scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal ArticleDOI

A monetary Minsky model of the Great Moderation and the Great Recession

01 Feb 2013-Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization (Elsevier)-Vol. 86, pp 221-235
TL;DR: In this article, a strictly monetary macroeconomic model was proposed to generate the monetary as well as the real phenomena manifested by both The Great Recession and The Great Moderation, which can generate both monetary and real phenomena.
Abstract: Steve Keen's model of Minsky's Financial Instability Hypothesis ( Keen, 1995 ) displayed qualitative characteristics that matched the real macroeconomic and income-distributional outcomes of the preceding and subsequent fifteen years: a period of economic volatility followed by a period of moderation, leading to a rise of instability once more and a serious economic crisis. This paper extends that model to build a strictly monetary macroeconomic model which can generate the monetary as well as the real phenomena manifested by both The Great Recession and The Great Moderation.

Summary (2 min read)

Introduction

  • The trend for recessions to become less frequent and milder abruptly gave way to a sharp decline in output, a doubling of unemployment, and a temporary fall into deflation.
  • The causes of this economic calamity will be debated for decades, but there should be little debate with the proposition that it was not predicted by any variant of mainstream economic analysis available at the time.

The Financial Instability Hypothesis—Genesis

  • These are questions that naturally follow from both the historical record and the comparative success of the past thirty-five years.
  • In addition to being based on unfamiliar theoretical and philosophical foundations, Minsky’s work has mainly been published in non-mainstream journals such as the Journal of Post Keynesian Economics and the Journal of Economic Issues, and minor journals such as the Nebraska Journal of Economics and Business.
  • The abstract model of the neoclassical synthesis cannot generate instability.

The Financial Instability Hypothesis—a Précis3

  • The cause of this high and universally practised risk aversion is the memory of a not too distant system-wide financial failure, when many investment projects foundered, many firms could not finance their borrowings, and many banks had to write off bad debts.
  • Such businesses will find themselves having to sell assets to finance their debt servicing—and this entry of new sellers into the market for assets pricks the exponential growth of asset prices.
  • As the boom collapses, the fundamental problem facing the economy is one of excessive divergence between the debts incurred to purchase assets, and the cash flows generated by them—with those cash flows depending both upon the level of investment and the rate of inflation.

Endogenous money

  • Though debt was modeled in the preceding system, money was not explicitly considered, and therefore price dynamics were absent.
  • There is no evidence that either the monetary base or M1 leads the cycle, although some economists still believe this monetary myth… if anything, the monetary base lags the cycle slightly….
  • From this he derived the proposition that banks, as the creators of these tokens, must be modeled as separate agents from firms and households, and that all transactions are single-commodity, monetary exchanges involving three agents: any monetary payment must therefore be a triangular transaction, involving at least three agents, the payer, the payee, and the bank.

Modeling Minsky III: Endogenous Money

  • There are 5 accounts in the basic model:6 1. A Bank Vault (BV) representing the banking sector’s monetary assets; 2. A Bank Transactions Account (BT) through which all expenditure and interest payments pass;7 3.
  • Payment of wages (row 7) 5. Payment of interest on workers’ account balances (row 8) 6.
  • Recording the endogenous creation of new money (row 13) One is the crucial step of endogenous money creation in response to the investment desires of firms (in this simple model, all capital expansion is shown as funded by borrowing money from the banking sector): 13.
  • The monetary functions are expressed as time constants9 whose value at any given time depends upon the rate of profit.
  • The wages share of output declines as debt levels rise, while the profit rate cycles around its equilibrium value before the final collapse (when exponential growth in the debt ratio means that bankers’ share of income explodes as income collapses).

Conclusion

  • Though much could be done to enhance its realism, in its present form it provides an explanation not only of the Great Recession, but also the Great Moderation that preceded it.
  • The fact that this model is relevant to today’s economic predicament vindicates Minsky’s stricture from 1982 that, if the authors are to fully comprehend how market economies really behave, “it is necessary to have an economic theory which makes great depressions one of the possible states in which their type of capitalist economy can find itself.”.

