A Global Dataset of Palmer Drought Severity Index for 1870–2002: Relationship with Soil Moisture and Effects of Surface Warming
Summary (3 min read)
1. Introduction
- Droughts and floods are extreme climate events that percentage-wise are likely to change more rapidly than the mean climate (Trenberth et al. 2003).
- In order to monitor droughts and wet spells and to study their variability, numerous specialized indices have been devised using readily available data such as precipitation and temperature (Heim 2000; Keyantash and Dracup 2002).
- Most of these studies are regional and focus on a particular location or nation.
2. Datasets and procedures
- Table 1 lists the datasets used in this study.
- This depends on many factors, including field water-holding capacity (a function of soil texture and depth), antecedent soil conditions, and precipitation frequency and intensity (Trenberth et al. 2003).
- A severe thunderstorm can create a lot of surface runoff or even flash floods, but may leave the subsurface soil still dry.
- Dai et al. (1998) showed that area-averaged PDSI is significantly correlated (r 5 0.63 2 0.75) with streamflow of the twentieth century over the United States, midlatitude Canada, Europe, and southeast Australia.
- Significant correlations between the PDSI and the other drought measures should provide further support of the usefulness of the PDSI dataset.
3. PDSI versus soil moisture
- Figure 1 compares the observed and Palmer model– calculated soil moisture content for Illinois.
- The largest bias, which does not affect correlation, is in September when the calculated mean soil moisture is lower and interannual anomalies are larger than observed.
- Table 2 shows the correlation coefficients between the observed monthly mean soil moisture content (in top 1-m depth, except Illinois where it is top 0.9 m) and the Palmer model–calculated soil moisture content, Z index, PDSI, and observed precipitation for regions where soil moisture data are available (from Robock et al. 2000).
- These errors also contribute to the scatter in Figs.
- The records of the soil moisture data outside the United States are relatively short so that the SM versus PDSI correlation at each depth and for each month are noisy (not shown); nevertheless, the PDSI was found to correlate with the SM up to 1-m depth in most of the regions.
4. PDSI versus river flow
- The time series of annual streamflow rates and basinaveraged PDSI for world’s largest 10 rivers (except No. 5 Brahmaputra and No. 10 Mekong, both in southern Asia, whose streamflow records are too short), plus 4 smaller rivers that have long records are compared (Fig. 5).
- This mostly affects the PDSI of the earlier years of the time series.
- The PDSI over the Amazon basin closely follows the flow rates at Obidos during the last three decades, it suggests low flow rates in the 1960s and near-normal flows in the 1950s when there were no streamflow data, and it matches the measured flow rates in the 1940s.
- For most rivers, the correlation coefficient between the observed annual streamflow and basin-averaged annual PDSI is comparable to that between the streamflow and basin-averaged precipitation (from previous winter to autumn of the year for river basins with significant snowmelt).
- The low correlation between the PDSI and streamflow over the Yenisey basin results largely from their op- posite trends during 1960–2000, when precipitation changed little while temperature increased by ;28C over this basin (not shown).
5. Leading patterns in global PDSI
- Figure 6 shows temporal and spatial patterns of the two leading empirical orthogonal functions (EOFs) of the correlation matrix of monthly PDSI from 1900 to 2002.
- Almost all land boxes except Greenland and Antarctica have data after about 1948, and this meets the minimum of 50 yr of data for each box the authors required for the EOF analysis.
- This is in contrast to spatially uniform increases in the precipitation trend EOF (Dai et al. 1997).
- The second EOF (Fig. 6) of the PDSI reveals temporal and spatial patterns that are highly correlated with ENSO, suggesting that this pattern of mostly multiyear variability is ENSO related and hence represents a true mode of climate system behavior.
- This linear result is only a first-order approximation, as asymmetry exists between the cold and warm phases (e.g., Monahan and Dai 2004).
6. Trends in PDSI, and global dry and wet areas
- During the first half of the twentieth century, the Guinea Coast, southern Africa, parts of Canada, and southern and central Europe became drier, while it became wetter in most of Asia, Alaska, and parts of South America as precipitation increased over these regions while surface warming was relatively small (not shown).
- Since 1950, substantial increases of precipitation (not shown) have occurred in Argentina, the southern United States, and most of western Australia, which resulted in wetter conditions in these regions (Fig. 7).
- In fact, the warming by the end of the twentieth century results in decreases of 0.5–1.5 of PDSI over most land areas (Fig. 8).
- After 1950, PDSI values are available for almost all land boxes except Antarctica and Greenland.
- The precipitation decreases around the early 1980s that occurred mainly over ENSO-sensitive regions such as the Sahel, southern Africa, and east Asia as El Niños, which reduce rainfall over these regions (Dai et al. 1997; Dai and Wigley 2000), became more prominent after the late 1970s (Trenberth and Hoar 1996).
7. Summary and concluding remarks
- The authors derived a monthly PDSI dataset for 1870–2002 using monthly precipitation and surface air temperature data for global land areas, except Antarctica and Greenland, on a 2.58 3 2.58 grid.
