scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal ArticleDOI

10 years of the Medipix2 Collaboration

TL;DR: The Medipix2 Collaboration as mentioned in this paper was started with the aim of disseminating hybrid pixel detector technology from High Energy Physics to other fields, and has been widely used in many applications.
Abstract: The Medipix2 Collaboration was started officially in September 1999 with the aim of disseminating hybrid pixel detector technology from High Energy Physics to other fields. The Collaboration was initially composed of 13 European research institutes. Over the ensuing 10 years the Collaboration expanded to reach a peak of 17 member institutes. Although our main scientific focus has been the development of the Medipix2 and Timepix single photon counting pixel detector readout chips the Collaboration members have expanded the range of applications for the technology to many more scientific fields than initially foreseen. We have signed a number of Technology Transfer Agreements during that time, most notably with PANalytical, whose commercially available PIXcel detector is based on the second version of the Medipix2 chip. This paper will review the history of the Collaboration covering as much as possible the main technical highlights. The success of the Collaboration is testimony to the willingness of a large number of groups and individuals to pool efforts for a common purpose. The paper will also cover some of those aspects and summarize the lessons learnt.
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Christopher J. Milne, Thomas Schietinger, M. Aiba, Arturo Alarcon, J. Alex, Alexander Anghel, Vladimir Arsov, Carl Beard, Paul Beaud, Simona Bettoni, M. Bopp, H. Brands, Manuel Brönnimann, Ingo Brunnenkant, Marco Calvi, A. Citterio, Paolo Craievich, Marta Csatari Divall, Mark Dällenbach, Michael D’Amico, Andreas Dax, Yunpei Deng, Alexander Dietrich, Roberto Dinapoli, Edwin Divall, Sladana Dordevic, Simon Ebner, Christian Erny, Hansrudolf Fitze, Uwe Flechsig, Rolf Follath, F. Frei, Florian Gärtner, Romain Ganter, Terence Garvey, Zheqiao Geng, I. Gorgisyan, C. Gough, A. Hauff, Christoph P. Hauri, Nicole Hiller, Tadej Humar, Stephan Hunziker, Gerhard Ingold, Rasmus Ischebeck, Markus Janousch, Pavle Juranić, M. Jurcevic, Maik Kaiser, Babak Kalantari, Roger Kalt, B. Keil, Christoph Kittel, Gregor Knopp, W. Koprek, Henrik T. Lemke, Thomas Lippuner, Daniel Llorente Sancho, Florian Löhl, C. Lopez-Cuenca, Fabian Märki, F. Marcellini, G. Marinkovic, Isabelle Martiel, Ralf Menzel, Aldo Mozzanica, Karol Nass, Gian Luca Orlandi, Cigdem Ozkan Loch, Ezequiel Panepucci, Martin Paraliev, Bruce D. Patterson, Bill Pedrini, Marco Pedrozzi, Patrick Pollet, Claude Pradervand, Eduard Prat, Peter Radi, Jean-Yves Raguin, S. Redford, Jens Rehanek, Julien Réhault, Sven Reiche, Matthias Ringele, J. Rittmann, Leonid Rivkin, Albert Romann, Marie Ruat, C. Ruder, Leonardo Sala, Lionel Schebacher, T. Schilcher, Volker Schlott, Thomas J. Schmidt, Bernd Schmitt, Xintian Shi, M. Stadler, L. Stingelin, Werner Sturzenegger, Jakub Szlachetko, D. Thattil, D. Treyer, A. Trisorio, Wolfgang Tron, S. Vetter, Carlo Vicario, Didier Voulot, Meitian Wang, Thierry Zamofing, Christof Zellweger, R. Zennaro, Elke Zimoch, Rafael Abela, Luc Patthey, Hans-Heinrich Braun 
TL;DR: The SwissFEL X-ray Free Electron Laser (XFEL) facility as discussed by the authors started construction at the Paul Scherrer Institute (Villigen, Switzerland) in 2013 and will be ready to accept its first users in 2018 on the Aramis hard Xray branch.
Abstract: The SwissFEL X-ray Free Electron Laser (XFEL) facility started construction at the Paul Scherrer Institute (Villigen, Switzerland) in 2013 and will be ready to accept its first users in 2018 on the Aramis hard X-ray branch. In the following sections we will summarize the various aspects of the project, including the design of the soft and hard X-ray branches of the accelerator, the results of SwissFEL performance simulations, details of the photon beamlines and experimental stations, and our first commissioning results.

295 citations


Cites background from "10 years of the Medipix2 Collaborat..."

