Search or ask a question
Pricing
Login
Sign up
Home
Notebook
BETA
Literature Review
Copilot
Citation generator
Paraphraser
AI Detector
Chrome Extension
Talk with us
Use on ChatGPT
All figures (18)
Fig. 8 An influence of the tool deflection on its maximum immersion angle
Fig. 9 An initialisation of the tool estimated position in a given section in steady state Fig. 10 The basic algorithm in the steady state
Fig. 11 The thickening of the number of sections at the time of a transition zone passage
Fig. 12 The definition of the first calculation section
Fig. 21 The error profile between the cloud of simulated and measured dots
Fig. 19 The simulation of deflection of the machined surface
Fig. 20 The maximal engagement card
Fig. 18 The calculated profile in the steady mode
Fig. 1 The place of the generating points
Fig. 2 The evolution of the generating point of a tool
Fig. 14 The tool deflection model: approximation by a polynomial curve
Fig. 13 The complete prediction algorithm
Fig. 3 The deflection model definition Fig. 4 The calculation of the resulting deflection dy at point P
Fig. 16 The definition of an engagement line Fig. 17 The validation of the identification protocol
Fig. 15 The local reference mark of the milling cutter
Fig. 6 A simulation of the machined surface
Fig. 5 The part for the calibration of the tool workpiece material couple
Fig. 7 A comparison of the simulated and machined surfaces
Journal Article
•
DOI
•
A prediction of the machining defects in flank milling
[...]
A. Larue
1
,
B. Anselmetti
•
Institutions (1)
École normale supérieure de Cachan
1
11 Jun 2003
-
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology