A catalogue of reporting guidelines for health research.
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The EQUATOR Network as mentioned in this paper is an international initiative that aims to enhance the reliability and value of the published health research literature by providing resources, education and training to facilitate good research reporting and assists in the development, dissemination and implementation of robust reporting guidelines.Abstract:
Growing evidence demonstrates widespread deficiencies in the reporting of health research studies. The EQUATOR Network is an international initiative that aims to enhance the reliability and value of the published health research literature. EQUATOR provides resources, education and training to facilitate good research reporting and assists in the development, dissemination and implementation of robust reporting guidelines. This paper presents a collection of tools and guidelines available on the EQUATOR website (http://www.equator-network.org) that have been developed to increase the accuracy and transparency of health research reporting.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Improving Bioscience Research Reporting: The ARRIVE Guidelines for Reporting Animal Research
TL;DR: Most of the papers surveyed did not report using randomisation or blinding to reduce bias in animal selection and outcome assessment, consistent with reviews of many research areas, including clinical studies, published in recent years.
Journal ArticleDOI
The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations
Brian Hutton,Georgia Salanti,Deborah M Caldwell,Anna Chaimani,Christopher H. Schmid,Chris Cameron,John P. A. Ioannidis,Sharon E. Straus,Kristian Thorlund,Jeroen P. Jansen,Cynthia D. Mulrow,Ferrán Catalá-López,Peter C Gøtzsche,Kay Dickersin,Isabelle Boutron,Douglas G. Altman,David Moher +16 more
TL;DR: The process of developing specific advice for the reporting of systematic reviews that incorporate network meta-analyses is described, and the guidance generated from this process is presented.
Journal ArticleDOI
Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research.
TL;DR: 1.2 Provide an accurate summary of the background, res principal findings, and conclusions of the study.
Journal ArticleDOI
Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis
John P. A. Ioannidis,Sander Greenland,Mark A. Hlatky,Muin J. Khoury,Malcolm R. Macleod,David Moher,David Moher,Kenneth F. Schulz,Kenneth F. Schulz,Robert Tibshirani +9 more
TL;DR: Potential solutions for problems related to the research workforce are proposed, including improvements in protocols and documentation, consideration of evidence from studies in progress, standardisation of research efforts, optimisation and training of an experienced and non-conflicted scientific workforce, and reconsideration of scientific reward systems.
Journal ArticleDOI
Testing the reliability and efficiency of the pilot Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) for systematic mixed studies review
Romina Pace,Pierre Pluye,Gillian Bartlett,Ann C. Macaulay,Jon Salsberg,Justin Jagosh,Robbyn Seller +6 more
TL;DR: The reliability and efficiency of the pilot Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT), a pilot version of the mixed studies review (MSR), is promising, and encourages further development.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
TL;DR: Moher et al. as mentioned in this paper introduce PRISMA, an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses, which is used in this paper.
Journal Article
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
TL;DR: The QUOROM Statement (QUality Of Reporting Of Meta-analyses) as mentioned in this paper was developed to address the suboptimal reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Journal ArticleDOI
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement
TL;DR: A structured summary is provided including, as applicable, background, objectives, data sources, study eligibility criteria, participants, interventions, study appraisal and synthesis methods, results, limitations, conclusions and implications of key findings.
Journal ArticleDOI
The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration
Alessandro Liberati,Douglas G. Altman,Jennifer Tetzlaff,Cynthia D. Mulrow,Peter C Gøtzsche,John P. A. Ioannidis,Mike Clarke,Mike Clarke,Philip J. Devereaux,Jos Kleijnen,David Moher +10 more
TL;DR: An Explanation and Elaboration of the PRISMA Statement is presented and updated guidelines for the reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses are presented.
Journal ArticleDOI
Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups
Allison Tong,Allison Tong,Peter Sainsbury,Peter Sainsbury,Jonathan C. Craig,Jonathan C. Craig +5 more
TL;DR: The criteria included in COREQ, a 32-item checklist, can help researchers to report important aspects of the research team, study methods, context of the study, findings, analysis and interpretations.