scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal ArticleDOI

A Measure of Comovement for Economic Variables: Theory and Empirics

TL;DR: In this article, a measure of dynamic comovement between (possibly many) time series and names it cohesion is defined in the frequency domain and is appropriate for processes that are costationary, possibly after suitable transformations.
Abstract: This paper proposes a measure of dynamic comovement between (possibly many) time series and names it cohesion. The measure is defined in the frequency domain and is appropriate for processes that are costationary, possibly after suitable transformations. In the bivariate case, the measure reduces to dynamic correlation and is related, but not equal, to the well known quantities of coherence and coherency. Dynamic correlation on a frequency band equals (static) correlation of bandpass-filtered series. Moreover, long-run correlation and cohesion relate in a simple way to co-integration. Cohesion is useful to study problems of business-cycle synchronization, to investigate short-run and long-run dynamic properties of multiple time series, and to identify dynamic clusters. We use state income data for the United States and GDP data for European nations to provide an empirical illustration that is focused on the geographical aspects of business-cycle fluctuations.

Summary (1 min read)

Jump to:  and [Summary]

Summary

  • Wkh phdvxuh lv gh qhg lq wkh iuhtxhqf| grpdlq dqg lv dssursuldwh iru surfhvvhv zklfk duh frvwdwlrqdu|/ srvvleo| diwhu vxlwdeoh wudqv0 irupdwlrqv1.
  • Frkhvlrq lv xvhixo wr vwxg| sureohpv ri exvlqhvv f|foh v|qfkurql}dwlrq/ wr lqyhv0 wljdwh vkruw0uxq dqg orqj0uxq g|qdplf surshuwlhv ri pxowlsoh wlph vhulhv/ wr lghqwli| g|qdplf foxvwhuv1.
  • Zh xvh vwdwh lqfrph gdwd iru wkh XV dqg JGS gdwd iru Hxurshdq qdwlrqv wr surylgh dq hpslulfdo looxvwudwlrq irfxvhg rq wkh jhrjudsklfdo dvshfwv ri exvlqhvv f|foh xfwxdwlrqv1 MHO Fodvvl fdwlrq=.

Did you find this useful? Give us your feedback

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

i@thi Lu L4Li4i?| uLh ,UL?L4U V@h@M*itG
AiLh) @?_ ,4ThUt
ht|LTi hL
@hL 6Lh?
|
wUhi3@ +iU*?
}
Devwudfw
Nh|zrugv=
Exvlqhvv f|foh/ Vhfwrudo frpryhphqwv/ frkhuhqfh/ jhrjudsk|1
Wklv sdshu sursrvhv d phdvxuh ri g|qdplf frpryhphqw ehwzhhq
+
srvvleo| pdq|
,
wlph vhulhv dqg qdphv lw
frkhvlrq
1 Wkh phdvxuh lv ghqhg lq wkh iuhtxhqf| grpdlq
dqg lv dssursuldwh iru surfhvvhv zklfk duh frvwdwlrqdu|/ srvvleo| diwhu vxlwdeoh wudqv0
irupdwlrqv1 Lq wkh elyduldwh fdvh/ wkh phdvxuh uhgxfhv wr
g|qdplf fruuhodwlrq
dqg lv
uhodwhg/ exw qrw htxdo/ wr wkh zhoo nqrzq txdqwlwlhv
frkhuhqfh
dqg
frkhuhqf|
1 G|qdplf
fruuhodwlrq rq d iuhtxhqf| edqg htxdov
+
vwdwlf
,
fruuhodwlrq ri edqg0sdvv owhuhg vhulhv1
Pruhryhu/ orqj uxq fruuhodwlrq dqg frkhvlrq uhodwh lq d vlpsoh zd| wr frlqwhjudwlrq1
Frkhvlrq lv xvhixo wr vwxg| sureohpv ri exvlqhvv f|foh v|qfkurql}dwlrq/ wr lqyhv0
wljdwh vkruw0uxq dqg orqj0uxq g|qdplf surshuwlhv ri pxowlsoh wlph vhulhv/ wr lghqwli|
g|qdplf foxvwhuv1 Zh xvh vwdwh lqfrph gdwd iru wkh XV dqg JGS gdwd iru Hxurshdq
qdwlrqv wr surylgh dq hpslulfdo looxvwudwlrq irfxvhg rq wkh jhrjudsklfdo dvshfwv ri
exvlqhvv f|foh xfwxdwlrqv1
MHO Fodvvlfdwlrq=
H6/ F4
LhhitTL?_i?Ui __hittG ht|LTi hL c ,+,5c Df @i 6# +LLtii*|c h i**it
fDf i4@*G UUhL 9*M@UMi
Xqlyhuvlwh Oleuh gh Eux{hoohv/ HFDUHV
|
Xqlyhuvlw| ri Prghqd dqg FHSU
}
Xqlyhuvlwh Oleuh gh Eux{hoohv/ HFDUHV dqg FHSU1

