scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal ArticleDOI

A Closed-Form Solution for the Health Capital Model

TL;DR: It is shown that the optimal solution always implies eternal life and this outcome occurs independently from the initial stock of health, the impact of health on productivity, and the importance of health for utility.
Abstract: This paper provides a closed-form solution for the health capital model of health demand. The results are exploited in order to prove analytically the comparative dynamics of the model. Results are derived for the so called pure investment model, the pure consumption model and a combination of both types of models. Given the plausible assumptions that (i) health declines with age and that (ii) the health capital stock at death is lower than the health capital stock needed for eternal life, it is shown that the optimal solution always implies eternal life. This outcome occurs independently from the initial stock of health, the impact of health on productivity, and the importance of health for utility and it is robust against the introduction of a finite age-dependent rate of health depreciation.

Summary (2 min read)

1. Introduction

  • This paper provides for the first time a closed-form solution of the health capital model of health demand.
  • In any period or, in continuous time, in any instant of time, health capital depreciates and is potentially augmented by health investment.
  • After acknowledging that a finite life requires that the fixed point for health capital lies below the minimum health needed for survival, the paper continues without debating the potential logical inconsistency involved in this assumption.

2. The Model

  • In order to derive a closed-form solution the authors need to assume that the utility function and the production function are iso-elastic.
  • The authors assume that goods consumption provides always utility and that health may or may not enter the utility function, 0 < β ≤ 1.
  • These modifications would not change the basic mechanics of the model because the first order conditions are structurally identical in both cases.
  • The original Grossman model additionally assumes that the production of health needs also a time input beyond health expenditure.

3. The Solution

  • Given (14), which is assumed until Section 5, individuals prefer a constant consumption share and thus a constant share of health care expenditure throughout their life.the authors.
  • This means that the explicit solution does not require an implausible assumption about the value of σ.
  • In other words, the optimal solution remains interior when the rate of health depreciation increases.

4. Comparative Dynamics

  • Initially healthier people are healthier at any given age t.
  • As individuals age their health capital stock is declining if their initial health is larger than H∗ and rising if their initial health is lower than H∗. Proposition 5 (Income and Medical Technology).
  • Irrespective of the power of medical technology, the weight of health in utility, and income, eternal life is the optimal solution and it is approached from everywhere, i.e. for any state of initial health.
  • Notice from (18) that H∗ is approached from any initial condition.
  • The available discussion of the comparative statics of the Grossman model has focussed on models with constant δ.

5. Generalization

  • Since a closed-form solution exists only for a special parametrization the question naturally occurs how general these results are.
  • The following proposition establishes that the qualitative features regarding the steady state of immortality are universal.
  • The special case and the general case share the same steady state.
  • The not-drawn special case where σ = σ̃, is reached when the ẋ = 0–isocline is horizontal and coincides with the stable saddlepath.
  • The expenditure share of health care increases with age and deteriorating health capital stock if and only if σ < σ̃.

6. Conclusion

  • This paper has provided an analytical closed-form solution of the Grossman model.
  • It exhibits a unique saddlepath-stable fixed point at which health does not deteriorate.
  • Global convergence towards immortality is a troubling prediction.
  • With the present paper at hand it is easy to see how it reverts the equilibrating forces of the Grossman model.
  • Because of its gerontological foundation the model of health deficit accumulation is straightforwardly calibrated with real data.

Did you find this useful? Give us your feedback

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Strulik, Holger
Working Paper
A closed-form solution for the health capital model
cege Discussion Papers, No. 222
Provided in Cooperation with:
Georg August University of Göttingen, cege - Center for European, Governance and Economic
Development Research
Suggested Citation: Strulik, Holger (2014) : A closed-form solution for the health capital model,
cege Discussion Papers, No. 222, University of Göttingen, Center for European, Governance
and Economic Development Research (cege), Göttingen
This Version is available at:
http://hdl.handle.net/10419/103879
Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:
Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen
Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.
Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle
Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich
machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.
Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen
(insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten,
gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort
genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte.
Terms of use:
Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your
personal and scholarly purposes.
You are not to copy documents for public or commercial
purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them
publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise
use the documents in public.
If the documents have been made available under an Open
Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you
may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated
licence.

ISSN: 1439-2305
Number 222 – November 2014
A CLOSED-FORM SOLUTION FOR THE
HEALTH CAPITAL MODEL
Holger Strulik

A Closed-form Solution for the Health Capital Model
Holger Strulik
November 2014.
Abstract. This paper provides a closed-form solution for the health capital model
of health demand. The results are exploited in order to prove analytically the
comparative dynamics of the model. Results are deri ved for the so called pure
investme nt model, the pu r e consumption model and a combination of both types of
models. Given the plausible assumption s that (i) health declines with age and that
(ii) the health capital stock at death is lower than the health capital stock needed
for eternal life, it is shown that the optimal solution always impli e s et er n al li fe . This
outcome occurs independently from the initial st ock of health, the impact of health
on producti v i ty, and the importance of heal t h for utility and it is robust against the
introduction of a finite age-dependent rate of health depreciation.
Keywords: Longevity, Health, Health Care Demand.
JEL: D91, J17, J26, I12.
I would li ke to thank Carl-Johan Dalgaard, Ben Heijdra, Volker Meier, Gustav Feichtinger, Johannes
Schuenemann, and Timo Trimborn fo r d i sc u ss io n and helpful comments.
University of Goettingen , Department of Economics, Platz der Goettinger Sieben 3, 37073 Goettingen,
Germany; email: h o lg e r.st ru l ik@ wi wi .u n i- g oett in g en . d e.

1. Introduction
This paper provides for the first time a closed-form solution of the health capital model of
health demand. The model is also known as the Gr ossm an model, named after the seminal paper
of Grossman (1972), which develop ed its main ingredient s . In its long history the Grossm an
model has been criticized for various s hor t com i ngs and counterfactual predictions. Several of
these (alleged) shortcomings have been addressed by further developments of the original model.
The core mechanics of the Grossman model is the conventional paradigm in the economics of
health demand and remained, until recently, basically unchallenged by the development of an
alternative theory. Empirically, the Grossman model is the inspiration if not the foundation of
many redu ce d- for m and str uc t ur al models of health demand.
The core me chanics of the Grossman model arise from the assumption that individuals ac-
cumulate health c api t al H in a simi l ar fashion as they accumulate human capital in form of
education. In any period or , in continuous time, in any instant of ti me , health capit al depreci-
ates and is potentially augment ed by health investment. The health capital stock of an individual
of age t thus evolves, in continuous time, according to
˙
H(t) = f(I(t)) δ(t )H(t), in which I
is investment, f is a positive function, and δ is the depreciation rate. The key assumption is
that the loss of health capit al through depreciation is an increasing function of its stock. This
means that of two individuals of the same age t, the one in bett er health, i.e. the one with the
greater health stock H(t) loses more health capital in the next instant, since health depreciati on
δ(t)H(t) is increasing in H(t). Notice that this basic assumption is imposed independently from
whether δ is considered to be constant or age-dependent.
1
The notion of health capital accumulation according to the Grossman mode l c ontradicts basic
insights from modern gerontology. There, the human life course is understood as “intrinsic,
cumulative, progr es si ve, and deleterious loss of function that eventually culminates in death.”
(Arking, 2006, Masoro, 2006). Evidence from gerontology support s the reverse of the Grossman
assumption. The accu mulation of health deficits is foun d to be a positive fun ct i on of the health
deficits that are already present in an individual. Of two individuals of the same age the
unhealthier one is predicted to los e more heal t h (accumulate more health deficits) in the next
instant. This law of health deficit accumulation has a micro-fou nd at i on in reliability th eor y and
1
This paper is not the first one that observes this potentially problematic assumption of the Grossman model,
see, for example, Case and Deaton (2005), McFadden (2008).
1

