scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal Article•DOI•

A Comprehensive Stakeholder-Typology Model Based on Salience Attributes in Construction Projects

Amir Bahadorestani1, Jan Terje Karlsen2, Nasser Motahari Farimani1•
Ferdowsi University of Mashhad1, BI Norwegian Business School2
01 Sep 2019-Journal of Construction Engineering and Management-asce (American Society of Civil Engineers)-Vol. 145, Iss: 9, pp 04019048
TL;DR: In this paper, a comprehensive project stakeholder typology model (PSTM) based on stakeholder salience attributes (SSAs) is presented. And stakeholders are considered as one of the major pillars of the project.
Abstract: This article presents a comprehensive project stakeholder typology model (PSTM) based on stakeholder salience attributes (SSAs). Stakeholders are considered as one of the major pillars of c...

Summary (2 min read)

Jump to: [Introduction] – [If the components of attribute “A” could not be assigned to another attribute and the components] – [Developing TAM attributes] – [Project Stakeholder Typology Model (PSTM)] and [Discussion and conclusion]

Introduction

  • This paper is about stakeholder typology in construction projects.
  • There exist a number of models, frameworks and methods with classifying stakeholder salience attributes (SSAs) and stakeholder typology as a central (Aapaoja & Haapasalo, 2014; Yu & Leung, 2018).
  • Comparing previous studies reveals the fact that the various SSAs are included in some models but not mentioned in others.
  • In step 3 a combination of survey and semi-structured interviews were performed to determine the assignment degrees between each component and each attribute.

If the components of attribute “A” could not be assigned to another attribute and the components

  • Of other attributes could not be assigned to the attribute “A”, it is said that the attribute “A” has a clear and accurate boundary.
  • The numbers inside the parentheses in Table 7 show the average of the semi-structured interview method findings.
  • As previously mentioned, the purpose of this paper is to identify stakeholder salience attributes (SSAs) that have a clear, accurate, and non-overlapping boundary and to develop a comprehensive project stakeholder typology model (PSTM) based on the SSAs.
  • The Delphi method is an iterative process where the facilitators are obtaining expert opinions in several iterative rounds.
  • The authors findings from the Venn diagram also highlights that if a component is shared in two attributes, it should be assigned to the attribute with the highest assignment degree.

Developing TAM attributes

  • Mitchell et al. (1997) has stated several definitions of “power” from researchers and theorists; however, he did not offer a single definition of this attribute, also known as Power.
  • After a careful investigation of the four attributes and all of the components in this study, it was realized that all components offered by Mitchell et al. (1997) are found in three attributes “power”, “impact”, and “influence”.
  • On the other hand, “power” is a subset of “impact” and “influence” and the attributes of “influence” and “impact” can define “power” in a broader sense.
  • In comparison with the TAM, this attribute is wider in the new model.
  • In addition to the components expressed by Mitchell et al. (1997), the new attribute includes other components and is introduced as “Legitimacy” but with a wider definition in the new model.

Project Stakeholder Typology Model (PSTM)

  • Mitchell et al. (1997) have not included the attribute of “Proximity” in their model for the purpose of determining the importance of stakeholders and their positions but a part of the attribute of “Proximity” is embedded in the context of “Legitimacy” in the TAM (Fig. 2).
  • Each area shows the type of stakeholder with regard to the possession of SSAs.
  • This study offers the PSTM as the core of stakeholder-related research and actions in construction industry.
  • To analyze, identify and manage project stakeholders, all four attributes are necessary: “Potency”, “Legitimacy”, “Urgency”, and “Proximity”.
  • Table 11 shows these groups with their considerations.

Discussion and conclusion

  • The existence of crudity and turbulence in the literature of stakeholder analysis, identification and management is quite obvious in construction industry.
  • The authors also found that two the attributes “support” and “power” are subsets of attributes “impact” and “influence” and thus should not be considered as independent attributes.
  • This paper presented a comprehensive project stakeholder typology model (PSTM), which contains all four attributes “Potency”, “Legitimacy”, “Urgency”, and “Proximity” and their components can be used for managing stakeholders in construction projects.
  • The reason is that the authors have applied all attributes from literature to analyze and redefine the complete and non-overlapping SSAs, and therefore, PSTM specifies different types of stakeholders more accurate and in more details.

