A scalable processing-in-memory accelerator for parallel graph processing
13 Jun 2015-Vol. 43, Iss: 3, pp 105-117
TL;DR: This work argues that the conventional concept of processing-in-memory (PIM) can be a viable solution to achieve memory-capacity-proportional performance and designs a programmable PIM accelerator for large-scale graph processing called Tesseract.
Abstract: The explosion of digital data and the ever-growing need for fast data analysis have made in-memory big-data processing in computer systems increasingly important. In particular, large-scale graph processing is gaining attention due to its broad applicability from social science to machine learning. However, scalable hardware design that can efficiently process large graphs in main memory is still an open problem. Ideally, cost-effective and scalable graph processing systems can be realized by building a system whose performance increases proportionally with the sizes of graphs that can be stored in the system, which is extremely challenging in conventional systems due to severe memory bandwidth limitations. In this work, we argue that the conventional concept of processing-in-memory (PIM) can be a viable solution to achieve such an objective. The key modern enabler for PIM is the recent advancement of the 3D integration technology that facilitates stacking logic and memory dies in a single package, which was not available when the PIM concept was originally examined. In order to take advantage of such a new technology to enable memory-capacity-proportional performance, we design a programmable PIM accelerator for large-scale graph processing called Tesseract. Tesseract is composed of (1) a new hardware architecture that fully utilizes the available memory bandwidth, (2) an efficient method of communication between different memory partitions, and (3) a programming interface that reflects and exploits the unique hardware design. It also includes two hardware prefetchers specialized for memory access patterns of graph processing, which operate based on the hints provided by our programming model. Our comprehensive evaluations using five state-of-the-art graph processing workloads with large real-world graphs show that the proposed architecture improves average system performance by a factor of ten and achieves 87% average energy reduction over conventional systems.
Citations
More filters
Posted Content•
TL;DR: This paper proposes an automatic design flow to generate simplified superconducting quantum processor architecture with negligible performance loss for different quantum programs and shows that the design methodology could outperform IBM's general-purpose design schemes with better Pareto-optimal results.
Abstract: More computational resources (i.e., more physical qubits and qubit connections) on a superconducting quantum processor not only improve the performance but also result in more complex chip architecture with lower yield rate. Optimizing both of them simultaneously is a difficult problem due to their intrinsic trade-off. Inspired by the application-specific design principle, this paper proposes an automatic design flow to generate simplified superconducting quantum processor architecture with negligible performance loss for different quantum programs. Our architecture-design-oriented profiling method identifies program components and patterns critical to both the performance and the yield rate. A follow-up hardware design flow decomposes the complicated design procedure into three subroutines, each of which focuses on different hardware components and cooperates with corresponding profiling results and physical constraints. Experimental results show that our design methodology could outperform IBM's general-purpose design schemes with better Pareto-optimal results.
24 citations
Cites background from "A scalable processing-in-memory acc..."
..., machine learning [25, 26], graph processing [27, 28]), but faces different scenarios because both the program patterns and the hardware design space are different in QC....
[...]
TL;DR: A ubiquitous accelerator with out-of-order automatic parallelization for large-scale data-intensive applications, including clustering algorithms, deep neural networks, genome sequencing, and collaborative filtering is designed.
Abstract: Machine learning has been widely applied in various emerging data-intensive applications, and has to be optimized and accelerated by powerful engines to process very large scale data. Recently, the instruction set based accelerators on Field Progarmmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs) have been a promising topic for machine learning applications. The customized instructions can be further scheduled to achieve higher instruction-level parallelism. In this article, we design a ubiquitous accelerator with out-of-order automatic parallelization for large-scale data-intensive applications. The accelerator accommodates four representative applications, including clustering algorithms, deep neural networks, genome sequencing, and collaborative filtering. In order to improve the coarse-grained instruction-level parallelism, the accelerator employs an out-of-order scheduling method to enable parallel dataflow computation. We use Colored Petri Net (CPN) tools to analyze the dependences in the applications, and build a hardware prototype on the real FPGA platform. For cluster applications, the accelerator can support four different algorithms, including K-Means, SLINK, PAM, and DBSCAN. For collaborative filtering applications, it accommodates Tanimoto, euclidean, Cosine, and Pearson Correlation as Similarity metrics. For deep learning applications, we implement hardware accelerators for both training process and inference process. Finally, for genome sequencing, we design a hardware accelerator for the BWA-SW algorithm. Experimental results show that the accelerator architecture can reach up to 25X speedup against Intel processors with affordable hardware cost, insignificant power consumption, and high flexibility.
