scispace - formally typeset

Journal ArticleDOI

A comparative analysis reveals little evidence for niche conservatism in aquatic macrophytes among four areas on two continents

01 Jan 2017-Oikos (Wiley/Blackwell (10.1111))-Vol. 126, Iss: 1, pp 136-148

TL;DR: The results suggest that niche shifts, rather than different environmental conditions, were responsible for variable responses of aquatic macrophytes to local ecological variables, which highlights the need to study niche conservatism using local-scale data to better understand whether species' niches are conserved.

AbstractOne of the most intriguing questions in current ecology is the extent to which the ecological niches of species are conserved in space and time. Niche conservatism has mostly been studied using coarse-scale data of species' distributions, although it is at the local habitat scales where species' responses to ecological variables primarily take place. We investigated the extent to which niches of aquatic macrophytes are conserved among four study regions (i.e. Finland, Sweden and the US states of Minnesota and Wisconsin) on two continents (i.e. Europe and North America) using data for 11 species common to all the four study areas. We studied how ecological variables (i.e. local, climate and spatial variables) explain variation in the distributions of these common species in the four areas using species distribution modelling. In addition, we examined whether species' niche parameters vary among the study regions. Our results revealed large variation in both species' responses to the studied ecological variables and in species' niche parameters among the areas. We found little evidence for niche conservatism in aquatic macrophytes, though local environmental conditions among the studied areas were largely similar. This suggests that niche shifts, rather than different environmental conditions, were responsible for variable responses of aquatic macrophytes to local ecological variables. Local habitat niches of aquatic macrophytes are mainly driven by variations in local environmental conditions, whereas their climate niches are more or less conserved among regions. This highlights the need to study niche conservatism using local-scale data to better understand whether species' niches are conserved, because different niches (e.g. local versus climate) operating at various scales may show different degrees of conservatism. The extent to which species' niches are truly conserved has wide practical implications, including for instance, predicting changes in species' distributions in response to global change.

Topics: Ecological niche (66%), Environmental niche modelling (65%), Niche (58%), Common species (55%), Habitat (50%)

Summary (2 min read)

INTRODUCTION

  • Different niche concepts exist (e.g., Hutchinson 1957) , including fundamental, realised and existing fundamental niches (see review by Chase and Leibold 2003) .
  • Fine-grained data enables evaluating effects of the Eltonian noise hypothesis (Soberón and Nakamura 2009) .
  • The authors study examines whether or not niches of aquatic macrophytes are conserved between different geographical areas.

Study areas and macrophyte species

  • These four distinct study areas show a clear east-west orientation.
  • In addition to these major climatic differences, both Finland and Minnesota have harsher climate conditions than Sweden and Wisconsin.
  • In addition, many aquatic macrophytes are known to have efficient dispersal abilities, and often aggressively colonize new habitats (Santamaria 2002) .
  • Species' prevalence varied among the areas and was often similar between geographically neighbouring study areas (Table S2 ).

Explanatory variables

  • Explanatory data consisted of lake-specific local, climate and spatial variables (Table S1 ).
  • In Finland, water chemistry comprised of median values of 1-m surface water samples taken during the growing season (June-September) over the period 2000-2008.
  • Spatial variables originated from db-MEMs, were orthogonal (linearly independent) and were obtained from spectral decomposition of a truncated distance matrix of the spatial relationships among sampling locations.
  • The authors used geographic coordinates of lake centres to calculate Euclidean distances between lakes, and only positive eigenvectors were employed in additional analyses.
  • These spatial eigenvectors are specific for each study region, thus cannot be directly compared across the different regions.

Statistical analyses

  • The authors used two methods to test for differences in mean environmental conditions and heterogeneity of environmental conditions among the study areas.
  • These analyses were done separately for standardized values of "local", "climate" and "combined local-climate" variable groups.
  • Significance of among-study area differences was tested through permutation of least-squares residuals.
  • In the ordinal approach, the authors evaluated whether local and climate niches vary among the same 11 species across the study areas using Outlying Mean Index analysis (OMI, Dolédec et al. 2000) .

