A 4pt Bending Bond Test Approach to Evaluate Water Effect in a Composite Beam
read more
Citations
Recommendation of RILEM TC 241-MCD on interface debonding testing in pavements
Interfacial fracture toughness of composite concrete beams
Interface Debonding Behavior
Méthode de résolution du M4-5n par éléments finis mixtes pour l’analyse des chaussées avec discontinuités
Caractérisation du collage des interfaces de chaussées par essais de rupture en mode I
References
Determination of displacements using an improved digital correlation method
Edge-Bonded Dissimilar Orthogonal Elastic Wedges Under Normal and Shear Loading
Discussion: ``Edge-Bonded Dissimilar Orthogonal Elastic Wedges Under Normal and Shear Loading'' (Bogy, D. B., 1968, ASME J. Appl. Mech., 35, pp. 460-466)
Intermediate crack-induced debonding in RC beams and slabs
Related Papers (5)
Mechanical analysis of a mixed mode debonding test for “composite” pavements
Debonding of a thin rubberised and fibre-reinforced cement-based repairs: Analytical and experimental study
Frequently Asked Questions (9)
Q2. What is the mechanism of damage driven by water?
The damage can be driven with two mechanisms: (a) loss in strength and durability of materials due to the presence of water in the pore of asphalt concrete (b) loss of mechanical behaviour of bond between layers.
Q3. What is the advantage of the S/Spec coefficient?
The S/Spec coefficient offers the advantage to display all the experimental results (from different test campaigns) on the same curve system in term of interface-normalized area between layers.
Q4. What is the effect of water bath on the damage zone of the mono layer specimens?
On these mono layer specimens made with the cement concrete material only, it has been observed on the “d” values that water bath effect reduces around 1/3 the damage zone of the cement concrete (Hun, 2012).
Q5. What is the advantage of a mixed mode test?
The advantage of such a test is to be able to investigate the mechanical properties of interfaces under mixed mode conditions without using any supports nor applying any loads directly on the bituminous material.
Q6. What is the void content of the bituminous material?
For the test condition at a displacement-controlled of a 0.7mm/min loading rate, the equivalent elastic modulus value of the bituminous material equals approximately 2000 MPa at 20°C (Hun, 2012).
Q7. Why are the results of the adapted 4PT bending test considered as maximum values?
Due to the perfect elastic assumption in the model used here, first G Dunders and M4-5n results given in Table 5 may be considered as maximum values for the tests obtained in the water bath.
Q8. What is the average debonding length of a bi-layer specimen?
The final average debonding length of bi-layer specimen gives 59 mm for specimens tested in air compared to 97 mm for specimens tested into water.
Q9. What is the average fracture energy for debonding specimens in mixed mode?
That is to say the average fracture energy for debonding specimens tested in the water bath, in mixed mode condition (mainly mode I), is around 127J/m2 instead of 166J/m2 according to the first results coming from the macro elastic modelling approach (Table 1).