Acute covid-19 and multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children.
TL;DR: The most common symptoms in children with acute SARS-CoV-2 infection (covid-19 disease) are fever and cough, and other symptoms may include sore throat, rhinorrhoea, or congestion, myalgias, headache, fatigue, and gastrointestinal symptoms including nausea, vomiting, or diarrhoea.
Abstract: ### What you need to know
The most common symptoms in children with acute SARS-CoV-2 infection (covid-19 disease) are fever and cough. Other symptoms may include sore throat, rhinorrhoea, or congestion, myalgias, headache, fatigue, and gastrointestinal symptoms including nausea, vomiting, or diarrhoea. The range of symptom prevalence is reported from three large meta-analyses, one with 131 studies and 7780 paediatric patients,1 the second with 28 studies and 1614 patients,2 and the third with 46 studies and 551 patients3 and summarised in table 1. Though children have a similar distribution of initial symptoms as compared with adults, children are more likely to have mild, self-resolving symptoms without progression to the lower pulmonary disease that necessitates hospitalisation.4 Dermatological manifestations in children with mild disease are uncommon: acute infection has at times been associated with a maculopapular exanthem, but the pseudo chilblain lesions or “covid toes” seen in adults are rare.56 Although assessing the prevalence of loss of taste or smell among children may be challenging (especially when children …
Citations
More filters
TL;DR: A systematic review and meta-analysis highlighted the critical importance of a control group in studi7777es on CYP post SARS-CoV-2 infection.
100 citations
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors provide a conceptual framework on how the virus tricks the host immune system to induce infection and cause severe disease and explore the key differences between mild and severe COVID-19 and its short and long-term effects, particularly on the human brain.
Abstract: The coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) elicited by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused devastating health, economic and social impact worldwide. Its clinical spectrum ranges from asymptomatic to respiratory failure and multi-organ failure or death. The pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 infection is attributed to a complex interplay between virus and host immune response. It involves activation of multiple inflammatory pathways leading to hyperinflammation and cytokine storm, resulting in tissue damage, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and multi-organ failure. Accumulating evidence has raised concern over the long-term health effects of COVID-19. Importantly, the neuroinvasive potential of SARS-CoV-2 may have devastating consequences in the brain. This review provides a conceptual framework on how the virus tricks the host immune system to induce infection and cause severe disease. We also explore the key differences between mild and severe COVID-19 and its short- and long-term effects, particularly on the human brain.
61 citations
TL;DR: In this paper, the safety and immunogenicity of a recombinant adenovirus type-5 (Ad5)-vectored COVID-19 vaccine with homologous prime-boost regimens in healthy participants aged 6 years and above were assessed.
Abstract: Background We assessed the safety and immunogenicity of a recombinant adenovirus type-5 (Ad5)-vectored COVID-19 vaccine with homologous prime-boost regimens in healthy participants aged 6 years and above. Methods In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, participants received low-dose vaccine, middle-dose vaccine or placebo. Prime-booster regimens were given intramuscularly 56 days apart. ELISA antibodies to the receptor binding domain (RBD) and pseudovirus neutralising antibodies were detected. Adverse events were monitored for 28 days following each vaccination. Results A total of 430 participants were enrolled in the study, with 30 participants aged 18-55 years (MID cohort), 250 participants aged 56 years and older (OLD cohort), and 150 participants aged 6-17 years (MIN cohort). Ad5-vectored COVID-19 vaccine induced significant RBD-specific ELISA antibodies which decreased with increasing age, with geometric mean titres (GMTs) of 1037.5 in MIN cohort, 647.2 in MID cohort, and 338.0 in OLD cohort receiving 5×10 10 viral particles on day 28 following boost vaccination. Pseudovirus neutralising antibodies showed a similar pattern, with GMTs of 168.0 in MIN cohort, 76.8 in MID cohort, and 79.7 in OLD cohort. A single dose in children and adolescents induced higher antibody responses than that elicited by two doses in adults, with GMTs of 1091.6 and 96.6 in ELISA antibody and neutralising antibody, respectively. Homologous prime-boost vaccination was safety and tolerable. Conclusions Ad5-vectored COVID-19 vaccine with a single dose was safe and induced robust immune responses in children and adolescents aged 6-17 years. A prime-boost regimen needs further exploration for Ad5-vectored COVID-19 vaccine.