Response of macrophyte species to ecological variables in different study areas

  • Contrary to their expectations, the same macrophyte species responded differently to ecological variables in the four study areas (Table 1 ).
  • Only 3 (Ceratophyllum demersum, Phalaris arundinacea and Phragmites australis) of the 11 species studied were primarily affected by the same major ecological gradient over all the four study areas based on the variation partitioning procedure.
  • These results emphasise that local variables dominate over climate constraints in affecting the distributions of aquatic macrophyte species at regional extents.
  • The importance of local and climate variables on the studied species' distributions varied strongly across study areas.
  • Spatial variables with both large and small eigenvalues (SV1-SV20), indicating broad-and fine-scale variation in spatial structure, were the most influential for the studied species in Finland, Sweden and Minnesota.

Niche parameters: differences among species and among areas

  • Niche positions did not remain relatively similar in different study areas, and niche breaths were not especially wide for all species in all study areas (Table 3 ).
  • The niche positions were correlated among study areas, but correlations found for niche breadths among the study areas were low (Table 4 ).
  • In general, niche positions within each continent were positively correlated; however, correlations were negative between the continents.
  • For the niche breadths, species' values for Finland and Sweden were weakly positively correlated based on local, climate or combined localclimate conditions.
  • Other relationships varied incongruently among the study areas.

DISCUSSION

  • Species' niches and dispersal-related processes have recently been considered when studying niche conservatism in relation to their geographic distributions (Soberón 2007 , Godsoe 2010 , Peterson 2011) .
  • Only 3 of the 11 species studied were primarily affected by the same pure component across all the study areas based on the variation partitioning procedure.
  • The influence of alkalinity on macrophytes is related to the use of bicarbonate (HCO3 -) as a source of carbon for submerged species, directly influencing photosynthesis, growth and long-term survival (Rørslett 1991, Vestergaard and Sand-Jensen 2000) .
  • Previous niche conservatism studies have mostly examined shifts in climate niches (Hawkins et al. 2014 , Wasof et al. 2015) ; however, the authors found that climate variables contributed less than local variables to the distribution of aquatic macrophytes.
  • Spatial processes were, quite unexpectedly, also rather important for many macrophyte species.

Niche shifts or conservatism?

  • The authors found surprisingly little evidence for niche conservatism in the distributions of the 11 macrophyte species among the four study areas.
  • This finding suggests that the same species may have a wide niche breadth and/or non-marginal niche position in one area and a narrow niche breadth or marginal niche position in another area relative to the niches of the other species studied.
  • Thus, different responses of the same species to local environmental conditions may not be due to differences in environmental heterogeneity among the study areas, but rather, are more likely due to region-specific niche shifts in aquatic macrophytes in relation to local environmental conditions.
  • Alternatively, the environmental conditions across the study area are taken into account, and the environments available to the species are used differently between various regions.
  • More research is needed, however, to confirm assumptions because phenotypically plastic species traits causing incongruent results across their study areas can theoretically still be evolutionarily conserved.

Did you find this useful? Give us your feedback

...read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

1
A comparative analysis reveals little evidence for niche conservatism in aquatic
1
macrophytes among four areas on two continents
2
3
Janne Alahuhta
1, 2*
, Frauke Ecke
3
, Lucinda B. Johnson
4
, Laura Sass
5
and Jani Heino
6
4
5
1
University of Oulu, Department of Geography, FI-90014 University of Oulu, Finland,
6
2
Finnish Environment Institute, Freshwater Centre, FI-90014 Oulu, Finland
7
3
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment,
8
SWE-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
9
4
University of Minnesota Duluth, Natural Resources Research Institute, 5013 Miller Trunk
10
Highway, Duluth, MN 55811, USA
11
5
Illinois Natural History Survey, Prairie Research Institute, University of Illinois, 1816 South Oak
12
Street, Champaign, IL 61820, USA
13
6
Finnish Environment Institute, Natural Environment Centre, Biodiversity, FI-90014 Oulu, Finland
14
15
*Correspondence: Janne Alahuhta, University of Oulu, Department of Geography, P.O. Box 3000,
16
FI-90014, University of Oulu, Finland.
17
E-mail: janne.alahuhta@oulu.fi
18
19
20
21
22
23