W?|hL_U|L?
Aihi @hi ui i4ThU@* hi*@|L?t U @i |i t|@|t Lu Rt|)*3i_ u@U|t ? iUL?L4Ut
?i Lu |i4 t |@| 4@UhLiUL?L4U @}}hi}@|it UL4Li At LMtih@|L? @t Mii? |i
tLhUi Lu tTiU*@|L? Lu iUL?L4U |iLh) t?Ui |t Mh| W? 4L_ih? |iLhit Lu |i Mt?itt
U)U*i TiLT*i @i @t!i_ i|ih UL4Li4i?|t U@? Mi i T*@?i_ M) *@h}i @}}hi}@|i tLU!tc
4L?i|@h) Lh hi@*c Lh i|ih @? i T*@?@|L? tL*_ Mi uL?_ ? ?L?*?i@h ThLT@}@|L?
4iU@?t4t ,ih) 4@UhLiUL?L4U |i |MLL! t|@h|t M) @ t|@|i4i?| L? UL4Li4i?|t Mi|ii?
@}}hi}@|it OLiihc T@h@_L U@**)c |t t L?i Lu |i u@U|t |@| t *i@t| i** _LU4i?|i_
@?_ L? @| |ihi t 4Lhi UL?utL? Lu 4i@??} @?_ |ih4?L*L}) RL4Li4i?| t @
*Lti |ih4c TLttM*) _itUhM?} _gihi?| Ti?L4i?@ @?_c UL?ti^i?|*)c | 4@?) _gihi?|
?|ihThi|@|L?t `@| @hi hi@**) |i t|)*3i_ u@U|t @?_ @| tL*_ 4@UhLiUL?L4Ut Mi |h)?}
|L i T*@?q TThLTh@|i 4i@thit Lu UL4Li4i?| Mi|ii? |4i tihit ThLUittit tL*_
Mi _ii*LTi_ |L ThL_i @ 4i@??}u* @?tih |L |t ^it|L? Ai ?uLh4@* _tUttL?
L? UL4Li4i?|t t@**) hiuiht |L tL4i|?} U*Lti |L @ ?L|L? Lu ULhhi*@|L? OLiihc
|i |h@_|L?@* @) | U |i |4i tihit *|ih@|hi @t _i@*| | 4i@thi4i?| Lu
UL4Li4i?|t t M@ti_ L? @ ?L|L? Lu h@?! hi_U|L?
E
tii ? @?_ +i?ti*c bHH U @t
@ _gihi?| 4i@??} W? |t U@|i}Lh) Mi*L?}t |i _i@ Lu UL?|i}h@|L?
E
,?}*i @?_ Bh@?}ihc
bH.G |L ThLUittit @hi UL?|i}h@|i_ u |i tTiU|h@* _i?t|) @| uhi^i?U) 3ihL @t h@?!
L?ic UL_iTi?_i?Ui
E
BLhihL @?_ i@Ui**ic bb2c U hiuiht |L *?i@h UL4M?@|L?t Lu
ULhhi*@|i_ ThLUittit U @hi Lu *Lih @|Lhi}hitti Lh_ih |@? L|ihtc UL44L? ui@|hit
E,?}*i @?_ kL3U!c bbc i *?i@h UL4M?@|L?t U @hi ?Thi_U|@M*i | hitTiU| |L
T@t| ?uLh4@|L? @?_ UL44L? U)U*it
E
V@_ @?_ ,?}*i bb U @hi _i?i_ @t UL44L?
ui@|hit ? ht| _gihi?Uit uLh ThLUittit U @hi UL?|i}h@|i_ At U*@tt Lu UL?UiT|t
Thiti?|t tiih@* ThLM*i4t 6ht|c } UhLttULhhi*@|L? ?i|ih 4T*it ?Lh t 4T*i_ M)
UL?|i}h@|L?c UL44L? U)U*it Lh UL44L? ui@|hit
E
"@c bb @?_ 6Lh? @?_ +iU*?c
bbb 5iUL?_c |iti 4i@thit @hi M?@h) 6Lh i @4T*ic |L ThLUittit @hi i|ih UL?|i}h@|i_
Lh ?L|c M| i U@?<| it|@M*t _gihi?| _i}hiit Lu @ttLU@|L? 6?@**)c ? Lh_ih |L |it| uLh
h@?! hi_U|L?c i ?ii_ |L it|4@|i |i T@h@4i|iht Lu @ V+c U 4@) Mi ThLM*i4@|U
4
Wklv uhvhdufk kdv ehhq vxssruwhg e| dq D1U1F1 frqwudfw ri wkh Frppxqdxwh iudqfdlvh gh Ehojltxh dqg
e| wkh Hxurshdq Frpplvvlrq xqghu wkh Wudlqlqj dqg Prelolw| ri Uhvhdufkhuv Surjudpph
+
Frqwudfw Qr
HUEIPU[FW<;03546
,

