A Practical Beginner’s Guide to Cyclic Voltammetry
13 Feb 2018-Journal of Chemical Education (American Chemical Society and Division of Chemical Education, Inc.)-Vol. 95, Iss: 2, pp 197-206
TL;DR: In this article, a short introduction to cyclic voltammetry is provided to help the reader with data acquisition and interpretation, and common pitfalls are provided, and the reader is encouraged to apply what is learned in short, simple training modules provided in the Supporting Information.
Abstract: Despite the growing popularity of cyclic voltammetry, many students do not receive formalized training in this technique as part of their coursework. Confronted with self-instruction, students can be left wondering where to start. Here, a short introduction to cyclic voltammetry is provided to help the reader with data acquisition and interpretation. Tips and common pitfalls are provided, and the reader is encouraged to apply what is learned in short, simple training modules provided in the Supporting Information. Armed with the basics, the motivated aspiring electrochemist will find existing resources more accessible and will progress much faster in the understanding of cyclic voltammetry.
Citations
More filters
TL;DR: In this article, a review of recent advances in supercapacitor (SC) technology with respect to charge storage mechanisms, electrode materials, electrolytes (e.g., particularly paper/fiber-like 3D porous structures), and their practical applications is presented.
1,058 citations
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors summarize the experimental findings for various classes of solid electrolytes and relate them to computational predictions, with the aim of providing a deeper understanding of the interfacial reactions and insight for the future design and engineering of interfaces in SSBs.
Abstract: Solid-state batteries (SSBs) using a solid electrolyte show potential for providing improved safety as well as higher energy and power density compared with conventional Li-ion batteries. However, two critical bottlenecks remain: the development of solid electrolytes with ionic conductivities comparable to or higher than those of conventional liquid electrolytes and the creation of stable interfaces between SSB components, including the active material, solid electrolyte and conductive additives. Although the first goal has been achieved in several solid ionic conductors, the high impedance at various solid/solid interfaces remains a challenge. Recently, computational models based on ab initio calculations have successfully predicted the stability of solid electrolytes in various systems. In addition, a large amount of experimental data has been accumulated for different interfaces in SSBs. In this Review, we summarize the experimental findings for various classes of solid electrolytes and relate them to computational predictions, with the aim of providing a deeper understanding of the interfacial reactions and insight for the future design and engineering of interfaces in SSBs. We find that, in general, the electrochemical stability and interfacial reaction products can be captured with a small set of chemical and physical principles. The reliable operation of solid-state batteries requires stable or passivating interfaces between solid components. In this Review, we discuss models for interfacial reactions and relate the predictions to experimental findings, aiming to provide a deeper understanding of interface stability.
521 citations
TL;DR: In this article, the surface defects and interface can be rationally designed and functioned in electrocatalytic CO2 reduction (ECR) catalysts, and how these atomic-level controlling approaches help to promote efficiency and selectivity.
377 citations
TL;DR: It is envisioned that widespread adoption of electrochemistry will go beyond supplanting unsustainable reagents in mundane redox reactions to the development of exciting reactivity paradigms that enable heretofore unimagined retrosynthetic pathways.
Abstract: The appeal and promise of synthetic organic electrochemistry have been appreciated over the past century. In terms of redox chemistry, which is frequently encountered when forging new bonds, it is difficult to conceive of a more economical way to add or remove electrons than electrochemistry. Indeed, many of the largest industrial synthetic chemical processes are achieved in a practical way using electrons as a reagent. Why then, after so many years of the documented benefits of electrochemistry, is it not more widely embraced by mainstream practitioners? Erroneous perceptions that electrochemistry is a "black box" combined with a lack of intuitive and inexpensive standardized equipment likely contributed to this stagnation in interest within the synthetic organic community. This barrier to entry is magnified by the fact that many redox processes can already be accomplished using simple chemical reagents even if they are less atom-economic. Time has proven that sustainability and economics are not strong enough driving forces for the adoption of electrochemical techniques within the broader community. Indeed, like many synthetic organic chemists that have dabbled in this age-old technique, our first foray into this area was not by choice but rather through sheer necessity. The unique reactivity benefits of this old redox-modulating technique must therefore be highlighted and leveraged in order to draw organic chemists into the field. Enabling new bonds to be forged with higher levels of chemo- and regioselectivity will likely accomplish this goal. In doing so, it is envisioned that widespread adoption of electrochemistry will go beyond supplanting unsustainable reagents in mundane redox reactions to the development of exciting reactivity paradigms that enable heretofore unimagined retrosynthetic pathways. Whereas the rigorous physical organic chemical principles of electroorganic synthesis have been reviewed elsewhere, it is often the case that such summaries leave out the pragmatic aspects of designing, optimizing, and scaling up preparative electrochemical reactions. Taken together, the task of setting up an electrochemical reaction, much less inventing a new one, can be vexing for even seasoned organic chemists. This Account therefore features a unique format that focuses on addressing this exact issue within the context of our own studies. The graphically rich presentation style pinpoints basic concepts, typical challenges, and key insights for those "electro-curious" chemists who seek to rapidly explore the power of electrochemistry in their research.
