A Four-Point Bending Test for the Bonding Evaluation of Composite Pavement
Summary (2 min read)
Introduction
- Due to shrinkage phenomenon occurred in cement materials, the existing vertical crack through the cement concrete layer combined to environmental and traffic loadings affects the durability of composite pavements made with asphalt and cement materials.
- This paper deals with the study of debonding.
- Previous research works have proposed some experimental devices to characterize the bond strength of asphalt-concrete interface in mode I [1] .
- The optimum design incorporating these variables has not been done yet.
- Considering homogenous, elastic and isotropic material assumptions, the specimen design is studied in order to optimize stresses to cause delamination between layers.
Introduction to the M4-5n
- Theses stress fields are responsible for the delamination between layers at the edge or cracking location points.
- Hellinger-Reissner's formulation reduces the real 3D problem to the determination of regular plane fields (x,y) per layer i and interface i, i+1 (and i-1, i).
- The M4-5n advantage is to give finite value of stresses near the edge or crack permitted to identify easily delamination criteria [3] .
- This method is programmed under the free software Scilab.
- One simulation takes few seconds (CPU time).
Effect of the specimen geometry and material characteristics on stress field
- The specimen geometry takes into account the space constraints of the test and heterogeneity of used material (span length 420mm, width 120mm, each layer thickness 60mm).
- The equivalent elastic modulus of the asphalt material depends of the temperature and the loading speed conditions.
- This M4-5n parametric analysis indicates that the tensile stress at the bottom of the concrete layer 2 is in competition with interface stresses depending on the modulus of the asphalt.
- This variation influences the specimen rupture mode during the test.
- To reduce the experimental cost for measuring the crack propagation and to get the maximum areas of damage towards one edge only, asymmetric specimens are explored numerically in the following.
Test specimens
- In order to allow evaluation of bonding behavior, only one type of asphalt and cement concrete were used for all samples (see Table I ).
- A semi-coarse bituminous mix with aggregate size 0/10 and bitumen grade 35/50 is used.
- Two types of specimen were made; (a) type I -concrete over asphalt known as Ultra Thin Whitetopping (UTW), (b) type II -asphalt overlay concrete with an intermediate tack coat layer.
- For type II, the surface of concrete layer was cleaned by water blasting before tack coat placement.
- The composite slabs were sawed into a required dimension (see Table II ).
Test setup and conditions
- To avoid any problems with the viscoelasticity and the thermo-susceptibility of asphalt material, the loading points and supports are placed on the concrete layer .
- The specimen geometry is designed to simulate the maximum stress intensity towards the edges of interface.
- Testing was performed by a hydraulic press.
- The 4PB tests were conducted for bilayer specimens for various environmental conditions.
- During the test, the specimen was placed in a climatic chamber.
Crack propagation monitoring
- An ideal way of measuring the crack growth should give the possibility of continuous crack length determination without influencing the specimen or the delamination process itself.
- LVDT technique was chosen for this study.
- It consisted on using two LVDT per specimen edge fixed on asphalt layer and its respective ends supported on aluminum sheets attached to concrete layer .
Identification of failure phenomenon and influence of interface between layers
- Various kinds of failure mode were exhibited by the bilayer specimens under 4PB test around 20°C.
- Only for one specimen (Type I-PT-3-2), a failure was observed in the central zone between the loading location points.
- For the type II specimen, all specimens were delaminated at the interface between layers not only at low temperature (6°C) but also at high temperature (20°C).
- In the modeling, the asphalt modulus value was taken from its master curve at the test temperature and by converting the static test duration (T) into the frequency (f=1/T).
- The combined approach with the 4PB test and M4-5n can evaluate the bonding between layers.
Stress intensity at edge of interface and energy release rate
- According to the experimental results, the delamination is usually dissymmetric.
- The evolution of the energy release rate is given in function of the normalized crack length 2a/L F .