- The PDSI was compared with warm-season soil moisture data from Illinois and Eurasia and streamflow records for the world’s largest rivers and some smaller rivers with long records.
- They also show upward trends during the last 40 yr or so for the Orinoco, Mississippi, and Paraná.
- The very dry areas (PDSI , 23.0) over global land have increased from ;12% to 30% since the 1970s, with a large jump in the early 1980s due to an El Niño– induced precipitation decrease and subsequent increases primarily due to surface warming, while the very wet areas (PDSI .
- Over the Mississippi River basin during the last 50 yr, increased cloudiness has decreased solar heating and thus pan evaporation, while actual evapotranspiration has increased because of increased precipitation and soil moisture (Milly and Dunne 2001).
Did you find this useful? Give us your feedback
Citations
3,402 citations
3,352 citations
3,108 citations
2,651 citations
2,611 citations
References
13,366 citations
6,711 citations
"A Global Dataset of Palmer Drought ..." refers methods in this paper
...Evapotranspiration in the Palmer model is calculated using a simple scheme that does not explicitly account for the effects of changes in surface solar radiation, relative humidity, and wind speed (Penman 1948)....
[...]
6,391 citations
3,608 citations
"A Global Dataset of Palmer Drought ..." refers background in this paper
...This mode is induced mainly by the precipitation anomalies associated with ENSO (e.g., Ropelewski and Halpert 1987; Dai and Wigley 2000; Trenberth and Caron 2000), as shown by the strong similarity between the ENSO EOFs of the PDSI and land precipitation (Dai et al. 1997), while the effects of ENSO-induced temperature anomalies (Kiladis and Diaz 1989) are small....
[...]
...This mode is induced mainly by the precipitation anomalies associated with ENSO (e.g., Ropelewski and Halpert 1987; Dai and Wigley 2000; Trenberth and Caron 2000), as shown by the strong similarity between the ENSO EOFs of the PDSI and land precipitation (Dai et al. 1997), while the effects of…...
[...]
2,526 citations
"A Global Dataset of Palmer Drought ..." refers background in this paper
...Droughts and floods are extreme climate events that percentage-wise are likely to change more rapidly than the mean climate (Trenberth et al. 2003)....
[...]
...This depends on many factors, including field water-holding capacity (a function of soil texture and depth), antecedent soil conditions, and precipitation frequency and intensity (Trenberth et al. 2003)....
[...]
...The increased risk of drought duration, severity, and extent is a direct consequence (Trenberth et al. 2003), and the theoretical expectations are being realized, as shown here and discussed by Nicholls (2004)....
[...]
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (12)
Q2. What is the main cause of the widespread drying of the last two–three decades?
Surface air temperature increases over land, which increase the water-holding capacity of the air and thus its demand of moisture, have been a primary cause for the widespread drying during the last two–three decades.
Q3. What is the prominent index of meteorological drought in the United States?
The Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) is the most prominent index of meteorological drought used in the United States (Heim 2002).
Q4. What is the reason that annual PDSI correlates with annual river flows?
The reason that annual PDSI correlates with annual river flows even for river basins with large snowmelt, such as the Lena and Columbia, is that winter and spring snowfall increases the PDSI during these and subsequent months, leading to correlations on annual time scales.
Q5. Why did of the regions become drier from 1950 to 2002?
most of Eurasia, Africa, Canada, Alaska, and eastern Australia became drier from 1950 to 2002, partly because of large surface warming since 1950 over these regions.
Q6. Why is it important to monitor droughts and wet spells?
Because they are among the world’s costliest natural disasters and affect a very large number of people each year (Wilhite 2000), it is important to monitor them and understand and perhaps predict their variability.
Q7. What is the Palmer model for determining the severity of a drought?
The Palmer model also computes, as an intermediate term in the computation of the PDSI, the Palmer moisture anomaly index (Z index), which is a measure of surface moisture anomaly for the current month without the consideration of the antecedent conditions thatcharacterize the PDSI.
Q8. What is the correlation coefficient between the SM and the PDSI?
The observed SM versus PDSI correlation coefficients range from ;0.5 to 0.7, whereas the correlation with the Z index and precipitation are generally lower, as the Z index and precipitation time series have more high-frequency variations than the PDSI.
Q9. What is the reason for the widespread drying over these regions?
Large surface warming has occurred since 1950 over these regions (Fig. 8), which is a major cause for the widespread drying over these regions.
Q10. How did the global dry areas decrease from 1950 to 1972?
the global areas under either very dry or very wet conditions decreased slightly by ;7% from 1950 to 1972, with precipitation as the primary contributor.
Q11. What is the largest drying effect over central Asia and Canada?
The largest drying effect occurred over central Asia and Canada, where the surface air has warmed 1.58–2.08C since 1950 (Fig. 8).
Q12. How many land boxes have data after 1948?
Almost all land boxes except Greenland and Antarctica have data after about 1948, and this meets the minimum of 50 yr of data for each box the authors required for the EOF analysis.