Did you find this useful? Give us your feedback

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

A Monetary Minsky Model of the Great Moderation and
the Great Recession
Abstract
Steve Keen’s model of Minsky’s Financial Instability Hypothesis (Steve Keen, 1995) displayed
qualitative characteristics that matched the real macroeconomic and income-distributional
outcomes of the preceding and subsequent fifteen years: a period of economic volatility followed
by a period of moderation, leading to a rise of instability once more and a serious economic
crisis. This paper extends that model to build a strictly monetary macroeconomic model which
can generate the monetary as well as the real phenomena manifested by both “The Great
Recession” and “The Great Moderation”.
Introduction
The financial and economic crisis that began in 2007 brought to an abrupt end a period of
economic tranquility that many macroeconomists had celebrated as "The Great Moderation"
(Luca Benati and Paolo Surico, 2009, Ben S. Bernanke, 2004, Steven J Davis and James A Kahn,
2008, Jordi Gali and Luca Gambetti, 2009). The trend for recessions to become less frequent and
milder abruptly gave way to a sharp decline in output, a doubling of unemployment, and a
temporary fall into deflation.

Monetary Minsky Model of the Great Moderation and Great Recession
2
Figure 1:The Great Moderation gives way to the Great Recession
The causes of this economic calamity will be debated for decades, but there should be little
debate with the proposition that it was not predicted by any variant of mainstream economic
analysis available at the time. It was however a prediction of the non-mainstream "Financial
Instability Hypothesis" (FIH) developed by Hyman Minsky.
Steve Keen’s 1995 model of this hypothesis generated qualitative characteristics that matched
the real macroeconomic and income-distributional outcomes of the preceding and subsequent
fifteen years: a period of economic volatility followed by a period of moderation, leading to a
rise of instability once more and a serious economic crisis; and the wage share of income
declining while non-financial business incomes stabilised and financial sector earnings rose
(Steve Keen, 1995; 2000, p. 93). This model is acknowledged as the reason why Keen was one
of the handful of economists to anticipate and warn of the approaching economic and financial
crisis well before it actually occurred (Steve Keen 2007; Dirk J Bezemer, 2009, 2010; Edward
Fullbrook, 2010).
This paper extends that model to build a strictly monetary macroeconomic model of the FIH,
which can generate the monetary as well as the real qualitative characteristics of both “The Great
Recession” and “The Great Moderation” that preceded it. I begin with an overview of Minsky’s
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015
5
2.5
0
2.5
5
7.5
10
12.5
15
Unemployment
Inflation
Unemployment and Inflation
Year
Percent
0

Monetary Minsky Model of the Great Moderation and Great Recession
3
Financial Instability Hypothesis, since many economists are unfamiliar with this non-
neoclassical integrated theory of macroeconomics and finance.
1
The language and concepts in Minsky's theory were also developed completely outside the
mainstream economic debate of the past 30 years,
2
and will therefore appear very foreign to
most macroeconomists today. I hope that readers can look past this unfamiliarity to apply the
spirit of Friedman's methodological dictum, that what matters is not the assumptions of a theory,
but its capacity to give accurate predictions (Milton Friedman, 1953).
The Financial Instability Hypothesis—Genesis
Minsky’s motivation for developing the Financial Instability Hypothesis was that, since the
Great Depression had occurred, a valid economic theory had to be able to generate such an
outcome as one of its possible states:
Can “It”—a Great Depression—happen again? And if “It” can
happen, why didn’t “It” occur in the years since World War II?
These are questions that naturally follow from both the historical
record and the comparative success of the past thirty-five years. To
answer these questions it is necessary to have an economic theory
which makes great depressions one of the possible states in which
our type of capitalist economy can find itself. (Hyman P. Minsky,
1982a, p. 5)
1
In addition to being based on unfamiliar theoretical and philosophical foundations, Minsky’s
work has mainly been published in non-mainstream journals such as the Journal of Post
Keynesian Economics and the Journal of Economic Issues, and minor journals such as the
Nebraska Journal of Economics and Business. Minsky has appeared only twice in the AER:
Hyman Minsky 1957 and 1971.
2
The evolution of Minsky’s hypothesis is discussed in detail in Steve Keen, 1995 and 2001.
Hyman Minsky, 1982b provides his most important papers (the introduction and Chapters 1-5
are sufficient). I also recommend Minsky 1975. His final book Stabilizing an Unstable Economy
Hyman Minsky, 1986, is a far less useful guide to his theories than these earlier works.

