scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Proceedings ArticleDOI

A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows

About: The article was published on 1992-01-06. It has received 8784 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: K-epsilon turbulence model & K-omega turbulence model.
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors proposed the DES97 model, denoted DES97 from here on, which can exhibit an incorrect behavior in thin boundary layers and shallow separation regions, when the grid spacing parallel to the wall becomes less than the boundary-layer thickness.
Abstract: Detached-eddy simulation (DES) is well understood in thin boundary layers, with the turbulence model in its Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) mode and flattened grid cells, and in regions of massive separation, with the turbulence model in its large-eddy simulation (LES) mode and grid cells close to isotropic. However its initial formulation, denoted DES97 from here on, can exhibit an incorrect behavior in thick boundary layers and shallow separation regions. This behavior begins when the grid spacing parallel to the wall Δ∥ becomes less than the boundary-layer thickness δ, either through grid refinement or boundary-layer thickening. The grid spacing is then fine enough for the DES length scale to follow the LES branch (and therefore lower the eddy viscosity below the RANS level), but resolved Reynolds stresses deriving from velocity fluctuations (“LES content”) have not replaced the modeled Reynolds stresses. LES content may be lacking because the resolution is not fine enough to fully support it, and/or because of delays in its generation by instabilities. The depleted stresses reduce the skin friction, which can lead to premature separation.

2,065 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a CFD strategy is proposed that combines delayed detached-eddy simulation (DDES) with an improved RANS-LES hybrid model aimed at wall modelling in LES (WMLES).

1,543 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors discuss the many levels possible for the numerical prediction of a turbulent flow, the target being a complete airplane, turbine, or car, and their hope is to stimulate reflection, discussion, and planning.

1,264 citations

Book
01 Jan 2015
TL;DR: This updated edition includes new worked programming examples, expanded coverage and recent literature regarding incompressible flows, the Discontinuous Galerkin Method, the Lattice Boltzmann Method, higher-order spatial schemes, implicit Runge-Kutta methods and code parallelization.
Abstract: Computational Fluid Dynamics: Principles and Applications, Third Edition presents students, engineers, and scientists with all they need to gain a solid understanding of the numerical methods and principles underlying modern computation techniques in fluid dynamics By providing complete coverage of the essential knowledge required in order to write codes or understand commercial codes, the book gives the reader an overview of fundamentals and solution strategies in the early chapters before moving on to cover the details of different solution techniques This updated edition includes new worked programming examples, expanded coverage and recent literature regarding incompressible flows, the Discontinuous Galerkin Method, the Lattice Boltzmann Method, higher-order spatial schemes, implicit Runge-Kutta methods and parallelization An accompanying companion website contains the sources of 1-D and 2-D Euler and Navier-Stokes flow solvers (structured and unstructured) and grid generators, along with tools for Von Neumann stability analysis of 1-D model equations and examples of various parallelization techniques Will provide you with the knowledge required to develop and understand modern flow simulation codes Features new worked programming examples and expanded coverage of incompressible flows, implicit Runge-Kutta methods and code parallelization, among other topics Includes accompanying companion website that contains the sources of 1-D and 2-D flow solvers as well as grid generators and examples of parallelization techniques

1,228 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present three broad classes of approaches: bypassing this region altogether using wall functions, solving a separate set of equations in the nearwall region, weakly coupled to the outer flow, or simulating the near-wall region in a global, Reynolds-averaged, sense.
Abstract: The numerical simulation of high Reynolds number flows is hampered by model accuracy if the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations are used, and by computational cost if direct or large-eddy simulations (LES) that resolve the near-wall layer are employed. The cost of a calculation scales like the Reynolds number to the power 3 for direct numerical simulations, or 2.4 for LES, making the resolution of the wall layer at high Reynolds number infeasible even with the most advanced computers. In LES, an attractive alternative to compute high-Re flows is the use of wall-layer models, in which only the outer layer is resolved, while the near-wall region is modeled. Three broad classes of approaches are presently used: bypassing this region altogether using wall functions, solving a separate set of equations in the near-wall region, weakly coupled to the outer flow, or simulating the near-wall region in a global, Reynolds-averaged, sense. These approaches are discussed and their ranges of applicability are highlighted. Various unresolved issues in wall-layer modeling are presented.

