Book•
An introduction to parallel algorithms
01 Oct 1992-
TL;DR: This book provides an introduction to the design and analysis of parallel algorithms, with the emphasis on the application of the PRAM model of parallel computation, with all its variants, to algorithm analysis.
Abstract: Written by an authority in the field, this book provides an introduction to the design and analysis of parallel algorithms. The emphasis is on the application of the PRAM (parallel random access machine) model of parallel computation, with all its variants, to algorithm analysis. Special attention is given to the selection of relevant data structures and to algorithm design principles that have proved to be useful. Features *Uses PRAM (parallel random access machine) as the model for parallel computation. *Covers all essential classes of parallel algorithms. *Rich exercise sets. *Written by a highly respected author within the field. 0201548569B04062001
Citations
More filters
Posted Content•
TL;DR: Sage as mentioned in this paper is a parallel semi-asymmetric graph engine that uses NVRAM for large-scale graph analytics, where the graph is stored as a read-only data structure and the amount of mutable memory is proportional to the number of vertices.
Abstract: Non-volatile main memory (NVRAM) technologies provide an attractive set of features for large-scale graph analytics, including byte-addressability, low idle power, and improved memory-density. NVRAM systems today have an order of magnitude more NVRAM than traditional memory (DRAM). NVRAM systems could therefore potentially allow very large graph problems to be solved on a single machine, at a modest cost. However, a significant challenge in achieving high performance is in accounting for the fact that NVRAM writes can be much more expensive than NVRAM reads.
In this paper, we propose an approach to parallel graph analytics using the Parallel Semi-Asymmetric Model (PSAM), in which the graph is stored as a read-only data structure (in NVRAM), and the amount of mutable memory is kept proportional to the number of vertices. Similar to the popular semi-external and semi-streaming models for graph analytics, the PSAM approach assumes that the vertices of the graph fit in a fast read-write memory (DRAM), but the edges do not. In NVRAM systems, our approach eliminates writes to the NVRAM, among other benefits.
To experimentally study this new setting, we develop Sage, a parallel semi-asymmetric graph engine with which we implement provably-efficient (and often work-optimal) PSAM algorithms for over a dozen fundamental graph problems. We experimentally study Sage using a 48-core machine on the largest publicly-available real-world graph (the Hyperlink Web graph with over 3.5 billion vertices and 128 billion edges) equipped with Optane DC Persistent Memory, and show that Sage outperforms the fastest prior systems designed for NVRAM. Importantly, we also show that Sage nearly matches the fastest prior systems running solely in DRAM, by effectively hiding the costs of repeatedly accessing NVRAM versus DRAM.
5 citations
Posted Content•
TL;DR: This work presents the first shared-memory parallel algorithm for incremental graph connectivity that is both provably work-efficient and has polylogarithmic parallel depth.
Abstract: On an evolving graph that is continuously updated by a high-velocity stream of edges, how can one efficiently maintain if two vertices are connected? This is the connectivity problem, a fundamental and widely studied problem on graphs. We present the first shared-memory parallel algorithm for incremental graph connectivity that is both provably work-efficient and has polylogarithmic parallel depth. We also present a simpler algorithm with slightly worse theoretical properties, but which is easier to implement and has good practical performance. Our experiments show a throughput of hundreds of millions of edges per second on a $20$-core machine.
5 citations
Cites methods from "An introduction to parallel algorit..."
...Using standard parallel operations [11], the work of the other steps is clearly bounded by |Ri`1|, including mkFrontier because removeDup does work linear in the input, which is bounded by |Ri`1|....
[...]
...Given a sequence of m numbers, there is a duplicate removal algorithm removeDup running in Opmq work and Oplog2 mq depth [11]....
[...]
15 Aug 1994
TL;DR: An efficient parallel algorithms for some geometric bipartitioning problems and a report mode orthogonal range queries in optimal O(logn) time using 0(1 + k/ logn) processors, where k is the number of points inside the query range.
