




Did you find this useful? Give us your feedback
Content maybe subject to copyright Report
[...]
768 citations
[...]
43 citations
[...]
36 citations
[...]
28 citations
[...]
27 citations
[...]
13,749 citations
[...]
7,605 citations
[...]
4,440 citations
[...]
1,885 citations
49 The presence of the –S–O– bonding was further corroborated by Fourier Transform Infra-red Spectroscopy ( FTIR ) studies, which revealed peak at 1030 cm 1 ( Fig. S5, ESI† ). 57 In their case, the 1520 | Sustainable Energy Fuels, 2017, 1, 1516–1523 PrGO shows a signicant oxygen content ( C: O ratio of 4. 6 ), as compared to the pristine GO ( C: O ratio of 2. 1 ) which provides the conductive, high surface area and alongside the FLGs, further decreases the need for a large amount of carbon to immobilize the high S-content. Aer a few charge–discharge cycles at C/20, the same 3-D PrGO/FLG-S electrode was further tested at different C rates ( C/ 10 to 5C ). 60 Interestingly, as the charge current density further increased to 2C and 5C ( constant discharge at C/5 ), the 3-D FLG/PrGO-S electrode continued to deliver high specic capacity of 830 mA h g 1 and 700 mA h g 1, respectively ( Fig. 5 ).
In fact, as the charge current density increased from C/10 to 1C, the capacity continued to drop, and just aer 150 cycles, the 2-D planar geometry electrodes could deliver only 560 mA h g 1.
The residual functional groups on the PrGO surface especially C–O and –COOH can act as the reaction centres with Li+ ions by rapidly and reversibly capturing them through surface absorption and surface redox reaction.
During the continuous charge– discharge cycles, these polysuldes diffuse into liquid electrolyte and shuttle through the separator to lithium anode, and nally precipitate as an insulating layer (Li2S2 and/or Li2S) over the electrodes.
Recent reports have utilised the epoxide and hydroxyl groups on the basal plane of GO in addition to the edge dominant carbonyl and carboxyl groups for the immobilisation of sulfur and its discharge products.
the epoxide groups on the PrGO surface further enhances the immobilization of sulfur and polysuldes during the discharge process.
5. However, aer subsequent cycles, the capacity continued to drop, suggesting dissolution of soluble Lipolysuldes in liquid electrolyte, causing irreversible loss of active material from the cathode.
the presence of epoxide (C–O–C), hydroxyl (–OH) and carboxyl (–COOH) groups on the PrGO surface is expected to further enhance the sulfur and lithium polysulde immobilization during the discharge process.
In conclusion, hybrid 3-D electrode structures consisting of FLGs melt-impregnated with PrGO-sulfur nanocomposites were successfully prepared with a high sulphur loading of 80 wt%.
the overall performance of current Li–S batteries is impeded by inherently poor electronic and ionic conductivity of sulfur and the dissolution of higher-order polysulphides phases (Li2Sn (8$ n $ 2)) during potential cycling which cause irreversible loss of active material.
This reduction of rst plateau may be because of the intermediate species (such as unstable polysuldes and radicals (S3c)) not getting enough time to evolve and actively participate in the electrochemical reaction.
Drop casting of PrGO/S nanocomposite on the FLG is expected to have additional advantages; rstly, the large surface area of PrGO will act as a barrier layer between the electrode and electrolyte; with the functional groups such as epoxide, hydroxyl and carboxyl on the PrGO physically sandwiching the sulfur (and its polysuldes) within the micro void/channelled FLG structure.
These residual groups have been previously suggested to immobilise sulfur and subsequently free lithium polysuldes during the charging–discharging process.
55 Considering the PrGO/FLG electrodes in this study have only 20% carbon content, the presence of this intermediate peak (at 2.15 V) even at low currents (C/20) is attributed to the enhanced sulfur immobilisation within the PrGO/FLG matrix due to the presence of oxygen functional (carbonyl and carboxyl) groups, which actively form S–O bonds facilitating the chemical adsorption of sulfur.
6,11 This requires: (i) conning the insulating sulfur and polysulde shuttles in electronically conductive electrode matrix, (ii) facile ionic network around encapsulated sulfur formed by the liquid electrolyte in the pores of the composite electrode matrix and (iii) efficient charge transfer reaction between the liquid electrolyte and the active material.
Such excellent rate capability at high currents in 3-D electrodes can be attributed to low chargetransfer resistance (both ionic and electronic resistance) and low lithium polysulde dissolution.
The 2-D PrGO/S electrode showed an initial discharge capacity of 1080mA h g 1 at C/10 rate, as compared to an initial value of 1320 mA h g 1 for the 3D FLG/PrGO-S electrode, as shown in Fig.
The growth of few layered graphene (FLG) nanoakes was carried out in a 1.5 kW, 2.45 GHz SEKI microwave plasma enhanced chemical vapour deposition system.
The discharge performance of the planar 2-D PrGO/S composites with equivalent sulfur loading ( 80 wt%) was carried out using similar charge–discharge sequences as that for the 3-D FLG/PrGO/S electrodes.
Owing to the melt inltration process utilised for the 3-D FLG/PrGO-S synthesis, a thin layer of sulfur nanoparticles as well as larger discrete particles were observed embedded in the matrix as evident from the elemental mapping and energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis, which further conrms the high sulfur/carbon ratio (see Fig. S4, ESI†).
63,64 Nonetheless, various complex processes are involved during charge–discharge of Li–S battery and are affected by factors such as scan rate, dissolution of active material in electrolyte, sulfur to carbon ratio, additives etcetera.
the current study highlights the importance of the electrode microstructure and the presence of surface functional groups to improve active material utilisation and charge discharge performance at high currents (C-rates).