A retrospective on friedman's theory of permanent income*
Summary (2 min read)
Introduction
- The theory of the Consumption function played an important role in explaining why traditional Keynesian demand management, through transitory tax policy or other transitory income boosting measures can have little or no effect on real consumption and on the desired policy outcomes.
- The apparently simple ideas in this excellent book have been so insightful and powerful that they have given rise to a huge amount of research, both theoretical and empirical, which continues to this date.
- Particularly that which has been based on microeconomic data, and I demonstrate the relevance of these ideas for their current way of thinking about consumption, savings and income processes.
A statement of the Hypothesis
- Milton Friedman’s PI hypothesis originates from the basic intuition that individuals would wish to smooth consumption and not let it fluctuate with short run fluctuations in income.
- The basic hypothesis posited is that individuals consume a fraction of this permanent income in each period and thus the average propensity to consume would equal the marginal propensity to consume.
- He brings together empirical results and statistical theory, and develops new results by combining these with his economic ideas.
- By comparing averages over time or across different groups of individuals, Friedman is implicitly using Instrumental variables, now a well recognised technique for dealing with classical measurement error in linear models.
- Wald (1940) suggested comparing group averages to overcome measurement error, although the way he approached grouping was not quite right.
The notions of Permanent Income
- The PIH provides a flexible framework for the study of consumption and savings.
- Much of the subsequent research has filled in those elements necessary for explaining aspects of the data, thus defining the agenda for research on consumption and savings.
- The basic hypothesis requires a rolling horizon, which allows some degree of smoothing of consumption.
- The flexibility of the hypothesis comes at a price, since it is hard to define the theoretical underpinnings of the model, and consequently it is hard to make more detailed statements about policy.
- Friedman points this out in the Consumption function book when he states that that permanent income is best defined “… to be whatever seems to correspond to consumer behaviour.”.
The theoretical foundations of the PIH
- There have been other attempts to explain consumption behaviour.
- The key implication of this model ttt E R cU λ β =)(' is that the marginal utility of consumption in each period is equal to the expected marginal utility of wealth multiplied by a factor depending on the interest rate and the rate of time preference.
- Whether this will be detectable in the data will depend on the proportion of individuals who are thus constrained.
- This is not too say that this is not important, but to lay the ground for arguing that a more general version of the PIH, with similar foundations is in fact consistent with the data, although the version of the PIH developed here is probably too restrictive.
Risk aversion, and the PIH
- Given that markets are never found to be complete (e.g. Cochrane, 1991) and Attanasio and Davis, 1996) and given aggregate uninsurable shocks this must be a central issue.
- While these ideas were not formalised at the time they turn out to be key elements in demonstrating that some generalised version of the PIH does in fact fit the data very well and can explain observed consumption patterns.
- It may for example be reasonable to think that more consumption is shifted towards the household when it consists of more members.
- Heckman (1974) pointed out that if consumption is not additively separable from hours of work and this is ignored, the resulting consumption choices over time will look as if they track income, in a way that would reject the basic premise of the permanent income hypothesis.
- The study of income processes has been motivated in part by the study of consumption and savings because it has become apparent that knowing the time series properties of income may be informative about consumption behaviour.
Conclusions
- Most important discoveries and insights are simple, economical, have important implications for a broad range of issues and withstand the test of time.
- Moreover, they generate large amounts of research, verifying it and refining it.
- This is exactly the case with Friedman’s PIH.
- At the end of all this, the original idea has not only survived, but has formed the basis for developing a coherent analysis of consumption and savings.
Did you find this useful? Give us your feedback
Citations
5 citations
Cites background from "A retrospective on friedman's theor..."
...This assumes that households are able to determine what their long-term consumption needs are and then apportion their resources accordingly in order to cover their life span (Carroll, 2001; Meghir, 2002)....
[...]
5 citations
Cites background from "A retrospective on friedman's theor..."
...For instance, it was found that the poor consume at their subsistence level, yet they often have little saving to smooth consumption in case of income shocks (Schmidt-Hebbel, Webb, & Corsetti, 1992; Meghir, 2004)....
[...]
...Consumption is based on long-term expectations about income since households prefer to smooth consumption over time and avoid short-term fluctuations (Meghir, 2004)....
[...]
...The implication of permanent income hypothesis is that individuals do not consume transitory income (𝑀𝑃𝑆𝑇 = 1) so temporary changes in transitory income will directly affect household saving (Schmidt-Hebbel et al., 1992; Meghir, 2004)....
[...]
...The implication of permanent income hypothesis is that individuals do not consume transitory income (MPST = 1) so temporary changes in transitory income will directly affect household saving (Schmidt-Hebbel et al., 1992; Meghir, 2004)....
[...]
4 citations
Additional excerpts
...(See Meghir, 2004.)...
[...]
4 citations
Cites background from "A retrospective on friedman's theor..."
...Challenging the assumptions of the model, the income uncertainty hypothesis and financial constraints hypothesis have been raised to explain the discrepancy (Madsen & McAleer, 2000; Meghir, 2004)....
[...]
4 citations
Cites background from "A retrospective on friedman's theor..."
...Meghir (2004) found that the propensity to consume is affected by household demographic characteristics such as the number and age composition of the household members, which dictate the consumption needs and preferences over time....
[...]
References
15,146 citations
13,200 citations
5,476 citations
5,379 citations
"A retrospective on friedman's theor..." refers methods in this paper
...…of the Euler equation approach for the study of savings and consumption, the introduction of Rational expectations in economic modelling and the Lucas (1976) critique, provided both the motivation and the means by which to develop tests of the PIH that did not involve measuring PI, at least…...
[...]
5,069 citations
"A retrospective on friedman's theor..." refers background in this paper
...…appeal, it is a special case of an intertemporal optimisation model of consumer behaviour, which is the most coherent and logically consistent model we have at present.3 This model has its roots in the works of Fisher (1907) and Ramsey (1928) and has since been developed in many directions....
[...]