scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessDissertationDOI

Adaptive co-management as an approach to tourism destination governance – a case of protected areas in Bangladesh

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this paper, Chen et al. investigated the impacts of the adaptive co-management approach on tourism destination governance in the context of two protected areas of Bangladesh; Lawachara National Park and Sundarbans East Wildlife Sanctuary.
Abstract
Tourism in protected areas can accelerate development opportunities by providing various direct and indirect ecological, socio-economic and cultural benefits, particularly in developing countries (Dudley, 2008; Newsome & Hassell, 2014; Tosun, 2000; WWF [World Wide Fund For Nature], 2014). However, developing countries, and their protected areas, are often characterised by poor governance systems that impede the development of these locations as tourism destinations and therefore affect those (poor) people living in and around these areas (Eklund, Arponen, Visconti, & Cabeza, 2011; Parnini, 2006). Therefore, policy or institutional arrangements are required which promote better governance systems and enable local people to obtain socio-economic and ecological benefits from tourism activities (Figgis & Bushell, 2007). Consequently, a paradigm shift is occurring within protected area planning and management with a transition from traditional top-down to participatory bottom-up approaches to ensure the participation of local stakeholders in decision-making, planning, implementation, monitoring and evaluation, and ultimately benefit-sharing (Eagles, McCool, & Haynes, 2002; Niedzialkowski, Paavola, & Jedrzejewska, 2012). As such, these institutional arrangements can promote better governance systems for local communities to improve their living standards as well as facilitating effective protected area management planning systems (Dearden, Bennett, & Johnston, 2005). ‘Adaptive co-management’ (ACM) is a dynamic process whereby institutional arrangements and ecological knowledge are continually tested and revised through a process of ‘learning-by-doing’ (Armitage, Berkes, & Doubleday, 2007b). ACM has been suggested as a more inclusive alternate approach to governance which can better facilitate the management and protection of natural resources (Armitage, Berkes, Dale, Kocho-Schellenberg, & Patton, 2011; Plummer & Fitzgibbon, 2004a). ACM has also been advocated due to the fact that it can provide a means to empower local stakeholders and enhance collaboration with other stakeholder groups. This is achieved through more flexible systems that encompass complex cross-scale linkages (Olsson, Folke, & Berkes, 2004; Wood, Butler, Sheaves, & Wani, 2013). ACM has several attributes or principles. Social learning is one of the key principles and is based on the creation of cooperative and collaborative frameworks that can facilitate iterative learning amongst diverse groups of stakeholders (Ruitenbeek & Cartier, 2001; Schusler, Decker, & Pfeffer, 2003). Social learning is particularly relevant for tourism development in protected areas as tourism is multiple stakeholder activity requiring collaboration (Haddock-Fraser & Hampton, 2010; McCool, 2009). Both ACM and social learning have only recently been explored in tourism although the concepts have yet to be linked to tourism destination governance generally (Chen, Ku, & Chen, 2016; Fennell, Plummer, & Marschke, 2008; Lai, Hsu, & Wearing, 2016; Pennington-Gray, Schroeder, & Gale, 2014) or protected area governance specifically (Lai et al., 2016; Plummer & Fennell, 2009). Addressing the identified research gaps, the overarching aim of this qualitative study is to investigate the impacts of the ACM approach on tourism destination governance in the context of two protected areas of Bangladesh; Lawachara National Park and Sundarbans East Wildlife Sanctuary. This research follows the style of three interconnected manuscripts. Manuscript one presents a review and synthesis of the ACM literature and in doing so identifies four inter-connected principles of the ACM approach: communication and collaboration; social learning; shared rights, responsibility and decision-making; and building adaptive capacity and resilience. A conceptual framework of tourism destination governance that incorporates ACM principles, process, variables and outcomes is developed. Manuscript two aims to empirically investigate the extent to which an ACM approach was able to enhance the achievement of key governance principles such as participation, social learning, accountability, transparency, power, and rule of law. Stakeholder interviews showed that the ACM approach provided a congenial environment that facilitates iterative learning amongst stakeholders, and for some, resulted in attitude and behaviour change towards protected area conservation. Manuscript three is an exploratory study that sought to analyse how social learning is embedded in the governance of a protected area tourism destination. The empirical findings show that social learning allows for diverse stakeholder groups to interact together to create new knowledge, develop awareness and empower local communities. The findings reinforce the importance of social learning for tourism destination governance. The overall theoretical and practical implications of this research are the application of ACM as an approach that can enhance tourism destination governance. Enhanced governance systems are crucial for contributing to sustainable tourism development objectives, as well as protected area conservation and management.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Adaptive co-management as an approach to tourism destination governance a
case of protected areas in Bangladesh
Md. Wasiul Islam
B.Sc. (Hon’s), M.S., M.Sc.
A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at
The University of Queensland in 2017
School of Business

