scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
JournalISSN: 0033-6807

R & D Management 

Wiley-Blackwell
About: R & D Management is an academic journal published by Wiley-Blackwell. The journal publishes majorly in the area(s): New product development & Innovation management. It has an ISSN identifier of 0033-6807. Over the lifetime, 2207 publications have been published receiving 96783 citations. The journal is also known as: ar & Romeo.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors show a new habit that, actually it's a very old habit to do that can make your life more qualified, change your habit to hang or waste the time to only chat with your friends.
Abstract: Change your habit to hang or waste the time to only chat with your friends. It is done by your everyday, don't you feel bored? Now, we will show you the new habit that, actually it's a very old habit to do that can make your life more qualified. When feeling bored of always chatting with your friends all free time, you can find the book enPDF national innovation systems a comparative analysis and then read it.

1,980 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the implications and trends that underpin open innovation are discussed in terms of strategic, organizational, behavioral, knowledge, legal and business perspectives and its economic implications, and a special issue aims to advance the R&D, innovation and technology management perspective by building on past and present studies in the field and providing future directions.
Abstract: There is currently a broad awareness of open innovation and its relevance to corporate R&D. The implications and trends that underpin open innovation are actively discussed in terms of strategic, organizational, behavioral, knowledge, legal and business perspectives and its economic implications. This special issue aims to advance the R&D, innovation, and technology management perspective by building on past and present studies in the field and providing future directions. Recent research, including the papers in this special issue, demonstrates an increasing range of situations where the concept is regarded as applicable. Most research to date has followed the outside-in process of open innovation, while the inside-out process remains less explored. A third coupled process of open innovation is also attracting significant research attention. These different processes show why it is necessary to have a full understanding of how and where open innovation can add value in knowledge-intensive processes. There may be a need for a creative interpretation and adaptation of the value propositions, or business models, in each situation. In other words, there are important implications for new and emerging methods of R&D management.

1,787 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Open Innovation has utility as a paradigm for industrial innovation beyond high-tech to more traditional and mature industries as mentioned in this paper, and many Open Innovation concepts are already in use in a wide range of industries.
Abstract: Companies have historically invested in large research and development departments to drive innovation and provide sustainable growth. This model, however, is eroding due to a number of factors. What is emerging is a more open model, where companies recognize that not all good ideas will come from inside the organization and not all good ideas created within the organization can be successfully marketed internally. To date, Open Innovation concepts have been regarded as relevant primarily to ‘high-technology’ industries, with examples that include Lucent, 3Com, IBM, Intel and Millenium Pharmaceuticals. In this article, we identify organizations in industries outside ‘high technology’ that are early adopters of the concept. Our findings demonstrate that many Open Innovation concepts are already in use in a wide range of industries. We document practices that appear to assist organizations adopting these concepts, and discover that Open Innovation is not ipso facto a recipe for outsourcing R&D. We conclude that Open Innovation has utility as a paradigm for industrial innovation beyond high tech to more traditional and mature industries.

1,767 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors carried out an empirical test of the extent to which the rate of communica- tion between a project group and the outside world decreases with mean project tenure and how far performance decreases with project tenure.
Abstract: The Not-Invented-Here (NIH) syn- drome is defined as the tendency of a project group of stable composition to believe it pos- sess~~ a monopoly of knowledge of its field, which leads it to reject new ideas from outsiders to the likely detriment of its performance. The authors have carried out an empirical test of the extent to which the rate of communica- tion between a project group and the outside world decreases with mean project tenure and how far performance decreases with project tenure. The study, carried out in a large laboratory, shows that performance increases up to 1.5 years tenure, stays steady for a time but by five years has declined noticeably. This tendency is best accounted for by the marked decline in communication rate among group members and between them and critical external sources of information. The authors analyse the significance of this finding and suggest means of maintaining the vitality of long-standing project teams.

1,472 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors trace developments in the dominant perceived model of industrial innovation from the simple linear "technology push" and "need pull" models of the 1960s and early 1970s, through the coupling model of the late 1970s to early 1980s, to the integrated model of today.
Abstract: Not only is technology changing rapidly, but the process of the commercialisation of technological change—the industrial innovation process—is changing also. The paper traces developments in the dominant perceived model of industrial innovation from the simple linear ‘technology push’ and ‘need pull’ models of the 1960s and early 1970s, through the ‘coupling model’ of the late 1970s to early 1980s, to the ‘integrated’ model of today. The latter (the 4th Generation innovation process) marked a shift from perceptions of innovation as a strictly sequential process to innovation perceived as a largely parallel process. This shift owed much to observations of innovation processes in leading Japanese corporations. Recent developments indicate the possibilities attainable in the proposed ‘strategic integration and networking’ model, elements of which are already in place. According to this 5th generation model, innovation is becoming faster; it increasingly involves inter-company networking; and it employs a new electronic toolkit (expert systems and simulation modelling).

1,465 citations

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Journal in previous years
YearPapers
202343
202241
202178
202044
201951
201849