A low-power CMOS Gm-C filter for wireless receiver applications with on-chip automatic tuning system
Citations
14 citations
Cites methods from "A low-power CMOS Gm-C filter for wi..."
...In recent years, the OTA-C filters are used in many applications such as wireless receiver (Adrang et al., 2006), portable ECG (Lee & Cheng, 2009) and EEG (Casson & Rodriguez-Villegas, 2011) systems, mobile (Lakshmi & Vanathi, 2010), etc. Anyway, the OTA is a key circuit for analogue circuit design such as analogue continuous-time filters (Carrillo, Torelli, & Duque-Carrillo, 2011; Pedro et al., 2012; Zhang & El-Masry, 2007; Zhang, Zhang, & El-Masry, 2008) and analogue discrete-time filters (Chilakapati, Fiez, & Eshraghi, 2002; Lopez-Martin, Baswa, & Carvajal, 2005). Performance filtering frequency responses such as low-pass (LP), band-pass (BP), high-pass (HP), band-stop (BS) and all-pass (AP) as well as specifications such as power consumption and chip area are the main issues in analogue continuous-time filters for many applications. The main advantage of the universal filters is the ability of realizing all standard filtering frequency responses including LP, BP and HP. So the universal filter is preferable because it will cause a smaller size of the filter circuits (Jeshvaghani & Dolatshahi, 2014) that is very suitable for IC implementation. By mixing the inverting or non-inverting of the LP and HP filtering frequency responses in the output node, a filter can realise the BS filtering frequency response. Furthermore, if all of the standard filtering frequency responses collect together in the output node, a filter can realise the AP filtering frequency response. The universal filters reported by Lee and Liao (2008), Chen, Shen, and Wang (2008) employ two OTAs, one differential difference current conveyor (DDCC) and two capacitors. The universal filter proposed by Lee and Liao (2008) consists of 129 transistors, has a centre frequency of 2.18 MHz and consumes 83 mW but cannot realise the BS and AP filtering frequency responses. The two floating capacitors in the universal filter proposed by Chen et al. (2008) cause increased noise. The universal current mode filter proposed by Chen (2013) employs three dual-output current conveyors (DO-CCIIs), three grounded resistors and two grounded capacitors. The main drawback of this circuit is using three resistors which increase the noise and occupy more area on the chip. The universal filters proposed by Tangsrirat (2008) and Chang (2006) for realising different filtering frequency responses need to use a digitally programmable technique. This technique using some switches causes increased switching noise (Parvizi et al., 2017). Anyway, several universal OTA-C (Gm-C) filters have been reported by Parvizi et al. (2017), Jeshvaghani and Dolatshahi (2014), Tangsrirat (2008), Chang (2006), Chang and Pai (2000), Kumngern, Knobnob, and Dejhan (2010), Chang and Al-Hashimi (2003), Chunhua, Ling, and Tao (2008), Kumngern and Junnapiya (2012), Lee (2010), Abuelma’atti and Bentrcia (2006), Chen, Liao, and Lee (2009) and Namdari and Dolatshahi (2017)....
[...]
