A Black Critique of the Internal Revenue Code
01 Jan 1996-Wisconsin Law Review (Wisconsin Law Review)-Vol. 1996, pp 751
TL;DR: Using Census data and the Survey of Income Program participation (SIPP), this article showed that black Americans pay more federal income tax than whites at the same income levels than white Americans.
Abstract: Using Census data and the Survey of Income Program participation (SIPP), the authors use social science methodology to show that blacks pay more federal income tax than whites at the same income levels.
Summary (4 min read)
Jump to: [A BLACK CRITIQUE OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE] – [A. Critical Race Theory and Method] – [C. The Significance of Our Work] – [A. Tax Benefits] – [1. REALIZATION AND REFINANCING] – [2. SECTION 1014 BASIS ADJUSTMENT] – [3. CAPITAL GAINS] – [4. GiFrs] – [B. Wealth and the Social Science Literature] – [1. EARLY WEALTH RESEARCH] – [C. Results of Our Study] – [1. ANALYSIS OF RACE AND ASSET COMPOSITION] – [2. GIFTS AND INHERITANCE] and [D. Conclusion]
A BLACK CRITIQUE OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE
- This article raises the question of whether the Internal Revenue Code systematically favors whites over blacks.
- If this part of critical race theory has merit, then every important American institution should reflect racial subordination, even such a seemingly neutral institution as the American tax system.
- When it existed, income averaging allowed taxpayers with fluctuating incomes to average their incomes over several accounting periods, thereby placing themselves in lower tax brackets.'.
- The exclusion of interest on tax free bonds 3 explicitly removes from the tax base "accessions to income, clearly realized, and over which taxpayers have complete dominion.".
- While many studies about the impact of tax law rely on data from returns, the authors were unable to do so because tax returns are not coded by race.
A. Critical Race Theory and Method
- Critical race theory has generated heated debates about method.
- For us, narrative is a powerful and worthwhile method.
- When Professor Williams writes about being denied entrance to a store because of her race,2 she opens this experience to whites in an intimate way that statistics cannot replicate.
- Bell often uses such devices as a means of exposing society's faults.
- In their view, hostile critics of critical race theory have placed too much emphasis on the use of narrative, and not enough emphasis on the theory of systematic racial subordination in American society.
C. The Significance of Our Work
- For the most part the authors reserve their conclusions until they have presented the data.
- Nonetheless, in America a gap exists between blacks and most lawmakers because many whites and blacks do not interact in any meaningful way.
- The authors believe that this ignorance is one of the reasons for structural racial subordination in America.
- As lawyers concerned with racial justice in America, the authors also believe that if the Internal Revenue Code systematically subordinates black interests, then Congress should change it.
- The authors next present their evidence about how the provisions that they studied have different impacts on blacks and whites.
A. Tax Benefits
- The authors looked at four code sections that protect wealth, both while the original owner holds it and when the original owner passes it on to other people, usually younger family members.
- 33 These provisions are relevant to their topic of black/white differences in tax benefits for two reasons.
- In addition to the general benefits that flow to appreciated property, owner-occupied homes come with four tax benefits of their own.
- If a couple has a taxable income between the rate shift levels for single and joint returns, there is a possibility of a marriage bonus.
1. REALIZATION AND REFINANCING
- 37 In contrast, when many assets appreciate in value in their owners' hands, the increased value is not immediately taxed.
- A nonstatutory rule called "realization" determines the time of taxation.
2. SECTION 1014 BASIS ADJUSTMENT
- In order for a taxpayer to obtain Section 1014's benefits, the type of property involved is crucial.
- First, Section 1014 only benefits property that has appreciated in value.
- Property that has declined in value receives a stepped down basis on the owner's death, and thus nobody takes a deduction for the lost value.
- Bank accounts can appreciate as they accumulate interest but that interest is realized and taxed each year.
- When the heirs receive the contents of those already-taxed accounts, there is no built in-yet untaxed-gain for Section 1014 to protect.
3. CAPITAL GAINS
- The practical result of the difference between "ordinary income" and "capital gains" is that the highest rate of federal tax on ordinary income is 39.6% while the highest capital gains rate is 28%.'.
- ' the more than forty percent increase in tax from 28% to 39.6% is enough to keep wealthy taxpayers focused on the capital gains rate.
- In combination with other rules, the net result of the "detached and disinterested generosity" requirement is that gifts from strangers (such as prizes and awards) are usually taxed.".
