scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal Article•DOI•

A simple mechanism for the efficient provision of public goods - experimental evidence

Josef Falkinger1, Ernst Fehr2, Simon Gächter2, Rudolf Winter-Ebmer3•
University of Regensburg1, University of Zurich2, Johannes Kepler University of Linz3
01 Mar 2000-The American Economic Review (American Economic Association)-Vol. 90, Iss: 1, pp 247-264
TL;DR: In this paper, a series of experiments designed to investigate the factor of incentive mechanisms in the case of private provisions of public goods is presented. But the results showed that the proposed incentive mechanism is very promising.
Abstract: The author reports on a series of experiments designed to investigate the factor of incentive mechanisms in the case of private provisions of public goods. In the Control treatment, there was no mechanism so that subjects faced strong free-riding incentives. In the so-called Falkinger mechanism treatment, the author implemented the Falkinger mechanism. The studies explored the impact of the mechanism in different economic environments. Results showed that the proposed incentive mechanism is very promising. Section I of the paper introduces the mechanism to be examined. Section II discusses the experimental design. Empirical results are provided in Section III, and Section IV interprets these results followed by a summary.

Summary (1 min read)

Jump to:  and [Summary]

Summary

  • In the Control treatment, there was no mechanism so that subjects faced strong free-riding incentives.
  • The studies explored the impact of the mechanism in different economic environments.
  • Results showed that the proposed incentive mechanism is very promising.
  • Empirical results are provided in Section III, and Section IV interprets these results followed by a summary.

Did you find this useful? Give us your feedback

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

University of Zurich
Zurich Open Repository and Archive
Winterthurerstr. 190
CH-8057 Zurich
http://www.zora.unizh.ch
Year: 2000
A simple mechanism for the efficient provision of public goods:
experimental evidence
Falkinger, Josef; Fehr, Ernst; Gächter, Simon; Winter-Ebmer, Rudolf
Falkinger, Josef; Fehr, Ernst; Gächter, Simon; Winter-Ebmer, Rudolf. A simple mechanism for the efficient
provision of public goods: experimental evidence. American Economic Review 2000, 90(1):247-264.
Postprint available at:
http://www.zora.unizh.ch
Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich.
http://www.zora.unizh.ch
Originally published at:
American Economic Review 2000, 90(1):247-264
Falkinger, Josef; Fehr, Ernst; Gächter, Simon; Winter-Ebmer, Rudolf. A simple mechanism for the efficient
provision of public goods: experimental evidence. American Economic Review 2000, 90(1):247-264.
Postprint available at:
http://www.zora.unizh.ch
Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich.
http://www.zora.unizh.ch
Originally published at:
American Economic Review 2000, 90(1):247-264
A simple mechanism for the efficient provision of public goods:
experimental evidence
Abstract
The author reports on a series of experiments designed to investigate the factor of incentive mechanisms
in the case of private provisions of public goods. In the Control treatment, there was no mechanism so
that subjects faced strong free-riding incentives. In the so-called Falkinger mechanism treatment, the
author implemented the Falkinger mechanism. The studies explored the impact of the mechanism in
different economic environments. Results showed that the proposed incentive mechanism is very
promising. Section I of the paper introduces the mechanism to be examined. Section II discusses the
experimental design. Empirical results are provided in Section III, and Section IV interprets these results
followed by a summary.
Citations
More filters
Journal Article•DOI•
z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments

[...]

Urs Fischbacher
07 Feb 2007-Experimental Economics
TL;DR: Z-Tree as mentioned in this paper is a toolbox for ready-made economic experiments, which allows programming almost any kind of experiments in a short time and is stable and easy to use.
Abstract: z-Tree (Zurich Toolbox for Ready-made Economic Experiments) is a software for developing and conducting economic experiments. The software is stable and allows programming almost any kind of experiments in a short time. In this article, I present the guiding principles behind the software design, its features, and its limitations.

9,760 citations

Journal Article•DOI•
A theory of fairness, competition and cooperation

[...]