Monetary Minsky Model of the Great Moderation and Great Recession
4
For this reason, Minsky explicitly rejected neoclassical economics:
The abstract model of the neoclassical synthesis cannot generate
instability. When the neoclassical synthesis is constructed, capital
assets, financing arrangements that center around banks and money
creation, constraints imposed by liabilities, and the problems
associated with knowledge about uncertain futures are all assumed
away. For economists and policy-makers to do better we have to
abandon the neoclassical synthesis. (Hyman P. Minsky, 1982a, p.
5)
Minsky instead combined insights from Schumpeter, Fisher and Keynes to develop a theory of
financially-driven business cycles which can lead to an eventual debt-deflationary crisis.
The Financial Instability Hypothesis—a Précis
3
Minsky’s analysis of a financial cycle begins at a time when the economy is doing well (the rate
of economic growth equals or exceeds that needed to reduce unemployment), but firms are
conservative in their portfolio management (debt to equity ratios are low and profit to interest
cover is high), and this conservatism is shared by banks, who are only willing to fund cash-flow
shortfalls or low-risk investments. The cause of this high and universally practised risk aversion
is the memory of a not too distant system-wide financial failure, when many investment projects
foundered, many firms could not finance their borrowings, and many banks had to write off bad
debts. Because of this recent experience, both sides of the borrowing relationship prefer
extremely conservative estimates of prospective cash flows: their risk premiums are very high.
However, the combination of a growing economy and conservatively financed investment means
that most projects succeed. Two things gradually become evident to managers and bankers:
“Existing debts are easily validated and units that were heavily in debt prospered: it pays to
lever.” (Hyman P. Minsky, 1982a, p. 6). As a result, both managers and bankers come to regard
the previously accepted risk premium as excessive. Investment projects are evaluated using less
33
This summary of Minsky is reproduced from Steve Keen (1995) with the kind permission of
the Journal of Post Keynesian Economics.

Monetary Minsky Model of the Great Moderation and Great Recession
5
conservative estimates of prospective cash flows, so that with these rising expectations go rising
investment and asset prices. The general decline in risk aversion thus sets off both growth in
investment and exponential growth in the price level of assets, which is the foundation both of
the boom and its eventual collapse.
More external finance is needed to fund the increased level of investment and the speculative
purchase of assets, and these external funds are forthcoming because the banking sector shares
the increased optimism of investors (Hyman P. Minsky, 1982b, p. 65). The accepted debt to
equity ratio rises, liquidity decreases, and the growth of credit accelerates.
This marks the beginning of what Minsky calls “the euphoric economy” (Hyman P. Minsky,
1982b, p. 121), where both lenders and borrowers believe that the future is assured, and therefore
that most investments will succeed. Asset prices are revalued upward as previous valuations are
perceived to be based on mistakenly conservative grounds. Highly liquid, low-yielding financial
instruments are devalued, leading to a rise in the interest rates offered by them as their purveyors
fight to retain market share.
Financial institutions now accept liability structures both for themselves and their customers
“that, in a more sober expectational climate, they would have rejected” (Hyman P. Minsky,
1982b, pp. 120-125). The liquidity of firms is simultaneously reduced by the rise in debt to
equity ratios, making firms more susceptible to increased interest rates. The general decrease in
liquidity and the rise in interest paid on highly liquid instruments triggers a market-based
increase in the interest rate, even without any attempt by monetary authorities to control the
boom. However the increased cost of credit does little to temper the boom, since anticipated
yields from speculative investments normally far exceed prevailing interest rates, leading to a
decline in the elasticity of demand for credit with respect to interest rates.
The condition of euphoria also permits the development of an important actor in Minsky’s
drama, the Ponzi financier (Hyman P. Minsky, 1982b, p. 123; James K. Galbraith, 1955, pp. 4-
5). These capitalists profit by trading assets on a rising market, and incur significant debt in the
process. The servicing costs for Ponzi debtors exceed the cash flows of the businesses they own,
but the capital appreciation they anticipate far exceeds the interest bill. They therefore play an