- In contrast, gifts from family members and friends commonly receive the Section 102 exclusion.
- Moreover, wealthy people generally count other wealthy people as their family and friends, while low-asset individuals can only hope to get wealth transfers from strangers and lotteries.
- The gift exclusion under Section 102 thus favors the more fortunate both because wealthy individuals have access to more gifts and because they have access to the "right" gifts.
1. EARLY WEALTH RESEARCH
- Social scientists conducted several race and wealth studies from the 1960s through the 1980s.
- 59 Despite limitations on the data, some authors did try to make more precise comparisons between more similarly situated blacks and whites.
- Social scientists also became interested in the different types of assets owned by individuals of different races.
- Using different databases and slightly different controls, Lorman Lundsten and Harold Black, 61 O'Hare, and Terrell all looked at asset composition and came to much the same conclusions.
C. Results of Our Study
- The authors review of the social science literature confirms a wide gap in black and white wealth, both in gross averages and after controlling for such factors as income, education, region, marriage, and children.
- The studies also confirm that blacks hold a higher percentage of their wealth in consumption items than whites do, and a lesser percentage in financial and investment assets.
- First, because the authors are concerned about tax consequences, they are interested in different categorizations of assets than the social scientists are.
- For several reasons, the authors did their own analysis of the same data used by Hersch and White-Means.
- Using a sample called the PUMS Couples File drawn from the 1980 United States Census data, the authors constructed a variable that measured the proportion of family income earned by the wife for married couples with incomes that triggered the marriage penalty.
1. ANALYSIS OF RACE AND ASSET COMPOSITION
- Table 2 shows the mean amounts owned in each asset category, by black and white respondents separately.
- The last two columns report the percentage of total holdings in these four asset categories that consist of assets in each individual category, again for black and white respondents separately.
2. GIFTS AND INHERITANCE
- To partially rectify this data deficiency, the authors constructed a variable from the NSFH database that measured the value of assets held by blacks and whites at age sixty-five in four asset categories: home, other real estate, business or farm property, and motor vehicles.
- The authors intent was to get some measure of the value of assets that blacks and whites owned at a time near death, as a way of estimating the differential potential by race of taking advantage of the stepped up basis for property transferred by bequest.
- Their constructed variable is far from perfect because it does not include the value of stocks and bonds, which are most likely to benefit from basis adjustments at the time of gift or death.
- Furthermore, their variable includes motor vehicles, which rarely benefit from such adjustments.
- It must be emphasized that the authors have not measured directly the differential impact on blacks and whites of the tax rules they have discussed, because they have been unable to directly examine returns.
- Nonetheless, the authors have gathered very strong inferential evidence to support the hypothesis that whites benefit more than blacks from the tax provisions they have studied, each of which deviates from an ideal income tax as set forth in Glenshaw Glass.
- The value of benefits received, which Hersch and White-Means crudely estimated, is more relevant to tax concerns, since as the value of excluded or deferred benefits increase, the tax benefits grow as well.
- It seems likely that the value of employer-provided health benefits is more or less the same for all workers, since the Code requires that employer provided health benefits be "non-discriminatory" if they are to be excluded from the employee's income.the authors.
- Because blacks are less likely to be highly compensated, when they do participate in employer provided pension and 401(k) plans, they are likely to receive less pension benefits than whites.
Did you find this useful? Give us your feedback
TL;DR: This paper used Critical Race Theory (CRT) in the higher education affirmative action debate surrounding the Hopwood v. T exas decision (1996) to explain the social construction and operation of racism in educational institutions.
Abstract: Critical race theory (CRT) has garnered increasing attention from various circles and disciplines as an emerging perspective in jurisprudence scholarship addressing race. CRT scholarship encompasses and borrows from a myriad set of sociopolitical and philosophical critiques that challenge the objective reality of the law and of legal doctrine and interpretation. CRT scholars have argued that racism is an endemic part of U.S. social relations and this racism has shaped the laws and policies of U.S. institutions.Recently, scholars in education have started to explore the utility of CRT and the ways theories about race can explain the social construction and operation of racism in educational institutions.This paper continues this inquiry by briefly illustrating how CRT can be used in the higher education affirmative action debate surrounding the Hopwood v . T exas decision (1996). Specifically,the presentationof definitive race-neutral legal interpretations of narratives vs. counterstories of race is discus...