2
SUMMARY
24
One of the most intriguing questions in current ecology is the extent to which the ecological niches
25
of species are conserved in space and time. Niche conservatism has mostly been studied using
26
coarse-scale data of species distributions, although it is at the local habitat scales where species
27
responses to ecological variables primarily take place. We investigated the extent to which niches of
28
aquatic macrophytes are conserved among four study regions (i.e., Finland, Sweden and the US
29
states of Minnesota and Wisconsin) on two continents (i.e., Europe and North America) using data
30
for 11 species common to all the four study areas. We studied how ecological variables (i.e., local,
31
climate and spatial variables) explain variation in the distributions of these common species in the
32
four areas using species distribution modelling. In addition, we examined whether species niche
33
parameters vary among the study regions. Our results revealed large variation in both species
34
responses to the studied ecological variables and in species’ niche parameters among the areas. We
35
found little evidence for niche conservatism in aquatic macrophytes, though local environmental
36
conditions among the studied areas were largely similar. This suggests that niche shifts, rather than
37
different environmental conditions, were responsible for variable responses of aquatic macrophytes
38
to local ecological variables. Local habitat niches of aquatic macrophytes are mainly driven by
39
variations in local environmental conditions, whereas their climate niches are more or less
40
conserved among regions. This highlights the need to study niche conservatism using local-scale
41
data to better understand whether species niches are conserved, because different niches (e.g., local
42
vs. climate) operating at various scales may show different degrees of conservatism. The extent to
43
which species niches are truly conserved has wide practical implications, including for instance,
44
predicting changes in species’ distributions in response to global change.
45
46
47

3
INTRODUCTION
48
49
The extent to which ecological niches of species are conserved in space and time has important
50
implications for a wide variety of biogeographical, ecological and evolutionary questions (Wiens
51
and Graham 2005, Pearman et al. 2008, Warren et al. 2008). These questions range from ecological
52
specialization to predicting changes in species distributions under global change (Wiens et al.
53
2010, Peterson 2011). For example, the reliability of predictions provided by species distribution
54
modelling is questionable if niche shifts have truly taken place in different areas (Bennett et al.
55
2010, Wiens et al. 2005, Wiens et al. 2010). The concept of niche conservatism assumes that a
56
niche of a species remains unchanged or changes only slowly over hundreds to millions of years
57
(Wiens and Graham 2005, Pearman et al. 2008). Furthermore, it assumes environmentally
58
unsuitable conditions can limit a species’ geographic range when niche conservatism prevails
59
(Wiens et al. 2010). Although this concept was coined relatively recently (Peterson et al. 1999), the
60
idea of ecological niche dates back to the early 20th century (Grinnell 1917, Elton 1927). Different
61
niche concepts exist (e.g., Hutchinson 1957), including fundamental, realised and existing
62
fundamental niches (see review by Chase and Leibold 2003). A fundamental niche describes the
63
environmental conditions and resources that a species is potentially able to use, whereas the realised
64
niche represents the part of the fundamental niche that the species actually occupies as a result of
65
biotic interactions (e.g., predation, competition and parasitism). The existing fundamental niche is
66
the portion of the fundamental niche that is represented across the area accessible to the species
67
(Peterson et al. 2011).
68
69
Niche conservatism, in relation to the geographical distributions of species, is typically studied
70
using coarse grid-based data of species ranges at broad spatial extents (Hawkins et al. 2014, Wasof
71

