scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Posted ContentDOI

7-Methylguanosine Modifications in tRNA

16 Nov 2018-
TL;DR: To be able to better respond to diseases and infections in which the 7-methylguanosine (m7G) modification is considered to be involved, it is still necessary to further understand the catalytic mechanism of AdoMet and/or the tRNA bound form of m7G methyltransferases.
Abstract: More than 90 different modified nucleosides have been identified in tRNA. Among the tRNA modifications, the 7-methylguanosine (m7G) modification is found widely in eubacteria, eukaryotes, and a few archaea. In most cases, the m7G modification occurs at position 46 in the variable region and is a product of tRNA (m7G46) methyltransferase. The m7G46 modification forms a tertiary base pair with C13-G22, and stabilizes the tRNA structure. Recently, we have proposed a reaction mechanism for eubacterial tRNA m7G methyltransferase (TrmB) based on the results of biochemical studies and previous biochemical, bioinformatic, and structural studies by others. However, an experimentally determined mechanism of methyl-transfer remains to be ascertained. The physiological functions of m7G46 in tRNA have started to be determined over the past decade. To be able to better respond to diseases and infections in which the m7G modification is considered to be involved, it is still necessary to further understand the catalytic mechanism of AdoMet and/or the tRNA bound form of m7G methyltransferases. In this review, information of tRNA m7G modifications and tRNA m7G methyltransferases are summarized and the differences in reaction mechanism between tRNA m7G methyltransferase and rRNA or mRNA m7G methylation enzyme are discussed.

Summary (3 min read)

1. Introduction

  • Transfer RNA, which is one of the classical non-coding RNAs, functions as an adaptor molecule supplying amino acids to ribosomes according to the codon of the mRNA.
  • 7-methylguanosine (m7G) is one of the most conserved modified nucleosides and is common in eubacteria, eukaryotes [4], and a few archaea [7].
  • The m7G46 forms a tertiary base pair with the C13-G22 base pair in the L-shaped tRNA structure.
  • Domains of life Organisms Positions of m7G Enzyme names Higher order structure References eubacteria E. coli 46 TrmB monomer [51,56] A. aeolicus 46 TrmB monomer [49,57,58].
  • By combining the aniline cleavage method and the Donis-Keller-method, which uses ribonucleases [42,43], it is possible to identify the position of m7G in tRNA.

2. Structural Analyses and Catalytic Mechanisms of m7G Methyltransferases

  • Structural studies of tRNA modification enzymes can be informative both for the specificity and catalytic mechanism of the enzymes.
  • Furthermore, the combination of structural and biochemical analysis data allows comparison of reaction mechanisms from different species.
  • This makes it possible to infer information about molecular evolution.
  • MTases belong to two protein super families, which are structurally and phylogenetically unrelated, namely, the Rossmann fold MTases (RFM) and SPOUT MTases (SpoU and TrmD) [59].

2.1. Eubacterial tRNA m7G46 Methyltransferases (TrmB)

  • Dimerization does not seem to be a common feature of the enzymes, as the interface is not conserved and the TrmB enzymes of E. coli and A. aeolicus are monomeric.
  • Alanine substitution of Arg287 in the long C-terminal region considerably reduces the methyltransfer activity.
  • Figure 3. Comparison of thermophilic and methophilic TrmB. (A) Sequence alignment of TrmB.
  • The noncatalytic subunits are involved in stabilizing the catalytic subunit or activating and fine tuning the activity.
  • Separate expression of Trm8 and Trm82 proteins and their subsequent mixing resulted in proteins with no activity.

2.2. Heterodimeric tRNA m7G Methyltransferase of Yeast (Trm8/Trm82)

  • Yeast Tr 8/Trm82 proteins are unrelated and have no homology to each other.
  • The homologous human proteins METTL/WDR4 complement Trm8/Trm82 in yeast [28].
  • The targets of these methyltransferase are components of different parts of the translation machinery, namely, rRNA, tRNAs, and release factors [68].
  • The noncatalytic subunits ar involved in stabilizing the catalytic subunit or activating and fine tuni g the activity.
  • An active Trm8/Trm82 heterodimer was synthesized when RNAs of both Trm8 and Trm82 were co-translat d [30].

2.3. mRNA Cap m7G Methyltransferase

  • TrmB and mRNA cap-m7G methyltransferase (Abd1) have different targets for methylation.
  • In the catalytic center of TrmB, the amino acid residues present differ totally from those in the catalytic center of Abd1.
  • The m7G methyltransferase domain is heterodimerized with a stimulatory vD12 subunit [73,74].
  • An allosteric mechanism, whereby the vD12 subunit enhances the affinity of the catalytic vD1 subunit for AdoMet and the guanine acceptor, has been proposed.
  • It has been shown that the catalytic subunits of vD1, as well as the yeast mRNA capping enzyme Abd1, are unrelated to Trm8.

3. Physiological Functions

  • A large number of tRNA modifications have important roles in tRNA function [76].
  • In particular, tRNA modifications in the anticodon region play a major role in translation and growth [77].
  • The role of many tRNA modifications outside of the anticodon region are considered auxiliary to correct structure formation and fine tuning of the translation because it hardly appears as phenotypic defects [76,77].
  • Because of this, information about the role of the m7G46 modification in tRNA was limited for a long time, even though the modification is widely found in eubacteria and eukaryotes.
  • Clarification of the function of m7G46 in tRNA has begun over the past decade.

