scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal ArticleDOI

A Consistent Test of Stationary Ergodicity

01 Aug 1993-Econometric Theory (Cambridge University Press)-Vol. 9, Iss: 04, pp 589-601
TL;DR: In this paper, a statistical test of stationary-ergodicity for known Markovian processes on R^d is presented. But it is not applicable to testing models and algorithms, as well as estimated time series processes ignoring the estimation error, since the test can be easily performed using any of a number of standard statistical and mathematical computer packages.
Abstract: A formal statistical test of stationary-ergodicity is developed for known Markovian processes on R^d. This makes it applicable to testing models and algorithms, as well as estimated time series processes ignoring the estimation error. The analysis is conducted by examining the asymptotic properties of the Markov operator on density space generated by the transition in the state space. The test is developed under the null of stationary-ergodicity, and it is shown to be consistent against the alternative of nonstationary-ergodicity. The test can be easily performed using any of a number of standard statistical and mathematical computer packages.

Summary (2 min read)

1 Introduction

  • Ergodicity conditions play an integral part in many estimation and modeling decisions.
  • Under that null hypothesis, the authors develop a consistent test.
  • Stationary ergodicity of the data generating process is equivalent to the convergence of Cesaro averages of the transition probabilities to a unique invariant measure.
  • This is a completely different version of an earlier paper ((9], based on Chapter 4 of (11]) that was presented in the 1988 North American Summer Meetings of the Econometric Society.
  • Financial support from the NSF is gratefully acknowledged.

2 T he Null Hypothesis of Stationary-Ergodicity

  • The authors assume that there exists at least one stationary density f* such that Pf*= f*.
  • Since ergodicity is mainly used to ensure that time series sample moments converge to the moments under the unique stationary measure, this limitation does not seem very severe.
  • The authors test will be shown to have asymptotic power 1 against the non stationary-ergodic alternative.
  • As seen from [10, example 4, p. 218], their weaker criterion of (not necessarily uniform) convergence can be satisfied in cases where condition (D) is violated.

3 An Operational Test of Stationary-Ergodicity

  • Notice that non-stationarity in this sense is different from the common usage of the term in time series contexts.
  • The same procedure can now be followed where the xJ's are drawn from g.
  • Notice that the mapping iii is itself one-to-one and onto, and is quite easy to implement in practice, and hence, the authors can limit attention to transitions on [O, 1].
  • This establishes the existence of a unique probability measure on ([O, 1], B([O, 1])) (namely 7r .,(.)) to which the Cesaro averages of transitions from any initial condition converge, which is their definition of the stationary-ergodicity of p.,(., .).

4 A consistent testing procedure

  • A test of the type described above can be performed for any pair of initial densities to obtain the required size.
  • See [18] for a number of those tests based on the empirical distribution function.
  • Their algorithm generates a discrete random variable Z from the multinomial distribution with the probability vector p0, ,Pk, and then generates x as 1.
  • Now, the authors know that under the alternative of non-stationary-ergodicity, Harris recurrence [13, p.115] must be violated.

5 Monte Carlo Investigation of small sample be

  • The authors report on Monte Carlo results investigating the small sample properties of their suggested testing procedure.
  • For random number generation, the authors used Press et al's [17], subroutine ran1{), and they initialized it with the clock time each time they ran a new Monte Carlo at different values of k, n, and s.
  • For the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, the authors used Press et al's [17) subroutine kstwo, with its accompanying subroutines probks and sort(}.
  • The rest of the code was written in C, and compiled, vectorized, and run on a Cray YMP2E/116.

6 Concluding Remarks

  • By known, all the authors mean is that one can generate random draws from some stochastic transition x1+1 � p(x,, .).
  • This accommodates among other things simulations from models where closed form solutions cannot be explicitly written.
  • There is no reason in principle why one cannot use this test on estimated laws of motion PT(e, .) which are believed to be consistent estimators of some true p( e,.) under the maintained hypothesis of stationary-ergodicity.
  • Clearly, as T i oo, the stationary ergodic or otherwise behavior of the transition PT(e, .) will mimic that of the original p(e, .).
  • On the other hand, their test parameters k, n, and s are within their control, bounded only by computational limitations.

Did you find this useful? Give us your feedback

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report




   
  
    
 
 
 
  
   
 
  

    



           
 
   
          
     




    

 

        
 

  





   



   
    

    

          
   
  
 
  
        
 
     
    
       
 


 
 
 







   
    

      

    




  
 


j








 

 




J




J

 
      






   

  



 







 









  

 
       

 
 
   
 

 

   

  


     
   


 
 
   

 
 


 
   

          

  
   



           


Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors show how to consistently estimate ergodic models by simulated minimum distance techniques, both in a long-run equilibrium and during an adjustment phase, under a variety of conditions.

122 citations

Posted Content
TL;DR: This paper illustrates the use of the nonparametric Wald-Wolfowitz test to detect stationarity and ergodicity in agent-based models and shows that with appropriate settings the tests can detect non-stationarity and non-ergodicity.
Abstract: This paper illustrates the use of the nonparametric Wald-Wolfowitz test to detect stationarity and ergodicity in agent-based models. A nonparametric test is needed due to the practical impossibility to understand how the random component influences the emergent properties of the model in many agent-based models. Nonparametric tests on real data often lack power and this problem is addressed by applying the Wald-Wolfowitz test to the simulated data. The performance of the tests is evaluated using Monte Carlo simulations of a stochastic process with known properties. It is shown that with appropriate settings the tests can detect non-stationarity and non-ergodicity. Knowing whether a model is ergodic and stationary is essential in order to understand its behavior and the real system it is intended to represent; quantitative analysis of the artificial data helps to acquire such knowledge.