i? |i ?4Mih Lu |4i tihit t *@h}i 6Lh @** |iti hi@tL?tc *i |i ?L|L? Lu h@?!
hi_U|L? t Uih|@?*) ?|ihit|?} |L U@h@U|ih3i tL4i @tTiU|t Lu |i _)?@4U ThLTih|it Lu
4*|@h@|i |4i tihitc | t ?L| |i @TThLTh@|i L?i uLh |i t|_) Lu UL4Li4i?|t
| @| t @? @TThLTh@|i 4i@thi Lu UL4Li4i?|q W? |t T@Tih i tL |@| i t|
?} |i |MLL! ^@?||it *!i ULihi?Ui @?_ ULihi?U)c U @hi _i*) ti_ ? |4i tihit
*|ih@|hic @hi ?L| @TThLTh@|i @t UL4Li4i?| ?_i it `i ThLTLti @ hi*@|i_ M| _gihi?|
4i@thic _)?@4U ULhhi*@|L?c U @hti ^|i ?@|h@**) uhL4 M@tU uhi^i?U) _L4@? ?L
|L?t #)?@4U ULhhi*@|L? U@? Mi _iUL4TLti_ M) uhi^i?U) @?_ uhi^i?U) M@?_ @?_ U@?
|i? Mi ti_ |L t|_) Mt?itt U)U*i @t i** @t *L?}h? ^it|L?t #)?@4U ULhhi*@|L?
Mi|ii? |L ThLUittit Lih @ M@?_ |h?t L| |L Mi _i?|U@* |L t|@|U ULhhi*@|L? Lu |i t@4i
ThLUittitc @u|ih t|@M*i Thi*|ih?} LhiLihc *L?}h? _)?@4U ULhhi*@|L? t hi*@|i_ ? @
t4T*i @) |L t|LU@t|U UL?|i}h@|L?
`i ti Lh ?L|L? Lu _)?@4U ULhhi*@|L? |L UL?t|hU| @ 4*|@h@|i ?_i Lu UL4Li
4i?|c U i ?@4i ULitL? Ai *@||ih ThL_it @ t44@h) 4i@thi Lu |i _i}hii Lu
UL4Li4i?| |? @ }hLT Lu @h@M*it Lh Mi|ii? |L }hLTt Lu @h@M*it @?_ U@? Mi ti_c
uLh ?t|@?Uic @t @ 4i|hU |L UL?t|hU| _)?@4U U*t|iht
AL **t|h@|i Lh ThLTLti_ 4i@thi @?_ |L ThL_i uh|ih 4L|@|L?c i it|4@|i ULi
tL? Lu L|T| _@|@ ? N5 t|@|it @?_ ,hLTi@? ?@|L?t @?_ t|_) |i uL**L?} ^it|L?t
hi L|T| U|@|L?t |? ,hLTi 4Lhi ULhhi*@|i_ |@? L|T| U|@|L?t |? |i
N5 @?_ @hi hit*|t |i t@4i uLh Mt?itt U)U*i uhi^i?Uit @?_ |i *L?} h?q hi t|@|it Lh
UL?|hit U UL4Li 4Lhi t|hL?}*) U*Lti*) *LU@|i_ uhL4 @ }iL}h@TU@* TL?| Lu iq
#Lit MLh_ih 4@||iht uLh L|T| t)?UhL?3@|L? @?_ @| @| uhi^i?U) h@?}iq
2 #)?@4U ULhhi*@|L?
2 Ai _i?|L? @?_ |i M@tU 4L|@|L?
L?t_ih |L 3ihL4i@? hi@* t|LU@t|U ThLUittit % @?_ +wi|7
%
E
b@?_7
+
E
bc Z bZc
Mi |i tTiU|h@* _i?t|) u?U|L?t Lu % @?_ + @?_
%+
E
b Mi |i ULtTiU|h4 Ai 4i@thi
i ThLTLtic _)?@4U ULhhi*@|L?c t
4
%+
E
b'
%+
E
b
t
7
%
E
b7
+
E
b
c
E