...In recent years, the OTA-C filters are used in many applications such as wireless receiver (Adrang et al., 2006), portable ECG (Lee & Cheng, 2009) and EEG (Casson & Rodriguez-Villegas, 2011) systems, mobile (Lakshmi & Vanathi, 2010), etc. Anyway, the OTA is a key circuit for analogue circuit design such as analogue continuous-time filters (Carrillo, Torelli, & Duque-Carrillo, 2011; Pedro et al., 2012; Zhang & El-Masry, 2007; Zhang, Zhang, & El-Masry, 2008) and analogue discrete-time filters (Chilakapati, Fiez, & Eshraghi, 2002; Lopez-Martin, Baswa, & Carvajal, 2005). Performance filtering frequency responses such as low-pass (LP), band-pass (BP), high-pass (HP), band-stop (BS) and all-pass (AP) as well as specifications such as power consumption and chip area are the main issues in analogue continuous-time filters for many applications. The main advantage of the universal filters is the ability of realizing all standard filtering frequency responses including LP, BP and HP. So the universal filter is preferable because it will cause a smaller size of the filter circuits (Jeshvaghani & Dolatshahi, 2014) that is very suitable for IC implementation. By mixing the inverting or non-inverting of the LP and HP filtering frequency responses in the output node, a filter can realise the BS filtering frequency response. Furthermore, if all of the standard filtering frequency responses collect together in the output node, a filter can realise the AP filtering frequency response. The universal filters reported by Lee and Liao (2008), Chen, Shen, and Wang (2008) employ two OTAs, one differential difference current conveyor (DDCC) and two capacitors. The universal filter proposed by Lee and Liao (2008) consists of 129 transistors, has a centre frequency of 2.18 MHz and consumes 83 mW but cannot realise the BS and AP filtering frequency responses. The two floating capacitors in the universal filter proposed by Chen et al. (2008) cause increased noise. The universal current mode filter proposed by Chen (2013) employs three dual-output current conveyors (DO-CCIIs), three grounded resistors and two grounded capacitors. The main drawback of this circuit is using three resistors which increase the noise and occupy more area on the chip. The universal filters proposed by Tangsrirat (2008) and Chang (2006) for realising different filtering frequency responses need to use a digitally programmable technique....
[...]
...In recent years, the OTA-C filters are used in many applications such as wireless receiver (Adrang et al., 2006), portable ECG (Lee & Cheng, 2009) and EEG (Casson & Rodriguez-Villegas, 2011) systems, mobile (Lakshmi & Vanathi, 2010), etc. Anyway, the OTA is a key circuit for analogue circuit design such as analogue continuous-time filters (Carrillo, Torelli, & Duque-Carrillo, 2011; Pedro et al., 2012; Zhang & El-Masry, 2007; Zhang, Zhang, & El-Masry, 2008) and analogue discrete-time filters (Chilakapati, Fiez, & Eshraghi, 2002; Lopez-Martin, Baswa, & Carvajal, 2005). Performance filtering frequency responses such as low-pass (LP), band-pass (BP), high-pass (HP), band-stop (BS) and all-pass (AP) as well as specifications such as power consumption and chip area are the main issues in analogue continuous-time filters for many applications. The main advantage of the universal filters is the ability of realizing all standard filtering frequency responses including LP, BP and HP. So the universal filter is preferable because it will cause a smaller size of the filter circuits (Jeshvaghani & Dolatshahi, 2014) that is very suitable for IC implementation. By mixing the inverting or non-inverting of the LP and HP filtering frequency responses in the output node, a filter can realise the BS filtering frequency response. Furthermore, if all of the standard filtering frequency responses collect together in the output node, a filter can realise the AP filtering frequency response. The universal filters reported by Lee and Liao (2008), Chen, Shen, and Wang (2008) employ two OTAs, one differential difference current conveyor (DDCC) and two capacitors. The universal filter proposed by Lee and Liao (2008) consists of 129 transistors, has a centre frequency of 2.18 MHz and consumes 83 mW but cannot realise the BS and AP filtering frequency responses. The two floating capacitors in the universal filter proposed by Chen et al. (2008) cause increased noise....
[...]