3.1. tRNA m7G46 Modification in Yeast

  • TrmB gene disruption in E. coli demonstrated no phenotypic defects [58].
  • Since both Trm8 and Trm82 are absolutely required to form m7G in yeast, a phenotype would be expected already in trm8 or trm82 single mutants and not requiring a double deletion [28].
  • Hypo-modified mature tRNAVal(AAC) deacylates and degrades rapidly in a double deletion mutant strain of trm8 and trm4 (∆trm4∆trm8), (Trm4 is a methyltransferase for 5-methyl cytidine at positions 34, 40, 48, and 49 in tRNA) at 37 ◦C, resulting in a temperature sensitive phenotype [78].
  • Deletion of MET22, which likely regulates 5′–3′ exonuclease Rat1 and Xrn1 activity indirectly, prevents tRNAVal(AAC) degradation in the ∆trm4∆trm8 strain.
  • Maf1 inhibits tRNA transcription via a mechanism dependent on phosphorylation and nuclear accumulation of Maf1, followed by physical association with Pol III in the tRNA genes.

3.2. tRNA m7G46 Modification in Thermophilic Eubacteria

  • In comparison with these eukaryotic enzymes, there is limited information about eubacterial enzymes.
  • The mechanism by which modifications are controlled remained unknown until the beginning of the 21st century.
  • When the trmB gene was disrupted, the introduction ratio of Gm18, m5s2U54, and m1A58 was dramatically changed, and the melting temperature of the hypo-modified tRNA decreased.
  • In particular, degradation of tRNAPhe and tRNAIle was detected.
  • Thus, the m7G46 and Ψ55 modifications work as an accelerator and a brake, respectively [6].

3.3. Involvement of tRNA m7G46 Modification in Fungal Pathogenicity

  • The first report of the relationship between tRNA modification enzymes and fungal pathogenicity was by Takano et al., who showed that the tRNA m7G46 modification is required for plant infection by the phytopathogenic fungus Colletotrichum lagenarium, the cause of cucumber anthracnose [32].
  • Aph1 (Appressorial Penetration into Host) is required for efficient tRNA m7G46 modification in C. lagenarium, and experiments with aph1 gene knockout mutants suggest that Aph1 is required for appressorium-mediated host invasion and also has important roles in resistance to several stresses including the basic defense response of the host plant.
  • Given that in addition to m7G46 there are other tRNA modifications which are related to infection [6], tRNA modification and tRNA modification enzymes are likely be an important factor in the relationship between host and infectious organisms.

3.4. Involvement of tRNA m7G46 Methyltransferase in Diseases

  • Since tRNA modification regulates protein synthesis, there are several reports on the relationship between tRNA modification and genetic disease.
  • METTL1 and WDR4 are the human homologues of Trm8 and Trm82, respectively.
  • The observation of the influence of 5-FU in the yeast ∆trm8 strain leads to the hypothesis that these RTD-rerated modifying enzymes might affect the efficiency of 5-FU in human cancer cells.
  • Thus, NSUN2 and METTL1 are involved 5-FU sensitivity in HeLa cells.
  • This study has clearly demonstrated the tRNA m7G methylome in mammals and shows the critical nature of METTL1 and WDR and m7G modification in regulation of stem cells and disease.

4. Perspective

  • Since m7G was found in tRNA, the genes encoding tRNA m7G methyltransferase have been identified in several organisms, and amino acid residues key to the reaction mechanism have been identified [22,25,29,57].
  • Recently, a reaction mechanism for TrmB has been proposed [25].
  • Also, genes encoding the tRNA m7G methyltransferase responsible for m7G at position 49 in archaeal tRNA and for anticodon m7G of mt tRNA or chloroplast tRNA have not yet been identified.
  • This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (16K18493 to C.T.) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS).

Did you find this useful? Give us your feedback

Figures (4)

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

International Journal of
Molecular Sciences
Review
7-Methylguanosine Modifications in
Transfer RNA (tRNA)
Chie Tomikawa
Department of Materials Science and Biotechnology, Graduate School of Science and Engineering,
Ehime University, Bunkyo 3, Matsuyama, Ehime 790-8577, Japan; tomikawa.chie.mm@ehime-u.ac.jp;
Tel./Fax: +81-89-927-9947
Received: 13 November 2018; Accepted: 13 December 2018; Published: 17 December 2018


Abstract:
More than 90 different modified nucleosides have been identified in tRNA. Among the
tRNA modifications, the 7-methylguanosine (m
7
G) modification is found widely in eubacteria,
eukaryotes, and a few archaea. In most cases, the m
7
G modification occurs at position 46 in the
variable region and is a product of tRNA (m
7
G46) methyltransferase. The m
7
G46 modification forms
a tertiary base pair with C13-G22, and stabilizes the tRNA structure. A reaction mechanism for
eubacterial tRNA m
7
G methyltransferase has been proposed based on the results of biochemical,
bioinformatic, and structural studies. However, an experimentally determined mechanism of
methyl-transfer remains to be ascertained. The physiological functions of m
7
G46 in tRNA have
started to be determined over the past decade. For example, tRNA m
7
G46 or tRNA (m
7
G46)
methyltransferase controls the amount of other tRNA modifications in thermophilic bacteria,
contributes to the pathogenic infectivity, and is also associated with several diseases. In this review,
information of tRNA m
7
G modifications and tRNA m
7
G methyltransferases is summarized and the
differences in reaction mechanism between tRNA m
7
G methyltransferase and rRNA or mRNA m
7
G
methylation enzyme are discussed.
Keywords: RNA modification; tRNA methyltransferase; tRNA modification; methylase
1. Introduction
Transfer RNA, which is one of the classical non-coding RNAs, functions as an adaptor molecule
supplying amino acids to ribosomes according to the codon of the mRNA. It is important that
tRNA forms a precise L-shape structure for its full function [
1
] and this requires tRNA modification.
More than 100 different modified nucleosides have been reported to date and found throughout
the different families of RNA molecules [
2
,
3
]. tRNA in particular is the most heavily modified [
3
,
4
].
The modified nucleosides include thiolation, deamination, isomerization conversion of uridine to
pseudouridine, or the combination of several modifications. Of the modification, methylation is the
most abundant. This modification encompasses 1-methyladenosine (m
1
A), 5-methyluridine (m
5
U),
5-methylcytidine (m
5
C), 1-, 2-, or 7- position methylation of G (m
1
G, m
2
G, m
7
G), 2’-O-methylation
of ribonucleoside (Nm), and others [
3
,
5
,
6
]. The most widely prevalent tRNA methylation is
S-adenosyl-L-methionine (AdoMet)-dependent methylation by AdoMet dependent methyltransferases.
7-methylguanosine (m
7
G) is one of the most conserved modified nucleosides and is common in
eubacteria, eukaryotes [
4
], and a few archaea [
7
]. Even in psychrophiles which have low levels of
modified nucleoside content, m
7
G has been found in addition to dihydrouridine (D), pseudouridine
(
Ψ
), and m
5
U [
8
]. Additionally, m
7
G is present in introns containing pre-tRNA together with
N
2
,N
2
-dimethylguanine (m
2
2
G),
Ψ
and m
1
A [
9
]. For this reason, it is thought that m
7
G is generated
immediately after the transcription. m
7
G is most frequently located at position 46 in the tRNA
variable region, and forms a tertiary base pair with C13-G22 in the three-dimensional core of tRNA
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 4080; doi:10.3390/ijms19124080 www.mdpi.com/journal/ijms

