scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

A study of relationships between traffic noise and annoyance for different urban site typologies

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this paper, the authors analyse the different attitudes of residents in urban areas in regard to annoyance induced by traffic noise, account taken of the effects of the street configuration and of the presence of specific public transport modes in the definition of the dose-response curves.
Abstract
The paper intends to analyse the different attitudes of residents in urban areas in regard to annoyance induced by traffic noise, account taken of the effects of the street configuration and of the presence of specific public transport modes in the definition of the dose-response curves. People’s annoyance was investigated through a campaign of noise and traffic measurements and an epidemiological survey, administered to a sample of 830 residents in the buildings close to the measurement points. An ordinal regression model taking into account environmental and urban characteristics was used to identify a dose-response relationship. The cumulative probabilities allowed to define two cut points on the dose-response curves (60 and 75 dB(A)), grouping people in three classes and making the representation of the dose-response relationships different from those traditionally defined that use only the percentage of highly annoyed people. The results show different people’s attitudes towards the annoyance in the urban sites while the dose-response relationship shows that the correlation between annoyance and noise is low. For the same value of day equivalent level, 10% more people are annoyed in L sections (broad streets) than in U sections (narrow streets). Furthermore, all the dose-response curves show a higher sensitivity of people living in L sections; this difference can be measured as a shift of about 4 dB(A). Noise levels are, arguably, a useful indicator, but they are not reliable enough to define the discomfort of the residents, while the site characteristics could shed light on annoyance variability.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Noise and health.

H. A. Denzel
- 06 Mar 1964 - 
TL;DR: The substantiated effects of environmental noise include annoyance, which increases as exposure increases, and sleep disturbance, to which many can habituate, although the relation between sleep loss and health is not clearly understood.
Journal ArticleDOI

Evidence Relating to Environmental Noise Exposure and Annoyance, Sleep Disturbance, Cardio-Vascular and Metabolic Health Outcomes in the Context of IGCB (N): A Scoping Review of New Evidence.

TL;DR: A review on annoyance, sleep disturbance, cardiovascular and metabolic effects in relation to environmental noise was prepared to advise the Interdepartmental Group on Costs and Benefits Noise Subject Group whether this new evidence warrants an update of their recommendations.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Public Health Impact of Road-Traffic Noise in a Highly-Populated City, Republic of Korea: Annoyance and Sleep Disturbance

TL;DR: Park et al. as discussed by the authors presented a procedure to determine the levels of road-traffic noise at both day and night, and an assessment of the adverse health effects across Gwangju Metropolitan City (GMC), Republic of Korea (ROK).
Journal ArticleDOI

Effect of a fragrant tree on the perception of traffic noise

TL;DR: In this article, the effect of a fragrant tree on the perception of traffic noise was investigated, which was reflected in increased overall comfort of the street, decreased annoyance caused by traffic noise, and improvement in auditory and olfactory satisfaction.
Journal ArticleDOI

Acoustic amenity analysis for high-rise building along urban expressway: Modeling traffic noise vertical propagation using neural networks

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors analyzed acoustic amenity and developed a noise analysis model for high-rise buildings, especially those along urban expressway, in order to determine low frequency noise, which is perhaps less noticed for most survey.
References
More filters
Book

Applied Logistic Regression

TL;DR: Hosmer and Lemeshow as discussed by the authors provide an accessible introduction to the logistic regression model while incorporating advances of the last decade, including a variety of software packages for the analysis of data sets.
Book

A technique for the measurement of attitudes

Rensis Likert
TL;DR: The instrument to be described here is not, however, indirect in the usual sense of the word; it does not seek responses to items apparently unrelated to the attitudes investigated, and seeks to measure prejudice in a manner less direct than is true of the usual prejudice scale.
Book

Analysis of ordinal categorical data

Alan Agresti
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a survey of the advantages of using logit models in regression models for Ordinal Probabilities, Scores, and Odds Ratios, as well as their drawbacks.
Related Papers (5)
Trending Questions (1)
What is the perception of residents towards urban noise?

The paper analyzes the annoyance induced by traffic noise on residents in urban areas, taking into account the effects of street configuration and specific public transport modes. It does not specifically mention the perception of residents towards urban noise.