342 citations
TL;DR: Electro-organic conversion has attracted particular attention from international academia and industry as an environmentally benign and cost-effective technique and reveals novel pathways in synthetic organic chemistry.
Abstract: The severe limitations of fossil fuels and finite resources influence the scientific community to reconsider chemical synthesis and establish sustainable techniques. Several promising methods have emerged, and electro-organic conversion has attracted particular attention from international academia and industry as an environmentally benign and cost-effective technique. The easy application, precise control, and safe conversion of substrates with intermediates only accessible by this method reveal novel pathways in synthetic organic chemistry. The popularity of electricity as a reagent is accompanied by the feasible conversion of bio-based feedstocks to limit the carbon footprint. Several milestones have been achieved in electro-organic conversion at rapid frequency, which have opened up various perspectives for forthcoming processes.
269 citations
References
More filters
TL;DR: 1. Advantages and disadvantages of Chemical Redox Agents, 2. Reversible vs Irreversible ET Reagents, 3. Categorization of Reagent Strength.
Abstract: 1. Advantages of Chemical Redox Agents 878 2. Disadvantages of Chemical Redox Agents 879 C. Potentials in Nonaqueous Solvents 879 D. Reversible vs Irreversible ET Reagents 879 E. Categorization of Reagent Strength 881 II. Oxidants 881 A. Inorganic 881 1. Metal and Metal Complex Oxidants 881 2. Main Group Oxidants 887 B. Organic 891 1. Radical Cations 891 2. Carbocations 893 3. Cyanocarbons and Related Electron-Rich Compounds 894
3,432 citations
TL;DR: In this paper, a critical review of conversion constants amongst various reference electrodes reported in the literature reveals that in most cases the comparisons of redox potential values are far from accurate, and therefore, caution should be exercised when one is comparing the redox properties of complexes measured in CH 3 CN solutions versus different reference electrodes.
1,212 citations
TL;DR: In this article, it is shown that in principle three reference levels can be chosen to measure an absolute value of the electrode potential, and a thermodynamic analysis of the components of the emf of an elec- trochemical cell is shown.
Abstract: The document begins with the illustration of the most widespread misunderstandings in the literature about the physical meaning of absolute electrode potential. The correct expression for this quantity is then de— rived by a thermodynamic analysis of the components of the emf of an elec— trochemical cell. It is shown that in principle three reference levels can be chosen to measure an absolute value of the electrode potential. Only one of these possesses all the requisites for a meaningful comparison on a con— mon energy scale between electrochemical and physical parameters. Such a comparison is the main problem for which the adoption of a correct scale for absolute electrode potentials is a prerequisites. The document ends with the recommendation of a critically evaluated value for the absolute potential of the standard hydrogen electrode in water and in a few other protic solvents. The \"electrode potential\" is often misinterpreted as the electric potential difference between a point in the bulk of the solid conductor and a point in the bulk of the electrolyte solution (L4) (Note a). In reality, the transfer of charged particles across the electrode/electrolyte solution interface is controlled by the difference in the energy levels of the species in the two phases (at constant T and p), which includes not only electrical (electric potential difference) but also chemical (Gibbs energy difference) contributions since the two phases are compositionally dissimilar (refs. 1,2). The value of the tjq of a \"single\" electrode, e.g. one consisting of an electronic conductor in contact with an ionic conductor, is not amenable of direct experimental determination. This is because the two metallic probes from the measuring instruments, both made of the same material, e.g. a metal M1, have to be put in contact with the bulk of these two phases to pick up the signal there. This creates two additional interfaces: a M1/solution interface, and a M1/electrode metal interface. The experimental set-up can be sketched as follows: M1 SIMIMI (1) where M is the metal of the electrode under measure, S is the electrolyte solution, M1 is the metal of the \"connections\" to the measuring instrument and the prime on M indicates that this terminal differs from the other one (M1) by the