...In recent years, the OTA-C filters are used in many applications such as wireless receiver (Adrang et al., 2006), portable ECG (Lee & Cheng, 2009) and EEG (Casson & Rodriguez-Villegas, 2011) systems, mobile (Lakshmi & Vanathi, 2010), etc. Anyway, the OTA is a key circuit for analogue circuit design such as analogue continuous-time filters (Carrillo, Torelli, & Duque-Carrillo, 2011; Pedro et al., 2012; Zhang & El-Masry, 2007; Zhang, Zhang, & El-Masry, 2008) and analogue discrete-time filters (Chilakapati, Fiez, & Eshraghi, 2002; Lopez-Martin, Baswa, & Carvajal, 2005). Performance filtering frequency responses such as low-pass (LP), band-pass (BP), high-pass (HP), band-stop (BS) and all-pass (AP) as well as specifications such as power consumption and chip area are the main issues in analogue continuous-time filters for many applications. The main advantage of the universal filters is the ability of realizing all standard filtering frequency responses including LP, BP and HP. So the universal filter is preferable because it will cause a smaller size of the filter circuits (Jeshvaghani & Dolatshahi, 2014) that is very suitable for IC implementation. By mixing the inverting or non-inverting of the LP and HP filtering frequency responses in the output node, a filter can realise the BS filtering frequency response. Furthermore, if all of the standard filtering frequency responses collect together in the output node, a filter can realise the AP filtering frequency response. The universal filters reported by Lee and Liao (2008), Chen, Shen, and Wang (2008) employ two OTAs, one differential difference current conveyor (DDCC) and two capacitors....
[...]
...In recent years, the OTA-C filters are used in many applications such as wireless receiver (Adrang et al., 2006), portable ECG (Lee & Cheng, 2009) and EEG (Casson & Rodriguez-Villegas, 2011) systems, mobile (Lakshmi & Vanathi, 2010), etc. Anyway, the OTA is a key circuit for analogue circuit design such as analogue continuous-time filters (Carrillo, Torelli, & Duque-Carrillo, 2011; Pedro et al., 2012; Zhang & El-Masry, 2007; Zhang, Zhang, & El-Masry, 2008) and analogue discrete-time filters (Chilakapati, Fiez, & Eshraghi, 2002; Lopez-Martin, Baswa, & Carvajal, 2005). Performance filtering frequency responses such as low-pass (LP), band-pass (BP), high-pass (HP), band-stop (BS) and all-pass (AP) as well as specifications such as power consumption and chip area are the main issues in analogue continuous-time filters for many applications. The main advantage of the universal filters is the ability of realizing all standard filtering frequency responses including LP, BP and HP. So the universal filter is preferable because it will cause a smaller size of the filter circuits (Jeshvaghani & Dolatshahi, 2014) that is very suitable for IC implementation. By mixing the inverting or non-inverting of the LP and HP filtering frequency responses in the output node, a filter can realise the BS filtering frequency response. Furthermore, if all of the standard filtering frequency responses collect together in the output node, a filter can realise the AP filtering frequency response. The universal filters reported by Lee and Liao (2008), Chen, Shen, and Wang (2008) employ two OTAs, one differential difference current conveyor (DDCC) and two capacitors. The universal filter proposed by Lee and Liao (2008) consists of 129 transistors, has a centre frequency of 2.18 MHz and consumes 83 mW but cannot realise the BS and AP filtering frequency responses. The two floating capacitors in the universal filter proposed by Chen et al. (2008) cause increased noise. The universal current mode filter proposed by Chen (2013) employs three dual-output current conveyors (DO-CCIIs), three grounded resistors and two grounded capacitors....
[...]
8 citations
4 citations
4 citations
3 citations
References
652 citations
"A low-power CMOS Gm-C filter for wi..." refers methods in this paper
...The linearization methods include cross-coupling of multiple differential pairs [3], [4] adaptive biasing [3], [5] source degeneration [6], [7] and pseudo-differential stages (using transistor in the triode region or in saturation) [8]....
[...]
644 citations
343 citations
327 citations
"A low-power CMOS Gm-C filter for wi..." refers methods in this paper
...The linearization methods include cross-coupling of multiple differential pairs [3], [4] adaptive biasing [3], [5] source degeneration [6], [7] and pseudo-differential stages (using transistor in the triode region or in saturation) [8]....
[...]
284 citations
"A low-power CMOS Gm-C filter for wi..." refers methods in this paper
...The linearization methods include cross-coupling of multiple differential pairs [3], [4] adaptive biasing [3], [5] source degeneration [6], [7] and pseudo-differential stages (using transistor in the triode region or in saturation) [8]....
[...]