scispace - formally typeset

Journal ArticleDOI

A continuum method for modeling surface tension

01 Jun 1992-Journal of Computational Physics (Academic Press Professional, Inc.)-Vol. 100, Iss: 2, pp 335-354

Abstract: In the novel method presented for modeling the effects of surface tension on fluid motion, the interfaces between fluids with different, color-represented properties are finite-thickness transition regions across which the color varies continuously. A force density proportional to the surface curvature of constant color is defined at each point in the transition region; this force-density is normalized in such a way that the conventional description of surface tension on an interface is recovered when the ratio of local transition-reion thickness to local curvature radius approaches zero. The properties of the method are illustrated by computational results for 2D flows.
Topics: Capillary surface (64%), Capillary length (61%), Curvature (61%), Surface tension (60%), Surface stress (60%)
Citations
More filters

Journal ArticleDOI
Shiyi Chen1, Gary D. DoolenInstitutions (1)
TL;DR: An overview of the lattice Boltzmann method, a parallel and efficient algorithm for simulating single-phase and multiphase fluid flows and for incorporating additional physical complexities, is presented.
Abstract: We present an overview of the lattice Boltzmann method (LBM), a parallel and efficient algorithm for simulating single-phase and multiphase fluid flows and for incorporating additional physical complexities. The LBM is especially useful for modeling complicated boundary conditions and multiphase interfaces. Recent extensions of this method are described, including simulations of fluid turbulence, suspension flows, and reaction diffusion systems.

6,030 citations


Cites methods from "A continuum method for modeling sur..."

  • ...Traditional numerical schemes have been successfully used for simple interfacial boundaries (Glimm et al 1981, Brackbill et al 1992, Chang et al 1996)....

    [...]



Journal ArticleDOI
Stanley Osher1, Ronald Fedkiw2Institutions (2)
TL;DR: The level set method is couple to a wide variety of problems involving external physics, such as compressible and incompressible flow, Stefan problems, kinetic crystal growth, epitaxial growth of thin films, vortex-dominated flows, and extensions to multiphase motion.
Abstract: The level set method was devised by S. Osher and J. A. Sethian (1988, J. Comput. Phys.79, 12–49) as a simple and versatile method for computing and analyzing the motion of an interface Γ in two or three dimensions. Γ bounds a (possibly multiply connected) region Ω. The goal is to compute and analyze the subsequent motion of Γ under a velocity field v. This velocity can depend on position, time, the geometry of the interface, and the external physics. The interface is captured for later time as the zero level set of a smooth (at least Lipschitz continuous) function ϕ (x, t); i.e., Γ(t)={x|ϕ(x, t)=0}. ϕ is positive inside Ω, negative outside Ω, and is zero on Γ(t). Topological merging and breaking are well defined and easily performed. In this review article we discuss recent variants and extensions, including the motion of curves in three dimensions, the dynamic surface extension method, fast methods for steady state problems, diffusion generated motion, and the variational level set approach. We also give a user's guide to the level set dictionary and technology and couple the method to a wide variety of problems involving external physics, such as compressible and incompressible (possibly reacting) flow, Stefan problems, kinetic crystal growth, epitaxial growth of thin films, vortex-dominated flows, and extensions to multiphase motion. We conclude with a discussion of applications to computer vision and image processing.

2,038 citations


Cites methods from "A continuum method for modeling sur..."

  • ...See [87] and [12] for earlier front tracking and VOF methods (respectively) using a similar formulation....

    [...]


Journal ArticleDOI
Gretar Tryggvason1, Bernard Bunner, Asghar Esmaeeli2, Damir Juric3  +5 moreInstitutions (4)
Abstract: Direct numerical simulations of multiphase flows, using a front-tracking method, are presented. The method is based on writing one set of governing equations for the whole computational domain and treating the different phases as one fluid with variable material properties. Interfacial terms are accounted for by adding the appropriate sources as δ functions at the boundary separating the phases. The unsteady Navier–Stokes equations are solved by a conventional finite volume method on a fixed, structured grid and the interface, or front, is tracked explicitly by connected marker points. Interfacial source terms such as surface tension are computed on the front and transferred to the fixed grid. Advection of fluid properties such as density is done by following the motion of the front. The method has been implemented for fully three-dimensional flows, as well as for two-dimensional and axisymmetric ones. First, the method is described for the flow of two or more isothermal phases. The representation of the moving interface and its dynamic restructuring, as well as the transfer of information between the moving front and the fixed grid, are discussed. Applications and extensions of the method to homogeneous bubbly flows, atomization, flows with variable surface tension, solidification, and boiling are then presented.