1,181 citations

References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a two-equation turbulence model is proposed that is shown to be quite accurate for attached boundary layers in adverse pressure gradient, compressible boundary layers, and free shear flows.
Abstract: A comprehensive and critical review of closure approximations for two-equation turbulence models has been made. Particular attention has focused on the scale-determining equation in an attempt to find the optimum choice of dependent variable and closure approximations. Using a combination of singular perturbation methods and numerical computations, this paper demonstrates that: 1) conventional A:-e and A>w formulations generally are inaccurate for boundary layers in adverse pressure gradient; 2) using "wall functions'' tends to mask the shortcomings of such models; and 3) a more suitable choice of dependent variables exists that is much more accurate for adverse pressure gradient. Based on the analysis, a two-equation turbulence model is postulated that is shown to be quite accurate for attached boundary layers in adverse pressure gradient, compressible boundary layers, and free shear flows. With no viscous damping of the model's closure coefficients and without the aid of wall functions, the model equations can be integrated through the viscous sublayer. Surface boundary conditions are presented that permit accurate predictions for flow over rough surfaces and for flows with surface mass addition.

2,783 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the turbulent boundary layer on a flat plate, with zero pressure gradient, is simulated numerically at four stations between R sub theta = 225 and R sub tta = 1410.
Abstract: The turbulent boundary layer on a flat plate, with zero pressure gradient, is simulated numerically at four stations between R sub theta = 225 and R sub theta = 1410. The three-dimensional time-dependent Navier-Stokes equations are solved using a spectra method with up to about 10 to the 7th power grid points. Periodic spanwise and stream-wise conditions are applied, and a multiple-scale procedure is applied to approximate the slow streamwise growth of the boundary layer. The flow is studied, primarily, from a statistical point of view. The solutions are compared with experimental results. The scaling of the mean and turbulent quantities with Reynolds number is examined and compared with accepted laws, and the significant deviations are documented. The turbulence at the highest Reynolds number is studied in detail. The spectra are compared with various theoretical models. Reynolds-stress budget data are provided for turbulence-model testing.

1,934 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a new turbulence closure model was proposed to treat two-dimensional, turbulent boundary layers with strong adverse pressure gradients and attendant separation by using an ordinary differential equation derived from the turbulent kinetic energy equation to describe the stream wise development of the maximum Reynolds shear stress in conjunction with an assumed eddy viscosity distribution.
Abstract: A new turbulence closure model designed specifically to treat two-dimensional, turbulent boundary layers with strong adverse pressure gradients and attendant separation is presented The influence of history effects are modelled by using an ordinary differential equation derived from the turbulent kinetic energy equation to describe the stream wise development of the maximum Reynolds shear stress in conjunction with an assumed eddy viscosity distribution that has as its velocity scale the maximum Reynolds shear stress In the outer part of the boundary layer, the eddy viscosity is treated as a free parameter which is adjusted in order to satisfy the ODE for the maximum shear stress Because of this, the model is not simply an eddy viscosity model, but contains features of a Reynolds stress model Comparisons with experiment are presented that clearly show the proposed model to be superior to the Cebeci-Smith one in treating strongly retarded and separated flows In contrast to two-equation, eddy viscosity models, it requires only slightly more computational effort than simple models such as the Cebeci-Smith

378 citations

Proceedings ArticleDOI
11 Jan 1988

226 citations

Proceedings ArticleDOI
01 Apr 1987
TL;DR: In this paper, an artificial dissipation model, including boundary treatment, that is employed in many central difference schemes for solving the Euler and Navier-Stokes equations is discussed.
Abstract: An artificial dissipation model, including boundary treatment, that is employed in many central difference schemes for solving the Euler and Navier-Stokes equations is discussed. Modifications of this model such as the eigenvalue scaling suggested by upwind differencing are examined. Multistage time stepping schemes with and without a multigrid method are used to investigate the effects of changes in the dissipation model on accuracy and convergence. Improved accuracy for inviscid and viscous airfoil flow is obtained with the modified eigenvalue scaling. Slower convergence rates are experienced with the multigrid method using such scaling. The rate of convergence is improved by applying a dissipation scaling function that depends on mesh cell aspect ratio.

194 citations