Abstract: We present efficient parallel algorithms for some geometric bipartitioning problems. Our algorithms are designed to run in the CREW PRAM model of parallel computation. These bipartition problems are the following. Given a planar point set S (left| S right| = n), a measure mu acting on S and a pair of values fmu_1 and mu_2, does there exist a bipartition S = S_1 cup S_2 such that mu(S_{1}) leqslant mu_i for i = 1,2? We present efficient parallel algorithms for several measures like diameter under L_infty and L_1 metric; area, perimeter or length of diagonal of the smallest enclosing axes-parallel rectangle and the side length of the smallest enclosing axes-parallel square. All our parallel algorithms run in O(logn) time using O{n) processors in the CREW PRAM. The work done (processor-time product) by our algorithms matches the time complexity of the best known sequential algorithms for most of these problems. As a by product of our algorithms, we can perform report mode orthogonal range queries in optimal O(logn) time using 0(1 + k/logn) processors, where k is the number of points inside the query range. The processor-time product for this range reporting algorithm is optimal.
5 citations
Book Chapter•
01 Jan 2011TL;DR: This paper introduces PARL, a parallel left radix sorting algorithm for use on ordinary shared memory multi core machines, that has just one simple statement in its sequential part and is user friendly in that the user calling this PARL algorithm does not have to deal with creating threads themselves; to sort their data, they just create a sorting object and make a call to a thread safe method in that object.
Abstract: The problem addressed in this paper is that we want to sort an integer array a [] of length n on a multi core machine with k cores. Amdahl’s law tells us that the inherent sequential part of any algorithm will in the end dominate and limit the speedup we get from parallelisation of that algorithm. This paper introduces PARL, a parallel left radix sorting algorithm for use on ordinary shared memory multi core machines, that has just one simple statement in its sequential part. It can be seen as a major rework of the Partitioned Parallel Radix Sort (PPR) that was developed for use on a network of communicating machines with separate memories. The PARL algorithm, which was developed independently of the PPR algorithm, has in principle some of the same phases as PPR, but also many significant differences as described in this paper. On a 32 core server, a speedup of 5-12 times is achieved compared with the same sequential ARL algorithm when sorting more than 100 000 numbers and half that speedup on a 4 core PC work station and on two dual core laptops. Since the original sequential ARL algorithm in addition is 3-5 times faster than the standard Java Arrays.sort algorithm, this parallelisation translates to a significant speedup of approx. 10 to 30 for ordinary user programs sorting larger arrays. The reason that we don’t get better results, i.e. a speedup equal to the number of cores when the number of cores exceeds 2, is chiefly explained by a limited memory bandwidth. This thread pool implementation of PARL is also user friendly in that the user calling this PARL algorithm does not have to deal with creating threads themselves; to sort their data, they just create a sorting object and make a call to a thread safe method in that object.
5 citations
Cites background or methods from "An introduction to parallel algorit..."
...sort algorithm, which is a Quicksort [5] implementation....
[...]
...We find first of all a set of algorithms for special purpose network machines, but also for grids of more ordinary machines [1,5,6,8,9, 27]....
[...]
23 Apr 2001
TL;DR: This paper presents an O((log logN))time algorithm for computing the DT of an N N image on a Common CRCW PRAM with O(N = log logN) processors for any such that 0 < < 1.
Abstract: The distance transform (DT) is an operation to convert a binary image consisting of black and white pixels to a representation where each pixel has the distance of the nearest black pixel in a given distance metric. The DT has many applications in computer vision and image processing. In this paper, we present an O((log logN))time algorithm for computing the DT of an N N image on a Common CRCW PRAM with O(N = log logN) processors for any such that 0 < < 1. Our algorithm works for all the important distance metrics used for computing distance transform in image processing applications. The previous best parallel algorithm for computing DT for any metric is by Fujiwara et al. [5] and works inO(logN= log logN) time usingO(N log logN= logN) processors on the Common CRCW PRAM. Hayashi et al. [7] presented an O(log logN) time and O(N= log logN) processors algorithm on the Common CRCW PRAM for computing DT. However, their algorithm works for a class of metrics called x-monotone metrics.