4
et al. 2015), while niche shifts in space and time are less frequently investigated using fine-grained
72
data (i.e., samples from local ecosystems) at broad spatial extents (but see Bennett et al. 2010,
73
Valdujo et al. 2013; Wasof et al. 2013). The ready availability of spatial data at medium to coarse
74
scales provides the opportunity to examine niche conservatism with respect to climatic variation
75
(Broennimann et al. 2007, Hawkins et al. 2014, Wasof et al. 2015); however, local habitat niche
76
studies require fine scale data not available across large regions. Fine-grained data enables
77
evaluating effects of the Eltonian noise hypothesis (Soberón and Nakamura 2009). This hypothesis
78
predicts that ecological interactions and species effects on resources define individual distributions
79
at fine spatial scales, whereas coarse-scaled abiotic factors structure distributions at broader scales.
80
81
Local-scale habitat variables can strongly affect species niche shifts even at broad spatial scales,
82
because it is the local habitat to which species respond in the first place (e.g. Wasof et al. 2013).
83
The phenomenon is exemplified by water acidity-related niches of freshwater diatoms which are
84
conserved across continents (Bennett et al. 2010). In many freshwater systems, local water
85
chemistry and habitat structure contribute equally or more strongly than climate to species
86
distributions and community structure at broad spatial extents (Sharma et al. 2011, Alahuhta 2015).
87
These local habitat variables are also essential in determining species niche parameters, because
88
ecological gradients across freshwater ecosystems are often strong. For example, wide variation in
89
influential chemical and physical characteristics typically exists within a small geographical area
90
(Elser et al. 2007), and species respond to these major environmental gradients (Bennett et al. 2010,
91
Sharma et al. 2011, Alahuhta and Heino 2013). Typically, researchers are interested in knowing
92
how species niche positions and niche breadths vary in relation to local habitat variables
93
(Boulangeat et al. 2012, Wasof et al. 2013, Heino and Grönroos 2014), and potential niche shifts
94
can be observed from differences in these habitat niche parameters for the same species across
95

5
different areas (Ackerly 2003). Species niches are probably conserved if the distribution-
96
environment relationships are relatively similar for the same species across different study areas.
97
98
Recently, dispersal has also been included in the set of important processes affecting the
99
relationship between realised niches and geographical distributions (Soberón 2007, Soberón and
100
Nakamura 2009, Godsoe 2010, Peterson 2011). Dispersal is incorporated in the concept of spatial
101
processes, which depending on their dispersal abilities and possible geographical barriers allows
102
species to track variation in suitable habitats (Heino and de Mendoza, 2016). Species disperse
103
among suitable habitats that are structured as a network of habitat patches, varying in area, degree
104
of isolation and quality, surrounded by unsuitable habitats in the landscape (Hanski 1998, Leibold et
105
al. 2004). Spatial processes can constrain species responses to environmental variability, thus
106
relating directly to niche conservatism (Wiens et al. 2010). Spatial processes are especially
107
important in lake systems, because adaptation to living in water leads to the formation of well-
108
delimited populations surrounded by an inhospitable terrestrial matrix (Dahlgren and Ehrlén 2005,
109
Hortal et al. 2014). Lake macrophytes are a particularly suitable organismal group for the study of
110
spatial variability because these plants cannot actively move and have strong spatial structure even
111
within lake habitats (Nilsson et al. 2010, Arthaud et al. 2013). To date, it has been assumed that the
112
ecological niches of aquatic macrophytes remain unchanged in space (Chambers et al. 2008),
113
although no actual study has investigated whether or not the niches of aquatic macrophytes are
114
conserved at broad spatial extents.
115
116
Our study examines whether or not niches of aquatic macrophytes are conserved between different
117
geographical areas. Our primary aim is to investigate how ecological variables (i.e., local, climate
118
and spatial) explain variation in the distributions of common aquatic macrophyte species in four
119

