An explanation for cope's rule.
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Most modern interpreters of Cope's Rule have attributed its validity solely to certain fundamental advantages of size increase, at least one of which is alleged to have operated within most evolutionary lineages.Abstract:
Cope's Rule is the name customarily applied to the widespread tendency of animal groups to evolve toward larger physical size. According to Kurten (1953), this paleontologic rule of evolution "is second in repute only to 'Dollo's Law' of . . .irreversibility." Although the rule was never concisely formulated by Cope, it is generally implicit in his writings (Cope, 1887, 1896). Like many other evolutionary generalizations extracted from the fossil record, Cope's Rule was derived primarily from study of mammalian phylogeny. Writers like Deperet (1909), Newell (1949), and Rensch (1959) have added diverse examples of evolutionary size increase to the mammalian trends discussed by Cope. Because numerous exceptions are known, recognition of the concept as a law has been rejected by most workers. Still, it has been widely upheld as a valid empirical generalization, and of the definitions for "rule" listed by Webster, "a generally prevailing condition," describes it accurately. Most modern interpreters of Cope's Rule have attributed its validity solely to certain fundamental advantages of size increase, at least one of which is alleged to have operated within most evolutionary lineages (Newell, 1949, p. 122-123; Kurten, 1953, p. 105; Simpson, 1953, p. 151; Rensch, 1959, p. 210-211; Gould, 1966b, p. 1138). Most of the proposed advantages of evolutionary size increase have been reviewed by Newell (1949), Kurten (1953), Rensch (1959), and Gould (1966a). Among the more salient are: improved ability to capture prey or ward off predators, greater reproductive success, increased intelligence (with increased brain size), better stamina, expanded size range of acceptable food, decreased annual mortality, extended individual longevity, and increased heat retention per unit volume. Certainly when evolutionary size increase occurs, it is in response to selection pressure resulting from one or more advantages. As Bonner (1968) pointed out, however, a net trend toward increased size within a higher taxon usually produces an increase in mean and maximum animal size, but not necessarily in minimum animal size. Selection pressure favoring size decrease is not rare but only less common than pressure favoring size increase. Reliance solely on inherent advantages of larger size to explain the high incidence of size increase suffers from deficiencies resembling some of those attached to the discarded concept of orthogenesis. The "inherent advantage" idea attempts only to account for directional evolution, without reference to limits. Clearly when size increase occurs in aread more
Citations
More filters
Book
Pattern and Process in Macroecology
Kevin J. Gaston,Tim M. Blackburn +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the structure of regional (large-scale) ecological assemblages or communities, and the influence this has at a local (small scale) level are discussed.
Journal ArticleDOI
Extinction Vulnerability and Selectivity: Combining Ecological and Paleontological Views
TL;DR: This work has shown that replacement of vulnerable taxa by rapidly spreading taxa that thrive in human-altered environments will ultimately produce a spatially more homogenized biosphere with much lower net diversity.
Journal ArticleDOI
Punctuated equilibrium comes of age
Stephen Jay Gould,Niles Eldredge +1 more
TL;DR: Punctuated equilibrium's most important implications remain the recognition of stasis as a meaningful and predominant pattern within the history of species, and the recasting of macroevolution as the differential success of certain species within clades.
Journal ArticleDOI
The evolution of dinosaurs
TL;DR: The ascendancy of dinosaurs on land near the close of the Triassic now appears to have been as accidental and opportunistic as their demise and replacement by therian mammals at the end of the Cretaceous.
Journal ArticleDOI
Analyzing body size as a factor in ecology and evolution
TL;DR: Etude des methodologies employees pour les mesures d'echelle en biologie, montree par 3 exemples tires de the litterature ecologique and evolutionniste pour illustrer les problemes communs a la plupart des controverses sur ce sujet.
References
More filters
Book
On Growth and Form
TL;DR: This book is an application of some of the concepts of physical science and sundry mathematical methods to the study of organic form and is like one of Darwin's books, well-considered, patiently wrought-out, learned, and cautious.
Journal ArticleDOI
Homage to Santa Rosalia or Why Are There So Many Kinds of Animals
TL;DR: The address of the president of a society, founded largely to further the study of evolution, at the close of the year that marks the centenary of Darwin and Wallace's initial presentation of the theory of natural selection.
Book
Problems of relative growth
TL;DR: This detailed study of the different rates of growth of parts of the body relative to the body as a whole represents Sir Julian Huxley's great contribution to analytical morphology, and it is still a basis for modern investigations in morphometrics and evolutionary biology.