TL;DR: In this paper, the origins of tax systems in the United States and France were examined through a historical comparison of France and the United states, and analysis of several shadow cases, arguing that decisions about tax structure were shaped by resistance to the concentration of economic power and the centralization of state power in France and that these 19thcentury movements of resistance to modernization shaped the foundations of contemporary political economy.
Abstract: This article examines the origins of tax systems. Through a historical comparison of France and the United States, and analysis of several shadow cases, the article explains why the United States has relied more heavily on progressive income taxation than France, which has favored regressive sales taxes. This study traces the origins of these two tax systems to the early 20th century, arguing that decisions about tax structure were shaped by resistance to the concentration of economic power in the United States and the centralization of state power in France. In the United States, the rapid concentration of economic power in the late 19th century spurred a political movement for a tax with clear redistributive purposes. In France, resistance to the centralization of state power and concomitant fears of “fiscal inquisition” weakened the drive for an effective income tax, leaving the state to rely on consumption taxes to meet its revenue needs. These 19th-century movements of resistance to modernization shaped the foundations of contemporary political economy.
TL;DR: The authors examine contributions to the study of taxation that illuminate core issues in the sociology of contemporary capitalism, including the causes of poverty and inequality in rich countries and of inequality between rich and poor countries.
Abstract: This article reviews recent research in fiscal sociology. We specifically examine contributions to the study of taxation that illuminate core issues in the sociology of contemporary capitalism, including the causes of poverty and inequality in rich countries and of inequality between rich and poor countries. Research on developed countries suggests that tax policy changes are important for explaining rising income inequality, tax policies may structure durable inequalities of race and gender, and earnings-conditional tax subsidies may alleviate poverty more effectively and with less stigma than means-tested social spending. Scholars also find the most generous welfare states rely the most heavily on regressive taxes, although there is disagreement over how this association arises. Comparative research on developing countries shows consumption taxes are more conducive to growth than taxes on income, tax-financed spending benefits growth if it is spent on productive investments, and taxation strengthened de...
TL;DR: In this article, social epidemiology has made a powerful case that health determined not just by individual-level factors such as our genetic make-up, access to medical services, or lifestyle choices, but also by social conditions, including the economy, law, and culture.
Abstract: Social epidemiology has made a powerful case that health determined not just by individual-level factors such as our genetic make-up, access to medical services, or lifestyle choices, but also by social conditions, including the economy, law, and culture. Indeed, at the level of populations, evidence suggests that these “structural” factors are the predominant influences on health. Legal scholars in public health, including those in the health and human rights movement, have contended that human rights, laws, and legal practices are powerfully linked to health. Social epidemiology and health-oriented legal scholarship are complementary in their focus and their research needs. Legal scholarship has identified plausible ways in which legal and human rights factors could be influencing health, but empirical evidence has been limited.
TL;DR: Social epidemiology and health-oriented legal scholarship are complementary in their focus and their research needs and empirical evidence has been limited.
Abstract: Social epidemiology has made a powerful case that health is determined not just by individual-level factors such as our genetic make-up, access to medical services, or lifestyle choices, but also by social conditions, including the economy, law, and culture. Indeed, at the level of populations, evidence suggests that these "structural" factors are the predominant influences on health. Legal scholars in public health, including those in the health and human rights movement, have contended that human rights, laws and legal practices are powerfully linked to health. Social epidemiology and health-oriented legal scholarship are complementary in their focus and their research needs. Legal scholarship has identified plausible ways in which legal and human rights factors could be influencing health, but empirical evidence has been limited. Epidemiology has marshaled considerable evidence that social structures are broadly related to the level and distribution of health in a society, but bolstering claims of causation and intervening both require the elucidation of the mechanisms through which social structures actually influence health. Finding these mechanisms requires the integration of all the sciences that can offer explanations of the phenomena at issue, from the physiology of stress to the sociology of social status. Law, we suggest here, is an important mechanism to pursue. In this article, we present an heuristic framework for including law as a social factor in epidemiological research, and conversely for understanding how law can have health consequences worthy of consideration by lawyers. The framework posits law operating simultaneously in two broadly defined roles: Laws and legal practices contribute to the development, and influence the stability, of social conditions that have been associated with population health outcomes (i.e., law contributes to the creation and perpetuation of fundamental social determinants of health), and law operates as a pathway along which broader social determinants of health have an effect (i.e., law is one of the social systems through which more fundamental social characteristics work to create health effects). Consideration of existing data in epidemiology and the social science of law supports the plausibility and usefulness of this framework.
Related Papers (5)
01 Jan 2009
01 Jan 1991