60 citations
TL;DR: In this paper, a cross-sectional study was conducted from 17 May to 3 June using vaccination booking records of 4023 young adolescents in Qatar to determine parental vaccine hesitancy rate, subgroups and influencing factors related to the BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine among their young adolescents (12-15 years old) in Qatar.
43 citations
TL;DR: Covid-19 among children and adolescents was found to have limited impact on healthcare services in Norway, and preschool aged children might take longer to recover than primary or secondary school students (1-3 months), usually because of respiratory conditions.
Abstract: Abstract Objectives To explore whether and for how long use of healthcare services is increased among children and adolescents after covid-19. Design Before and after register based study. Setting General population of Norway. Participants Norwegians aged 1-19 years (n=706 885) who were tested for SARS-CoV-2 from 1 August 2020 to 1 February 2021 (n=10 279 positive, n=275 859 negative) or not tested (n=420 747) and were not admitted to hospital, by age groups 1-5, 6-15, and 16-19 years. Main outcome measures Monthly percentages of all cause and cause specific healthcare use in primary care (general practitioner, emergency ward) and specialist care (outpatient, inpatient) from six months before to about six months after the week of being tested for SARS-CoV-2, using a difference-in-differences approach. Results A substantial short term relative increase in primary care use was observed for participants during the first month after a positive SARS-CoV-2 test result compared with those who tested negative (age 1-5 years: 339%, 95% confidence interval 308% to 369%; 6-15 years: 471%, 450% to 491%; 16-19 years: 401%, 380% to 422%). Use of primary care for the younger age groups was still increased at two months (1-5 years: 22%, 4% to 40%; 6-15 years: 14%, 2% to 26%) and three months (1-5 years: 26%, 7% to 46%, 6-15 years: 15%, 3% to 28%), but not for the oldest group (16-19 years: 11%, −2% to 24% and 6%, −7% to 19%, respectively). Children aged 1-5 years who tested positive also showed a minor long term (≤6 months) relative increase in primary care use (13%, −0% to 26%) that was not observed for the older age groups, compared with same aged children who tested negative. Results were similar yet the age differences less pronounced compared with untested controls. For all age groups, the increase in primary care visits was due to respiratory and general or unspecified conditions. No increased use of specialist care was observed. Conclusion Covid-19 among children and adolescents was found to have limited impact on healthcare services in Norway. Preschool aged children might take longer to recover (3-6 months) than primary or secondary school students (1-3 months), usually because of respiratory conditions.
42 citations
References
More filters
TL;DR: In patients hospitalized with Covid-19, the use of dexamethasone resulted in lower 28-day mortality among those who were receiving either invasive mechanical ventilation or oxygen alone at randomization but not among those receiving no respiratory support.
Abstract: BackgroundCoronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) is associated with diffuse lung damage. Glucocorticoids may modulate inflammation-mediated lung injury and thereby reduce progression to respiratory failure and death.MethodsIn this controlled, open-label trial comparing a range of possible treatments in patients who were hospitalized with Covid-19, we randomly assigned patients to receive oral or intravenous dexamethasone (at a dose of 6 mg once daily) for up to 10 days or to receive usual care alone. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. Here, we report the final results of this assessment.ResultsA total of 2104 patients were assigned to receive dexamethasone and 4321 to receive usual care. Overall, 482 patients (22.9%) in the dexamethasone group and 1110 patients (25.7%) in the usual care group died within 28 days after randomization (age-adjusted rate ratio, 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75 to 0.93; P<0.001). The proportional and absolute between-group differences in mortality varied considerably according to the level of respiratory support that the patients were receiving at the time of randomization. In the dexamethasone group, the incidence of death was lower than that in the usual care group among patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation (29.3% vs. 41.4%; rate ratio, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.81) and among those receiving oxygen without invasive mechanical ventilation (23.3% vs. 26.2%; rate ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.72 to 0.94) but not among those who were receiving no respiratory support at randomization (17.8% vs. 14.0%; rate ratio, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.92 to 1.55).ConclusionsIn patients hospitalized with Covid-19, the use of dexamethasone resulted in lower 28-day mortality among those who were receiving either invasive mechanical ventilation or oxygen alone at randomization but not among those receiving no respiratory support. (Funded by the Medical Research Council and National Institute for Health Research and others; RECOVERY ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04381936. opens in new tab; ISRCTN number, 50189673. opens in new tab.)