5 citations
References
More filters
Book•
01 Sep 1991
TL;DR: This chapter discusses sorting on a Linear Array with a Systolic and Semisystolic Model of Computation, which automates the very labor-intensive and therefore time-heavy and expensive process of manually sorting arrays.
Abstract: Preface Acknowledgments Notation 1 Arrays and Trees 1.1 Elementary Sorting and Counting 1.1.1 Sorting on a Linear Array Assessing the Performance of the Algorithm Sorting N Numbers with Fewer Than N Processors 1.1.2 Sorting in the Bit Model 1.1.3 Lower Bounds 1.1.4 A Counterexample-Counting 1.1.5 Properties of the Fixed-Connection Network Model 1.2 Integer Arithmetic 1.2.1 Carry-Lookahead Addition 1.2.2 Prefix Computations-Segmented Prefix Computations 1.2.3 Carry-Save Addition 1.2.4 Multiplication and Convolution 1.2.5 Division and Newton Iteration 1.3 Matrix Algorithms 1.3.1 Elementary Matrix Products 1.3.2 Algorithms for Triangular Matrices 1.3.3 Algorithms for Tridiagonal Matrices -Odd-Even Reduction -Parallel Prefix Algorithms 1.3.4 Gaussian Elimination 1.3.5 Iterative Methods -Jacobi Relaxation -Gauss-Seidel Relaxation Finite Difference Methods -Multigrid Methods 1.4 Retiming and Systolic Conversion 1.4.1 A Motivating Example-Palindrome Recognition 1.4.2 The Systolic and Semisystolic Model of Computation 1.4.3 Retiming Semisystolic Networks 1.4.4 Conversion of a Semisystolic Network into a Systolic Network 1.4.5 The Special Case of Broadcasting 1.4.6 Retiming the Host 1.4.7 Design by Systolic Conversion-A Summary 1.5 Graph Algorithms 1.5.1 Transitive Closure 1.5.2 Connected Components 1.5.3 Shortest Paths 1.5.4 Breadth-First Spanning Trees 1.5.5 Minimum Weight Spanning Trees 1.6 Sorting Revisited 1.6.1 Odd-Even Transposition Sort on a Linear Array 1.6.2 A Simple Root-N(log N + 1)-Step Sorting Algorithm 1.6.3 A (3 Root- N + o(Root-N))-Step Sorting Algorithm 1.6.4 A Matching Lower Bound 1.7 Packet Routing 1.7.1 Greedy Algorithms 1.7.2 Average-Case Analysis of Greedy Algorithms -Routing N Packets to Random Destinations -Analysis of Dynamic Routing Problems 1.7.3 Randomized Routing Algorithms 1.7.4 Deterministic Algorithms with Small Queues 1.7.5 An Off-line Algorithm 1.7.6 Other Routing Models and Algorithms 1.8 Image Analysis and Computational Geometry 1.8.1 Component-Labelling Algorithms -Levialdi's Algorithm -An O (Root-N)-Step Recursive Algorithm 1.8.2 Computing Hough Transforms 1.8.3 Nearest-Neighbor Algorithms 1.8.4 Finding Convex Hulls 1.9 Higher-Dimensional Arrays 1.9.1 Definitions and Properties 1.9.2 Matrix Multiplication 1.9.3 Sorting 1.9.4 Packet Routing 1.9.5 Simulating High-Dimensional Arrays on Low-Dimensional Arrays 1.10 problems 1.11 Bibliographic Notes 2 Meshes of Trees 2.1 The Two-Dimensional Mesh of Trees 2.1.1 Definition and Properties 2.1.2 Recursive Decomposition 2.1.3 Derivation from KN,N 2.1.4 Variations 2.1.5 Comparison With the Pyramid and Multigrid 2.2 Elementary O(log N)-Step Algorithms 2.2.1 Routing 2.2.2 Sorting 2.2.3 Matrix-Vector Multiplication 2.2.4 Jacobi Relaxation 2.2.5 Pivoting 2.2.6 Convolution 2.2.7 Convex Hull 2.3 Integer Arithmetic 2.3.1 Multiplication 2.3.2 Division and Chinese Remaindering 2.3.3 Related Problems -Iterated Products -Rooting Finding 2.4 Matrix Algorithms 2.4.1 The Three-Dimensional Mesh of Trees 2.4.2 Matrix Multiplication 2.4.3 Inverting Lower Triangular Matrices 2.4.4 Inverting Arbitrary Matrices -Csanky's Algorithm -Inversion by Newton Iteration 2.4.5 Related Problems 2.5 Graph Algorithms 2.5.1 Minimum-Weight Spanning Trees 2.5.2 Connected Components 2.5.3 Transitive Closure 2.5.4 Shortest Paths 2.5.5 Matching