2

AL 4L|@|i |t 4i@thi i ?|hL_Ui |i tTiU|h@* _iUL4TLt|L? Lu |i ThLUittit %
|
@?_
+
|
ci
%
|
'
]
Z
3
Z
e
b|
_~
%
Eb +
|
'
]
Z
3
Z
e
b|
_~
+
Ebc E2
ihi _~
%
Eb@?__~
+
Eb @hi EUL4T*i  Lh|L}L?@* ?Uhi4i?| ThLUittit Etii i} hLU!i**
@?_ #@tc @T e , ThittL? 2 t@)t |@| %
|
@?_ +
|
U@? Mi i Thitti_ @t ??|i t4t< Lu
@it Lu _gihi?| uhi^i?Uitc i@U @?} @ h@?_L4 @4T*|_i t t i** !?L?c |i tTiU
|h@* @?_ UhLtttTiU|h@* _i?t|) u?U|L?t Lu %
|
@?_ +
|
@hi hi*@|i_ |L |i @MLi hiThiti?|@|L?
? |i uL**L?} @)G
7
%
Eb'@hEe
b|
_~
%
Eb ' @hE_~
%
Eb
7
+
E
b'@h
E
_~
%
E
b
7
%+
E
b'UL
E
_~
%
E
bc_~
+
E
b
7
+%
E
b'UL
E
_~
+
E
bc_~
%
E
b
E

`*i |i @it @TTi@h?} ? hiThiti?|@|L?
E
2 @hi UL4T*i c | t i@t*) tii? |@|c u %
|
t hi@*c |i? _~
%
E
b'_~
%
E
bc tL |@|
e
b|
_~
%
E
bne
3
b|
_~
%
E
b'2ULt
E
b|_L
%
E
b 2t?
E
b|_T
%
E
bc
E
e
ihi _L
%
@?_ _T
%
_i?L|ic hitTiU|i*)c |i hi@* @?_ |i 4@}?@h) T@h| Lu _~
%
Oi?Uii
@i |i @*|ih?@|i hiThiti?|@|L?
%
|
'2
]
Z
f
ULtEb|_L
%
Eb 2
]
Z
f
t?Eb|_T
%
Ebc ED
ihi |i UL4TL?i?| @| uhi^i?U) b t ULt
E
b|_L
%
E
bt?
E
b|_T
%
E
bc U t hi@* 54*@h*)c
|i hi@* @i _iUL4TLt|L? Lu +
|
t
+
|
'2
]
Z
f
ULt
E
b|_L
+
E
b 2
]
Z
f
t?
E
b|_T
+
E
b
t t i@t*) LM|@?i_ uhL4
E
 @?_
E
ec Lh ThLTLti_ 4i@thic 4
%+
E
bc t ?L|?} i*ti |@?
|i ULhhi*@|L? ULiUi?| Mi|ii? |i hi@* @it Lu uhi^i?U) b @TTi@h?} ? |i @MLi
hiThiti?|@|L?c i ULt
E
b|_L
+
E
b t?
E
b|_T
+
E
b@?_ULt
E
b|_L
%
E
b t?
E
b|_T
%
E
b At
t |i hi@tL? ) |i 4i@thi t _i?i_ L?*) uLh ?L??i}@|i uhi^i?Uitc L? |i ?|ih@*
d
fcZ *i@h*)c _)?@4U ULhhi*@|L? U@? @h) Mi|ii? @?_ 

