Showing papers in "Philosophical Investigations in 1992"
••
[...]
53 citations
••
5 citations
••
4 citations
••
4 citations
••
TL;DR: This paper argued that folk psychology is not empirically vulnerable in the same way theories are, and has evaluative functions that make it irreplaceable by a scientific theory, arguing that it is neither would-be nor has-been science.
Abstract: Against the claim that folk psychology is a theory, I contend thatfolk psychology is not empirically vulnerable in the same way theories are, and has evaluative functions that make it irreplaceable by a scientific theory. It is neither would-be nor has-been science.
3 citations
••