scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
JournalISSN: 2042-891X

World Review of Political Economy 

Pluto Journals
About: World Review of Political Economy is an academic journal published by Pluto Journals. The journal publishes majorly in the area(s): Capitalism & Marxist philosophy. It has an ISSN identifier of 2042-891X. Over the lifetime, 260 publications have been published receiving 833 citations. The journal is also known as: WRPE.


Papers
More filters
Book ChapterDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a reconceptualization of the theory of social structure of accumulation (SSA) is proposed, which makes it possible to explain the thirty years of neoliberalism as an SSA.
Abstract: This article puts forward a reconceptualization of the theory of a social structure of accumulation (SSA). The thirty years of neoliberalism presenta problem for SSA theory. According to current SSA theory, an SSA is an institutional configuration that for a long period of time promotes rapid capital accumulation and economic growth. Although neoliberalism is clearly a new and long-lasting institutional structure that replaced the postwar SSA, growth in the neoliberal economy has been relatively sluggish. This article offers a revised concept of an SSA, which makes it possible to explain neoliberalism as an SSA. It argues that every SSA promotes profit-making but does not necessarily bring accumulation that is rapid by some historical standard. It introduces the concept of liberal and regulated SSAs and examines the features of both types of SSA. It considers the implications of this revised SSA theory for understanding the current capitalist economic crisis.

56 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors argue that it was not competitive devaluation that restored growth after the 2001 crisis, but default on state debt caused by the previous destruction of productive capital, and that the same holds for the policies of "austerity", which are designed to reduce debt and raise profitability.
Abstract: The ultimate cause of crises in capitalism is lack of profitability. The Keynesian and Austerians (the supporters of austerity measures), deny this. So their solutions to crises do not work. Keynesian state-induced stimulus programs (redistributive, monetary, and fiscal) cannot overcome the underlying tendency for profitability to fall. The same holds for the policies of "austerity," which are designed to reduce debt and raise profitability. These conclusions are particularly relevant for the weaker Eurozone economies in the midst of the euro crisis. In a case study of Argentina, we argue that it was not competitive devaluation that restored growth after the 2001 crisis, but default on state debt caused by the previous destruction of productive capital.

25 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a more thorough socio-ecological analysis of modern large-scale, capitalist agriculture is presented to assess the potential for a socially and ecologically just food production system.
Abstract: IntroductionModern large-scale, capitalist agriculture remains at the nexus of numerous social and ecological contradictions. Its ability to produce massive amounts of food is unparalleled, yet billions of people worldwide are malnourished. capital-intensive agricultural techniques contribute to a transformation of property tenure and alterations in labor relations. While these changes can generate prosperity for some, they also tend to further the escalation of global inequalities and displacement of rural people throughout the world. At the same time, this form of agriculture generates a myriad of ecological problems, including the pollution of watersheds with pesticides and excess fertilizers, the deterioration of soil fertility, the loss of habitat for native species, and the accumulation of substantial quantities of animal waste. this system of food production is supported by the immense consumption of fossil fuels used, for example, to produce nitrogen fertilizer and transport goods to world markets, contributing to the atmospheric accumulation of carbon dioxide and, therefore, global climate change. many of the problems associated with modern large-scale agriculture-including ecological degradation, health deprivation, rural dispossession, and the division of labor-are rooted in the demands of accumulation and concentration of capital.In what follows, we contribute to the analysis of modern global food systems to (1) advance a more thorough socioecological analysis of contemporary capitalist agriculture and (2) assess the potential for a socially and ecologically just food production system. Our first goal is to address how the organization of capitalist agriculture consistently generates ecological problems. In order to illustrate this point, we employ Karl marx's metabolic approach-via the concepts of metabolic rift and metabolic restoration-to study the dynamic relationship of interchange between social and ecological systems. We examine capitalist agriculture as part of a social metabolic order, combining marx's critique of political economy with his metabolic analysis. this investigation reveals how capital creates metabolic rifts-i.e., breaks, ruptures, or separations in socioecological systems-in agriculture, which intensify the division between town and country, lead to the depletion of soil nutrients, and undermine ecosystems.Our second goal is to demonstrate how transcending metabolic rifts necessitates a revolution in the social metabolic order of society. marx's concept of metabolic restoration, which is rooted in maintaining the reproduction of natural cycles and systems, helps establish a foundation for what is required by a sustainable society. By way of a comparative analysis, we discuss how cuba's model of organic agriculture illustrates the potential for metabolic restoration, through reestablishing nutrient cycles, overcoming alienating conditions of labor, reconnecting farmers to the land, and establishing participatory forms of production. the expanded theoretical discussion of metabolic rift and metabolic restoration aids in demonstrating that the cuban model of organic agriculture is distinct from US organic agriculture as well as historic, state socialist regimes of food production.We begin with a discussion of marx's metabolic, political-economic approach. then, we address the metabolic rifts in modern agriculture, including US organic food production. We conclude by applying our theoretical development to cuba's distinct model of organic agriculture. Our analysis suggests that the way toward restoring ecologically degraded systems, associated with agriculture, lies in transforming the political economy of food systems.Metabolic analysis and the critique of Political economyEnvironmental degradation has existed throughout human history and is not unique to capitalism (Broswimmer 2002; Buell 2003; davis 2001; diamond 2005; foster 1994; Ponting 1993). Nevertheless, the emergence and spread of capitalist social relations created a fundamental change in the interactions between natural and social systems-capitalism produced a specific social metabolic order (clark and foster 2010; meszaros 1995, 40-45). …

24 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examine the existing literature on trade liberalisation and its effect on the economies of developing countries and briefly examine the theory of comparative advantage which is seen as justification for global trade liberalization under the auspices of the World Trade Organisation.
Abstract: This paper examines the existing literature on trade liberalisation and its effect on the economies of developing countries. It will also briefly examine the theory of comparative advantage which is seen as justification for global trade liberalisation under the auspices of the World Trade Organisation. This process is also associated with greater openness, economic interdependence and deepening economic integration with the world economy. The study is important because once again the international institutions strongly advocate trade and financial liberalisation in developing countries. The proponents of trade liberalisation argue that multilateral trade negotiations would achieve these goals, and poor countries particularly would benefit from it. However, such policies may increase vulnerability and make developing countries further hostages of international finance capital. Adoption of open market policies in agriculture would also mean the abandoning of self-reliance and food sovereignty, which may have wider consequences in terms of food shortages, food prices and rural employment

18 citations

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Journal in previous years
YearPapers
202314
202267
20212
20207
201917
201814