Did you find this useful? Give us your feedback

Figures (14)

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal Article•DOI•
Social sustainability considerations in construction project feasibility study: a stakeholder salience perspective

[...]

Ashish Goel1, L.S. Ganesh, Arshinder Kaur•
Indian Institute of Technology Madras1
18 May 2020-Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management
TL;DR: In this paper, social sustainability considerations related to occupational health and safety, workers' employment practices and proactive involvement of communities and end-users were found to be inadequately addressed in feasibility study reports.
Abstract: Past research recommends integration of social sustainability (SS) considerations in construction project feasibility study for benefitting a larger group of project stakeholders. However, there is a lack of empirical evidence to this effect, especially from the developing economies. The purpose of this study is to address this knowledge gap through a SS-centric analysis of feasibility study reports using a stakeholder salience perspective.,Feasibility study reports for 61 projects were obtained from various government organizations in India. The SS considerations were identified in the reports using a combination of quantitative and qualitative assessments. The former was based on content analysis and the latter was conducted using “VOSviewer” text analysis software.,SS considerations related to occupational health and safety, workers' employment practices and proactive involvement of communities and end-users were found to be inadequately addressed in the reports. Based on occurrences of the SS considerations, project-affected community was found to be the most salient stakeholder, followed by the end-users and the construction workers. Statistical analysis revealed significant relationship between the SS considerations and the type of project as well as the type of project delivery system.,This study contributes to better understanding of integrating SS considerations in feasibility study of construction projects. Its results provide useful inputs to decision-makers for orienting construction projects, right from the early phases, towards benefitting the disadvantaged and weaker stakeholders irrespective of their salience attributes. In developing economies, such interventions may improve quality of lives of a large number of project stakeholders and also cultivate a positive societal image of the construction industry as a respectful, ethical and employee friendly industry.

23 citations

Journal Article•DOI•
The antecedents of construction project change: an analysis of design and build procurement application

[...]

Jessica Smith, David J. Edwards, Igor Martek, Nicholas Chileshe, Susan Hayhow, Chris Roberts 
26 Feb 2021-Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology
TL;DR: In this article, the causal nexus of change during the construction phase is assessed and delineated; the key affecting factors are thematically grouped under headings: extent and severity; time in relation to implementing; instigating party; individual(s) responsible for managing the change; reason for the change, available resource; recoverable or non-recoverable; contract / project type; type of client.
Abstract: Purpose: This research seeks to excoriate, define and delineate the main drivers of ‘change’ in commercial construction projects and generate guidelines on how to minimise exposure to the associated adverse effects upon project stakeholders. Methodology: The research adopts mixed doctrines through a combination of epistemological lenses, embracing two primary philosophical stances: (i) interpretivism, to identify the primary drivers of change based on a systematic literature review and (ii) a post-positivist, inductive approach to analyse the results of change within a Joint Contracts Tribunal (JCT) Design and Build (D&B) construction project case study. Findings: The causal nexus of change during the construction phase is assessed and delineated; the key affecting factors are thematically grouped under headings: extent and severity; time in relation to implementing; instigating party; individual(s) responsible for managing the change; reason for the change; available resource; recoverable or non-recoverable; contract / project type; type of client. Following this, the effects of change on key elements of the project are encapsulated and recommendations for adaptations which may provide improved experiences are offered. Originality: The study tackles the common issue of managing the deleterious effects of change on commercial construction projects, defining management techniques to minimise stakeholder tribulation.

23 citations

Journal Article•DOI•
Monopoly with corporate social responsibility, product differentiation, and environmental R&D: Implications for economic, environmental, and social sustainability

[...]

Chenyu Wang1•
Hunan University1
10 Mar 2021-Journal of Cleaner Production
TL;DR: In this article, the authors develop a numerical simulation model and explore the implications for economic, environmental, and social sustainability when the monopolist is characterized by corporate social responsibility (CSR), product differentiation, and environmental RD.

16 citations

Journal Article•DOI•
Asymmetric legitimacy perception across megaproject stakeholders: The case of the Fehmarnbelt Fixed Link

[...]