4,501 citations
TL;DR: The distribution of children’s COVID-19 cases varied with time and space, and most of the cases were concentrated in Hubei province and surrounding areas, providing strong evidence of human-to-human transmission.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To identify the epidemiological characteristics and transmission patterns of pediatric patients with the 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in China. METHODS: Nationwide case series of 2135 pediatric patients with COVID-19 reported to the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention from January 16, 2020, to February 8, 2020, were included. The epidemic curves were constructed by key dates of disease onset and case diagnosis. Onset-to-diagnosis curves were constructed by fitting a log-normal distribution to data on both onset and diagnosis dates. RESULTS: There were 728 (34.1%) laboratory-confirmed cases and 1407 (65.9%) suspected cases. The median age of all patients was 7 years (interquartile range: 2–13 years), and 1208 case patients (56.6%) were boys. More than 90% of all patients had asymptomatic, mild, or moderate cases. The median time from illness onset to diagnoses was 2 days (range: 0–42 days). There was a rapid increase of disease at the early stage of the epidemic, and then there was a gradual and steady decrease. The disease rapidly spread from Hubei province to surrounding provinces over time. More children were infected in Hubei province than any other province. CONCLUSIONS: Children of all ages appeared susceptible to COVID-19, and there was no significant sex difference. Although clinical manifestations of children’s COVID-19 cases were generally less severe than those of adult patients, young children, particularly infants, were vulnerable to infection. The distribution of children’s COVID-19 cases varied with time and space, and most of the cases were concentrated in Hubei province and surrounding areas. Furthermore, this study provides strong evidence of human-to-human transmission.
3,053 citations
United States Public Health Service1, Emory University2, Rutgers University3, Harvard University4, Central Michigan University5, Westchester Medical Center6, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai7, New York University8, Saint Barnabas Medical Center9, University of Pennsylvania10, SUNY Downstate Medical Center11, Yale University12, University of Colorado Denver13, Boston Children's Hospital14, Case Western Reserve University15, Louisiana State University16, University of Washington17, Johns Hopkins University18, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston19, University of Mississippi20, Tufts University21, Vanderbilt University22
TL;DR: Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children associated with SARS-CoV-2 led to serious and life-threatening illness in previously healthy children and adolescents.
Abstract: Background Understanding the epidemiology and clinical course of multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) and its temporal association with coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19)...
1,887 citations
TL;DR: It is found that interventions aimed at children might have a relatively small impact on reducing SARS-CoV-2 transmission, particularly if the transmissibility of subclinical infections is low.
Abstract: The COVID-19 pandemic has shown a markedly low proportion of cases among children1–4. Age disparities in observed cases could be explained by children having lower susceptibility to infection, lower propensity to show clinical symptoms or both. We evaluate these possibilities by fitting an age-structured mathematical model to epidemic data from China, Italy, Japan, Singapore, Canada and South Korea. We estimate that susceptibility to infection in individuals under 20 years of age is approximately half that of adults aged over 20 years, and that clinical symptoms manifest in 21% (95% credible interval: 12–31%) of infections in 10- to 19-year-olds, rising to 69% (57–82%) of infections in people aged over 70 years. Accordingly, we find that interventions aimed at children might have a relatively small impact on reducing SARS-CoV-2 transmission, particularly if the transmissibility of subclinical infections is low. Our age-specific clinical fraction and susceptibility estimates have implications for the expected global burden of COVID-19, as a result of demographic differences across settings. In countries with younger population structures—such as many low-income countries—the expected per capita incidence of clinical cases would be lower than in countries with older population structures, although it is likely that comorbidities in low-income countries will also influence disease severity. Without effective control measures, regions with relatively older populations could see disproportionally more cases of COVID-19, particularly in the later stages of an unmitigated epidemic. A new epidemiological study shows reduced susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 and decreased risk of developing severe symptoms in people aged younger than 20 years, suggesting that children have limited contribution to spread of COVID-19.
1,281 citations
TL;DR: The emergence of multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children in New York State coincided with widespread SARS-CoV-2 transmission; this hyperinflammatory syndrome with dermatologic, mucocutaneous, and gastrointestinal manifestations was associated with cardiac dysfunction.
Abstract: Background A multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) is associated with coronavirus disease 2019 The New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) established active, statewi
1,012 citations