electrical state only. It is expedient to replace the M1/S interface with a more specific, reproducible and stable system known as the reference electrode. It ensues that an electrode potential can only be measured against a reference system. The measured quantity is thus a relative electrode potential. For the specific example of cell (1), the measured quantity E, the electrode potential of M relative to M1 (Note b), is conventionally split into two contributions, each pertaining to one of the electrodes: EEM_EM1 (2) EM and EM1 can be expressed in their own on a potential scale referred to another reference electrode. In this respect, the hydrogen electrode is conventionally taken as the universal Note a: This quantity, known as the Galvani potential difference between M and 5, has been defined in ref. 3. Note b: In accord with the IUPAC convention on the sign of electrode potentials, all electrode potentials in this document are to be intended as \"reduction potentials\", i.e. the electrode reaction is written in the direction of the reduction (refs. 3,4). 956 Absolute electrode potential (Recommendations 1986) 957 (for solutions in protic solvents) reference electrode for which, under standard conditions, E°(H/H2) = 0 at every temperature (Note c). Since EM as measured is a relative value, it appeals to many to know what the absolute value may be: viz. , the value of EM measured with respect to a universal reference system not including any additional metal/solution interface. Actually, for the vast majority of practical electrochenilcal problems, there is no need to bring in absolute potentials . The one outstanding example where this concept is useful is the matching of semiconductor energy levels and solution energy levels . However, from a fundamental point of view, this problem comes necessarily about in every case one wants to connect the \"relative\" electrode potential to the \"absolute\" physical quantities of the given system. On a customary basis, since the electrode potential is envisaged as the electric potential drop between M and S, the cell potential difference for system (1) is usually written as the electric potential difference between the two metallic terminals: EMi M1 (3) Since three interfaces are involved in cell (1), eqn.(3) can be rewritten as: E (M{ M) + (M S) + (S Mi) (4) Comparison of eqn. (4) with eqn. (2) shows that the identification of the absolute electrode potential with (M S) is not to be reconmended because it is conceptually misleading. Since M' and M are in electronic equilibrium, then (ref. 3): (4M ) = ('/F pr/F) (5) where the right hand side of eqn. (5) expresses the difference in chemical potential of electrons in the two electrode metals. Substitution of eqn.(5) into eqn.(4) gives: E = (p ii'/F) (E'q p'/F) (6) The two exoressions in brackets do not contain quantities pertaining to the other interfaces. They can thus be defined as single electrode potentials (Note d). Since eqn. (6) has been obtained with the two electrodes assembled into a cell, it is possible that terms common to both electrodes do not appear explicitly in eqn. (6) because they cancel out ultimately. The relationship between the truly absolute electrode potential and the single electrode potential in eqn.(6) can thus be written in the form (Note e) (ref. 5): EM(abs) = EM(r) + K (7) where K is a constant depending on the \"absolute\" reference system, and
1,205 citations
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors proposed a universal reference electrode for nonaqueous solvents, such as the normal hydrogen electrode (NHE) or saturated calomel electrode (SCE).
Abstract: Electrochemistry is an increasingly popular technique for the characterization of new compounds. The basic thermodynamic quantity that is assigned to an electrode process is the standard or formal reduction potential (E^o or E^f). In aqueous solution the measurement of reduction potentials is facilitated by the use of reliable and universally accepted reference electrodes such as the normal hydrogen electrode (NHE) or the saturated calomel electrode (SCE). In many instances electrochemical measurements in water are impossible due to insolubility or instability of the compound. Unfortunately, no universal reference electrode exists for nonaqueous solvents.
914 citations
TL;DR: In this paper, the procedural steps and their theoretical implications for a laboratory in cyclic voltammetry were described and discussed. But they did not specify the theoretical implications of these procedural steps.
Abstract: This article details the procedural steps and their theoretical implications for a laboratory in cyclic voltammetry.
376 citations