ii
Abstract
Tourism in protected areas can accelerate development opportunities by providing various direct and
indirect ecological, socio-economic and cultural benefits, particularly in developing countries
(Dudley, 2008; Newsome & Hassell, 2014; Tosun, 2000; WWF [World Wide Fund For Nature],
2014). However, developing countries, and their protected areas, are often characterised by poor
governance systems that impede the development of these locations as tourism destinations and
therefore affect those (poor) people living in and around these areas (Eklund, Arponen, Visconti, &
Cabeza, 2011; Parnini, 2006). Therefore, policy or institutional arrangements are required which
promote better governance systems and enable local people to obtain socio-economic and ecological
benefits from tourism activities (Figgis & Bushell, 2007). Consequently, a paradigm shift is occurring
within protected area planning and management with a transition from traditional top-down to
participatory bottom-up approaches to ensure the participation of local stakeholders in decision-
making, planning, implementation, monitoring and evaluation, and ultimately benefit-sharing
(Eagles, McCool, & Haynes, 2002; Niedziałkowski, Paavola, & Jędrzejewska, 2012). As such, these
institutional arrangements can promote better governance systems for local communities to improve
their living standards as well as facilitating effective protected area management planning systems
(Dearden, Bennett, & Johnston, 2005).
‘Adaptive co-management’ (ACM) is a dynamic process whereby institutional arrangements and
ecological knowledge are continually tested and revised through a process of ‘learning-by-doing’
(Armitage, Berkes, & Doubleday, 2007b). ACM has been suggested as a more inclusive alternate
approach to governance which can better facilitate the management and protection of natural
resources (Armitage, Berkes, Dale, Kocho-Schellenberg, & Patton, 2011; Plummer & Fitzgibbon,
2004a). ACM has also been advocated due to the fact that it can provide a means to empower local
stakeholders and enhance collaboration with other stakeholder groups. This is achieved through more
flexible systems that encompass complex cross-scale linkages (Olsson, Folke, & Berkes, 2004;
Wood, Butler, Sheaves, & Wani, 2013).
ACM has several attributes or principles. Social learning is one of the key principles and is based on
the creation of cooperative and collaborative frameworks that can facilitate iterative learning amongst
diverse groups of stakeholders (Ruitenbeek & Cartier, 2001; Schusler, Decker, & Pfeffer, 2003).
Social learning is particularly relevant for tourism development in protected areas as tourism is
multiple stakeholder activity requiring collaboration (Haddock-Fraser & Hampton, 2010; McCool,
2009). Both ACM and social learning have only recently been explored in tourism although the

iii
concepts have yet to be linked to tourism destination governance generally (Chen, Ku, & Chen, 2016;
Fennell, Plummer, & Marschke, 2008; Lai, Hsu, & Wearing, 2016; Pennington-Gray, Schroeder, &
Gale, 2014) or protected area governance specifically (Lai et al., 2016; Plummer & Fennell, 2009).
Addressing the identified research gaps, the overarching aim of this qualitative study is to investigate
the impacts of the ACM approach on tourism destination governance in the context of two protected
areas of Bangladesh; Lawachara National Park and Sundarbans East Wildlife Sanctuary.
This research follows the style of three interconnected manuscripts. Manuscript one presents a review
and synthesis of the ACM literature and in doing so identifies four inter-connected principles of the
ACM approach: communication and collaboration; social learning; shared rights, responsibility and
decision-making; and building adaptive capacity and resilience. A conceptual framework of tourism
destination governance that incorporates ACM principles, process, variables and outcomes is
developed. Manuscript two aims to empirically investigate the extent to which an ACM approach
was able to enhance the achievement of key governance principles such as participation, social
learning, accountability, transparency, power, and rule of law. Stakeholder interviews showed that
the ACM approach provided a congenial environment that facilitates iterative learning amongst
stakeholders, and for some, resulted in attitude and behaviour change towards protected area
conservation. Manuscript three is an exploratory study that sought to analyse how social learning is
embedded in the governance of a protected area tourism destination. The empirical findings show
that social learning allows for diverse stakeholder groups to interact together to create new
knowledge, develop awareness and empower local communities. The findings reinforce the
importance of social learning for tourism destination governance.
The overall theoretical and practical implications of this research are the application of ACM as an
approach that can enhance tourism destination governance. Enhanced governance systems are crucial
for contributing to sustainable tourism development objectives, as well as protected area conservation
and management.