24 citations
Cites methods from "A scalable processing-in-memory acc..."
...Also, there have been some works using Processing-inMemory or Non-Volatile Memory to accelerate big data applications [43], [44]....
[...]
TL;DR: It is shown that GIRAF outperformed a reference computer architecture with a bandwidth-limited external storage access on a variety of data-intensive workloads.
Abstract: GIRAF is a General purpose In-storage Resistive Associative Framework based on resistive content addressable memory (RCAM), which functions simultaneously as a storage and a massively parallel associative processor. GIRAF alleviates the bandwidth wall by connecting every memory bit to processing transistors and keeping computing inside the storage arrays, thus implementing deep in-data, rather than near-data, processing. We show that GIRAF outperformed a reference computer architecture with a bandwidth-limited external storage access on a variety of data-intensive workloads. The performance of GIRAF Dot Product and Sparse Matrix-Vector multiplication exceeds the attainable performance of a reference architecture by 1200 $ \;\times $ × and 130 $ \;\times $ × , respectively.
24 citations
TL;DR: This paper provides the first comprehensive analysis of the first publicly-available real-world PIM architecture, and presents PrIM (Processing-In-Memory benchmarks), a benchmark suite of 16 workloads from different application domains, which are identified as memory-bound.
Abstract: Many modern workloads, such as neural networks, databases, and graph processing, are fundamentally memory-bound. For such workloads, the data movement between main memory and CPU cores imposes a significant overhead in terms of both latency and energy. A major reason is that this communication happens through a narrow bus with high latency and limited bandwidth, and the low data reuse in memory-bound workloads is insufficient to amortize the cost of main memory access. Fundamentally addressing this data movement bottleneck requires a paradigm where the memory system assumes an active role in computing by integrating processing capabilities. This paradigm is known as processing-in-memory (PIM). Recent research explores different forms of PIM architectures, motivated by the emergence of new 3D-stacked memory technologies that integrate memory with a logic layer where processing elements can be easily placed. Past works evaluate these architectures in simulation or, at best, with simplified hardware prototypes. In contrast, the UPMEM company has designed and manufactured the first publicly-available real-world PIM architecture. The UPMEM PIM architecture combines traditional DRAM memory arrays with general-purpose in-order cores, called DRAM Processing Units (DPUs), integrated in the same chip. This paper provides the first comprehensive analysis of the first publicly-available real-world PIM architecture. We make two key contributions. First, we conduct an experimental characterization of the UPMEM-based PIM system using microbenchmarks to assess various architecture limits such as compute throughput and memory bandwidth, yielding new insights. Second, we present PrIM (Processing-In-Memory benchmarks), a benchmark suite of 16 workloads from different application domains (e.g., dense/sparse linear algebra, databases, data analytics, graph processing, neural networks, bioinformatics, image processing), which we identify as memory-bound. We evaluate the performance and scaling characteristics of PrIM benchmarks on the UPMEM PIM architecture, and compare their performance and energy consumption to their modern CPU and GPU counterparts. Our extensive evaluation conducted on two real UPMEM-based PIM systems with 640 and 2,556 DPUs provides new insights about suitability of different workloads to the PIM system, programming recommendations for software designers, and suggestions and hints for hardware and architecture designers of future PIM systems.
24 citations
TL;DR: CiM-HE is introduced, a CiM architecture that can support operations for the Brakerski/Fan–Vercauteren (B/FV) scheme, a somewhat HE scheme for general computation, and a set of four end-to-end tasks for homomorphic multiplications.