Problems 2.6 Fast Evaluation of Straight-Line Code 2.6.1 Addition and Multiplication Over a Semiring 2.6.2 Extension to Codes with Subtraction and Division 2.6.3 Applications 2.7 Higher-Dimensional meshes of Trees 2.7.1 Definitions and Properties 2.7.2 The Shuffle-Tree Graph 2.8 Problems 2.9 Bibliographic Notes 3 Hypercubes and Related Networks 3.1 The Hypercube 3.1.1 Definitions and Properties 3.1.2 Containment of Arrays -Higher-Dimensional Arrays -Non-Power-of-2 Arrays 3.1.3 Containment of Complete Binary Trees 3.1.4 Embeddings of Arbitrary Binary Trees -Embeddings with Dilation 1 and Load O(M over N + log N) -Embeddings with Dilation O(1) and Load O (M over N + 1) -A Review of One-Error-Correcting Codes -Embedding Plog N into Hlog N 3.1.5 Containment of Meshes of Trees 3.1.6 Other Containment Results 3.2 The Butterfly, Cube-Connected-Cycles , and Benes Network 3.2.1 Definitions and Properties 3.2.2 Simulation of Arbitrary Networks 3.2.3 Simulation of Normal Hypercube Algorithms 3.2.4 Some Containment and Simulation Results 3.3 The Shuffle-Exchange and de Bruijn Graphs 3.3.1 Definitions and Properties 3.3.2 The Diaconis Card Tricks 3.3.3 Simulation of Normal Hypercube Algorithms 3.3.4 Similarities with the Butterfly 3.3.5 Some Containment and Simulation Results 3.4 Packet-Routing Algorithms 3.4.1 Definitions and Routing Models 3.4.2 Greedy Routing Algorithms and Worst-Case Problems 3.4.3 Packing, Spreading, and Monotone Routing Problems -Reducing a Many-to-Many Routing Problem to a Many-to-One Routing Problem -Reducing a Routing Problem to a Sorting Problem 3.4.4 The Average-Case Behavior of the Greedy Algorithm -Bounds on Congestion -Bounds on Running Time -Analyzing Non-Predictive Contention-Resolution Protocols 3.4.5 Converting Worst-Case Routing Problems into Average-Case Routing Problems -Hashing -Randomized Routing 3.4.6 Bounding Queue Sizes -Routing on Arbitrary Levelled Networks 3.4.7 Routing with Combining 3.4.8 The Information Dispersal Approach to Routing -Using Information Dispersal to Attain Fault-Tolerance -Finite Fields and Coding Theory 3.4.9 Circuit-Switching Algorithms 3.5 Sorting 3.5.1 Odd-Even Merge Sort -Constructing a Sorting Circuit with Depth log N(log N +1)/2 3.5.2 Sorting Small Sets 3.5.3 A Deterministic O(log N log log N)-Step Sorting Algorithm 3.5.4 Randomized O(log N)-Step Sorting Algorithms -A Circuit with Depth 7.45 log N that Usually Sorts 3.6 Simulating a Parallel Random Access Machine 3.6.1 PRAM Models and Shared Memories 3.6.2 Randomized Simulations Based on Hashing 3.6.3 Deterministic Simulations using Replicated Data 3.6.4 Using Information Dispersal to Improve Performance 3.7 The Fast Fourier Transform 3.7.1 The Algorithm 3.7.2 Implementation on the Butterfly and Shuffle-Exchange Graph 3.7.3 Application to Convolution and Polynomial Arithmetic 3.7.4 Application to Integer Multiplication 3.8 Other Hypercubic Networks 3.8.1 Butterflylike Networks -The Omega Network -The Flip Network -The Baseline and Reverse Baseline Networks -Banyan and Delta Networks -k-ary Butterflies 3.8.2 De Bruijn-Type Networks -The k-ary de Bruijn Graph -The Generalized Shuffle-Exchange Graph 3.9 Problems 3.10 Bibliographic Notes Bibliography Index Lemmas, Theorems, and Corollaries Author Index Subject Index
2,895 citations
"An introduction to parallel algorit..." refers background in this paper
...Multiprocessorbased computers have been around for decades and various types of computer architectures [2] have been implemented in hardware throughout the years with different types of advantages/performance gains depending on the application....
