scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

A rating scale for mania: reliability, validity and sensitivity.

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The MRS score correlated highly with an independent global rating, and with scores of two other mania rating scales administered concurrently, and also correlated with the number of days of subsequent stay in hospital.
Abstract
An eleven item clinician-administered Mania Rating Scale (MRS) is introduced, and its reliability, validity and sensitivity are examined. There was a high correlation between the scores of two independent clinicians on both the total score (0.93) and the individual item scores (0.66 to 0.92). The MRS score correlated highly with an independent global rating, and with scores of two other mania rating scales administered concurrently. The score also correlated with the number of days of subsequent stay in hospital. It was able to differentiate statistically patients before and after two weeks of treatment and to distinguish levels of severity based on the global rating.

read more

Citations
More filters
Book

How Healthy Are We?: A National Study of Well- Being at Midlife

TL;DR: "How Healthy Are The authors?" presents the key findings from the MIDUS survey in three sections: physical health, quality of life and psychological well-being, and the contexts of midlife.
Journal ArticleDOI

Omega 3 Fatty Acids in Bipolar Disorder: A Preliminary Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

TL;DR: Omega3 fatty acids were well tolerated and improved the short-term course of illness in this preliminary study of patients with bipolar disorder.
Journal ArticleDOI

Prediction of psychosis. A step towards indicated prevention of schizophrenia

TL;DR: It is demonstrated that it is possible to identify individuals with a high likelihood of onset of psychosis within a brief follow-up period, which lays the foundation for early treatment in an attempt to prevent, delay or minimise the severity of first onset of schizophrenia.
Journal ArticleDOI

Risk factors for psychosis in an ultra high-risk group: psychopathology and clinical features.

TL;DR: It appears possible to identify those individuals who are at particularly high risk of developing a psychotic disorder such as schizophrenia, given the very high PPV and low false positive rate with this two-step process, and it may be justifiable to target these individuals for intensive monitoring of mental state and even low-dose neuroleptic medication or other biological and psychosocial treatments.
Journal ArticleDOI

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Quetiapine in the Treatment of Bipolar I or II Depression

TL;DR: Quetiapine monotherapy is efficacious and well tolerated for the treatment of bipolar depression and demonstrated statistically significant improvement in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale total scores compared with placebo from week 1 onward.
References
More filters
Book

Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences

Sidney Siegel
TL;DR: This is the revision of the classic text in the field, adding two new chapters and thoroughly updating all others as discussed by the authors, and the original structure is retained, and the book continues to serve as a combined text/reference.
Journal ArticleDOI

A rating scale for depression

TL;DR: The present scale has been devised for use only on patients already diagnosed as suffering from affective disorder of depressive type, used for quantifying the results of an interview, and its value depends entirely on the skill of the interviewer in eliciting the necessary information.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale

TL;DR: The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BRS) as mentioned in this paper was developed to provide a rapid assessment technique particularly suited to the evaluation of patient change, and it is recommended for use where efficiency, speed, and economy are important considerations.
Journal ArticleDOI

Diagnostic criteria for use in psychiatric research.

TL;DR: Diagnostic criteria for 14 psychiatric illnesses along with the validating evidence for these diagnostic categories comes from workers outside the authors' group as well as from those within; it consists of studies of both outpatients and inpatients, of family studies, and of follow-up studies.
Related Papers (5)