it is a ver y stron g predi ct or of mortal i ty (M i tn i t sk i et al., 2002a, 2002b, 2005, 2006).
In defense of the Grossman model one could argue, based on Friedman ( 1953) , that a theory’s
assumptions should not matter as long as its pre di ct i ve quality is good. Generating test ab l e
predictions f rom the Grossman model, however, is a tough task. In order to appreciate this
fact, notic e that even the simplest ve r si on of the Grossman model generates two differential
equations (or in discrete t i me two difference equations): one equation of motion for the health
capital stock and one equation of motion generated from the first order conditions for optimal
health investment. The latter could be expressed as equation of motion for the shadow price
of health, or health investment, or consumption. The solution is thus expressed as a trajectory
in a two-dimensi on al phas e spac e. The problem is that there are infinitely m any trajectories
fulfilling the first order conditions, us ual l y pointing in all possible directions in the phase space.
In other words, based solely on the first order condi t i ons and th e equat i on of moti on for the
state variable (i.e. health capital), the solution is indeter mi nat e . The unique optimal solut i on of
the Grossman model is identified by the transversality condition. This unique optimal solution
allows to deri ve test abl e pred i ct i on s of the model.
It is perhaps fair to say that most of the problems that the literature had with solving the
Grossman model originated from an inappropriate use of the tr an sversality condition. Grossman
(1972) and some followers (e.g. Jacobsen, 2000) just ignored the transversality condition, others
had problems of applying it appropriately because they stated the health demand problem in
discrete time (Ried, 1998). Neglecting the tr an sversality condition is particul arl y worrying when
reduced-form or structural equat ion s for empirical estimation are deri ved. Many applications
derive these equations for health care demand from solving simplified ve rs i ons of the first order
conditions and the equation motion (Muurinen, 1982; Wagstaff, 1986; Grossman, 2000). But
since there are infinitely many trajectories fulfilling the r st order conditions, any structural form
obtained by ignoring the transversality condition is a result from (unwarranted) simplifications.
2
Some other studies suggested to reformulate the original Grossman model in order to reduce
the difficulties involved with identification. The original Grossman model assumes that death is
2
For exa m p le, Muurinen (1982 ) assumes that
˙
H/H is constant, i.e. an expon ential decline (or increase) of
health with age is assumed rather than derived. Muurinen actually states the transversality condition but then
ignores it in the derivation of health care demand. Similarly, Wagstaff (1986) accurately states a problem of free
terminal t i me but never invokes the transversality condition when solving for the structural form. Instead h e
records carefully the steps of simpli fyi n g assumption which distil from the infinitely many solution of the first
order conditions one particular set of estimation equations.
2

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A life cycle theory is developed in which individuals take into account the fact that the consumption of addictive goods reduces their health and longevity and is argued that the life cycle consumption pattern predicted for naive addiction is more suitable for motivating empirically observable patterns of addictive Goods consumption.

18 citations


Cites background or methods from "A Closed-Form Solution for the Heal..."

  • ...It has been shown elsewhere (Strulik, 2015a; Schuenemann et al., 2017a) that treating death as a health-dependent stochastic event adds more complexity but only marginally changes the predictions derived from the health deficit model....

    [...]

  • ...2 For a critique of the health capital model, see also Wagstaff, 1986; Zweifel and Breyer, 1997; Case and Deaton, 2005; Almond and Currie, 2011; Dalgaard and Strulik (2015), and Strulik (2015b)....

    [...]

  • ...An infinite life is actually supported by Grossman’s (1972) health capital model, which exhibits a steady state of constant health (see Strulik, 2015b)....

    [...]

  • ...In contrast to the health capital model, the health deficit model, as calibrated in Section 3, exhibits no steady state (see Dalgaard and Strulik, 2015, for a discussion of steady states in the health deficit model)....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Sep 2015
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors provided a closed-form solution for the health capital model of health demand, which they exploited in order to prove analytically the comparative dynamics of the model.
Abstract: This paper provides a closed-form solution for the health capital model of health demand. The results are exploited in order to prove analytically the comparative dynamics of the model. Results are derived for the so-called pure investment model, the pure consumption model and a combination of both types of models. Given the plausible assumptions that (i) health declines with age and that (ii) the health capital stock at death is lower than the health capital stock needed for eternal life, it is shown that the optimal solution implies eternal life.