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 4080 2 of 14
(The nucleotide positions in tRNA are numbered, according to the reference [
4
].) [
10
12
]. m
7
G has
no (net) charge under physiological conditions, but is positively charged in position 46 in tRNA via
hydrogen bonding to bases G22 and C13 [
13
15
] (Figure 1). Thus, 7-methylation of m
7
G produces
a site-specific electrostatic charge within the tRNA structure [
15
]. The tertiary base pair of the
m
7
G46-C13-G22 is considered to contribute to stabilization of the tRNA three-dimensional core.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, x FOR PEER REVIEW 2 of 14
(net) charge under physiological conditions, but is positively charged in position 46 in tRNA via
hydrogen bonding to bases G22 and C13 [13–15] (Figure 1). Thus, 7-methylation of m
7
G produces a
site-specific electrostatic charge within the tRNA structure [15]. The tertiary base pair of the m
7
G46-
C13-G22 is considered to contribute to stabilization of the tRNA three-dimensional core.
Figure 1. tRNA m
7
G46 methyltransferase methylates the N7-atom of guanine at position 46 in tRNA
and forms m
7
G46. (A) The secondary structure of tRNA is presented in cloverleaf form. Conserved
nucleotides are depicted as follows: adenosine, A; guanosine, G; cytidine, C; uridine, U; purine, R;
pyrimidine, Y. tRNA (m
7
G46) methyltransferase transfers a methyl-group to the N7-atom of guanine
at position 46 in tRNA and forms 7-methylguanine. (B) The L-shaped structure of tRNA is presented.
The m
7
G46 forms a tertiary base pair with the C13-G22 base pair in the L-shaped tRNA structure. In
the stick model, only atoms are visible and charge is invisible.
There are some examples where m
7
G is found in positions other than at position 46 (Figure 2,
Table 1). Chloroplast tRNA
Leu
(UAG) from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii has m
7
G at position 36 in the
tRNA anticodon [16]. In animal mitochondria in which there is deviation from the universal genetic
code, m
7
G is present at position 34 in the anticodon of mitochondorial (mt) tRNA
Ser
(GCU) of starfish,
Asterina amurensis [17], and squid, Loligo bleekeri [18]. Furthermore, the D-arms of the mt
tRNA
Ser
(m
7
GCU) in starfish and squid have an unusual secondary structure, and the mt
tRNA
Ser
(m
7
GCU) recognizes not only the serine codons AGU and AGC but also the unusual serine
codons AGA and AGG. Thus, m
7
G can make base-pairing with the four basic bases of A, U, G, and
C [19]. With respect to m
7
G in archaeal tRNA, in 1991, Edmonds et al. reported that tRNA mixtures
from some archaea contain m
7
G nucleoside; however, the position(s) in tRNA has remained
unidentified [7]. More than twenty years later, It was demonstrated that the presence of the m
7
G
modification in a thermo-acidophilic archaeon, Thermooplasma acidophilum at the novel, irregular
position 49 in class II tRNA
Leu
[20]. However, the gene encoding the methyltransferase for m
7
G49 in
tRNA has not been identified thus far.
Table1. N7-methylguanosine methyltransferase in tRNA.
Domains of
life
Organisms Positions of m
7
G Enzyme names
Higher order
structure
References
eubacteria E. coli 46 TrmB monomer [51,56]
A. aeolicus 46 TrmB monomer [49,57,58]
T. thermophilus 46 TrmB ? [86]
B. subtilis 46 TrmB homodimer [50]
S. pneumoniae 46 TrmB homodimer
PDB:
1YZH
archaea T. acidophilum 49 (tRNA
Leu
(UAG)) ? ? [7,20]
T. neutrophilus ? ? ? [7]
eukaryote S. cerevisiae 46 Trm8/Trm82 heterodimer [46,52,66]
S. cerevisiae 5 termini of pre-tRNA Ceg1p ? [24]
C. lagenarium 46 Aph1 ? [88]
Figure 1.
tRNA m
7
G46 methyltransferase methylates the N7-atom of guanine at position 46 in tRNA
and forms m
7
G46. (
A
) The secondary structure of tRNA is presented in cloverleaf form. Conserved
nucleotides are depicted as follows: adenosine, A; guanosine, G; cytidine, C; uridine, U; purine, R;
pyrimidine, Y. tRNA (m
7
G46) methyltransferase transfers a methyl-group to the N7-atom of guanine at
position 46 in tRNA and forms 7-methylguanine. (
B
) The L-shaped structure of tRNA is presented. The
m
7
G46 forms a tertiary base pair with the C13-G22 base pair in the L-shaped tRNA structure. In the
stick model, only atoms are visible and charge is invisible.
There are some examples where m
7
G is found in positions other than at position 46 (Figure 2,
Table 1). Chloroplast tRNA
Leu
(UAG) from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii has m
7
G at position 36 in
the tRNA anticodon [
16
]. In animal mitochondria in which there is deviation from the universal
genetic code, m
7
G is present at position 34 in the anticodon of mitochondorial (mt) tRNA
Ser
(GCU)
of starfish, Asterina amurensis [
17
], and squid, Loligo bleekeri [
18
]. Furthermore, the D-arms of
the mt tRNA
Ser
(m
7
GCU) in starfish and squid have an unusual secondary structure, and the mt
tRNA
Ser
(m
7
GCU) recognizes not only the serine codons AGU and AGC but also the unusual serine
codons AGA and AGG. Thus, m
7
G can make base-pairing with the four basic bases of A, U, G,
and C [
19
]. With respect to m
7
G in archaeal tRNA, in 1991, Edmonds et al. reported that tRNA
mixtures from some archaea contain m
7
G nucleoside; however, the position(s) in tRNA has remained
unidentified [
7
]. More than twenty years later, it was demonstrated that the presence of the m
7
G
modification in a thermo-acidophilic archaeon, Thermooplasma acidophilum at the novel, irregular
position 49 in class II tRNA
Leu
[
20
]. However, the gene encoding the methyltransferase for m
7
G49 in
tRNA has not been identified thus far.
Table 1. N7-methylguanosine methyltransferase in tRNA.
Domains of Life Organisms
Positions of m
7
G
Enzyme Names Higher Order Structure References
eubacteria E. coli 46 TrmB monomer [21,22]
A. aeolicus 46 TrmB monomer [2325]
T. thermophilus 46 TrmB ? [26]
B. subtilis 46 TrmB homodimer [27]
S. pneumoniae 46 TrmB homodimer PDB: 1YZH
archaea T. acidophilum
49 (tRNA
Leu
(UAG))
? ? [7,20]
T. neutrophilus ? ? ? [7]
eukaryote S. cerevisiae 46 Trm8/Trm82 heterodimer [2830]
S. cerevisiae 5
0
termini of pre-tRNA Ceg1p ? [31]
C. lagenarium 46 Aph1 ? [32]
human 46 METTL1/WDR4 ? [21,28]
C. reinhardtii
37 (chloroplast
tRNA
Leu
(UAG))
? ? [16]
A. amurensis 34 (mt tRNASer(GCU)) ? ? [17,19]
L. bleekeri 34 (mt tRNASer(GCU)) ? ? [18,19]
Unidentified m
7
G positions, enzymes, and higher order structures are indicated by question marks.

