A Brief Measure for Assessing Generalized Anxiety Disorder: The GAD-7
TL;DR: In this article, a 7-item anxiety scale (GAD-7) had good reliability, as well as criterion, construct, factorial, and procedural validity, and increasing scores on the scale were strongly associated with multiple domains of functional impairment.
Abstract: Background Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is one of the most common mental disorders; however, there is no brief clinical measure for assessing GAD. The objective of this study was to develop a brief self-report scale to identify probable cases of GAD and evaluate its reliability and validity. Methods A criterion-standard study was performed in 15 primary care clinics in the United States from November 2004 through June 2005. Of a total of 2740 adult patients completing a study questionnaire, 965 patients had a telephone interview with a mental health professional within 1 week. For criterion and construct validity, GAD self-report scale diagnoses were compared with independent diagnoses made by mental health professionals; functional status measures; disability days; and health care use. Results A 7-item anxiety scale (GAD-7) had good reliability, as well as criterion, construct, factorial, and procedural validity. A cut point was identified that optimized sensitivity (89%) and specificity (82%). Increasing scores on the scale were strongly associated with multiple domains of functional impairment (all 6 Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form General Health Survey scales and disability days). Although GAD and depression symptoms frequently co-occurred, factor analysis confirmed them as distinct dimensions. Moreover, GAD and depression symptoms had differing but independent effects on functional impairment and disability. There was good agreement between self-report and interviewer-administered versions of the scale. Conclusion The GAD-7 is a valid and efficient tool for screening for GAD and assessing its severity in clinical practice and research.
Citations
More filters
TL;DR: A large primary carebased anxiety study is analyzed to ascertain commonalities among anxiety diagnoses that are traditionally considered to be discrete and to determine whether a single measure can be used as a first step, common metric.
Abstract: Anxiety is as common as depression; however, it has received less attention and is often undetected and undertreated. The authors administered a 7-item anxiety scale to 965 primary care patients, w...
3,090 citations
TL;DR: In this article, the psychometric and pragmatic characteristics of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9 depression, generalized anxiety disorder (GAD)-7 anxiety and PHQ-15 somatic symptom scales are synthesized from two sources: (1) four multisite cross-sectional studies (three conducted in primary care and one in obstetric-gynecology practices) comprising 9740 patients, and (2) key studies from the literature that have studied these scales.
2,765 citations
TL;DR: Evidence supports reliability and validity of the G AD-7 as a measure of anxiety in the general population and can be used to compare a subject's GAD-7 score with those determined from a general population reference group.
Abstract: Background:The 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7) is a practical self-report anxiety questionnaire that proved valid in primary care. However, the GAD-7 was not yet validated in the general population and thus far, normative data are not available.Objectives:To investigate reliability
2,730 citations
TL;DR: This study identified a major mental health burden of the public during the COVID-19 outbreak as young people, people spending too much time thinking about the outbreak, and healthcare workers were at high risk of mental illness.
Abstract: China has been severely affected by Coronavirus Disease 2019(COVID-19) since December, 2019. We aimed to assess the mental health burden of Chinese public during the outbreak, and to explore the potential influence factors. Using a web-based cross-sectional survey, we collected data from 7,236 self-selected volunteers assessed with demographic information, COVID-19 related knowledge, generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), depressive symptoms, and sleep quality. The overall prevalence of GAD, depressive symptoms, and sleep quality of the public were 35.1%, 20.1%, and 18.2%, respectively. Younger people reported a significantly higher prevalence of GAD and depressive symptoms than older people. Compared with other occupational group, healthcare workers were more likely to have poor sleep quality. Multivariate logistic regression showed that age (< 35 years) and time spent focusing on the COVID-19 (≥ 3 hours per day) were associated with GAD, and healthcare workers were at high risk for poor sleep quality. Our study identified a major mental health burden of the public during the COVID-19 outbreak. Younger people, people spending too much time thinking about the outbreak, and healthcare workers were at high risk of mental illness. Continuous surveillance of the psychological consequences for outbreaks should become routine as part of preparedness efforts worldwide.
2,404 citations
TL;DR: The PHQ-4 is a valid ultra-brief tool for detecting both anxiety and depressive disorders and has a substantial effect on functional status that was independent of depression.
2,343 citations
References
More filters
TL;DR: The study suggests that the PHQ has diagnostic validity comparable to the original clinician-administered PRIME-MD, and is more efficient to use.
Abstract: ContextThe Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders (PRIME-MD) was developed
as a screening instrument but its administration time has limited its clinical
usefulness.ObjectiveTo determine if the self-administered PRIME-MD Patient Health Questionnaire
(PHQ) has validity and utility for diagnosing mental disorders in primary
care comparable to the original clinician-administered PRIME-MD.DesignCriterion standard study undertaken between May 1997 and November 1998.SettingEight primary care clinics in the United States.ParticipantsOf a total of 3000 adult patients (selected by site-specific methods
to avoid sampling bias) assessed by 62 primary care physicians (21 general
internal medicine, 41 family practice), 585 patients had an interview with
a mental health professional within 48 hours of completing the PHQ.Main Outcome MeasuresPatient Health Questionnaire diagnoses compared with independent diagnoses
made by mental health professionals; functional status measures; disability
days; health care use; and treatment/referral decisions.ResultsA total of 825 (28%) of the 3000 individuals and 170 (29%) of the 585
had a PHQ diagnosis. There was good agreement between PHQ diagnoses and those
of independent mental health professionals (for the diagnosis of any 1 or
more PHQ disorder, κ = 0.65; overall accuracy, 85%; sensitivity, 75%;
specificity, 90%), similar to the original PRIME-MD. Patients with PHQ diagnoses
had more functional impairment, disability days, and health care use than
did patients without PHQ diagnoses (for all group main effects, P<.001). The average time required of the physician to review the
PHQ was far less than to administer the original PRIME-MD (<3 minutes for
85% vs 16% of the cases). Although 80% of the physicians reported that routine
use of the PHQ would be useful, new management actions were initiated or planned
for only 117 (32%) of the 363 patients with 1 or more PHQ diagnoses not previously
recognized.ConclusionOur study suggests that the PHQ has diagnostic validity comparable to
the original clinician-administered PRIME-MD, and is more efficient to use.
7,444 citations
TL;DR: A number of case-finding instruments for detecting depression in primary care, ranging from 2 to 28 items, tend to be highly correlated, with little evidence that one measure is superior to any other.
Abstract: and treatable mental disorders presenting in general medical as well as specialty settings. There are a number of case-finding instruments for detecting depression in primary care, ranging from 2 to 28 items.1,2 Typically these can be scored as continuous measures of depression severity and also have established cutpoints above which the probability of major depression is substantially increased. Scores on these various measures tend to be highly correlated3, with little evidence that one measure is superior to any other.1,2,4
4,342 citations
3,392 citations
TL;DR: It is concluded that effect sizes are an important tool that will facilitate the use and interpretation of health status measures in clinical research in arthritis and other chronic diseases.
Abstract: Health status measures are being used with increasing frequency in clinical research. Up to now the emphasis has been on the reliability and validity of these measures. Less attention has been given to the sensitivity of these measures for detecting clinical change. As health status measures are app
2,339 citations
TL;DR: Using data from a clinical trial of therapy for back pain, it is shown that reproducibility should generally be quantified with the intraclass correlation coefficient rather than the more common Pearson r.r. coefficient, and that reproduction by retest at one-to-two week intervals may result in more realistic estimates of the variability to be observed among control subjects in a longitudinal study.
1,363 citations