1,817 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
Abstract: The numerical simulation of flows with interfaces and free-surface flows is a vast topic, with applications to domains as varied as environment, geophysics, engineering, and fundamental physics. In engineering, as well as in other disciplines, the study of liquid-gas interfaces is important in combustion problems with liquid and gas reagents. The formation of droplet clouds or sprays that subsequently burn in combustion chambers originates in interfacial instabilities, such as the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability. What can numerical simulations do to improve our understanding of these phenomena? The limitations of numerical techniques make it impossible to consider more than a few droplets or bubbles. They also force us to stay at low Reynolds or Weber numbers, which prevent us from finding a direct solution to the breakup problem. However, these methods are potentially important. First, the continuous improvement of computational power (or, what amounts to the same, the drop in megaflop price) continuously extends the range of affordable problems. Second, and more importantly, the phenomena we consider often happen on scales of space and time where experimental visualization is difficult or impossible. In such cases, numerical simulation may be a useful prod to the intuition of the physicist, the engineer, or the mathematician. A typical example of interfacial flow is the collision between two liquid droplets. Finding the flow involves the study not only of hydrodynamic fields in the air and water phases but also of the air-water interface. This latter part

1,770 citations


Cites methods from "A continuum method for modeling sur..."

  • ...After Brackbill et al (1992), this method is sometimes called the continuous surface force (CSF) method....

    [...]

  • ...As in the method used by Brackbill et al (1992), this approximation converges in theory toward the true normal asH → δS....

    [...]


References
More filters

Book
George Keith Batchelor1Institutions (1)
01 Jan 1967-
TL;DR: The dynamique des : fluides Reference Record created on 2005-11-18 is updated on 2016-08-08 and shows improvements in the quality of the data over the past decade.
Abstract: Preface Conventions and notation 1. The physical properties of fluids 2. Kinematics of the flow field 3. Equations governing the motion of a fluid 4. Flow of a uniform incompressible viscous fluid 5. Flow at large Reynolds number: effects of viscosity 6. Irrotational flow theory and its applications 7. Flow of effectively inviscid liquid with vorticity Appendices.

10,942 citations


Book
01 Jan 1978-
TL;DR: This book presents those parts of the theory which are especially useful in calculations and stresses the representation of splines as linear combinations of B-splines as well as specific approximation methods, interpolation, smoothing and least-squares approximation, the solution of an ordinary differential equation by collocation, curve fitting, and surface fitting.
Abstract: This book is based on the author's experience with calculations involving polynomial splines. It presents those parts of the theory which are especially useful in calculations and stresses the representation of splines as linear combinations of B-splines. After two chapters summarizing polynomial approximation, a rigorous discussion of elementary spline theory is given involving linear, cubic and parabolic splines. The computational handling of piecewise polynomial functions (of one variable) of arbitrary order is the subject of chapters VII and VIII, while chapters IX, X, and XI are devoted to B-splines. The distances from splines with fixed and with variable knots is discussed in chapter XII. The remaining five chapters concern specific approximation methods, interpolation, smoothing and least-squares approximation, the solution of an ordinary differential equation by collocation, curve fitting, and surface fitting. The present text version differs from the original in several respects. The book is now typeset (in plain TeX), the Fortran programs now make use of Fortran 77 features. The figures have been redrawn with the aid of Matlab, various errors have been corrected, and many more formal statements have been provided with proofs. Further, all formal statements and equations have been numbered by the same numbering system, to make it easier to find any particular item. A major change has occured in Chapters IX-XI where the B-spline theory is now developed directly from the recurrence relations without recourse to divided differences. This has brought in knot insertion as a powerful tool for providing simple proofs concerning the shape-preserving properties of the B-spline series.

9,966 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
C.W Hirt1, B. D. Nichols1Institutions (1)
Abstract: Several methods have been previously used to approximate free boundaries in finite-difference numerical simulations. A simple, but powerful, method is described that is based on the concept of a fractional volume of fluid (VOF). This method is shown to be more flexible and efficient than other methods for treating complicated free boundary configurations. To illustrate the method, a description is given for an incompressible hydrodynamics code, SOLA-VOF, that uses the VOF technique to track free fluid surfaces.

