Accelerated fractionation with dose reduction is associated with a reduced risk, whereas hyperfractionation shows elevated risk of developing osteoradionecrosis. Conclusions The risk of developing osteoradionecrosis among the irradiated head and neck cancer patient has significantly declined in recent years.