22 Ai hi*@|L? | RULihi?U) @?_ RULihi?Ui
#)?@4U ULhhi*@|L? t t|hU|*) hi*@|i_ |L ML| ULihi?U) @?_ ULihi?UiQ|L i** !?L?
?_iUit ? |4i tihit *|ih@|hi Lihi?U) t _i?i_ @t
F
%+
Eb'
7
%+
Eb
t
7
%
Eb7
+
Eb
'
%+
Ebn'
%+
Eb
t
7
%
Eb7
+
Eb
c
ihi '
%+
Eb |i ^@_h@|hi tTiU|h4 Oi?Ui ULihi?U) t UL4T*i ? }i?ih@* @?_ t ?L|
t)44i|hUc i F
%+
Eb@?_F
+%
Eb @hi ?L| i^@*c M| UL?}@|i #)?@4U ULhhi*@|L? 4
%+
Eb
t |i hi@* T@h| Lu ULihi?U) @?_ U@? @*tL Mi LM|@?i_ M) @ih@}?} ULihi?Uit @| uhi^i?U)
b @?_ bc U @*tL @hi UL?}@|iG
4
%+
E
b'
F
%+
E
bnF
%+
E
b
2
)t?}
E
 |i hi@_ih U@? i@t*) ihu) |@| F
%+
E
b t |i ULhhi*@|L? ULiUi?| Lu _~
%
E
b
@?_ _~
+
E
b Oi?Ui |i ?|ihThi|@|L? Lu ULihi?U) t ^|i t4*@h |L |@| Lu _)?@4U
ULhhi*@|L?c |i M@tU _gihi?Ui Mi?} |@| |i uLh4ih t hi*@|i_ |L |i UL4T*i hiThiti?|@|L?
E
2 h@|ih |@? |i hi@* @i _iUL4TLt|L?
E
D | @?L|ih @)c i t4T*) UL**iU| |L}i|ih
uhi^i?Uit b @?_ b tL |@| |i 4@}?@h) T@h|t U@?Ui* L| At t TihuiU|*) UL?tt|i?|
| Lh @4c t?Ui |i @it Lu uhi^i?Uit b @?_ b @i|it@4iTihL_U|)
+i}@h_?} ULihi?UiQLh t^@hi_ULihi?U)c @t t tL4i|4it U@**i_Q| t _i?i_ @t |i
t^@hi_ 4L_*t Lu ULihi?U)c |@| t
M
%+
E
b'
%+
E
b
2
n '
%+
E
b
2
7
%
Eb7
+
Eb
'
m 7
%+
E
b m
2
7
%
Eb7
+
Eb
AihiuLhi ULihi?Ui t hi@* @?_ t)44i|hU OLiihc | _Lit ?L| 4i@thi ULhhi*@|L? @|
_gihi?| uhi^i?Uitc MiU@ti | _thi}@h_t |i T@ti _gihi?Uit Mi|ii? @h@M*it At U@?
Mi i@t*) tii? M) LMtih?} |@| M
%+
E
b t ?@h@?| | hitTiU| |L tu|?} |i ThLUittit
Lih |4ic i |i ULihi?Ui Mi|ii? %
|
@?_ +
|
3
&
t|it@4i@t|@|Lu%
|
@?_ +
|
Atc
Mit_it Mi?} @? 44i_@|i UL?ti^i?Ui Lu |i _i?|L?c t UL?tt|i?| | |i i**!?L?
?|ihThi|@|L? Lu ULihi?Ui @t |i -
2
uhL4 |i hi}hittL? Lu +
|
L? |i T@t|c Thiti?| @?_ u|hi
Lu %
|
G U*i@h*)c ? |t hi}hittL?c i|ih |i UL?|i4TLh@?iLt hi}hittLh t %
|
Lh %
|
3
&
U@??L|
4@!i @?) _gihi?Ui
_gihi?| @) |L tii |i t@4i TL?| t ThL_i_ M) |i TL*@h hiThiti?|@|L? Lu |i
UhLtttTiU|h4G
7
%+
E
b'-
%+
E
be
w
E
b
e

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a more general segmentation basis is adopted, as they consider the homogeneity in the European countries' Consumer Confidence Indicators, rather than analyzing more traditional static similarity measures, instead, they adopt the concepts of dynamic correlation and cohesion between countries.