  • ...Importantly, single photon counting detectors (like PILATUS [188], EIGER [189] or Medipix [190]) are not suitable for the high photon fluxes at XFELs, and the use of charge-integrating detection systems becomes crucial....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a comprehensive overview of all data corrections, to aid the small-angle scatterer to decide which are relevant for their measurement and how these corrections are performed.
Abstract: For obtaining reliable nanostructural details of large amounts of sample?and if it is applicable?small-angle scattering (SAS) is a prime technique to use. It promises to obtain bulk-scale, statistically sound information on the morphological details of the nanostructure, and has thus led to many a researcher investing their time in it over the last eight decades of development. Due to pressure from scientists requesting more details on increasingly complex nanostructures, as well as the ever improving instrumentation leaving less margin for ambiguity, small-angle scattering methodologies have been evolving at a high pace over the past few decades.As the quality of any results can only be as good as the data that go into these methodologies, the improvements in data collection and all imaginable data correction steps are reviewed here. This work is intended to provide a comprehensive overview of all data corrections, to aid the small-angle scatterer to decide which are relevant for their measurement and how these corrections are performed. Clear mathematical descriptions of the corrections are provided where feasible. Furthermore, as no quality data exist without a decent estimate of their precision, the error estimation and propagation through all these steps are provided alongside the corrections. With these data corrections, the collected small-angle scattering pattern can be made of the highest standard, allowing for authoritative nanostructural characterization through its analysis. A brief background of small-angle scattering, the instrumentation developments over the years, and pitfalls that may be encountered upon data interpretation are provided as well.

159 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors report on the development of three generations of readout ASICs, including the Medipix ASIC, the Timepix ASIC and the TimePix ASIC.
Abstract: Hybrid pixel detectors were developed to meet the requirements for tracking in the inner layers at the LHC experiments. With low input capacitance per channel (10–100 fF) it is relatively straightforward to design pulse processing readout electronics with input referred noise of ∼ 100 e-rms and pulse shaping times consistent with tagging of events to a single LHC bunch crossing providing clean ‘images’ of the ionising tracks generated. In the Medipix Collaborations the same concept has been adapted to provide practically noise hit free imaging in a wide range of applications. This paper reports on the development of three generations of readout ASICs. Two distinctive streams of development can be identified: the Medipix ASICs which integrate data from multiple hits on a pixel and provide the images in the form of frames and the Timepix ASICs who aim to send as much information about individual interactions as possible off-chip for further processing. One outstanding circumstance in the use of these devices has been their numerous successful applications, thanks to a large and active community of developers and users. That process has even permitted new developments for detectors for High Energy Physics. This paper reviews the ASICs themselves and details some of the many applications.

96 citations


Cites background from "10 years of the Medipix2 Collaborat..."

  • ...For applications concerning Medipix2 prior to 2009 the reader is invited to consult this reference [18]....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This work is intended to provide a comprehensive overview of all data corrections, to aid the small-angle scatterer to decide which are relevant for their measurement and how these corrections are performed.
Abstract: For obtaining reliable nanostructural details of large amounts of sample --- and if it is applicable --- Small-Angle Scattering (SAS) is a prime technique to use. It promises to obtain bulk-scale, statistically sound information on the morphological details of the nanostructure, and has thus led to many a researcher investing their time in it over the last eight decades of development. Due to pressure both from scientists requesting more details on increasingly complex nanostructures, as well as the ever improving instrumentation leaving less margin for ambiguity, small-angle scattering methodologies have been evolving at a high pace over the last few decades. As the quality of any results can only be as good as the data that goes into these methodologies, the improvements in data collection and all imaginable data correction steps are reviewed here. This work is intended to provide a comprehensive overview of all data corrections, to aid the small-angle scatterer to decide which are relevant for their measurement and how these corrections are performed. Clear mathematical descriptions of the corrections are provided where feasible. Furthermore, as no quality data exists without a decent estimate of its precision, the error estimation and propagation through all these steps is provided alongside the corrections. With these data corrections, the collected small-angle scattering pattern can be made of the highest standard allowing for authoritative nanostructural characterisation through its analysis. A brief background of small-angle scattering, the instrumentation developments over the years, and pitfalls that may be encountered upon data interpretations are provided as well.

79 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a review of the direct imaging detectors used for imaging in electron microscopy is presented, including hybrid pixel detectors, monolithic active pixel sensors based on CMOS technology and pnCCDs.
Abstract: Electronic detectors used for imaging in electron microscopy are reviewed in this paper. Much of the detector technology is based on the developments in microelectronics, which have allowed the design of direct detectors with fine pixels, fast readout and which are sufficiently radiation hard for practical use. Detectors included in this review are hybrid pixel detectors, monolithic active pixel sensors based on CMOS technology and pnCCDs, which share one important feature: they are all direct imaging detectors, relying on directly converting energy in a semiconductor. Traditional methods of recording images in the electron microscope such as film and CCDs, are mentioned briefly along with a more detailed description of direct electronic detectors. Many applications benefit from the use of direct electron detectors and a few examples are mentioned in the text. In recent years one of the most dramatic advances in structural biology has been in the deployment of the new backthinned CMOS direct detectors to attain near-atomic resolution molecular structures with electron cryo-microscopy (cryo-EM). The development of direct detectors, along with a number of other parallel advances, has seen a very significant amount of new information being recorded in the images, which was not previously possible—and this forms the main emphasis of the review.

