Work-a Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation 

About: Work-a Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation is an academic journal published by IOS Press. The journal publishes majorly in the area(s): Medicine & Poison control. It has an ISSN identifier of 1051-9815. Over the lifetime, 5188 publications have been published receiving 65836 citations. The journal is also known as: Work (Amsterdam) & Work (Tokyo).

Pretest-posttest designs and measurement of change

Abstract: The article examines issues involved in comparing groups and measuring change with pretest and posttest data. Different pretest-posttest designs are presented in a manner that can help rehabilitation professionals to better understand and determine effects resulting from selected interventions. The reliability of gain scores in pretest-posttest measurement is also discussed in the context of rehabilitation research and practice.

Using scoping literature reviews as a means of understanding and interpreting existing literature.

Abstract: Objective This article compares and contrasts scoping literature reviews with other established methods for understanding and interpreting extant research literature. Methods Descriptions of the key principles and applications of scoping reviews are illustrated with examples from contemporary publications. Conclusions Scoping reviews are presented as an efficient way of identifying themes and trends in high-volume areas of scientific inquiry.

Understanding the stigma of mental illness in employment.

Abstract: Background Stigma has been identified as an important barrier to the full community participation of people with mental illness This study focuses on how stigma operates specifically within the domain of employment Objectives The purpose was to advance the development of theory related to the stigma of mental illness in employment to serve as a guiding framework for intervention approaches Method The study used a constructivist grounded theory methodology to analyze over 500 Canadian documents from a diverse range of sources and stakeholders, and interviews with 19 key informants Findings The paper develops several key components central to the processes of stigma in the work context These include the consequences of stigma, the assumptions underlying the expressions of stigma, and the salience of these assumptions, both to the people holding them and to the specific employment situation Assumptions are represented as varying in intensity Finally specific influences that perpetuate these assumptions are presented Implications The model suggests specific areas of focus to be considered in developing intervention strategies to reduce the negative effects of stigma at work

Return-to-work: The importance of human interactions and organizational structures.

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to gain insight into stakeholder perspectives on barriers and facilitators for return-to-work (RTW). Qualitative methodology with purposive sampling was employed. A total of 55 participants, representing a wide spectrum of stakeholders and industry, were interviewed in individual or group format. Interview transcripts were coded, categorized according to themes, and placed within a framework which reflected the dynamic interaction of individuals and the structural systems or context of those individuals. Findings indicated that perceived barriers to RTW included delays of all types in processing or delivery of information or treatment, and ineffective communication among stakeholders. Facilitators to RTW included establishment of RTW programs in the workplace, effective communication and teamwork, as well as trust and credibility among stakeholders. The interdependence of organizational structures and human interactions was evident in successful RTW programs which emphasized teamwork, early intervention, and communication. Differing stakeholder perspectives, however, especially on issues such as worker attitudes and participation, must be acknowledged and addressed if more injured workers are to be successful in returning to full employment.

Touch-screen tablet user configurations and case-supported tilt affect head and neck flexion angles.

Abstract: Objective: The aim of this study was to determine how head and neck postures vary when using two media tablet (slate) computers in four common user configurations. Methods: Fifteen experienced media tablet users completed a set of simulated tasks with two media tablets in four typical user configurations. The four configurations were: on the lap and held with the user's hands, on the lap and in a case, on a table and in a case, and on a table and in a case set at a high angle for watching movies. An infra-red LED marker based motion analysis system measured head/neck postures. Results: Head and neck flexion significantly varied across the four configurations and across the two tablets tested. Head and neck flexion angles during tablet use were greater, in general, than angles previously reported for desktop and notebook computing. Postural differences between tablets were driven by case designs, which provided significantly different tilt angles, while postural differences between configurations were driven by gaze and viewing angles. Conclusion: Head and neck posture during tablet computing can be improved by placing the tablet higher to avoid low gaze angles (i.e. on a table rather than on the lap) and through the use of a case that provides optimal viewing angles.