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 4080 3 of 14
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 of 14
human 46 METTL1/WDR4 ? [46,51]
C. reinhardtii
37 (chloroplast
tRNA
Leu
(UAG))
? ? [16]
A. amurensis 34 (mt tRNASer(GCU)) ? ? [17,19]
L. bleekeri 34 (mt tRNASer(GCU)) ? ? [18,19]
Unidentified m
7
G positions, enzymes, and higher order structures are indicated by question marks.
The 7-methylguanosine modifications occur not only in tRNA, but also in other RNA species
such as mRNA, ribosomal RNA (rRNA), small nuclear RNA (snRNA), and small nucleolar RNA
(snoRNA). The 5 terminus of eukaryotic mRNA is blocked by m
7
G
5
ppp
5
N cap structure [21,22], and
gene of cap-m
7
G methyltransferase (Abd1) is essential in Saccharomyces cerevisiae [23]. Surprisingly,
recent work has detected a cap structure in tRNA. In yeast, an m
7
G cap structure is found at the 5
termini of pre-tRNA bearing 5 leader sequences (Figure 2). The capped pre-tRNAs accumulate due
to inhibition of 5 exonucleases activities and protect pre-tRNAs from 5-exonucleolytic degradation
during maturation [24]. 7-methylguanosine is observed in 16S rRNA of aminoglycoside-producing
Actinobacteria, including Streptomyces tenebrarius and Micromonospora purpurea. The m
7
G
modification is at position G1405 in the 16S rRNA and has an aminoglycoside resistance activity [25–
27].
Figure 2. Positions of the m
7
G modification in tRNA. The numbers in circles indicate the positions of
m
7
G in tRNA.
Since Holley et al. determined the sequence of yeast tRNA
Ala
in 1965 [28], various tRNA
sequences have been reported, and the presences of modified nucleosides in tRNA have been
revealed. Also, the technical method of m
7
G detection has a history as well as tRNA sequencing.
Initially, Wintermeyer and Zachau described a specific chemical method in which m
7
G detection is
achieved via aniline-induced cleavage of the tRNA strand by β-elimination after additional treatment
under alkaline conditions or after its reduction by sodium borohydride (NaBH
4) in tRNA [29,30].
Both reduced m
7
G and its degradation products are susceptible to hydrolysis of the N-glycoside bond
with subsequent chain scission by the β-elimination. By combining the aniline cleavage method and
the Donis-Keller-method, which uses ribonucleases [31,32], it is possible to identify the position of
m
7
G in tRNA. These methods are utilized for m
7
G detection not only in tRNA but also in rRNA [33].
In the Donis-Keller-method, RNsase T1 is used for detection of guanosine position. Although RNase
T1 specifically digests the phosphodiester bond of guanosine-3 phosphate in ribonucleic acid and
ribonucleotide, the 7-methyl modification of guanosine prevents RNase T1 cleavage. Additionally, in
pre-tRNA containing m
7
G at the 5-end of the acceptor stem, the m
7
G modified nucleoside absolutely
prevents cleavage by M1 RNA, the catalytic RNA subunit of RNase P [34]. Inhibition by m
7
G is
Figure 2.
Positions of the m
7
G modification in tRNA. The numbers in circles indicate the positions of
m
7
G in tRNA.
The 7-methylguanosine modifications occur not only in tRNA, but also in other RNA species
such as mRNA, ribosomal RNA (rRNA), small nuclear RNA (snRNA), and small nucleolar RNA
(snoRNA). The 5
0
terminus of eukaryotic mRNA is blocked by m
7
G
5
0
ppp
5
0
N cap structure [
33
,
34
], and
gene of cap-m
7
G methyltransferase (Abd1) is essential in Saccharomyces cerevisiae [
35
]. Surprisingly,
recent work has detected a cap structure in tRNA. In yeast, an m
7
G cap structure is found at the 5
0
termini of pre-tRNA bearing 5
0
leader sequences (Figure 2). The capped pre-tRNAs accumulate due
to inhibition of 5
0
exonucleases activities and protect pre-tRNAs from 5
0
-exonucleolytic degradation
during maturation [
31
]. 7-methylguanosine is observed in 16S rRNA of aminoglycoside-producing
Actinobacteria, including Streptomyces tenebrarius and Micromonospora purpurea. The m
7
G modification
is at position G1405 in the 16S rRNA and has an aminoglycoside resistance activity [3638].
Since Holley et al. determined the sequence of yeast tRNA
Ala
in 1965 [
39
], various tRNA sequences
have been reported, and the presences of modified nucleosides in tRNA have been revealed. Also, the
technical method of m
7
G detection has a history as well as tRNA sequencing. Initially, Wintermeyer and
Zachau described a specific chemical method in which m
7
G detection is achieved via aniline-induced
cleavage of the tRNA strand by
β
-elimination after additional treatment under alkaline conditions
or after its reduction by sodium borohydride (NaBH
4
) in tRNA [
40
,
41
]. Both reduced m
7
G and its
degradation products are susceptible to hydrolysis of the N-glycoside bond with subsequent chain
scission by the
β
-elimination. By combining the aniline cleavage method and the Donis-Keller-method,
which uses ribonucleases [
42
,
43
], it is possible to identify the position of m
7
G in tRNA. These methods
are utilized for m
7
G detection not only in tRNA but also in rRNA [
44
]. In the Donis-Keller-method,
RNsase T1 is used for detection of guanosine position. Although RNase T1 specifically digests the
phosphodiester bond of guanosine-3
0
phosphate in ribonucleic acid and ribonucleotide, the 7-methyl
modification of guanosine prevents RNase T1 cleavage. Additionally, in pre-tRNA containing m
7
G
at the 5
0
-end of the acceptor stem, the m
7
G modified nucleoside absolutely prevents cleavage by M1
RNA, the catalytic RNA subunit of RNase P [
45
]. Inhibition by m
7
G is thought to be because the
approach of positive magnesium ion as a cleavage agent becomes impossible due to the positive charge
of m
7
G. In addition, antibodies which specifically target N
6
-methyladenine (m
6
A) and m
7
G were
prepared by immunization of rabbits with nucleoside conjugates of bovine serum albumin (m
6
A-BSA,
m
7
G-BSA) [
46
]. Both the anti-m
7
G and anti-m
6
A antibody adsorbents became a tool for fractionation
of oligonucleotides and nucleic acids. Currently, not only the m
7
G modification but also a variety of
other modified nucleosides can be detected more quickly and accurately by mass spectrometry or high
performance liquid chromatography [
47
]. Moreover, only recently, Motorin and co-authors reported a