54 citations

Posted Content
TL;DR: The authors revisited the issue of business cycle synchronisation in the euro area looking back on more than eight years of EMU experience and found that the mean level of synchronisation of national cycles within the currency union since 1999 is overall high, though not higher than in the first half of the nineties.
Abstract: This paper revisits the issue of business cycle synchronisation in the euro area looking back on more than eight years of EMU experience. The dispersion of output gaps across Member States has reached historically low levels since around 2002. Yet, this observation seems to reflect a general decrease in the amplitude of cyclical fluctuations rather than a continued increase in business cycle synchronisation. Using cross-country correlations, the mean level of synchronisation of national cycles within the currency union since 1999 is found to be overall high, though not higher than in the first half of the nineties. Around 2003, the level of cross-country synchronisation experienced a quite abrupt decrease. This picture is shared between several measures of the business cycle. A rebound and partial recovery of cross-country synchronisation is indicated from around 2004 onwards. The observed dip in synchronisation thus appears to be a transitory phenomenon, partly rooted in a recurrent pattern of falling business cycle synchronisation in early recovery phases.

50 citations


Cites background from "A Measure of Comovement for Economi..."

  • ...As to the question whether EMU has promoted business cycle synchronisation in the euro area, Graphs 3 and 4 suggest that the degree of cross-country correlation was slightly higher in the first half of the nineties (single market, run-up to EMU) than in the first five or six years following the introduction of the euro in 1999.16 14 See European Commission (2004) for a detailed discussion of these forces of cyclical convergence in EMU....

    [...]

  • ...Source: Commission services 40 See Croux et al. (2001) for details on the concept of dynamic correlation....

    [...]

  • ...28 See Section 6 for a comparison with countries outside the euro-area....

    [...]

  • ...5 See European Commission (2006b) for a detailed description of the scope and methodology of the survey data....

    [...]

  • ...Furthermore, due to the higher (monthly) observation frequency, the manufacturing data might possibly indicate some short-lived periods of divergence not 1 See Darvas, Rose and Szapáry (2005)....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Jul 2005
TL;DR: This article examined the synchronization of US regional business cycles for 1971-98 and found that US state cyclical asymmetries changed over time, with synchronization appearing to decline by the latter 1980s.
Abstract: Two key assumptions are often used in assessing the feasibility of a common currency area (CCA). First, asymmetric shocks increase the costs of forming a CCA. Second, the US represents a useful benchmark for evaluating a potential CCA. Changes in the asymmetry of US regional cycles, however, are rarely examined. Therefore, this study examines the synchronization of US regional business cycles for 1971--98. The results reveal that US state cyclical asymmetries changed over time, with synchronization appearing to decline by the latter 1980s. This suggests that the US was less likely to fit CCA criteria in the 1990s, which conflicts with its apparent successful monetary-policy experience. Yet, this seeming contradiction can be explained by a tradeoff between the volatility of the common-national business cycle and regional synchronization. Given that the volatility of an area's common shock can change regularly, these findings have implications for the assessment of all CCAs. Copyright 2005, Oxford University Press.

50 citations

Posted Content
TL;DR: In this article, it is argued that if two products or geographic areas belong in the same market, their relative price must be stationary, and that stationarity tests like the ADF and the KPSS can be helpful in delineating the relevant market for Antitrust purposes, particularly for abuses of dominant positions and agreements between competitors.
Abstract: In this Paper it is argued that, if two products or geographic areas belong in the same market, their relative price must be stationary. Hence stationarity tests like the ADF and the KPSS can be helpful in delineating the relevant market for Antitrust purposes, particularly for abuses of dominant positions and agreements between competitors. The proposed procedure is closely related with cointegration analysis but has more general validity. An application to the Italian milk market illustrates the technique.

50 citations


Cites background from "A Measure of Comovement for Economi..."

  • ...Uri et al. (1985) or focus on long-run dynamic correlation as defined in Croux et al. (2001)....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Using spectral analysis, the proportion of cyclical fluctuations in height series attributable to economic cycles is calculated and the extent to which these cyclical phenomena change over time is analyzed.
Abstract: Historical time series for average human height exhibit short- and medium-term cycles that can be associated with business cycles in the 19th and 20th century. Using spectral analysis, we calculate the proportion of cyclical fluctuations in height series attributable to economic cycles. We also analyze the extent to which these cyclical phenomena change over time. In the U.S., the association between height cycles and business cycles was weaker among richer segments of the society, and weaker among men than among women. Additionally, the relationship diminished over time, probably with the rich preceding the population at large.