Figures (5)
Citations
More filters

Journal ArticleDOI
Abstract: Additional co-authors: Gana Gecheva, Patrick Grillas, Jennifer Hauxwell, Seppo Hellsten, Jan Hjort, Mark V. Hoyer, Agnieszka Kolada, Minna Kuoppala, Torben Lauridsen, En‒Hua Li, Balazs A. Lukacs, Marit Mjelde, Alison Mikulyuk, Roger P. Mormul, Jun Nishihiro, Beat Oertli, Laila Rhazi, Mouhssine Rhazi, Laura Sass, Christine Schranz, Martin Sondergaard, Takashi Yamanouchi, Qing Yu, Haijun Wang, Xiao‒Ke Zhang, Jani Heino

85 citations


Cites background from "A comparative analysis reveals litt..."

  • ...…related to, for example, ecosystem functioning (Symstad et al., 2003) and resilience (Folke et al., 2004), biogeographical regionalization (Divisek et al., 2016), niche conservatism (Alahuhta et al., 2017), species conservation (Brooks et al., 2008) and ecosystem services (Naidoo et al., 2008)....

    [...]

  • ..., 2016), niche conservatism (Alahuhta et al., 2017), species conservation (Brooks et al....

    [...]


Journal ArticleDOI
Abstract: In the era of the Anthropocene, environmental change is accelerating biodiversity loss across ecosystems on Earth, among which freshwaters are likely the most threatened. Different biodiversity fac...

30 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The results supported the notion that ecological niches evolved independently of phylogeny in macrophyte lineages worldwide and showed that large-scale processes along latitudinal and elevational gradients have left a strong footprint in the current diversity patterns and community-environment relationships in lake macrophytes.
Abstract: Documenting the patterns of biological diversity on Earth has always been a central challenge in macroecology and biogeography. However, for the diverse group of freshwater plants, such research program is still in its infancy. Here, we examined global variation in taxonomic, functional and phylogenetic beta diversity patterns of lake macrophytes using regional data from six continents. A data set of ca. 480 lake macrophyte community observations, together with climatic, geographical and environmental variables, was compiled across 16 regions worldwide. We (a) built the very first phylogeny comprising most freshwater plant lineages; (b) exploited a wide array of functional traits that are important to macrophyte autoecology or that relate to lake ecosystem functioning; (c) assessed if different large-scale beta diversity patterns show a clear latitudinal gradient from the equator to the poles using null models; and (d) employed evolutionary and regression models to first identify the degree to which the studied functional traits show a phylogenetic signal, and then to estimate community-environment relationships at multiple spatial scales. Our results supported the notion that ecological niches evolved independently of phylogeny in macrophyte lineages worldwide. We also showed that taxonomic and phylogenetic beta diversity followed the typical global trend with higher diversity in the tropics. In addition, we were able to confirm that species, multi-trait and lineage compositions were first and foremost structured by climatic conditions at relatively broad spatial scales. Perhaps more importantly, we showed that large-scale processes along latitudinal and elevational gradients have left a strong footprint in the current diversity patterns and community-environment relationships in lake macrophytes. Overall, our results stress the need for an integrative approach to macroecology, biogeography and conservation biology, combining multiple diversity facets at different spatial scales.