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 4080 4 of 14
deep sequencing method named AlkAniline-Seq for the detection of m
7
G in RNA at single nucleotide
resolution. AlkAniline-Seq is exploited the generation of abasic sites by alkaline hydrolysis and aniline
cleavage. The method allows for sensitive m
7
G detection of total RNA from cells [48].
The enzymatic activity of tRNA (m
7
G46) methyltransferase was initially confirmed in cell extracts
from Escherichia coli [
49
] and has been purified more than 1000-fold [
50
]. Enzymatic activities have also
been detected from Salmonella typhimurium [
51
,
52
], Thermus flavus [
53
], Xenopus laevis [
54
], humans [
55
],
and plants [
9
]. The m
7
G46 modification is generated by tRNA (m
7
G46) methyltransferase (tRNA
(guanine-7-)-methyltransferase, EC 2.1.1.33; TrMet (m
7
G46)) [
3
,
56
] The gene encoding tRNA (m
7
G46)
methyltransferase was first identified in yeast and was shown to be composed of two protein subunits
Trm8 and Trm82 encoded by YDL201w and YDR165w, respectively [
28
]. Although Trm8 is the catalytic
subunit, formation of a complex with Trm82 is required for the enzymatic activity [
57
]. Following this
report, eubacterial genes have also been identified as trmB, whose classical name is yggh, in E. coli [
58
],
Aquifex aeolicus [23], and Bacillus subtilis [27] (Table 1).
In this review, information of tRNA m
7
G modifications and tRNA m
7
G methyltransferases since
m
7
G was discovered in tRNA is summarized, and the differences in reaction mechanism between
tRNA m
7
G methyltransferase and rRNA or mRNA m
7
G methylation enzyme are discussed.
2. Structural Analyses and Catalytic Mechanisms of m
7
G Methyltransferases
Structural studies of tRNA modification enzymes can be informative both for the specificity and
catalytic mechanism of the enzymes. Furthermore, the combination of structural and biochemical
analysis data allows comparison of reaction mechanisms from different species. This makes it
possible to infer information about molecular evolution. The crystal structures of tRNA (m
7
G46)
methyltransferase from B. subtilis [
27
], E. coli [
21
], Streptococcus pneumoniae (PDB: 1YZH), and
S. cerevisiae [
29
] have been reported (Table 1). X-ray crystallographies of TrmB and Trm8 have revealed
classic class I AdoMet-dependent methyltransferase structures. These AdoMet-dependent tRNA
MTases belong to two protein super families, which are structurally and phylogenetically unrelated,
namely, the Rossmann fold MTases (RFM) and SPOUT MTases (SpoU and TrmD) [
59
]. SPOUT MTases
have a deep trefoil knot structure which forms the catalytic site and the cofactor-binding pocket [
59
61
].
TrmB and Trm8 belong to the RFM family of MTases [29,58].
2.1. Eubacterial tRNA m
7
G46 Methyltransferases (TrmB)
Eubacterial TrmB exists as either a single subunit or a homodimer. TrmB of B. subtilis and
S. pneumoniae has a dimeric structure both in solution and in the crystal form. However, dimerization
does not seem to be a common feature of the enzymes, as the interface is not conserved and the TrmB
enzymes of E. coli and A. aeolicus are monomeric. Analysis of TrmB activity using mutant proteins
based on bioinformatic studies has revealed residues important for function [
22
]. The thermophilic
TrmB has a longer C-terminal region compared to the methophilic TrmB [
23
,
24
] (Figure 3B). It has
been reported that the C-terminal region is required for protein stability at high temperatures and
contributes to the selection of the precise guanine nucleotide (i.e., G46) to be modified [
24
]. Alanine
substitution of Arg287 in the long C-terminal region considerably reduces the methyltransfer activity.
Thus, a part of the C-terminal region may make contact with tRNA. In contrast, the methophilic
TrmB proteins from E. coli and B. subtilis have a long N-terminal region, and it has been shown that
Arg26 in E. coli TrmB is involved in activity [
22
]. Furthermore, when Asp133 is replaced by alanine or
asparagine in A. aeolicus TrmB, the methyltransfer activity is completely lost [
24
]. The aspartic acid
residue is highly conserved in both TrmB and Trm8. Therefore, the Asp133 of A. aeolicus TrmB is
considered as the catalytic center. Furthermore, in a docking model of guanine and the Trm8–Trm82
complex, the corresponding aspartic acid has the same positional relationship [29]. For this reason, it
is suggested that Asp133 of A. aeolicus TrmB captures the G46 base of tRNA. Mutagenesis study has
shown that Asp133 and several amino acid residues may contribute to AdoMet binding (Figure 4A).
Taken together, it has been proposed a hypothetical mechanism for TrmB in which the carboxyl group