47 citations

References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The relationship between co-integration and error correction models, first suggested in Granger (1981), is here extended and used to develop estimation procedures, tests, and empirical examples.
Abstract: The relationship between co-integration and error correction models, first suggested in Granger (1981), is here extended and used to develop estimation procedures, tests, and empirical examples. If each element of a vector of time series x first achieves stationarity after differencing, but a linear combination a'x is already stationary, the time series x are said to be co-integrated with co-integrating vector a. There may be several such co-integrating vectors so that a becomes a matrix. Interpreting a'x,= 0 as a long run equilibrium, co-integration implies that deviations from equilibrium are stationary, with finite variance, even though the series themselves are nonstationary and have infinite variance. The paper presents a representation theorem based on Granger (1983), which connects the moving average, autoregressive, and error correction representations for co-integrated systems. A vector autoregression in differenced variables is incompatible with these representations. Estimation of these models is discussed and a simple but asymptotically efficient two-step estimator is proposed. Testing for co-integration combines the problems of unit root tests and tests with parameters unidentified under the null. Seven statistics are formulated and analyzed. The critical values of these statistics are calculated based on a Monte Carlo simulation. Using these critical values, the power properties of the tests are examined and one test procedure is recommended for application. In a series of examples it is found that consumption and income are co-integrated, wages and prices are not, short and long interest rates are, and nominal GNP is co-integrated with M2, but not M1, M3, or aggregate liquid assets.

27,170 citations

01 Jan 1987

3,983 citations


"A Measure of Comovement for Economi..." refers background in this paper

  • ...In this category belong the following three concepts: (i) the idea of co-integration (Engle & Granger, 1987): two processes are co-integrated if the spectral density at frequency zero has rank one; (ii) codependence (Gourieroux & Peaucelle, 1992), which refers to linear combinations of correlated…...

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present evidence that most of the unemployment fluctuations of the seventies (unlike those in the sixties) were induced by unusual structural shifts within the U.S. economy.
Abstract: A substantial fraction of cyclical unemployment is better characterized as fluctuations of the "frictional" or "natural" rate than as deviations from some relatively stable natural rate. Shifts of employment demand between sectors of the economy necessitate continuous labor reallocation. Since it takes time for workers to find new jobs, some unemployment is unavoidable. This paper presents evidence that most of the unemployment fluctuations of the seventies (unlike those in the sixties) were induced by unusual structural shifts within the U.S. economy. Simple time-series models of layoffs and unemployment are constructed that include a measure of structural shifts within the labor market. These models are estimated and a derived natural rate series is constructed.

1,128 citations

ReportDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors introduce a class of statistical tests for the hypothesis that some feature that is present in each of several variables is common to them, which are data properties such as serial correlation, trends, seasonality, heteroscedasticity, auto-regression, and excess kurtosis.
Abstract: This article introduces a class of statistical tests for the hypothesis that some feature that is present in each of several variables is common to them. Features are data properties such as serial correlation, trends, seasonality, heteroscedasticity, autoregressive conditional hetero-scedasticity, and excess kurtosis. A feature is detected by a hypothesis test taking no feature as the null, and a common feature is detected by a test that finds linear combinations of variables with no feature. Often, an exact asymptotic critical value can be obtained that is simply a test of overidentifying restrictions in an instrumental variable regression. This article tests for a common international business cycle.

550 citations

Posted Content
TL;DR: The existence of a serial correlation common feature among the first differences of a set of I(1) variables implies the existence of common cycle in the Beveridge-Nelson-Stock-Watson decomposition of those variables as mentioned in this paper.
Abstract: The existence of a serial correlation common feature among the first differences of a set of I(1) variables implies the existence of a common cycle in the Beveridge-Nelson-Stock-Watson decomposition of those variables. A test for the existence of common cycles among cointegrated variables is developed. The test is used to examine the validity of the common trend-common cycle structure implied by Flavin's excess sensitivity hypothesis and Campbell and Mankiw's mixture of rational expectations and rule-of-thumb hypothesis for consumption and income. Linear independence between the cointegration and the cofeature vectors is exploited to decompose consumption and income into their trend and cycle components. Copyright 1993 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

511 citations