18 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
Abstract: The biodiversity of aquatic ecosystems is under threat and there is an urgent need to quantify the various facets of biodiversity to assess the conservation value of freshwater ecosystems. The effects of taxonomic relatedness have so far not been taken into account in biodiversity assessments of lake macrophytes. We therefore tested the response of species richness and average taxonomic distinctness (AvTD) of aquatic macrophytes along environmental gradients using linear regression models and Bayesian Information Criterion variable selection method. We selected data from four regions, each with 50–60 lakes, situated in northern Europe (Finland and Sweden) and northern America (Minnesota and Wisconsin). We separately studied all macrophyte species, hydrophytes and helophytes. Species richness and AvTD of aquatic macrophytes were generally negatively related in all regions, although it was not statistically significant. Both biodiversity measures responded to environmental gradients to various degrees among the studied macrophyte groups and regions. Species richness was best explained by alkalinity and lake area in Finland, by elevation, annual mean temperature and total phosphorus in Minnesota, and by alkalinity in Wisconsin. AvTD was best explained by alkalinity, annual mean temperature and total phosphorus in Finland and by alkalinity in Wisconsin. Very weak relationships were found in Sweden. Our findings strongly suggest that complementary indices are needed to indicate more comprehensively the effects of environmental conditions on freshwater biodiversity. Species richness was found to be a better measure than AvTD to account for conservation value in freshwaters. However, further research is required to evaluate the usefulness of AvTD to indicate conservation value (e.g. randomisation tests), because alternative measures are clearly needed for those freshwater taxa lacking complete information on true phylogenetic diversity.

13 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Investigating the dispersal capacity of species, namely their LDD potential, may contribute to estimate the likelihood of species to keep pace with climate change.
Abstract: The persistence of species may depend upon their capacity to keep pace with climate change. However, dispersal has been ignored in the vast majority of studies that aimed at estimating and predicting range shifts as a response to climate change. Long distance dispersal (LDD) in particular might promote rapid range shifts and allow species to track suitable habitat. Many aquatic plant species are dispersed by birds and have the potential to be dispersed over hundreds of kilometers during the bird migration seasons. I argue that such dispersal potential might be critical to allow species to track climate change happening at unprecedented high rates. As a case study, I used dispersal data from three aquatic plant species dispersed by migratory birds to model range shifts in response to climate change projections. By comparing four dispersal scenarios - (1) no dispersal, (2) unlimited dispersal, (3) LDD < 100 km, and (4) LDD mediated by bird migratory movements -, it was shown that, for bird-mediated dispersal, the rate of colonization is sufficient to counterbalance the rate of habitat loss. The estimated rates of colonization (3.2-31.5 km⋅year-1) are higher than, for example, the rate of global warming (previously estimated at 0.42 km⋅year-1). Although further studies are needed, the results suggest that these aquatic plant species can adjust their ranges under a severe climate change scenario. Therefore, investigating the dispersal capacity of species, namely their LDD potential, may contribute to estimate the likelihood of species to keep pace with climate change.

12 citations


Cites background from "A comparative analysis reveals litt..."

  • ...Another line of evidence comes from a recent study showing that the niche of aquatic plants is not conserved among different regions (Alahuhta et al., 2017)....

    [...]


References
More filters

Journal ArticleDOI
Abstract: We developed interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas (excluding Antarctica) at a spatial resolution of 30 arc s (often referred to as 1-km spatial resolution). The climate elements considered were monthly precipitation and mean, minimum, and maximum temperature. Input data were gathered from a variety of sources and, where possible, were restricted to records from the 1950–2000 period. We used the thin-plate smoothing spline algorithm implemented in the ANUSPLIN package for interpolation, using latitude, longitude, and elevation as independent variables. We quantified uncertainty arising from the input data and the interpolation by mapping weather station density, elevation bias in the weather stations, and elevation variation within grid cells and through data partitioning and cross validation. Elevation bias tended to be negative (stations lower than expected) at high latitudes but positive in the tropics. Uncertainty is highest in mountainous and in poorly sampled areas. Data partitioning showed high uncertainty of the surfaces on isolated islands, e.g. in the Pacific. Aggregating the elevation and climate data to 10 arc min resolution showed an enormous variation within grid cells, illustrating the value of high-resolution surfaces. A comparison with an existing data set at 10 arc min resolution showed overall agreement, but with significant variation in some regions. A comparison with two high-resolution data sets for the United States also identified areas with large local differences, particularly in mountainous areas. Compared to previous global climatologies, ours has the following advantages: the data are at a higher spatial resolution (400 times greater or more); more weather station records were used; improved elevation data were used; and more information about spatial patterns of uncertainty in the data is available. Owing to the overall low density of available climate stations, our surfaces do not capture of all variation that may occur at a resolution of 1 km, particularly of precipitation in mountainous areas. In future work, such variation might be captured through knowledgebased methods and inclusion of additional co-variates, particularly layers obtained through remote sensing. Copyright  2005 Royal Meteorological Society.