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 4080 5 of 14
of Asp133 captures the proton of N–H of the guanine base and the N7 atom of the guanine base itself
attacks the methyl group in AdoMet [
25
] (Figure 4B). A hypothetical catalytic mechanism for TrmI,
which is a methyltransferase for the N1 atom of adenosine at position 58 in tRNA, has also been
proposed [
62
]. In this mechanism, the N1 atom causes a nucleophilic attack on the methyl group of
AdoMet. Since the reactivity of nitrogen atoms in the bases is generally higher than the reactivity of
carbon and oxygen atoms [
56
], in some methyl group transfer reactions, the nitrogen atom itself seems
to directly attack the methyl group of AdoMet.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, x FOR PEER REVIEW 5 of 14
asparagine in A. aeolicus TrmB, the methyltransfer activity is completely lost [57]. The aspartic acid
residue is highly conserved in both TrmB and Trm8. Therefore, the Asp133 of A. aeolicus TrmB is
considered as the catalytic center. Furthermore, in a docking model of guanine and the Trm8–Trm82
complex, the corresponding aspartic acid has the same positional relationship [52]. For this reason, it
is suggested that Asp133 of A. aeolicus TrmB captures the G46 base of tRNA. Mutagenesis study has
shown that Asp133 and several amino acid residues may contribute to AdoMet binding (Figure 4A).
Taken together, it has been proposed a hypothetical mechanism for TrmB in which the carboxyl
group of Asp133 captures the proton of N–H of the guanine base and the N7 atom of the guanine
base itself attacks the methyl group in AdoMet [58] (Figure 4B). A hypothetical catalytic mechanism
for TrmI, which is a methyltransferase for the N1 atom of adenosine at position 58 in tRNA, has also
been proposed [59]. In this mechanism, the N1 atom causes a nucleophilic attack on the methyl group
of AdoMet. Since the reactivity of nitrogen atoms in the bases is generally higher than the reactivity
of carbon and oxygen atoms [45], in some methyl group transfer reactions, the nitrogen atom itself
seems to directly attack the methyl group of AdoMet.
Figure 3. Comparison of thermophilic and methophilic TrmB. (A) Sequence alignment of TrmB.
Conserved regions are highlighted in three colored squares (red, green, blue). Asp133 is indicated by
an asterisk. (B) Thermophilic and mesophilic TrmB proteins are illustrated schematically. The three
colored regions correspond to the amino acid sequences in panel A. Thermophilic TrmB has a distinct
long C-terminal region. Asp133 is highlighted with an arrow, and the red D corresponds to the Asp133.
Figure 3.
Comparison of thermophilic and methophilic TrmB. (
A
) Sequence alignment of TrmB.
Conserved regions are highlighted in three colored squares (red, green, blue). Asp133 is indicated by
an asterisk. (
B
) Thermophilic and mesophilic TrmB proteins are illustrated schematically. The three
colored regions correspond to the amino acid sequences in panel A. Thermophilic TrmB has a distinct
long C-terminal region. Asp133 is highlighted with an arrow, and the red D corresponds to the Asp133.