9,793 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
Abstract: This brief paper derives Euler’s equations for an inviscid fluid, summarizes the Cauchy momentum equation, derives the Navier-Stokes equation from that, and then talks about finite difference method approaches to solutions. Typical texts for this material are apparently Acheson, Elementary Fluid Dynamics and Landau and Lifschitz, Fluid Mechanics. 1. Basic Definitions We describe a fluid flow in three-dimensional space R as a vector field representing the velocity at all locations in the fluid. Concretely, then, a fluid flow is a function ~v : R× R → R that assigns to each point (t, ~x) in spacetime a velocity ~v(t, ~x) in space. In the special situation where ~v does not depend on t we say that the flow is steady. A trajectory or particle path is a curve ~x : R→ R such that for all t ∈ R, d dt ~x(t) = ~v(t, ~x(t)). Fix a t0 ∈ R; a streamline at time t0 is a curve ~x : R→ R such that for all t ∈ R, d dt ~x(t) = ~v(t0, ~x(t)). In the special case of steady flow the streamlines are constant across times t0 and any trajectory is a streamline. In non-steady flows, particle paths need not be streamlines. Consider the 2-dimensional example ~v = [− sin t cos t]>. At t0 = 0 the velocities all point up and the streamlines are vertical straight lines. At t0 = π/2 the velocities all point left and the streamlines are horizontal straight lines. Any trajectory is of the form ~x = [cos t + C1 sin t + C2] >; this traces out a radius-1 circle centered at [C1 C2] >. Indeed, all radius-1 circles in the plane arise as trajectories. These circles cross each other at many (in fact, all) points. If you find it counterintuitive that distinct trajectories can pass through a single point, remember that they do so at different times. 2. Acceleration Let f : R × R → R be some scalar field (such as temperature). Then ∂f/∂t is the rate of change of f at some fixed point in space. If we precompose f with a 1 Fluid Dynamics Math 211, Fall 2014, Carleton College trajectory ~x, then the chain rule gives us the rate of change of f with respect to time along that curve: D Dt f := d dt f(t, x(t), y(t), z(t)) = ∂f ∂t + ∂f ∂x dx dt + ∂f ∂y dy dt + ∂f ∂z dz dt = ( ∂ ∂t + dx dt ∂ ∂x + dy dt ∂ ∂y + dz dt ∂ ∂z ) f = ( ∂ ∂t + ~v · ∇ ) f. Intuitively, if ~x describes the trajectory of a small sensor for the quantity f (such as a thermometer), then Df/Dt gives the rate of change of the output of the sensor with respect to time. The ∂f/∂t term arises because f varies with time. The ~v ·∇f term arises because f is being measured at varying points in space. If we apply this idea to each component function of ~v, then we obtain an acceleration (or force per unit mass) vector field ~a(t, x) := D~v Dt = ∂~v ∂t + (~v · ∇)~v. That is, for any spacetime point (t, ~x), the vector ~a(t, ~x) is the acceleration of the particle whose trajectory happens to pass through ~x at time t. Let’s check that it agrees with our usual notion of acceleration. Suppose that a curve ~x describes the trajectory of a particle. The acceleration should be d dt d dt~x. By the definition of trajectory, d dt d dt ~x = d dt ~v(t, ~x(t)). The right-hand side is precisely D~v/Dt. Returning to our 2-dimensional example ~v = [− sin t cos t]>, we have ~a = [− cos t − sin t]>. Notice that ~v · ~a = 0. This is the well-known fact that in constant-speed circular motion the centripetal acceleration is perpendicular to the velocity. (In fact, the acceleration of any constant-speed trajectory is perpendicular to its velocity.) 3. Ideal Fluids An ideal fluid is one of constant density ρ, such that for any surface within the fluid the only stresses on the surface are normal. That is, there exists a scalar field p : R × R → R, called the pressure, such that for any surface element ∆S with outward-pointing unit normal vector ~n, the force exerted by the fluid inside ∆S on the fluid outside ∆S is p~n ∆S. The constant density condition implies that the fluid is incompressible, meaning ∇ · ~v = 0, as follows. For any region of space R, the rate of flow of mass out of the region is ∫∫ ∂R ρ~v · ~n dS = ∫∫∫

9,452 citations


"A continuum method for modeling sur..." refers background in this paper

  • ...Fortunately, there is an alternative and computationally much simpler expression for K [6], which one can also derive by considering the net surface force per unit area, F,, , on any given element of the surface S [9]....

    [...]

  • ...Examples can be found in the studies of capillarity [2, 31, low-gravity fluid flow [4, 51, hydrodynamic stability [6], surfactant behavior [7, 81, cavitation [9], and droplet dynamics [2] in clouds [lo] and in fuel sprays used in internal combustion engines [ 111....

    [...]


Journal ArticleDOI
01 Jan 1965-Physics of Fluids
Abstract: A new technique is described for the numerical investigation of the time‐dependent flow of an incompressible fluid, the boundary of which is partially confined and partially free The full Navier‐Stokes equations are written in finite‐difference form, and the solution is accomplished by finite‐time‐step advancement The primary dependent variables are the pressure and the velocity components Also used is a set of marker particles which move with the fluid The technique is called the marker and cell method Some examples of the application of this method are presented All non‐linear effects are completely included, and the transient aspects can be computed for as much elapsed time as desired

5,564 citations


Performance
Metrics
No. of citations received by the Paper in previous years
YearCitations
202246
2021643
2020616
2019594
2018492
2017487