- In the other way, the energy release rate can also be determined experimentally by using the compliance method.
- From the load-deflection curve, the relation of compliance is determined.
- Table III shows a summary of the interface stress intensity and the energy release rate which are comparable to the values found in literature [1] .
Conclusions
- Experimental results on bilayer specimens, in accordance with quasi-analytical analysis given by the M4-5n, have demonstrated that the proposed 4PB test can determine the interface behavior of bilayer materials, asphalt-concrete and concrete-asphalt.
- The crack growth was monitoring by means of a LVDT technique.
- For the geometry chosen, the specific test has shown mixed mode failure at the interface between layers.
- Comparisons with experimental results and analysis of failure modes given above demonstrate that the M4-5n can be used effectively for designing the specimen and as well as for analyzing the test.
Did you find this useful? Give us your feedback
Citations
References
56 citations
51 citations
33 citations
22 citations
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (15)
Q2. What is the bending test for a symmetrical case?
For a symmetrical case, the excellent convergence of normal and shear stresses at the interface between layers at 1ax = and 2ax = is obtained in [8].
Q3. What is the purpose of the study?
For better measuring the crack length and understanding the failure phenomenon, the Digital Image Correlation technique will be used for the next experimental campaign.
Q4. What is the advantage of the M4-5n test?
The M4-5n advantage is to give finite value of stresses near the edge or crack permitted to identify easily delamination criteria [3].
Q5. What are the main problems that have to be investigated?
Two main problems have to be investigated: i) debonding mechanisms at the interface between two layers; ii) reflective cracking phenomenon through asphalt overlay or corner cracks in concrete overlay.
Q6. What type of concrete was used for the experimental program?
Two types of specimen were made; (a) type The author– concrete over asphalt known as Ultra Thin Whitetopping (UTW), (b) type II – asphalt overlay concrete with an intermediate tack coat layer.
Q7. What are the advantages of the polynomial approximations?
These polynomial approximations have the advantage to define the normal stresses ( )yxii ,1, +ν and the shear stresses ( )yxii ,1, +ατ at the interface between i and i+1 layers.
Q8. What is the tensile stress at the bottom of the concrete layer 2?
This M4-5n parametric analysis indicates that the tensile stress at the bottom of the concrete layer 2 is in competition with interface stresses depending on the modulus of the asphalt.
Q9. What is the stress field of the M4-5n?
The M4-5n has five kinematic fields per layer i ( { }ni ,...,1∈ ): the average plane displacement ( )yxU i ,α , the average out of plane ( )yxU i ,3 and the average rotations ( )yxi ,αΦ { }( )2,1∈α .
Q10. What type of asphalt was used for all samples?
In order to allow evaluation of bonding behavior, only one type of asphalt and cement concrete were used for all samples (see Table I).
Q11. What is the geometry of the test?
The specimen geometry takes into account the space constraints of the test and heterogeneity of used material (span length 420mm, width 120mm, each layer thickness 60mm).
Q12. What is the relationship between the length of the concrete layer and the shear stresses?
In Figure 3.a, the more the length a2 increases, the more the tensile stress intensity at the bottom of concrete layer 2 is increasing under the loading point C and the more interface normal and shear stresses increase at theM.
Q13. What is the energy release rate for a pre-crack length?
Knowing the failure load (experimentally determined) for a specimen pre-crack length a0, the energy W(a0) stored in the specimen for this load was calculated.
Q14. What is the tensile stress at the bottom of layer 2?
Figure 2 shows that the more the Young modulus ratio between asphalt material (layer 1) and concrete material (layer 2) decreases, the more the tensile stress intensity at the bottom of layer 2 is maximal at points A and D relative to point B and C, and the more the intensities of normal and shear interface stresses are raised in absolute value at these points.
Q15. What is the effect of the specimen geometry and the material characteristics on internal stresses?
By using a specific elastic model, the influence of the specimen geometry and the material characteristics on internal stresses is presented.