Aircraft noise effects on sleep: a systematic comparison of EEG awakenings and automatically detected cardiac activations.
Citations
864 citations
231 citations
99 citations
Cites background from "Aircraft noise effects on sleep: a ..."
...…2001; Killgore et al. 2008; Randazzo et al. 1998) Impaired motor performance (Kahol et al. 2008; Pilcher and Huffcutt 1996) Dissociation (Lynn et al. 2012) Drowsiness, micro-sleeps and unintended sleep (Basner et al. 2008a, b; Philip and Akerstedt 2006; Pilcher et al. 2000; Scott et al. 2007)....
[...]
97 citations
Cites background from "Aircraft noise effects on sleep: a ..."
...Events perceived in such a way perhaps then have a large influence on subjective sleep quality, as has been proposed previously [45]....
[...]
81 citations
References
21 citations
"Aircraft noise effects on sleep: a ..." refers background in this paper
...The habituation to noise within a single night was already shown for EEG awakenings and EEG arousals (Basner and Samel 2004, Bonnet 1985), but, to our knowledge, never before for cardiac activations....
[...]
9 citations
"Aircraft noise effects on sleep: a ..." refers background in this paper
...However, in situations where the subject is already awake traffic noise may nevertheless adversely affect sleep by preventing the subject from falling asleep again, and therefore prolonging spontaneous or noise-induced awakenings (Basner and Siebert 2006)....
[...]
9 citations
"Aircraft noise effects on sleep: a ..." refers methods in this paper
...R-waves were automatically detected with a software developed in a LabVIEWTM environment (Samel et al 1997)....
[...]
5 citations
"Aircraft noise effects on sleep: a ..." refers background or methods in this paper
...On the other hand, if the interval is too long, too many spontaneous reactions are picked up, and repeated activations within the same subject are possible (Brink et al 2006b)....
[...]
...Actigraphy (Horne et al 1994, Passchier-Vermeer et al 2002) and seismosomnography (Brink et al 2006a) have been used to measure body movements during sleep....
[...]
...Our group prefers using PADDITIONAL over PINDUCED, because the biologic plausibility of PADDITIONAL is higher (Brink et al 2006b), and only reactions additionally caused by noise can be prevented with protection concepts, anyway....
[...]
...Three situations can be differentiated (Brink et al 2006b): (a) The reaction was caused by noise, (b) the reaction occurred spontaneously, (c) the reaction was caused by noise but would also have occurred spontaneously or the reaction occurred spontaneously but would have also been caused by noise....
[...]