Ernst Fehr1, Klaus M. Schmidt2•
University of Zurich1, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich2
01 Aug 1999-Quarterly Journal of Economics
TL;DR: This paper showed that if some people care about equity, the puzzles can be resolved and that the economic environment determines whether the fair types or the selesh types dominate equilibrium behavior in cooperative games.
Abstract: There is strong evidence that people exploit their bargaining power in competitivemarkets butnot inbilateral bargainingsituations. Thereisalsostrong evidence that people exploit free-riding opportunities in voluntary cooperation games. Yet, when they are given the opportunity to punish free riders, stable cooperation is maintained, although punishment is costly for those who punish. This paper asks whether there is a simple common principle that can explain this puzzling evidence. We show that if some people care about equity the puzzles can be resolved. It turns out that the economic environment determines whether the fair types or the selesh types dominate equilibrium behavior.

8,783 citations

Journal Article•DOI•
A Theory of Fairness, Competition and Cooperation

[...]

Ernst Fehr1•
University of Zurich1
01 Mar 1998-Social Science Research Network
TL;DR: This article showed that if a fraction of the people exhibit inequality aversion, stable cooperation is maintained although punishment is costly for those who punish, and they also showed that when they are given the opportunity to punish free riders, stable cooperations are maintained.
Abstract: There is strong evidence that people exploit their bargaining power in competitive markets but not in bilateral bargaining situations. There is also strong evidence that people exploit free-riding opportunities in voluntary cooperation games. Yet, when they are given the opportunity to punish free riders, stable cooperation is maintained although punishment is costly for those who punish. This paper asks whether there is a simple common principle that can explain this puzzling evidence. We show that if a fraction of the people exhibits inequality aversion the puzzles can be resolved.

6,919 citations

Journal Article•DOI•
Cooperation and Punishment in Public Goods Experiments

[...]

Ernst Fehr, Simon Gächter
01 Sep 2000-The American Economic Review
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors show that there is a widespread willingness of the cooperators to punish the free-riders, even if punishment is costly and does not provide any material benefits for the punisher.
Abstract: Casual evidence as well as daily experience suggest that many people have a strong aversion against being the 'sucker' in social dilemma situations. As a consequence, those who cooperate may be willing to punish free-riding, even if this is costly for them and even if they cannot expect future benefits from their punishment activities. A main purpose of this paper is to show experimentally that there is indeed a widespread willingness of the cooperators to punish the free-riders. Our results indicate that this holds true even if punishment is costly and does not provide any material benefits for the punisher. In addition, we provide evidence that free-riders are punished the more heavily the more they deviate from the cooperation levels of the cooperators. Potential free-riders, therefore, can avoid or at least reduce punishment by increasing their cooperation levels. This, in turn, suggests that in the presence of punishment opportunities there will be less free riding. Testing this conjecture is the other major aim of our paper.

3,161 citations

Journal Article•DOI•
Fairness and Retaliation: The Economics of Reciprocity

[...]

Ernst Fehr, Simon Gächter
01 Aug 2000-Journal of Economic Perspectives
TL;DR: The authors discusses the economic implications of reciprocity and shows that a substantial fraction of people behave according to this dictum: people repay gifts and take revenge even in interactions with complete strangers and even if it is costly for them and yields neither present nor future material rewards.
Abstract: This article discusses the economic implications of reciprocity. A long-standing tradition in economics views human beings as exclusively self-interested. In most economic accounts of individual behavior and aggregate social phenomena, the vast forces of greed are put at the center of the explanation. However, many people deviate from purely self-interested behavior in a reciprocal manner. Reciprocity means that in response to friendly actions, people are frequently much nicer and much more cooperative than predicted by the self-interest model; conversely, in response to hostile actions they are frequently much more nasty and even brutal. There is considerable evidence that a substantial fraction of people behave according to this dictum: People repay gifts and take revenge even in interactions with complete strangers and even if it is costly for them and yields neither present nor future material rewards. This notion of reciprocity is thus very different from kind or hostile responses in repeated interactions that are solely motivated by future material gains.

2,516 citations

References
More filters
Journal Article•DOI•
Incentives in Teams

[...]