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper , the authors analyze the main perceptions of capitalism and crises from a mainstream and heterodox perspective and provide a starting point for analysis oriented to investigate the feasibility of alternative economic structures.
Abstract: This paper analyses the main perceptions of capitalism and crises from a mainstream and heterodox perspective. Broadly defined within the neoclassical structure, the mainstream approaches support the idea of long-term stability of capitalism and describe crises as exogenous events. The heterodox perceptions, on the contrary, perceive crises as an internal feature of capitalism and propose to reframe the global economy within the limits of the socio-environmental systems. Despite the historical recurrence of crises, the neoclassic capitalist framework and the related mainstream perceptions are still dominating the international economic debate. Most of the crises have then been addressed with reforms oriented to adjust some elements of the system without changing the overall economic structure. On the contrary, limited numbers of initiatives have been implemented to reorganise the economy according to the heterodox perspectives. Within this context, further analysis would be needed to investigate the feasibility of the proposed heterodox solutions. By discussing the main perceptions of capitalism and crises and by considering the ethical implications of the mainstream and the heterodox approaches, the present paper contributes to the existing debate around stability of capitalism and provides a starting point for analysis oriented to investigate the feasibility of alternative economic structures.

1 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors explore a two-bank model in which one bank correctly estimates the probability of low-quality loan repayment while the other overestimates it, and both banks have identical convex costs when granting loans.
Abstract: This paper explores a two-bank model in which, first, one bank correctly estimates the probability of low-quality loan repayment while the other overestimates it, and second, both banks have identical convex costs when granting loans. In this context of optimistically biased banking competition, we show how the unbiased bank follows the biased competitor as long as the bias of the latter is not too large. This would favour bad borrowers, who get better credit conditions at the expense of good borrowers. As a consequence, the presence of a biased bank increases welfare as long as the expected default rate is sufficiently high. Contrariwise, in subprime markets, biased banking competition would be socially harmful.

1 citations

Dissertation
14 Dec 2016
TL;DR: The role of chocs petroliers in the fluctuation of macroeconomic variables is discussed in this article, where the authors propose a model for evaluating the relationship between relations between macroeconomiques reels, salaires, energy, and the environment.
Abstract: Depuis la stagflation observee consecutivement a la forte hausse du prix du petrole en 1973 et 1979, les chocs petroliers sont consideres comme l’une des sources de fluctuations potentiellement les plus importantes aux Etats-Unis comme dans de nombreux pays industrialises. De nombreux articles ont etudie le role des chocs petroliers dans la fluctuation des principales variables macroeconomiques a savoir, la croissance, le chomage, l’inflation et les salaires. Cependant, ces travaux n’ont pas encore permis d’aboutir a un consensus. Le debat s’est meme intensifie au cours de cette derniere decennie, en raison d’une absence de reaction forte de l’economie reelle pendant la periode d’augmentation du prix du petrole entre 2002 et 2007. En effet, la recession qu’aurait du engendrer une telle hausse des prix ne fut observee qu’au moment de la crise des subprimes en 2008. Plusieurs hypotheses furent avancees pour expliquer la difference entre les crises des annees 1970 et 2000. Blanchard & Gali (2009) et Blanchard & Riggi (2013) evoquent, par exemple, la reduction de la quantite de petrole utilisee dans la production, la plus grande flexibilite des salaires reels et une meilleure credibilite de la politique monetaire. Hamilton (2009) et Kilian (2008) suggerent quant a eux de l’expliquer par l’origine differente des deux chocs petroliers : un choc d’offre pendant les annees 70 et un choc de demande pendant les annees 2000. L’objectif original de la these etait de reexaminer l’impact des chocs petroliers sur l’economie reelle par le canal de la dette. [...]Le developpement de ces travaux entames dans la these pourra aboutir a un cadre alternatif de modelisation decisif pour l’intelligence de la macroeconomie. Il devrait permettre une meilleure comprehension de l’evaluation des relations reciproques entre la sphere financiere, la realite des cycles macroeconomiques reels, l’energie et le climat dans ce qui est sans aucun doute l’enjeu de notre generation : la transition ecologique.