16 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, an economic theory of depression and its impact on health behavior and longevity is proposed, based on studies from happiness research, depression is conceptualized as a drastic loss of utility and value of life for unchanged fundamentals.
Abstract: In this paper, I propose an economic theory of depression and its impact on health behavior and longevity. Based on studies from happiness research, depression is conceptualized as a drastic loss of utility and value of life for unchanged fundamentals. The model is used to explain how untreated depression leads to unhealthy behavior and adverse health outcomes: depressed individuals are predicted to save less, invest less in their health, consume more unhealthy goods, and exercise less. As a result, they age faster and die earlier than non-depressed individuals. I calibrate the model for an average American and discus how depression enlarges the socioeconomic gradient of health and consider feedback effects of depression on earnings and of physical exercise on depression as well as a variety of depression shocks. Delays in treatment for depression in young adulthood are predicted to have significant repercussions on late-life health outcomes and longevity.

13 citations


Cites background or methods from "A Closed-Form Solution for the Heal..."

  • ...As shown in Strulik (2015a) and Schuenemann et al. (2017b), stochastic versions of the health deficit model in which the probability of death depends positively on health deficits add more realism at the price of higher complexity but provide little extra insight into life-cycle choices and…...

    [...]

  • ...We solve model by applying the relaxation algorithm of Trimborn et al. (2008). We begin with the life cycle choices of the non-depressed benchmark American, which are shown in Figure 1 by blue (solid) lines....

    [...]

  • ...…the standard Euler equation for consumption adjusted by health deficits, Intuitively, the accumulation of health deficits drives down the incentive to spend on consumption in old age, and thus lowers the slope of the lifetime consumption path (which may become hump-shaped; see Strulik, 2015b)....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a model of aging and health deficit accumulation with an infinite time horizon and a steady state of constant health is proposed, where the time of death is uncertain and endogenous to lifestyle and health behavior.
Abstract: We propose a model of aging and health deficit accumulation model with an infinite time horizon and a steady state of constant health. The time of death is uncertain and endogenous to lifestyle and health behavior. This setup can be conceptualized as a strive for immortality that is never reached. We discuss adjustment dynamics and show that the new setup is particularly useful to understand aging of the oldest old, i.e. of individuals for which morbidity and mortality have reached a plateau. We then show how the existence of a steady state can be used to perform comparative dynamics exercises analytically. As an illustration we investigate the effects of more expensive health investment and of advances in medical technology on optimal short run and long run health behavior.

5 citations


Cites background from "A Closed-Form Solution for the Heal..."

  • ...In the standard model of health capital accumulation (Grossman, 1972) there always exists a steady state of constant health such that individuals inevitably live forever (Strulik, 2015)....

    [...]

  • ...In the health deficit model (Dalgaard and Strulik, 2014, 2015), a steady state of constant health exists as well, but only for a favorable constellation of parameters....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This editorial focuses on the history of the demand for health model and its impacts on the field of health economics.
Abstract: The year 2022 is the 50th anniversary of the publication of my demand for health model in "On the Concept of Health Capital and the Demand for Health," Journal of Political Economy 80(2): 223-255, and in The Demand for Health: A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation, NBER Occasional Paper 119 New York: Columbia University Press for the NBER. To mark that occasion, this editorial focuses on the history of the model and its impacts on the field of health economics.

4 citations

References
More filters
Book ChapterDOI
TL;DR: A model of the demand for the commodity "good health" is constructed and it is shown that the shadow price rises with age if the rate of depreciation on the stock of health rises over the life cycle and falls with education if more educated people are more efficient producers of health.
Abstract: The aim of this study is to construct a model of the demand for the commodity "good health." The central proposition of the model is that health can be viewed as a durable capital stock that produces an output of healthy time. It is assumed that individuals inherit an initial stock of health that depreciates with age and can be increased by investment. In this framework, the "shadow price" of health depends on many other variables besides the price of medical care. It is shown that the shadow price rises with age if the rate of depreciation on the stock of health rises over the life cycle and falls with education if more educated people are more efficient producers of health. Of particular importance is the conclusion that, under certain conditions, an increase in the shadow price may simultaneously reduce the quantity of health demanded and increase the quantity of medical care demanded.