16,411 citations




Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Various facets of such multimodel inference are presented here, particularly methods of model averaging, which can be derived as a non-Bayesian result.
Abstract: The model selection literature has been generally poor at reflecting the deep foundations of the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and at making appropriate comparisons to the Bayesian information...

7,541 citations


"A comparative analysis reveals litt..." refers result in this paper

  • ...Although the BIC is recommended 289 for data sets with a higher number of observations than in our data (Burnham and Anderson 2004), 290 parsimonious models helped us to compare the results across study areas....

    [...]

  • ...13 for data sets with a higher number of observations than in our data (Burnham and Anderson 2004), 290 parsimonious models helped us to compare the results across study areas....

    [...]


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A review of predictive habitat distribution modeling is presented, which shows that a wide array of models has been developed to cover aspects as diverse as biogeography, conservation biology, climate change research, and habitat or species management.
Abstract: With the rise of new powerful statistical techniques and GIS tools, the development of predictive habitat distribution models has rapidly increased in ecology. Such models are static and probabilistic in nature, since they statistically relate the geographical distribution of species or communities to their present environment. A wide array of models has been developed to cover aspects as diverse as biogeography, conservation biology, climate change research, and habitat or species management. In this paper, we present a review of predictive habitat distribution modeling. The variety of statistical techniques used is growing. Ordinary multiple regression and its generalized form (GLM) are very popular and are often used for modeling species distributions. Other methods include neural networks, ordination and classification methods, Bayesian models, locally weighted approaches (e.g. GAM), environmental envelopes or even combinations of these models. The selection of an appropriate method should not depend solely on statistical considerations. Some models are better suited to reflect theoretical findings on the shape and nature of the species’ response (or realized niche). Conceptual considerations include e.g. the trade-off between optimizing accuracy versus optimizing generality. In the field of static distribution modeling, the latter is mostly related to selecting appropriate predictor variables and to designing an appropriate procedure for model selection. New methods, including threshold-independent measures (e.g. receiver operating characteristic (ROC)-plots) and resampling techniques (e.g. bootstrap, cross-validation) have been introduced in ecology for testing the accuracy of predictive models. The choice of an evaluation measure should be driven primarily by the goals of the study. This may possibly lead to the attribution of different weights to the various types of prediction errors (e.g. omission, commission or confusion). Testing the model in a wider range of situations (in space and time) will permit one to define the range of applications for which the model predictions are suitable. In turn, the qualification of the model depends primarily on the goals of the study that define the qualification criteria and on the usability of the model, rather than on statistics alone. © 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

6,248 citations


"A comparative analysis reveals litt..." refers methods in this paper

  • ...Variation explained by each variable group was evaluated with deviance 284 statistics and based on adjusted D2, equivalent to adjusted R2, which provides unbiased estimates of 285 the explained variation (Guisan and Zimmermann 2000)....

    [...]

  • ...Variation explained by each variable group was evaluated with deviance 284 statistics and based on adjusted D(2), equivalent to adjusted R(2), which provides unbiased estimates of 285 the explained variation (Guisan and Zimmermann 2000)....

    [...]


Frequently Asked Questions (1)
Q1. What are the contributions in this paper?

Alahuhta et al. this paper, Frauke Ecke, Lucinda B. Johnson, Laura Sass and Jani Heino studied macrophytes among four areas on two continents.