[...]
...Every location in the array represents a node of the tree: T [1] is the root, with children at T [2] and T [3]....
[...]
...The text by [2] is a good start as it contains a comprehensive description of algorithms and different architecture topologies for the network model (tree, hypercube, mesh, and butterfly)....
[...]
Book•
01 Jan 1984
TL;DR: The authors have divided the use of computers into the following four levels of sophistication: data processing, information processing, knowledge processing, and intelligence processing.
Abstract: The book is intended as a text to support two semesters of courses in computer architecture at the college senior and graduate levels. There are excellent problems for students at the end of each chapter. The authors have divided the use of computers into the following four levels of sophistication: data processing, information processing, knowledge processing, and intelligence processing.
1,410 citations
"An introduction to parallel algorit..." refers background in this paper
...Parallel architectures have been described in several books (see, for example, [18, 29])....
[...]
TL;DR: The success of data parallel algorithms—even on problems that at first glance seem inherently serial—suggests that this style of programming has much wider applicability than was previously thought.
Abstract: Parallel computers with tens of thousands of processors are typically programmed in a data parallel style, as opposed to the control parallel style used in multiprocessing. The success of data parallel algorithms—even on problems that at first glance seem inherently serial—suggests that this style of programming has much wider applicability than was previously thought.
1,000 citations
"An introduction to parallel algorit..." refers background in this paper
...Recent work on the mapping of PRAM algorithms on bounded-degree networks is described in [3,13,14, 20, 25], Our presentation on the communication complexity of the matrix-multiplication problem in the sharedmemory model is taken from [1], Data-parallel algorithms are described in [15]....
[...]
01 May 1978
TL;DR: A model of computation based on random access machines operating in parallel and sharing a common memory is presented and can accept in polynomial time exactly the sets accepted by nondeterministic exponential time bounded Turing machines.
Abstract: A model of computation based on random access machines operating in parallel and sharing a common memory is presented. The computational power of this model is related to that of traditional models. In particular, deterministic parallel RAM's can accept in polynomial time exactly the sets accepted by polynomial tape bounded Turing machines; nondeterministic RAM's can accept in polynomial time exactly the sets accepted by nondeterministic exponential time bounded Turing machines. Similar results hold for other classes. The effect of limiting the size of the common memory is also considered.
951 citations
"An introduction to parallel algorit..." refers background in this paper
...Rigorous descriptions of shared-memory models were introduced later in [11,12]....
[...]
TL;DR: It is shown that arithmetic expressions with n ≥ 1 variables and constants; operations of addition, multiplication, and division; and any depth of parenthesis nesting can be evaluated in time 4 log 2 + 10(n - 1) using processors which can independently perform arithmetic operations in unit time.
Abstract: It is shown that arithmetic expressions with n ≥ 1 variables and constants; operations of addition, multiplication, and division; and any depth of parenthesis nesting can be evaluated in time 4 log2n + 10(n - 1)/p using p ≥ 1 processors which can independently perform arithmetic operations in unit time. This bound is within a constant factor of the best possible. A sharper result is given for expressions without the division operation, and the question of numerical stability is discussed.
864 citations
"An introduction to parallel algorit..." refers methods in this paper
...The WT scheduling principle is derived from a theorem in [7], In the literature, this principle is commonly referred to as Brent's theorem or Brent's scheduling principle....
[...]