58 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors introduce a class of nonlinear data generating processes (DGPs) that are first order Markov and can be represented as the sum of a linear plus a bounded nonlinear component, which correspond to the linear concepts of integratedness and cointegratedness.

57 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a set of algorithms for testing the ergodicity of empirical time series, without reliance on a specific parametric framework, is proposed, and the resulting test asymptotically obtains the correct size for stationary and non-stationary processes, and maximal power against non-ergodic but stationary alternatives.
Abstract: We propose a set of algorithms for testing the ergodicity of empirical time series, without reliance on a specific parametric framework. It is shown that the resulting test asymptotically obtains the correct size for stationary and nonstationary processes, and maximal power against non-ergodic but stationary alternatives. The test will not reject in the presence of nonstationarity that does not lead to ergodic failure. The work is linked to recent research on reformulations of the concept of integrated processes of order zero, and we demonstrate the means to operationalize new concepts of "short memory" for economic time series. Limited Monte Carlo evidence is provided with respect to power against the non-stationary and non-ergodic alternative of unit root processes. The method is used to investigate debates over stability of monetary aggregates relative to GDP, and the mean reversion hypothesis with respect to high frequency data on exchange rates. The test also is applied to other macroeconomic time series, as well as to very high frequency data on asset prices. Both the Monte Carlo and data analysis results suggest that the test has very promising size and power.

26 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a set of algorithms for testing the ergodicity of empirical time series, without reliance on a specific parametric framework, is proposed, and it is shown that the resulting test asymptotically obtains the correct size for stationary and nonstationary processes, and maximal power against non-ergodic but stationary alternatives.

21 citations

References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors used a test derived from the corresponding family of test statistics appropriate for the case when 0 is given and applied to the two-phase regression problem in the normal case.
Abstract: SUMMARY We wish to test a simple hypothesis against a family of alternatives indexed by a one-dimensional parameter, 0. We use a test derived from the corresponding family of test statistics appropriate for the case when 0 is given. Davies (1977) introduced this problem when these test statistics had normal distributions. The present paper considers the case when their distribution is chi-squared. The results are applied to the detection of a discrete frequency component of unknown frequency in a time series. In addition quick methods for finding approximate significance probabilities are given for both the normal and chi-squared cases and applied to the two-phase regression problem in the normal case.

2,047 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors investigated the extent to which specification error can explain the rejections of over-identifying restrictions of the intertemporal capital asset pricing model when tested using data on consumption growth and asset returns, particu- larly when additively separable, constant risk utility is attributed to the representa- tive agent.
Abstract: The overidentifying restrictions of the intertemporal capital asset pricing model are usually rejected when tested using data on consumption growth and asset returns, particu- larly when additively separable, constant relative risk utility is attributed to the representa- tive agent. This article investigates the extent to which specification error can explain these rejections. The empirical strategy is limited information maximum likelihood in conjunc- tion with seminonparametric (expanding parameter space) representations for both the law of motion and utility. We find that consumption growth and asset returns display conditional heterogeneity, but this fact does not account for rejection of the overidentifying restrictions as might be anticipated from the work of Hansen, Singleton, and others using generalized method of moments methods. We also find that expansion of the parameter space in the direction of nonseparable utility causes the overidentifying restrictions to be accepted. Our estimation strategy provides information on the manner in which the restrictions distort the law of motion. In particular, imposition of additively separable, constant relative risk aversion utility causes the conditional variance of consumption growth to be overpredicted, the conditional covariance of asset returns with consumption growth to be overpredicted, and an equity premium. Imposition of nonseparable seminon- parametric utility causes distortion in these same directions, though the distortions are much smaller which is consistent with the outcomes of the tests of the restrictions.

490 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, it was shown that any conditional moment test of functional form of nonlinear regression models can be converted into a chi-square test that is consistent against all deviations from the null hypothesis that the model represents the conditional expectation of the dependent variable relative to the vector of regressors.
Abstract: In this paper, it will be shown that any conditional moment test of functional form of nonlinear regression models can be converted into a chi-square test that is consistent against all deviations from the null hypothesis that the model represents the conditional expectation of the dependent variable relative to the vector of regressors. Copyright 1990 by The Econometric Society.

380 citations

Book
15 May 1978

364 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: New procedures are introduced which can cope efficiently with parameters of all sizes which require sampling from the normal distribution as an intermediate step.
Abstract: Accurate computer methods are evaluated which transform uniformly distributed random numbers into quantities that follow gamma, beta, Poisson, binomial and negative-binomial distributions. All algorithms are designed for variable parameters. The known convenient methods are slow when the parameters are large. Therefore new procedures are introduced which can cope efficiently with parameters of all sizes. Some algorithms require sampling from the normal distribution as an intermediate step. In the reported computer experiments the normal deviates were obtained from a recent method which is also described.

321 citations

Frequently Asked Questions (1)
Q1. What are the contributions in "Division of the humanities and social sciences" ?

Domowitz and El-Gama this paper developed a statistical test of stationary ergodicity for known Markovian processes on a density space.