Accessibility and transit-oriented development in European metropolitan areas
Summary (3 min read)
1. Introduction
- The urban and transport planning strategy of Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) has been generating considerable interest in academic and professional circles recently (Bertolini et al., 2012; Cervero, 2004; Curtis et al., 2009).
- By exploring these issues, the authors aim to provide empirical insights into the understudied relationship between TOD (a transport and urban development strategy embraced by increasing numbers of cities and regions across the world) and accessibility (a key policy aim and feature of the urban system).
- Accordingly, this paper innovatively contributes (1) a transparent link between the two and (2) a systematic way of assessing to what extent and because of which transport and land use features, the spatial distribution of jobs and population matches the rail network.
2. Literature review: TOD degree of the urban structure, travel behaviour and accessibility
- The interaction between the TOD degree of the urban structure, accessibility and travel behaviour has attracted considerable attention in the scientific literature worldwide.
- Within the TOD literature, an increasing number of studies focus specifically on how transit development impacts land use changes (Cervero and Landis, 1997; Ratner and Goetz, 2013).
- The answers to this broad issue remain thus ambivalent, and it is not yet clear whether land use strategies alone can have a significant effect on travel behaviour (Ewing and Cervero, 2010).
- Using different methods and measures of subjective or objective accessibility, many studies compare the accessibility by different modes, predominantly comparing public transport and car use (Benenson et al., 2011; Keller et al., 2011).
3. Research design
- The research methodology was set up to provide insights into the relationships between TOD degree of the urban structure and citywide accessibility.
- – Comparison between the various case studies and interpretation of the results: through geographical information systems (GIS), which provides spatial analysis and comparison as well as the visualisation of results.
3.1. Case studies
- The authors did not include TOD best practices in Europe (as exemplified by Copenhagen and Stockholm) as their aim was indeed not to identify best examples, or their defining characteristics, but rather urban form determinants of accessibility by rail.
- The authors selected case studies that showed sufficient variation on possible determinants, not that were potential best (or worst) practices.
- The decision was made to limit the number of case studies to six: more cities would have meant that fewer types of analyses could have been performed and triangulation between them and comparisons between different cities would have been more difficult and less transparent.
- Data availability was also a factor behind the choice.
3.2. Data sets, study areas and spatial units
- The GEOSTAT 1A project population grid (Statistical Office of the European Communities, 2012), which provides a homogeneous grid population dataset, was integrated with datasets from national census data and used for the land use analysis.
- The boundaries of the study areas were set as the circumference of 30 km radius, which approximately corresponds to the average commuting distance, centred in the main rail station, which the authors took as the node in the network with the highest connectivity value.
- Study areas in the different cases thus have similar total surface areas with only small differences because water and other non-urbanised natural areas are not computed in the boundaries of the study area, allowing a comparison between cases, as represented in Fig.
- The choice of this spatial unit has impact on the analysis results, according to the modifiable areal unit problem (MAUP) (Dark and Bram, 2007), with reference to the number of areal units used (scale effect) and depending on how smaller areal units are grouped at the local scale (zonation effect).
- Taking into account these two aspects, their choice was made according to three main criteria: (i) threshold of the total number of areal units for computational reasons, (ii) dimension of the spatial unit threshold based on walking accessibility to the station and (iii) comparable data availability for the six case studies.
3.3. Correlation variables
- The first variable is the TOD degree of the urban structure defined as the extent to which the job and inhabitant densities are developed along rail transit (tram, metro and regional rail) corridors.
- The authors measured this value with a method inspired by, but distinct from the node-place model (Bertolini, 1999): for each AZ they measured a ‘‘node index’’ and a ‘‘place index’’, and they analysed the bivariate scatterplot distribution in a xy graph of node and place index values for each AZ of the study area.
- Indeed average density is not measuring if and how densities are strategically distributed and articulated in a zone, and this constitutes a problem in analysing the degree of transit and land-use integration.
- The cumulative accessibility measure is calculated as the number of inhabitants and jobs reachable in 30 min travel time by rail (regional rail, metro and tram) and expressed as a percentage of the total number of inhabitants and jobs in the study area.
- Their aim is not to assess the impact of accessibility by rail on rail modal share, but to provide insights into the urban form determinants of rail accessibility.
4. Outputs of study cases cross-sectional comparison
- The cross-sectional analysis was completed in two steps.
- First, the two variables for the different case studies were calculated and analysed independently.
- The second step focused on the correlations between the two.
4.1. Outputs of cross-sectional analysis of TOD degree of the urban structure and accessibility in the study cases
- The measurement of the TOD degree of the urban structure yielded twelve maps (Figs. 2 and 3) and six scatterplots (Fig. 4).
- Diagrams in Fig. 4 allow a more systematic comparison of the different interrelations and scatter distributions of the place and node indices in the six study cases.