1 citations

References
More filters
Book
01 Jan 1936
TL;DR: In this article, a general theory of the rate of interest was proposed, and the subjective and objective factors of the propensity to consume and the multiplier were considered, as well as the psychological and business incentives to invest.
Abstract: Part I. Introduction: 1. The general theory 2. The postulates of the classical economics 3. The principle of effective demand Part II. Definitions and Ideas: 4. The choice of units 5. Expectation as determining output and employment 6. The definition of income, saving and investment 7. The meaning of saving and investment further considered Part III. The Propensity to Consume: 8. The propensity to consume - i. The objective factors 9. The propensity to consume - ii. The subjective factors 10. The marginal propensity to consume and the multiplier Part IV. The Inducement to Invest: 11. The marginal efficiency of capital 12. The state of long-term expectation 13. The general theory of the rate of interest 14. The classical theory of the rate of interest 15. The psychological and business incentives to liquidity 16. Sundry observations on the nature of capital 17. The essential properties of interest and money 18. The general theory of employment re-stated Part V. Money-wages and Prices: 19. Changes in money-wages 20. The employment function 21. The theory of prices Part VI. Short Notes Suggested by the General Theory: 22. Notes on the trade cycle 23. Notes on mercantilism, the usury laws, stamped money and theories of under-consumption 24. Concluding notes on the social philosophy towards which the general theory might lead.

15,146 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the theory of interest was restated and the output of capital goods and of consumption was analyzed in terms of uncertainty and fluctuations of investment, and demand and supply for output as a whole.
Abstract: I. Comments on the four discussions in the previous issue of points in the General Theory, 209. — II. Certain definite points on which the writer diverges from previous theories, 212. — The theory of interest restated, 215. — Uncertainties and fluctuations of investment, 217. — III. Demand and Supply for output as a whole, 219. — The output of capital goods and of consumption, 221.

5,476 citations

Book
Hyman P. Minsky1
01 Jan 1986
TL;DR: In his seminal work, Minsky presents his groundbreaking financial theory of investment, one that is startlingly relevant today as mentioned in this paper, explaining why the American economy has experienced periods of debilitating inflation, rising unemployment, and marked slowdowns and why the economy is now undergoing a credit crisis that he foresaw.
Abstract: "Mr. Minsky long argued markets were crisis prone. His 'moment' has arrived." -The Wall Street Journal In his seminal work, Minsky presents his groundbreaking financial theory of investment, one that is startlingly relevant today. He explains why the American economy has experienced periods of debilitating inflation, rising unemployment, and marked slowdowns-and why the economy is now undergoing a credit crisis that he foresaw. Stabilizing an Unstable Economy covers: The natural inclination of complex, capitalist economies toward instability Booms and busts as unavoidable results of high-risk lending practices "Speculative finance" and its effect on investment and asset prices Government's role in bolstering consumption during times of high unemployment The need to increase Federal Reserve oversight of banks Henry Kaufman, president, Henry Kaufman & Company, Inc., places Minsky's prescient ideas in the context of today's financial markets and institutions in a fascinating new preface. Two of Minsky's colleagues, Dimitri B. Papadimitriou, Ph.D. and president, The Levy Economics Institute of Bard College, and L. Randall Wray, Ph.D. and a senior scholar at the Institute, also weigh in on Minsky's present relevance in today's economic scene in a new introduction. A surge of interest in and respect for Hyman Minsky's ideas pervades Wall Street, as top economic thinkers and financial writers have started using the phrase "Minsky moment" to describe America's turbulent economy. There has never been a more appropriate time to read this classic of economic theory.

3,031 citations

Book
01 Jan 1953
TL;DR: In this paper, Newman's critical blast blows like a north wind against the more pretentious erections of modern economics, however a healthy and invigorating blast, without malice and with a sincere regard for scientific objectivity.
Abstract: "Stimulating, provocative, often infuriating, but well worth reading." Peter Newman, "Economica" "His critical blast blows like a north wind against the more pretentious erections of modern economics. It is however a healthy and invigorating blast, without malice and with a sincere regard for scientific objectivity." K.E. Boulding, "Political Science Quarterly" "Certainly one of the most engrossing volumes that has appeared recently in economic theory." William J. Baumol, "Review of Economics and Statistics""

3,029 citations