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is concluded that, while advanced technologies have uncovered the contributions of many of RNA modifications in cancer, the underlying mechanisms are still poorly understood and further studies are needed to elucidate the mechanism of how RNA modifications promote cell malignant transformation and generation of cancer stem cells, which will lead to the development of new strategies for cancer prevention and treatment.
Abstract: More than a hundred chemical modifications in coding and non-coding RNAs have been identified so far. Many of the RNA modifications are dynamic and reversible, playing critical roles in gene regulation at the posttranscriptional level. The abundance and functions of RNA modifications are controlled mainly by the modification regulatory proteins: writers, erasers and readers. Modified RNA bases and their regulators form intricate networks which are associated with a vast array of diverse biological functions. RNA modifications are not only essential for maintaining the stability and structural integrity of the RNA molecules themselves, they are also associated with the functional outcomes and phenotypic attributes of cells. In addition to their normal biological roles, many of the RNA modifications also play important roles in various diseases particularly in cancer as evidenced that the modified RNA transcripts and their regulatory proteins are aberrantly expressed in many cancer types. This review will first summarize the most commonly reported RNA modifications and their regulations, followed by discussing recent studies on the roles of RNA modifications in cancer, cancer stemness as wells as functional RNA modification machinery as potential cancer therapeutic targets. It is concluded that, while advanced technologies have uncovered the contributions of many of RNA modifications in cancer, the underlying mechanisms are still poorly understood. Moreover, whether and how environmental pollutants, important cancer etiological factors, trigger abnormal RNA modifications and their roles in environmental carcinogenesis remain largely unknown. Further studies are needed to elucidate the mechanism of how RNA modifications promote cell malignant transformation and generation of cancer stem cells, which will lead to the development of new strategies for cancer prevention and treatment.

32 citations


Cites background from "7-Methylguanosine Modifications in ..."

  • ...occurring most commonly in position 46 of the tRNAs in both yeast and human and position 1639 of the 18S subunit of the human rRNA [70-72]....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A comprehensive overview of the current state of research on the epitranscriptome can be found in this paper , where the authors analyzed the available information for all known RNA modifications and selected 25 modifications to describe in detail.
Abstract: The alphabet of building blocks for RNA molecules is much larger than the standard four nucleotides. The diversity is achieved by the post-transcriptional biochemical modification of these nucleotides into distinct chemical entities that are structurally and functionally different from their unmodified counterparts. Some of these modifications are constituent and critical for RNA functions, while others serve as dynamic markings to regulate the fate of specific RNA molecules. Together, these modifications form the epitranscriptome, an essential layer of cellular biochemistry. As of the time of writing this review, more than 300 distinct RNA modifications from all three life domains have been identified. However, only a few of the most well-established modifications are included in most reviews on this topic. To provide a complete overview of the current state of research on the epitranscriptome, we analyzed the extent of the available information for all known RNA modifications. We selected 25 modifications to describe in detail. Summarizing our findings, we describe the current status of research on most RNA modifications and identify further developments in this field.

4 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Dec 2022-Genes
TL;DR: Wang et al. as mentioned in this paper summarized the mechanisms of RNA modification in chronic lung diseases and found a new way to develop early diagnosis and treatment of chronic lung disease, which can lead to better understanding of the diseases and promote the development of new biomarkers and therapeutic strategies.
Abstract: Chronic lung diseases are highly prevalent worldwide and cause significant mortality. Lung cancer is the end stage of many chronic lung diseases. RNA epigenetics can dynamically modulate gene expression and decide cell fate. Recently, studies have confirmed that RNA epigenetics plays a crucial role in the developing of chronic lung diseases. Further exploration of the underlying mechanisms of RNA epigenetics in chronic lung diseases, including lung cancer, may lead to a better understanding of the diseases and promote the development of new biomarkers and therapeutic strategies. This article reviews basic information on RNA modifications, including N6 methylation of adenosine (m6A), N1 methylation of adenosine (m1A), N7-methylguanosine (m7G), 5-methylcytosine (m5C), 2′O-methylation (2′-O-Me or Nm), pseudouridine (5-ribosyl uracil or Ψ), and adenosine to inosine RNA editing (A-to-I editing). We then show how they relate to different types of lung disease. This paper hopes to summarize the mechanisms of RNA modification in chronic lung disease and finds a new way to develop early diagnosis and treatment of chronic lung disease.