Abstract: Homomorphic encryption (HE) allows direct computations on encrypted data. Despite numerous research efforts, the practicality of HE schemes remains to be demonstrated. In this regard, the enormous size of ciphertexts involved in HE computations degrades computational efficiency. Near-memory processing (NMP) and computing-in-memory (CiM)—paradigms where computation is done within the memory boundaries—represent architectural solutions for reducing latency and energy associated with data transfers in data-intensive applications, such as HE. This article introduces CiM-HE, a CiM architecture that can support operations for the Brakerski/Fan–Vercauteren (B/FV) scheme, a somewhat HE scheme for general computation. CiM-HE hardware consists of customized peripherals, such as sense amplifiers, adders, bit shifters, and sequencing circuits. The peripherals are based on CMOS technology and could support computations with memory cells of different technologies. Circuit-level simulations are used to evaluate our CiM-HE framework assuming a 6T-SRAM memory. We compare our CiM-HE implementation against: 1) two optimized CPU HE implementations and 2) a field-programmable gate array (FPGA)-based HE accelerator implementation. Compared with a CPU solution, CiM-HE obtains speedups between $4.6\times $ and $9.1\times $ and energy savings between $266.4\times $ and $532.8\times $ for homomorphic multiplications (the most expensive HE operation). Also, a set of four end-to-end tasks, i.e., mean, variance, linear regression, and inference, are up to $1.1\times $ , $7.7\times $ , $7.1\times $ , and $7.5\times $ faster (and $301.1\times $ , $404.6\times $ , $532.3\times $ , and $532.8\times $ more energy efficient). Compared with CPU-based HE in previous work, CiM-HE obtains $14.3\times $ speedup and $> 2600\times $ energy savings. Finally, our design offers $2.2\times $ speedup with $88.1\times $ energy savings compared with a state-of-the-art FPGA-based accelerator.
24 citations
References
More filters
01 Apr 1998
TL;DR: This paper provides an in-depth description of Google, a prototype of a large-scale search engine which makes heavy use of the structure present in hypertext and looks at the problem of how to effectively deal with uncontrolled hypertext collections where anyone can publish anything they want.
Abstract: In this paper, we present Google, a prototype of a large-scale search engine which makes heavy use of the structure present in hypertext. Google is designed to crawl and index the Web efficiently and produce much more satisfying search results than existing systems. The prototype with a full text and hyperlink database of at least 24 million pages is available at http://google.stanford.edu/. To engineer a search engine is a challenging task. Search engines index tens to hundreds of millions of web pages involving a comparable number of distinct terms. They answer tens of millions of queries every day. Despite the importance of large-scale search engines on the web, very little academic research has been done on them. Furthermore, due to rapid advance in technology and web proliferation, creating a web search engine today is very different from three years ago. This paper provides an in-depth description of our large-scale web search engine -- the first such detailed public description we know of to date. Apart from the problems of scaling traditional search techniques to data of this magnitude, there are new technical challenges involved with using the additional information present in hypertext to produce better search results. This paper addresses this question of how to build a practical large-scale system which can exploit the additional information present in hypertext. Also we look at the problem of how to effectively deal with uncontrolled hypertext collections where anyone can publish anything they want.
14,696 citations
"A scalable processing-in-memory acc..." refers methods in this paper
...Our comprehensive evaluations using five state-of-the-art graph processing workloads with large real-world graphs show that the proposed architecture improves average system performance by a factor of ten and achieves 87% average energy reduction over conventional systems....
[...]
Journal Article•
TL;DR: Google as discussed by the authors is a prototype of a large-scale search engine which makes heavy use of the structure present in hypertext and is designed to crawl and index the Web efficiently and produce much more satisfying search results than existing systems.
13,327 citations
TL;DR: This work presents a new coarsening heuristic (called heavy-edge heuristic) for which the size of the partition of the coarse graph is within a small factor of theSize of the final partition obtained after multilevel refinement, and presents a much faster variation of the Kernighan--Lin (KL) algorithm for refining during uncoarsening.
Abstract: Recently, a number of researchers have investigated a class of graph partitioning algorithms that reduce the size of the graph by collapsing vertices and edges, partition the smaller graph, and then uncoarsen it to construct a partition for the original graph [Bui and Jones, Proc. of the 6th SIAM Conference on Parallel Processing for Scientific Computing, 1993, 445--452; Hendrickson and Leland, A Multilevel Algorithm for Partitioning Graphs, Tech. report SAND 93-1301, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 1993]. From the early work it was clear that multilevel techniques held great promise; however, it was not known if they can be made to consistently produce high quality partitions for graphs arising in a wide range of application domains. We investigate the effectiveness of many different choices for all three phases: coarsening, partition of the coarsest graph, and refinement. In particular, we present a new coarsening heuristic (called heavy-edge heuristic) for which the size of the partition of the coarse graph is within a small factor of the size of the final partition obtained after multilevel refinement. We also present a much faster variation of the Kernighan--Lin (KL) algorithm for refining during uncoarsening. We test our scheme on a large number of graphs arising in various domains including finite element methods, linear programming, VLSI, and transportation. Our experiments show that our scheme produces partitions that are consistently better than those produced by spectral partitioning schemes in substantially smaller time. Also, when our scheme is used to compute fill-reducing orderings for sparse matrices, it produces orderings that have substantially smaller fill than the widely used multiple minimum degree algorithm.