Petr Witz1, Petr Witz2, Verena Stingl2, Verena Stingl3, Morten Wied2, Josef Oehmen2 •
Charles University in Prague1, Technical University of Denmark2, Aalborg University3
01 May 2021-International Journal of Project Management
TL;DR: In this article, the authors conduct a multi-site ethnography at one of the biggest contemporary cross-border transport megaprojects in the world and suggest three dimensions of project legitimacy perception: trust, majority, and morality.

16 citations

Journal Article•DOI•
Fuzzy Evaluation of the Factors Contributing to the Success of External Stakeholder Management in Construction

[...]

Goodenough D. Oppong1, Albert P.C. Chan1, Ernest Effah Ameyaw2, Samuel Frimpong3, Ayirebi Dansoh4 •
Hong Kong Polytechnic University1, Northumbria University2, University of New South Wales3, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology4
01 Nov 2021-Journal of Construction Engineering and Management-asce
TL;DR: In this article, the authors evaluate the factors contributing to the success of external stakeholder management at the project planning stage from the perspective of developing countries, focusing on evaluating the factors that contribute to the development of SM.
Abstract: The study focuses on evaluating the factors contributing to the success of external stakeholder management (SM) at the project planning stage from the perspective of developing countries. Q...

13 citations

References
More filters
Journal Article•DOI•
Investigating the awareness and application of sustainable construction concept by Malaysian developers

[...]

Nazirah Zainul Abidin1•
Universiti Sains Malaysia1
01 Oct 2010-Habitat International
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors investigate the level of awareness, knowledge and implementation of sustainable practices based on the perceptions of the project developers in Malaysia, and conclude that only large developers are beginning to take heed towards sustainable implementation in their projects.

366 citations

Journal Article•DOI•
Stakeholder theory: issues to resolve

[...]

Emerson Wagner Mainardes1, Helena Alves1, Mário Raposo1•
University of Beira Interior1
08 Mar 2011-Management Decision
TL;DR: In this article, the main issues driving the stakeholder theory academic debate are discussed and a research agenda is proposed with the objective of clarifying doubts and resolving the controversies ongoing among academics.
Abstract: Purpose – The objective of this paper is to collate and debate the main issues driving the stakeholder theory academic debate.Design/methodology/approach – First, a discussion of the stakeholder concept is set out before moving on to the history and nature of stakeholder theory. The work proceeds with an attempt to bring together systematically the points of divergence among researchers interested in stakeholder theory, and, finally, there is a brief discussion of these theoretical loopholes in conjunction with a proposed research agenda for the field.Findings – Based on the unification of the theoretically problematic issues, research agenda are put forward with the objective of clarifying doubts and resolving the controversies ongoing among academics. As regards the formulation of stakeholder theory, one question requiring resolution is that of the stakeholder concept itself. Additionally, further research should focus on the boundaries as to what constitutes a stakeholder group as well as defining the ...

327 citations

Journal Article•DOI•
Stakeholder Salience Revisited: Refining, Redefining, and Refueling an Underdeveloped Conceptual Tool

[...]

Benjamin A. Neville1, Simon J. Bell1, Gregory J. Whitwell1•
University of Melbourne1
26 Feb 2011-Journal of Business Ethics
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors revisited and further developed Mitchell et al.'s (1997) theory of stakeholder identification and salience, and argued that urgency is not relevant for identifying stakeholders, and that it is primarily the moral legitimacy of the stakeholder's claim that applies to stakeholder salience.
Abstract: This article revisits and further develops Mitchell et al.’s (Acad Manag Rev 22(4):853–886, 1997) theory of stakeholder identification and salience. Stakeholder salience holds considerable unrealized potential for understanding how organizations may best manage multiple stakeholder relationships. While the salience framework has been cited numerous times, attempts to develop it further have been relatively limited. We begin by reviewing the key contributions of other researchers. We then identify and seek to resolve three residual weaknesses in Mitchell et al.’s (1997) framework, thereby strengthening its foundations for further development. We argue, first, that urgency is not relevant for identifying stakeholders; second, that it is primarily the moral legitimacy of the stakeholder’s claim that applies to stakeholder salience; and last, that the salience of stakeholders will vary as the degrees of the attributes vary. These insights inform revised definitions of stakeholder salience and legitimacy, and necessitate a new theoretical underpinning for the role of legitimacy. Finally, we present an extensive agenda for future research with the objective of refueling research in stakeholder salience.