Theodore Groves
01 Jul 1973-Econometrica
TL;DR: This paper analyzes the problem of inducing the members of an organization to behave as if they formed a team and exhibits a particular set of compensation rules, an optimal incentive structure, that leads to team behavior.
Abstract: This paper analyzes the problem of inducing the members of an organization to behave as if they formed a team. Considered is a conglomerate-type organization consisting of a set of semi-autonomous subunits that are coordinated by the organization's head. The head's incentive problem is to choose a set of employee compensation rules that will induce his subunit managers to communicate accurate information and take optimal decisions. The main result exhibits a particular set of compensation rules, an optimal incentive structure, that leads to team behavior. Particular attention is directed to the informational aspects of the problem. An extended example of a resource allocation model is discussed and the optimal incentive structure is interpreted in terms of prices charged by the head for resources allocated to the subunits.

3,347 citations

Journal Article•DOI•
Multipart pricing of public goods

[...]

Edward H. Clarke
01 Sep 1971-Public Choice

3,253 citations

Book Chapter•DOI•
Public Goods: A Survey of Experimental Research

[...]

John O. Ledyard
31 Dec 1995-Research Papers in Economics
TL;DR: In this article, a review is made of various public goods experiments and it is found that the public goods environment is a very sensitive one with much that can affect outcomes but are difficult to control.
Abstract: Environments with public goods are a wonderful playground for those interested in delicate experimental problems, serious theoretical challenges, and difficult mechanism design issues. A review is made of various public goods experiments. It is found that the public goods environment is a very sensitive one with much that can affect outcomes but are difficult to control. The many factors interact with each other in unknown ways. Nothing is known for sure. Environments with public goods present a serious challenge even to skilled experimentalists and many opportunities for imaginative work.

3,135 citations

Journal Article•DOI•
On the private provision of public goods

[...]

Theodore C. Bergstrom1, Lawrence E. Blume1, Hal R. Varian1•
University of Michigan1
01 Feb 1986-Journal of Public Economics
TL;DR: In this article, the authors consider a general model of non-cooperative provision of a public good and show that there is always a unique Nash equilibrium in the model and characterize the properties and the comparative statics of the equilibrium.

2,237 citations

Book•
The Theory of Externalities, Public Goods, and Club Goods

[...]

Richard Cornes1, Todd Sandler2•
Australian National University1, University of Southern California2
30 Apr 1986
TL;DR: The authors presents a theoretical treatment of externalities (i.e., uncompensated interdependencies), public goods, and club goods, covering asymmetric information, underlying game-theoretic formulations, and intuitive and graphical presentations.
Abstract: This book presents a theoretical treatment of externalities (i.e. uncompensated interdependencies), public goods, and club goods. The new edition updates and expands the discussion of externalities and their implications, coverage of asymmetric information, underlying game-theoretic formulations, and intuitive and graphical presentations. Aimed at well-prepared undergraduates and graduate students making a serious foray into this branch of economics, the analysis should also interest professional economists wishing to survey recent advances in the field. No other single source for the range of materials explored is currently available. Topics investigated include Nash equilibrium, Lindahl equilibria, club theory, preference-revelation mechanism, Pigouvian taxes, the commons, Coase Theorem, and static and repeated games. The authors use mathematical techniques only as much as necessary to pursue the economic argument. They develop key principles of public economics that are useful for subfields such as public choice, labor economics, economic growth, international economics, environmental and natural resource economics, and industrial organization.

1,450 citations

Related Papers (5)
A theory of fairness, competition and cooperation

[...]

01 Aug 1999-Quarterly Journal of Economics
Ernst Fehr, Klaus M. Schmidt
Cooperation and Punishment in Public Goods Experiments

[...]

01 Sep 2000-The American Economic Review
Ernst Fehr, Simon Gächter
z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments

[...]

07 Feb 2007-Experimental Economics
Urs Fischbacher
Public Goods: A Survey of Experimental Research

[...]

31 Dec 1995-Research Papers in Economics
John O. Ledyard
Motivation, Knowledge Transfer, and Organizational Forms

[...]

01 Nov 1999-Social Science Research Network
Margit Osterloh, Margit Osterloh, Bruno S. Frey