- The higher correlation values for Amsterdam and Munich mean that in these cities there is a higher match between the distribution of residential and employment densities and the connectivity offered by the railway network.
- The average values of accessibility in the six cases summarized in Table 4 show that Amsterdam is the city with the highest average accessibility (on average 32.48% of all jobs and inhabitants in the metropolitan area are accessible by 30 min rail travel) while Naples has the lowest (5.32%).
4.2. Outputs of correlation analysis
- First, cumulative railbased accessibility is strongly correlated to the TOD degree of an urban area.
- Indeed, cumulative rail-based accessibility almost increases in direct proportion, when urban development becomes Table 5 Correlation between TOD degree and cumulative rail-based accessibility (average citywide value).
- Third, accessibility values are not correlated with maximal or average density of the study area.
- In order to explore these relationships further, Table 6 shows the result from a multiple regression model.
5. Conclusions
- Transit-Oriented Development is one the most commonly used development strategies for metropolitan areas.
- It is important to stress that the proposed correlation analysis is exploratory and hypothesis-generating rather than explanatory or hypothesis-testing.
- It can show the relationships between whole-city accessibility, and the density or connectivity of a single urban area and vice versa.
- In terms of implications for urban and transportation planning, this study suggests that strengthening the relationship between the railway network and land uses is an effective measure for increasing cumulative rail-based accessibility; improving railway network connectivity is also important, but just increasing densities is not.
- Thus, it would be interesting to extend the methodology with more sophisticated accessibility measures, for instance acknowledging distance decay and competition effects, or focusing on specific segments of the population.
Did you find this useful? Give us your feedback
Figures (10)
Table 6 Multiple regression analysis results. Fig. 2. Node and place indices (Amsterdam, Helsinki and Munich study areas). Fig. 5. The distribution of cumulative rail-based accessibility to inhabitants and jobs in the study areas. Table 4 Cumulative accessibility (average value at the citywide scale). Fig. 4. Scatterplots of node and place indices for each study case (place index on x axis and node index on y axis). Table 3 Comparison of TOD degree of the urban structure in the study cases, and other indices describing the scatterplots. Fig. 1. Grouping of studies on interrelations between TOD degree of the urban structure, accessibility and travel behaviour. Fig. 3. Node and place indices (Naples, Rome and Helsinki study areas). Table 1 Structural land use variables of the study cases. Source: Statistical Office of the European Communities (2011). Table 2 Structural transport system variables of the case studies. Source: Statistical Office of the E
Citations
129 citations
109 citations
73 citations
71 citations
70 citations
References
3,551 citations
"Accessibility and transit-oriented ..." refers background in this paper
...…(in terms of correlation coefficient R and R2 linear) and rail-based accessibility, in line with the general expectations expressed in the literature (Ewing and Cervero, 2010); – a positive (albeit weaker) relationship also exists between the variables representing the mean and the maximal node…...
[...]
...…in terms of travel distance, journey frequency, modal split, travel time and transport energy consumption (Boarnet, 2011; Cervero and Kockelman, 1997; Echenique et al., 2012; Ewing and Cervero, 2010; Naess, 2012; Schwanen et al., 2001; Shatu and Kamruzzaman, 2014; Stead and Marshall, 2001)....
[...]
...The answers to this broad issue remain thus ambivalent, and it is not yet clear whether land use strategies alone can have a significant effect on travel behaviour (Ewing and Cervero, 2010)....
[...]
...Also, observed trip length is generally shorter at locations that are more accessible (Ewing and Cervero, 2010)....
[...]
3,439 citations
"Accessibility and transit-oriented ..." refers background in this paper
...…form on travel behaviour, in terms of travel distance, journey frequency, modal split, travel time and transport energy consumption (Boarnet, 2011; Cervero and Kockelman, 1997; Echenique et al., 2012; Ewing and Cervero, 2010; Naess, 2012; Schwanen et al., 2001; Shatu and Kamruzzaman, 2014; Stead…...
[...]
2,185 citations
"Accessibility and transit-oriented ..." refers background in this paper
...Over time, accessibility has been defined and measured in numerous ways (Geurs and van Wee, 2004), but in general, two main categories can be found in the literature: objective measures and subjective understandings of accessibility (Curl et al., 2015)....
[...]
...The literature documents many ways to operationalize accessibility, depending on the problem and context of its application (Geurs and van Wee, 2004; Handy and Niemeier, 1997)....
[...]
...…give direct insight into the relationship between TOD and accessibility, that is, the degree to which the urban and transit network structures enable individuals to participate in activities and obtain spatially distributed resources (Geurs and van Wee, 2004; Handy, 1992; Handy and Niemeier, 1997)....
[...]
2,136 citations
"Accessibility and transit-oriented ..." refers background in this paper
...(1)) corresponds to the closeness centrality index (Sabidussi, 1966)....
[...]
1,473 citations