5,629 citations
"A scalable processing-in-memory acc..." refers methods in this paper
...For this purpose, we use METIS [27] to perform 512-way multi-constraint partitioning to balance the number of vertices, outgoing edges, and incoming edges of each partition, as done in a recent previous work [51]....
[...]
...This is confirmed by the observation that Tesseract with METIS spends 59% of execution time waiting for synchronization barriers....
[...]
12 Jun 2005
TL;DR: The goals are to provide easy-to-use, portable, transparent, and efficient instrumentation, and to illustrate Pin's versatility, two Pintools in daily use to analyze production software are described.
Abstract: Robust and powerful software instrumentation tools are essential for program analysis tasks such as profiling, performance evaluation, and bug detection. To meet this need, we have developed a new instrumentation system called Pin. Our goals are to provide easy-to-use, portable, transparent, and efficient instrumentation. Instrumentation tools (called Pintools) are written in C/C++ using Pin's rich API. Pin follows the model of ATOM, allowing the tool writer to analyze an application at the instruction level without the need for detailed knowledge of the underlying instruction set. The API is designed to be architecture independent whenever possible, making Pintools source compatible across different architectures. However, a Pintool can access architecture-specific details when necessary. Instrumentation with Pin is mostly transparent as the application and Pintool observe the application's original, uninstrumented behavior. Pin uses dynamic compilation to instrument executables while they are running. For efficiency, Pin uses several techniques, including inlining, register re-allocation, liveness analysis, and instruction scheduling to optimize instrumentation. This fully automated approach delivers significantly better instrumentation performance than similar tools. For example, Pin is 3.3x faster than Valgrind and 2x faster than DynamoRIO for basic-block counting. To illustrate Pin's versatility, we describe two Pintools in daily use to analyze production software. Pin is publicly available for Linux platforms on four architectures: IA32 (32-bit x86), EM64T (64-bit x86), Itanium®, and ARM. In the ten months since Pin 2 was released in July 2004, there have been over 3000 downloads from its website.
4,019 citations
"A scalable processing-in-memory acc..." refers methods in this paper
...We evaluate our architecture using an in-house cycle-accurate x86-64 simulator whose frontend is Pin [38]....
[...]
06 Jun 2010
TL;DR: A model for processing large graphs that has been designed for efficient, scalable and fault-tolerant implementation on clusters of thousands of commodity computers, and its implied synchronicity makes reasoning about programs easier.
Abstract: Many practical computing problems concern large graphs. Standard examples include the Web graph and various social networks. The scale of these graphs - in some cases billions of vertices, trillions of edges - poses challenges to their efficient processing. In this paper we present a computational model suitable for this task. Programs are expressed as a sequence of iterations, in each of which a vertex can receive messages sent in the previous iteration, send messages to other vertices, and modify its own state and that of its outgoing edges or mutate graph topology. This vertex-centric approach is flexible enough to express a broad set of algorithms. The model has been designed for efficient, scalable and fault-tolerant implementation on clusters of thousands of commodity computers, and its implied synchronicity makes reasoning about programs easier. Distribution-related details are hidden behind an abstract API. The result is a framework for processing large graphs that is expressive and easy to program.
3,840 citations
"A scalable processing-in-memory acc..." refers methods in this paper
...Our comprehensive evaluations using five state-of-the-art graph processing workloads with large real-world graphs show that the proposed architecture improves average system performance by a factor of ten and achieves 87% average energy reduction over conventional systems....
[...]
...It also includes two hardware prefetchers specialized for memory access patterns of graph processing, which operate based on the hints provided by our programming model....
[...]