iv
Declaration by author
This thesis is composed of my original work, and contains no material previously published or written
by another person except where due reference has been made in the text. I have clearly stated the
contribution by others to jointly-authored works that I have included in my thesis.
I have clearly stated the contribution of others to my thesis as a whole, including statistical assistance,
survey design, data analysis, significant technical procedures, professional editorial advice, financial
support and any other original research work used or reported in my thesis. The content of my thesis
is the result of work I have carried out since the commencement of my higher degree by research
candidature and does not include a substantial part of work that has been submitted to qualify for the
award of any other degree or diploma in any university or other tertiary institution. I have clearly
stated which parts of my thesis, if any, have been submitted to qualify for another award.
I acknowledge that an electronic copy of my thesis must be lodged with the University Library and,
subject to the policy and procedures of The University of Queensland, the thesis be made available
for research and study in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968 unless a period of embargo has
been approved by the Dean of the Graduate School.
I acknowledge that copyright of all material contained in my thesis resides with the copyright
holder(s) of that material. Where appropriate I have obtained copyright permission from the copyright
holder to reproduce material in this thesis and have sought permission from co-authors for any jointly
authored works included in the thesis.

v
Publications during candidature
Peer-reviewed journal paper:
Islam, M. W., Ruhanen, L., & Ritchie, B. W. (2017). Adaptive co-management: A novel approach to
tourism destination governance? Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, DOI:
10.1016/j.jhtm.2017.10.009
Islam, M. W., Ruhanen, L., & Ritchie, B. W. (2018). Exploring social learning as a contributor to
tourism destination governance. Tourism Recreation Research,
DOI:10.1080/02508281.2017.1421294
Peer-reviewed conference working papers:
Islam, M. W., Ruhanen, L., & Ritchie, B. W. (2016). Exploring social learning in the protected areas
of Bangladesh. Proceedings of the 26
th
Annual Council for Australasian Tourism and
Hospitality Education (CAUTHE) Conference, 9-11 Feb 2016, Blue Mountains International
Hotel Management School, Sydney, NSW, Australia, pp. 1204-1210.
Islam, M. W. & Ruhanen, L. (2015). Governance for tourism: Investigating the application of
adaptive co-management a conceptual paper. Proceedings of the 25
th
Annual Council for
Australasian Tourism and Hospitality Education (CAUTHE) Conference, 2-5 Feb 2015,
Southern Cross University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia, pp. 547-550.
Peer-reviewed conference abstracts/pitches:
Islam, M. W. (2015). Wildlife conservation through nature-based tourism in Lawachara National
Park: A realism or idealism? Presented at the Updating Species Red List of Bangladesh
Conference held on 14 June 2015 at CSS AVA Centre, Khulna, Bangladesh. Jointly organised
by International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) and Khulna University, pp. 71-75.
Islam, M. W., Ruhanen, L., & Ritchie, B. W. (2016). From local community harassment to
motivation: Adaptive co-management as an innovative tourism destination governance
approach. Presented at the 1
st
University of Queensland Bangladesh Association (UQBDA)
Conference on Taking Bangladesh Forward held on 27 Sept 2016 at University of Queensland,
Australia, pp. 20.

Citations
More filters
BookDOI

Sustainable tourism in protected areas : guidelines for planning and management (Russian version)

TL;DR: In this article, the authors provide both a theoretical structure and practical guidelines for managers to ensure that tourism contributes to the purposes of protected areas and does not undermine them, and provide an understanding of protected area tourism, and its management.
Book ChapterDOI

1 – Introduction and Overview

TL;DR: The United States Clean Air Act of 1970 (Clean Air Act) raised unprecedented implementation challenges for governments and affected industries as discussed by the authors, and the adaptive administrative and technological responses leading to the current framework for air pollution control policy.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Adaptive comanagement for building resilience in social-ecological systems.

TL;DR: It is proposed that the self-organizing process of adaptive comanagement development, facilitated by rules and incentives of higher levels, has the potential to expand desirable stability domains of a region and make social–ecological systems more robust to change.
Journal ArticleDOI

Adaptive co-management for social–ecological complexity

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors identify and outline the core features of adaptive co-management, which include innovative institutional arrangements and incentives across spatiotemporal scales and levels, learning through complexity and change, monitoring and assessment of interventions, the role of power, and opportunities to link science with policy.
Posted Content

Decentralization and Corruption: Evidence across Countries

TL;DR: Fisman and Gatti as mentioned in this paper examined the relationship between decentralization of government activities and the extent of rent extraction by private parties, and found that the origin of a country's legal system performs extremely well as an instrument for decentralization.
Journal ArticleDOI

Co-management : concepts and methodological implications

TL;DR: Co-management, or the joint management of the commons, is often formulated in terms of some arrangement of power sharing between the State and a community of resource users, but in reality there often are multiple local interests and multiple government agencies at play, and co-management can hardly be understood as the interaction of a unitary State and an homogeneous community.
Related Papers (5)