78 citations


Cites methods from "10 years of the Medipix2 Collaborat..."

  • ...Most of the earlier hybrid detector applications to electron microscopy have been carried out using one of the detectors developed within the Medipix Collaboration, which was initiated in CERN [29,39]....

    [...]

  • ...The absolute value DQE(Nyquist) is shown as a dotted line [41]. physics in CERN and some of the early history of hybrids is given in an early review [38]....

    [...]

References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
X. Llopart1, Rafael Ballabriga1, Michael Campbell1, Lukas Tlustos1, W. Wong1 
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors proposed a novel approach for the readout of a TPC at the future linear collider is to use a CMOS pixel detector combined with some kind of gas gain grid.
Abstract: A novel approach for the readout of a TPC at the future linear collider is to use a CMOS pixel detector combined with some kind of gas gain grid. A first test using the photon counting chip Medipix2 with GEM or Micromegas demonstrated the feasibility of such an approach. Although this experiment demonstrated that single primary electrons could be detected the chip did not provide information on the arrival time of the electron in the sensitive gas volume nor did it give any indication of the quantity of charge detected. The Timepix chip uses an external clock with a frequency of up to 100 MHz as a time reference. Each pixel contains a preamplifier, a discriminator with hysteresis and 4-bit DAC for threshold adjustment, synchronization logic and a 14-bit counter with overflow control. Moreover, each pixel can be independently configured in one of four different modes: masked mode: pixel is off, counting mode: 1-count for each signal over threshold, TOT mode: the counter is incremented continuously as long as the signal is above threshold, and arrival time mode: the counter is incremented continuously from the time the first hit arrives until the end of the shutter. The chip resembles very much the Medipix2 chip physically and can be readout using slightly modified versions of the various existing systems. This paper presents the main features of the new design, electrical measurements and some first images.

1,004 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Rafael Ballabriga1, Michael Campbell1, Erik H.M. Heijne1, Xavier Llopart1, Lukas Tlustos1 
01 Oct 2006
TL;DR: In this article, a pixel detector readout chip was developed with a new front-end architecture aimed at eliminating the spectral distortion produced by charge diffusion in highly segmented semiconductor detectors.
Abstract: A prototype pixel detector readout chip has been developed with a new front-end architecture aimed at eliminating the spectral distortion produced by charge diffusion in highly segmented semiconductor detectors. In the new architecture neighbouring pixels communicate with one another. At the corner of each pixel summing circuits add the total charge deposited in each sub-group of 4 pixels. Arbitration logic assigns a hit to the summing circuit with the highest charge. In the case where incoming X-ray photons produce fluorescence-a particular issue in high-Z materials-the charge deposited by those fluorescent photons will be included in the charge sum provided that the deposition takes place within the volume of the pixels neighbouring the initial impact point. The chip is configurable such that either the dimensions of each detector pixel match those of one readout pixel or detector pixels are 4 times greater in area than the readout pixels. In the latter case event-by-event summing is still possible between the larger pixels. As well as this innovative analog front-end circuit, each pixel contains comparators, logic circuits and two 15-bit counters. When the larger detector pixels are used these counters can be configured to permit multiple thresholds in a pixel providing spectroscopic information. The prototype chip has been designed and manufactured in an 8-metal 0.13 mum CMOS technology. First measurements show an electronic pixel noise of ~ 72 e-rms (Single Pixel Mode) and ~ 140 e-rms (Charge Summing Mode).

349 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The agreement enables us to conclude that the DQE of a backthinned direct electron MAPS detector is likely to be equal to, or better than, that of film at 300 keV.

262 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a software package for acquisition and data processing has been developed to control and manage complex measurements, e.g. data acquisition, position and rotation of the sample (stepper motors), source parameters, temperature, etc.
Abstract: The semiconductor pixel detector Medipix2 [1] (256×256 square pixels, 55×55 μm2 each) is a superior imaging device in terms of spatial resolution, linearity and dynamic range. This makes it suitable for various applications such as radiography, neutronography, and micro–tomography. The software package for acquisition and data processing has been developed to control and manage complex measurements. The solution features an open and very flexible modular architecture with custom made plugin support. Plugins can control parts of the acquisition system as well as perform real-time data processing and use these results as feedback for controlling further steps of measurements. This allows us to control, e.g. data acquisition, position and rotation of the sample (stepper motors), source parameters, temperature, etc. in a synchronized way. An example is the adaptive tomography plugin which adaptively controls the measurement and benefits from preprocessing performed by other plugins such as the beam-hardening correction of measured projections.

183 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The discussion is centred on the main parameters of interest to cryoEM users, viz. detective quantum efficiency (DQE), resolution or modulation transfer function (MTF), robustness against radiation damage, speed of readout, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and the number of independent pixels available for a given detector.

168 citations