scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

An educational video to increase clinical trials enrollment among breast cancer patients.

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The educational video did not significantly increase enrollment in breast cancer clinical trials and AA women had significantly more negative attitudes toward clinical trials than white women, which may partially explain the racial disparity in enrollment.
Abstract
Only 3% of women with breast cancer participate in cancer clinical trials nationwide. The lack of awareness about clinical trials is a significant barrier towards clinical trials participation. A study was conducted at a large urban Comprehensive Cancer Center to test (1) the effectiveness of an 18-min educational video on improving attitudes toward clinical trials and trials enrollment among new breast cancer patients seen at the Karmanos Cancer Institute, and (2) to assess racial differences in attitudes regarding clinical trials. Participants were randomized to either the educational intervention prior to their first oncology clinic appointment or to standard care. A baseline and 2-week post-intervention survey to assess attitudes toward clinical trials participation was completed by participants. Of 218 subjects recruited, 196 (55% white vs. 45% African American (AA)) eligible patients were included in the analysis. A small increase in therapeutic clinical trial enrollment was observed in the intervention arm but was not statistically significant (10.4% vs. 6.1%; P = 0.277). The intervention also did not result in a clear improvement in patients’ attitudes toward clinical trials at posttest. However, a lower enrollment rate for the AA women was noted after adjusting for stage (OR = 0.282, P = 0.049). Significantly more negative scores were noted in 3 out of the 5 baseline attitudinal scales for AA women. The educational video did not significantly increase enrollment in breast cancer clinical trials. The findings that AA women had significantly more negative attitudes toward clinical trials than white women may partially explain the racial disparity in enrollment. An educational video remains a simple and cost-effective way to educate patients. Future studies should focus on designing a new educational video to specifically target cultural and attitudinal barriers in the AA population to more effectively change attitudes and increase trial enrollment.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Methods to improve recruitment to randomised controlled trials: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis

TL;DR: There are promising strategies for increasing recruitment to trials, but some methods, such as open-trial designs and opt-out strategies, must be considered carefully as their use may also present methodological or ethical challenges.
Journal ArticleDOI

Strategies to improve recruitment to randomised controlled trials.

TL;DR: Trialists can increase recruitment to their trials by using the strategies shown to be effective in this review: telephone reminders; use of opt-out, rather than opt-in; procedures for contacting potential trial participants and open designs.

Closing the quality gap: revisiting the state of the science (vol. 3: quality improvement interventions to address health disparities).

TL;DR: Overall, QI interventions were not shown to reduce disparities, and some increased effect is seen in disadvantaged populations; these studies should be replicated and the interventions studied further as having potential to address disparities.
Journal ArticleDOI

Strategies to improve recruitment to randomised trials

TL;DR: The literature on interventions to improve recruitment to trials has plenty of variety but little depth, and only 3 of 72 comparisons are supported by high-certainty evidence according to GRADE.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Recruiting Minorities Into Clinical Trials Toward a Participant-Friendly System

TL;DR: The state of the art in recruiting participants for clinical trials designed to test new methods of treatment or disease prevention is described and a series of steps that are essential to effective clinical trials recruitment of diverse populations is presented.
Journal ArticleDOI

Participation of Minorities in Cancer Research

TL;DR: Low socioeconomic status, speaking a primary language other than English, differences in communication styles, mistrust of research and the medical system, fear, embarrassment, and lack of knowledge about the origin of cancer appear to have a negative impact on clinical cancer research participation rates.
Journal ArticleDOI

Centralised treatment, entry to trials and survival

TL;DR: A review was carried out of the published literature on survival rates for cancer in relation to patterns of organisation of medical care, specifically treatment at specialist centres or at hospitals treating larger numbers of patients and treatment by protocol, usually within the context of a clinical trial.
Journal Article

Knowledge of the Tuskegee study and its impact on the willingness to participate in medical research studies.

TL;DR: This study confirms the need for medical researchers to confront the issue of the Tuskegee Study and its continuing impact on African-Americans' trust of medical research studies.
Journal ArticleDOI

Recruitment and Retention of Minority Women in Cancer Screening, Prevention, and Treatment Trials

TL;DR: Estimated barriers to recruitment were lack of awareness, lack of transportation, interference with work/family responsibilities, financial costs, negative side effects, and burdensome procedures.
Related Papers (5)