4,532 citations

Book
01 Jan 1953
TL;DR: In this paper, Newman's critical blast blows like a north wind against the more pretentious erections of modern economics, however a healthy and invigorating blast, without malice and with a sincere regard for scientific objectivity.
Abstract: "Stimulating, provocative, often infuriating, but well worth reading." Peter Newman, "Economica" "His critical blast blows like a north wind against the more pretentious erections of modern economics. It is however a healthy and invigorating blast, without malice and with a sincere regard for scientific objectivity." K.E. Boulding, "Political Science Quarterly" "Certainly one of the most engrossing volumes that has appeared recently in economic theory." William J. Baumol, "Review of Economics and Statistics""

3,029 citations

Book
01 Jan 2009
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors introduce modern economic growth, and introduce the concept of economic growth in the context of modern economic development, and propose a new economic growth model, which they call the "Internet of Modern Economic Growth".
Abstract: Introduction to modern economic growth , Introduction to modern economic growth , کتابخانه دیجیتال و فن آوری اطلاعات دانشگاه امام صادق(ع)

1,797 citations

Book ChapterDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a detailed treatment of the human capital model of the demand for health which was originally developed in 1972 is discussed, and theoretical extensions of the model are reviewed, as well as empirical research that tests the predictions and studies causality between years of formal schooling completed and good health is surveyed.
Abstract: This chapter contains a detailed treatment of the human capital model of the demand for health which was originally developed in 1972. Theoretical predictions are discussed, and theoretical extensions of the model are reviewed. Empirical research that tests the predictions of the model or studies causality between years of formal schooling completed and good health is surveyed. The model views health as a durable capital stock that yields an output of healthy time. Individuals inherit an initial amount of this stock that depreciates with age and can be increased by investment. The household production function model of consumer behavior is employed to account for the gap between health as an output and medical care as one of many inputs into its production. In this framework the “shadow price” of health depends on many variables besides the price of medical care. It is shown that the shadow price rises with age if the rate of depreciation on the stock of health rises over the life cycle and falls with education (years of formal schooling completed) if more educated people are more efficient producers of health. An important result is that, under certain conditions, an increase in the shadow price may simultaneously reduce the quantity of health demanded and increase the quantities of health inputs demanded.

971 citations


"A Closed-Form Solution for the Heal..." refers background in this paper

  • ...Many applications derive these equations for health care demand from solving simplified versions of the first order conditions and the equation motion (Muurinen, 1982; Wagstaff, 1986; Grossman, 2000)....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors developed a model based on standard economic assumptions and argued that health spending is a superior good with an income elasticity well above one, and that the optimal composition of total spending shifts toward health, and the health share grows along with income.
Abstract: Over the past half century, Americans spent a rising share of total economic resources on health and enjoyed substantially longer lives as a result. Debate on health policy often focuses on limiting the growth of health spending. We investigate an issue central to this debate: Is the growth of health spending a rational response to changing economic conditions—notably the growth of income per person? We develop a model based on standard economic assumptions and argue that this is indeed the case. Standard preferences— of the kind used widely in economics to study consumption, asset pricing, and labor supply—imply that health spending is a superior good with an income elasticity well above one. As people get richer and consumption rises, the marginal utility of consumption falls rapidly. Spending on health to extend life allows individuals to purchase additional periods of utility. The marginal utility of life extension does not decline. As a result, the optimal composition of total spending shifts toward health, and the health share grows along with income. In projections based on the quantitative analysis of our model, the optimal health share of spending seems likely to exceed 30 percent by the middle of the century.

822 citations

Frequently Asked Questions (1)
Q1. What are the contributions mentioned in the paper "A closed-form solution for the health capital model" ?

This paper provides a closed-form solution for the health capital model of health demand.