232 citations

Journal Article•DOI•
Investigating the use of the stakeholder notion in project management literature, a meta-analysis

[...]

Marjolein C. Achterkamp, Janita F.J. Vos
01 Oct 2008-International Journal of Project Management
TL;DR: In this paper, a meta-analysis of project management literature is performed to investigate how the stakeholder notion is used in this literature and find that only a minority of the publications provide a clear definition and address the identification of stakeholders.

219 citations

Journal Article•DOI•
Stakeholder Theory Classification: A Theoretical and Empirical Evaluation of Definitions

[...]

Samantha Miles1•
Oxford Brookes University1
01 May 2017-Journal of Business Ethics
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present the first major attempt at sorting, filtering and ordering stakeholder theory and stakeholder definitions to produce a comprehensive, multi-dimensional classification of stakeholder theories.
Abstract: Stakeholder theory is widely accepted but elementary aspects remain indeterminate as the term ‘stakeholder’ is an essentially contested concept (Miles, J Bus Ethics 108:285–298, 2012; Mitchell, Organ Stud 33:1407–1411, 2012), being variously describable, internally complex and open in character (Gallie, Proc Aristot Soc 56:167–198, 1956). Such contestability is highly problematic for theory development and empirical testing. The extent of essential contestability, previously unknown, is demonstrated in this paper through a bounded systematic review of 593 different stakeholder theory definitions. As an essentially contested concept, the solution does not lie in a universal stakeholder definition, but in debating the boundaries of stakeholder identification. To this end, this paper presents the first major attempt at sorting, filtering and ordering stakeholder theory and stakeholder definitions to produce a comprehensive, multi-dimensional classification of stakeholder theory. The constructs of the classification model juxtapose existing stakeholder theories and contributions from across the multi-contextual applications of stakeholder theory, thereby providing an invaluable overview of what we know about stakeholder theory in one model. The classification model is then tested with positive results. The paper concludes with a comprehensive discussion of the implications of classification stakeholder theory definitions, which has for future research.

211 citations

Related Papers (5)
Stakeholder Prioritization Work: The Role of Stakeholder Salience in Stakeholder Research

[...]

23 May 2017
Ronald K. Mitchell, Jae Hwan Lee, Bradley R. Agle
A Case Study of Stakeholder Identification and Prioritization by Managers

[...]

01 Sep 2006-Social Science Research Network
Milena M. Parent, Milena M. Parent, David L. Deephouse
A network theory-based analysis of stakeholder issues and their interrelationships in large construction projects: a case study

[...]

27 Jun 2016-The international journal of construction management
Ka Yan Mok, Geoffrey Qiping Shen, Rebecca J. Yang
Stakeholder Identification and Salience After 20 Years: Progress, Problems, and Prospects

[...]

01 Jan 2021-Business & Society
Donna J. Wood, Ronald K. Mitchell, Bradley R. Agle, Logan M. Bryan 
A typology of operational approaches for stakeholder analysis and engagement

[...]

07 Mar 2011-Construction Management and Economics
Jing Yang, Geoffrey Qiping Shen, Lynda Bourne, Christabel Man-Fong Ho Ho, Xiaolong Xue 
Frequently Asked Questions (2)
Q1. What have the authors contributed in "A comprehensive stakeholder-typology model based on salience attributes in construction projects" ?

This paper presents a comprehensive project stakeholder typology model ( PSTM ) based on stakeholder salience attributes. Stakeholders are considered as one of the major pillars of construction projects and management of stakeholders is essential to effective project management in the construction industry. This analysis revealed important variation in the attributes, models and frameworks. Based on a Venn-diagram analysis of data, the authors suggest a clear and non-overlapping stakeholder salience attributes framework to be used in construction projects. The authors also propose a project stakeholder typology model ( PSTM ) based on stakeholder salience attributes. It is expected that the results of this study can be used by 

Future research Several proposals for future research are relevant based on the concerns of the current study. Second, it is also their view that further research should study how to calculate the assignment degree between each component and each attribute, for example by using fuzzy theory. Third, future research can also take into account the practical use of PSTM and the authors suggest a survey and expert interviews on PSTM utilization. Using a visualising tool to study stakeholder influence–two Australian examples.