3 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
29 Oct 2022-Cancers
TL;DR: Wang et al. as discussed by the authors used a consensus unsupervised clustering method to classify the BLCA patients into different clusters based on 18 m7G-related genes and developed a novel scoring system depending on the GSVA algorithm.
Abstract: Simple Summary Although N7-methylguanosine (m7G) modification serves as a tumor promoter in bladder cancer (BLCA), the comprehensive role of m7G-related characterization in BLCA remains unclear. In this study, we integrated three cohorts consisting of 760 BLCA patients and used a consensus unsupervised clustering method to classify the BLCA patients into different clusters based on 18 m7G-related genes. Next, we identified some candidate proteins via various approaches to reveal the potential mechanism among these m7G-related clusters. Finally, we developed a novel scoring system depending on the GSVA algorithm. The constructed m7G-related signature can accurately be used for risk stratification. Most importantly, our signature can effectively predict patients’ response to immunotherapy and some targeted chemotherapeutic drugs. We believe our research can guide more clinical therapeutic strategies, improving the survival of BLCA patients in the future. Abstract Although N7-methylguanosine (m7G) modification serves as a tumor promoter in bladder cancer (BLCA), the comprehensive role of m7G-related characterization in BLCA remains unclear. In this study, we systematically evaluated the m7G-related clusters of 760 BLCA patients through consensus unsupervised clustering analysis. Next, we investigated the underlying m7G-related genes among these m7G-related clusters. Univariate Cox and LASSO regressions were used for screening out prognostic genes and for reducing the dimension, respectively. Finally, we developed a novel m7G-related scoring system via the GSVA algorithm. The correlation between tumor microenvironment, prediction of personalized therapies and this m7G-related signature was gradually revealed. We first identified three m7G-related clusters and 1108 differentially expressed genes relevant to the three clusters. Based on the profile of 1108 genes, we divided BLCA patients into two clusters, which were quantified by our established m7G-related scoring system. Patients with higher m7G-related scores tended to have a better OS and more chances to benefit from immunotherapy. A significantly negative connection between sensitivity to classic chemotherapeutic drugs and m7G-related signature was uncovered. In summary, our data show that m7G-related characterization of BLCA patients can be of value for prognostic stratification and for patient-oriented therapeutic options, designing personalized treatment strategies in the preclinical setting.

3 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Nov 2022-Cancers
TL;DR: Wang et al. as mentioned in this paper established an m7G gene-based prognostic model (m7G score), which demonstrated the important roles of m7g-related genes during colon cancer initiation and progression.
Abstract: Simple Summary N7-methylguanosine (m7G) plays an important role in the tumorigenesis and progression of colon cancer (CC). According to the capability of m7G-related genes, they are classified into three types: methyltransferases, binding proteins and demethylases. Hence, m7G-related genes could promote cancers by regulating RNAs. To further explore the functions of m7G, 29 m7G-related genes were selected and then 15 of them were utilized to construct a novel signature, termed the m7G score. Altogether, we found that the prognosis of CC patients with distinct m7G scores were significantly different. Furthermore, we applied various experiments and bioinformatics analyses to validate our results. We expect that the m7G score could indicate the correct clinical situation, which might optimize our treatments for CC patients. Abstract Colon cancer (CC), one of the most common malignancies worldwide, lacks an effective prognostic prediction biomarker. N7-methylguanosine (m7G) methylation is a common RNA modification type and has been proven to influence tumorigenesis. However, the correlation between m7G-related genes and CC remains unclear. The gene expression levels and clinical information of CC patients were downloaded from public databases. Twenty-nine m7G-related genes were obtained from the published literature. Via unsupervised clustering based on the expression levels of m7G-related genes, CC patients were divided into three m7G clusters. Based on differentially expressed genes (DEGs) from the above three groups, CC patients were further divided into three gene clusters. The m7G score, a prognostic model, was established using principal component analysis (PCA) based on 15 prognosis-associated m7G genes. KM curve analysis demonstrated that the overall survival rate was remarkably higher in the high-m7G score group, which was much more significant in advanced CC patients as confirmed by subgroup analysis. Correlation analysis indicated that the m7G score was associated with tumor mutational burden (TMB), PD-L1 expression, immune infiltration, and drug sensitivity. The expression level of prognosis-related m7G genes was further confirmed in human CC cell lines and samples. This study established an m7G gene-based prognostic model (m7G score), which demonstrated the important roles of m7G-related genes during CC initiation and progression. The m7G score could be a practical biomarker to predict immunotherapy response and prognosis in CC patients.

2 citations

References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is concluded that, while advanced technologies have uncovered the contributions of many of RNA modifications in cancer, the underlying mechanisms are still poorly understood and further studies are needed to elucidate the mechanism of how RNA modifications promote cell malignant transformation and generation of cancer stem cells, which will lead to the development of new strategies for cancer prevention and treatment.
Abstract: More than a hundred chemical modifications in coding and non-coding RNAs have been identified so far. Many of the RNA modifications are dynamic and reversible, playing critical roles in gene regulation at the posttranscriptional level. The abundance and functions of RNA modifications are controlled mainly by the modification regulatory proteins: writers, erasers and readers. Modified RNA bases and their regulators form intricate networks which are associated with a vast array of diverse biological functions. RNA modifications are not only essential for maintaining the stability and structural integrity of the RNA molecules themselves, they are also associated with the functional outcomes and phenotypic attributes of cells. In addition to their normal biological roles, many of the RNA modifications also play important roles in various diseases particularly in cancer as evidenced that the modified RNA transcripts and their regulatory proteins are aberrantly expressed in many cancer types. This review will first summarize the most commonly reported RNA modifications and their regulations, followed by discussing recent studies on the roles of RNA modifications in cancer, cancer stemness as wells as functional RNA modification machinery as potential cancer therapeutic targets. It is concluded that, while advanced technologies have uncovered the contributions of many of RNA modifications in cancer, the underlying mechanisms are still poorly understood. Moreover, whether and how environmental pollutants, important cancer etiological factors, trigger abnormal RNA modifications and their roles in environmental carcinogenesis remain largely unknown. Further studies are needed to elucidate the mechanism of how RNA modifications promote cell malignant transformation and generation of cancer stem cells, which will lead to the development of new strategies for cancer prevention and treatment.

32 citations

Frequently Asked Questions (1)
Q1. What contributions have the authors mentioned in the paper "7-methylguanosine modifications in transfer rna (trna)" ?

In this review, information of tRNA m7G modifications and tRNA m7G methyltransferases is summarized and the differences in reaction mechanism between tRNA m7G methyltransferase and rRNA or mRNA m7G methylation enzyme are discussed.