scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
JournalISSN: 2234-4772

The Journal of the Korean Institute of Information and Communication Engineering 

The Korean Institute of Information and Communication Sciences
About: The Journal of the Korean Institute of Information and Communication Engineering is an academic journal published by The Korean Institute of Information and Communication Sciences. The journal publishes majorly in the area(s): Wireless sensor network & Computer science. It has an ISSN identifier of 2234-4772. Over the lifetime, 3082 publications have been published receiving 3219 citations. The journal is also known as: Journal of the Korea Institute of Information & Communication Engineering & Journal of the Korea Institute of Information and Communication Engineering.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors propose a method to solve the problem of the lack of resources in the South Korean market by using the concept of "social media" as a "social network".
Abstract: 스마트폰의 등장은 컴퓨터를 손바닥 안으로 옮기는 혁명을 가져왔으며, 그 혁명은 생활의 편리함과 즐거움을 제공하는 스마트 사회를 선도하고 있지만, 스마트폰 증후군을 포함한 부작용 요소가 과거의 그 어떤 IT 기기들보다 더욱 폭넓고 다양한 형태로 나타나고 있다. 본 논문에서는 스마트폰 이용 목적별로 위험 요인을 중심으로 부작용 유형과 유형별 핵심 이슈를 도출하고 이를 토대로 사회적 영향을 진단하였다. 그리고 진단 결과를 토대로 바람직한 스마트폰 활용에 대한 사회적 이해와 공감대가 형성될 수 있도록 부작용을 최소화하기 위한 대응 방안을 제시하였다. 제시한 대응 방안은 스마트 사회의 창의ㆍ협력ㆍ소통ㆍ오락통의 플랫폼인 스마트폰을 바람직하게 활용하게 함으로써 가시적이고 잠재적인 부작용에 대해 체계적으로 대응할 수 있을 것이다.

16 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the three most commonly used tools (applications) in social sciences are compared and analyzed based on structural equation modeling, confirmatory factor analysis was performed using the IBM AMOS Ver. 23, the LISREL 8.70 and the SmartPLS 2.0.
Abstract: Structural equation modeling is pointing to statistical procedures that simultaneously perform path analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. Today, this statistical procedure is an essential tool for researchers in the social sciences. There are as AMOS, LISREL and PLS representative tools that can perform structural equation modeling analysis. AMOS provides a convenient graphical user interface for beginners to use. PLS has the advantage of not having a constraint on normal distribution as well as a graphical user interface. Therefore, we compared and analyzed the three most commonly used tools (applications) in social sciences. Based on structural equation modeling, confirmatory factor analysis was performed using the IBM AMOS Ver. 23, the LISREL 8.70 and the SmartPLS 2.0. The comparative results show that LISREL has the highest explanatory power of dependent variables than other analytical tools. The path coefficients and T-values presented by the analysis results showed similar results for all three analysis tools. This study suggests practical and theoretical implications based on the results. 키워드 : 에이모스, 리즈렐, 부분 최소 자승법, 경로 분석, 구조방정식 모델링

14 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Eun-Jee Song1
TL;DR: The research of buzz monitoring system that analyzes big data, and examples of customer reputation using buzz monitoring are presented, and the implication of the result from the customer reputation is analyzed.
Abstract: Recently, SNS (Social Network Service) such as Twitter and Facebook has grown dramatically because of smart phones. Since development of IT has created massive information, social big data extremely increased. Competition between corporations is getting more intense, so they need customer feedback in order to fulfill an effective management. Because social big data plays an important role for getting customer feedback, a lot of corporations are interested in analyzing and applying of social big data. Collecting and analyzing social big data is operated by Buzz monitoring system. This paper demonstrates the research of buzz monitoring system that analyzes big data, and presents examples of customer reputation using buzz monitoring. In the paper, after all, it would analyze the result from the customer reputation, and research the implication.

13 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the potential distribution of asymmetric double gate MOSFETs has been analyzed for gate bias voltage, gate oxide thickness, and channel doping concentration in asymmetric DGMOSFs.
Abstract: This paper has presented the potential distribution for asymmetric double gate(DG) MOSFET, and sloved Poisson equation to obtain the analytical solution of potential distribution. The symmetric DGMOSFET where both the front and the back gates are tied together is three terminal device and has the same current controllability for front and back gates. Meanwhile the asymmetric DGMOSFET is four terminal device and can separately determine current controllability for front and back gates. To approximate with experimental values, we have used the Gaussian function as doping distribution in Poisson equation. The potential distribution has been observed for gate bias voltage and gate oxide thickness and channel doping concentration of the asymmetric DGMOSFET. As a results, we know potential distribution is greatly changed for gate bias voltage and gate oxide thickness, especially for gate to increase gate oxide thickness. Also the potential distribution for source is changed greater than one of drain with increasing of channel doping concentration.

13 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors proposed a method to solve the problem of the lack of an ECC-compliant ECC standard for the purpose of improving the performance of the ECC.
Abstract: 모바일애플리케이션은 시간과 장소에 구애받지 않고 스마트디바이스 기반에서 활용되는 SW를 말한다. 최근 스마트디바이스의 보급률과 이용률이 지속적으로 증가하면서 개인과 기업들은 수많은 모바일애플리케이션 서비스를 제공하고 있다. 하지만 모바일애플리케이션의 양이 급증하는 것에 비해 모바일애플리케이션의 품질 평가에 관한 연구는 매우 부족하여 모바일애플리케이션의 품질기준이 정립되지 않은 실정이다. 더욱이, 모바일애플리케이션은 스마트디바이스를 통해 활용되므로 이동성과 휴대성, 인터넷 접속성 등의 다양한 특성, 스마트디바이스의 하드웨어적 특징(저성능 고효율의 CPU, 메모리 등)을 포함하고 있기 때문에, 일반적인 SW와는 차별화된 품질기준과 평가모델이 필요하다. 본 논문에서는 이러한 필요성에 따라 모바일애플리케이션 평가모델을 제안하고자 한다. 평가모델은 국제표준인 ISO/IEC 25000의 품질속성에 기반하여 제안하였으며, 검증을 위해 시나리오 기반의 사례연구를 수행하였다. 본 연구는 모바일애플리케이션의 품질을 평가하는데 기여할 것으로 판단된다.

13 citations

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Journal in previous years
YearPapers
202394
20219
202032
201953
201847
201782