Book•
An introduction to parallel algorithms
01 Oct 1992-
TL;DR: This book provides an introduction to the design and analysis of parallel algorithms, with the emphasis on the application of the PRAM model of parallel computation, with all its variants, to algorithm analysis.
Abstract: Written by an authority in the field, this book provides an introduction to the design and analysis of parallel algorithms. The emphasis is on the application of the PRAM (parallel random access machine) model of parallel computation, with all its variants, to algorithm analysis. Special attention is given to the selection of relevant data structures and to algorithm design principles that have proved to be useful. Features *Uses PRAM (parallel random access machine) as the model for parallel computation. *Covers all essential classes of parallel algorithms. *Rich exercise sets. *Written by a highly respected author within the field. 0201548569B04062001
Citations
More filters
06 Oct 1997
TL;DR: This work designs a consistent and set-driven learner that achieves update time O(n2logn), and establishes the first algorithm for learning one-variable pattern languages having an expected total learning time that provably differs from the update time by a constant factor only.
Abstract: A pattern is a finite string of constant and variable symbols. The langauge generated by a pattern is the set of all strings of constant symbols which can be obtained from the pattern by substituting non-empty strings for variables. We study the learnability of one-variable pattern languages in the limit with respect to the update time needed for computing a new single hypothesis and the expected total learning time taken until convergence to a correct hypothesis. Our results are as follows. First, we design a consistent and set-driven learner that, using the concept of descriptive patterns, achieves update time O(n2logn), where n is the size of the input sample. The best previously known algorithm for computing descriptive one-variable patterns requires time O(n4logn) (cf. Angluin, J. Comput. Systems Sci. 21 (1) (1980) 46-62). Second, we give a parallel version of this algorithm that requires time O(logn) and O(n3/logn) processors on an EREW-PRAM. Third, using a modified version of the sequential algorithm as a subroutine, we devise a learning algorithm for one-variable patterns whose expected total learning time is O(l2logl) provided that sample strings are drawn from the target language according to a probability distribution with expected string length l. The probability distribution must be such that strings of equal length have equal probability, but can be arbitrary otherwise. Thus, we establish the first algorithm for learning one-variable pattern languages having an expected total learning time that provably differs from the update time by a constant factor only. Finally, we show how the algorithm for descriptive one-variable patterns can be used for learning one-variable patterns with a polynomial number of superset queries with respect to the one-variable patterns as query language.
40 citations
Additional excerpts
...[8])....
[...]
23 Jul 2013
TL;DR: The priority update operation serves as a useful parallel primitive and good programming abstraction as it can be used to avoid non-determinism since, in the common case when >p is a total order, priority updates commute, and it has many applications to programs using shared data.
Abstract: Memory contention can be a serious performance bottleneck in concurrent programs on shared-memory multicore architectures. Having all threads write to a small set of shared locations, for example, can lead to orders of magnitude loss in performance relative to all threads writing to distinct locations, or even relative to a single thread doing all the writes. Shared write access, however, can be very useful in parallel algorithms, concurrent data structures, and protocols for communicating among threads.We study the "priority update" operation as a useful primitive for limiting write contention in parallel and concurrent programs. A priority update takes as arguments a memory location, a new value, and a comparison function >p that enforces a partial order over values. The operation atomically compares the new value with the current value in the memory location, and writes the new value only if it has higher priority according to >p. On the implementation side, we show that if implemented appropriately, priority updates greatly reduce memory contention over standard writes or other atomic operations when locations have a high degree of sharing. This is shown both experimentally and theoretically. On the application side, we describe several uses of priority updates for implementing parallel algorithms and concurrent data structures, often in a way that is deterministic, guarantees progress, and avoids serial bottlenecks. We present experiments showing that a variety of such algorithms and data structures perform well under high degrees of sharing. Given the results, we believe that the priority update operation serves as a useful parallel primitive and good programming abstraction as (1) the user largely need not worry about the degree of sharing, (2) it can be used to avoid non-determinism since, in the common case when >p is a total order, priority updates commute, and (3) it has many applications to programs using shared data.
40 citations
IBM1
TL;DR: This study studies parallel graph algorithms on two different multi-threaded, multi-core platforms, finding the number of hardware threads in either platform is not sufficient to fully mask memory latency and reveals interesting interplay between architecture and algorithm.
Abstract: The erratic memory access pattern of graph algorithms makes it hard to optimize on cache-based architectures. While multithreading hides memory latency, it is unclear how hardware threads combined with caches impact the performance of typical graph workload. As modern architectures strike different balances between caching and multithreading, it remains an open question whether the benefit of optimizing locality behavior outweighs the cost. We study parallel graph algorithms on two different multi-threaded, multi-core platforms, that is, IBM Power7 and Sun Niagara2. Our experiments first demonstrate their performance advantage over prior architectures. We find nonetheless the number of hardware threads in either platform is not sufficient to fully mask memory latency. Our cache-friendly scheduling of memory accesses improves performance by up to 2.6 times on Power7 and prior cache-based architectures, yet the same technique significantly degrades performance on Niagara2. Software prefetching and manipulating the storage of the input to improve spatial locality improve performance by up to 2.1 times and 1.3 times on both platforms. Our study reveals interesting interplay between architecture and algorithm.
39 citations
Cites background from "An introduction to parallel algorit..."
...Tarjan and Vishkin defined a smaller relation R c with |R ′ c| = O(m) and proved that the transitive closure of R c is the same as that of Rc [27], [24]....
[...]
TL;DR: The result demonstrates that linear-programming primal-dual approximation techniques can lead to fast, efficient parallel algorithms.
Abstract: The paper describes a simple deterministic parallel/distributed (2+epsilon)-approximation algorithm for the minimum-weight vertex-cover problem and its dual (edge/element packing).
39 citations
Cites methods from "An introduction to parallel algorit..."
...Consequently, the correctness and the approximation ratio of the algorithm are established by Lemmas 2 and 3. Using standard techniques [ Ja92 ], each iteration of the while loop beginning with q remaining edges can be done in O(ln q) time and O(r q) operations on an EREW-PRAM....
[...]
...Processors. Using standard techniques, the operations can be efficientlyscheduled without increasing the time or the operations by more than a constant, so by the Work-Time Scheduling Principle [ Ja92 ], the number of processors required is M/ln2 m — the work...
[...]
TL;DR: This work presents an NC approximation algorithm for the weighted matching problem in graphs with an approximation ratio of (1 - e), which improves the previously best approximation ratios of an NC algorithm.
39 citations
Cites background or methods from "An introduction to parallel algorit..."
...See [ 5 , 7] for more background on parallel algorithms....
[...]
...This is possible in O(log n) time using list compression methods (see for example [ 5 ])....
[...]
References
More filters
Book•
01 Sep 1991
TL;DR: This chapter discusses sorting on a Linear Array with a Systolic and Semisystolic Model of Computation, which automates the very labor-intensive and therefore time-heavy and expensive process of manually sorting arrays.
Abstract: Preface Acknowledgments Notation 1 Arrays and Trees 1.1 Elementary Sorting and Counting 1.1.1 Sorting on a Linear Array Assessing the Performance of the Algorithm Sorting N Numbers with Fewer Than N Processors 1.1.2 Sorting in the Bit Model 1.1.3 Lower Bounds 1.1.4 A Counterexample-Counting 1.1.5 Properties of the Fixed-Connection Network Model 1.2 Integer Arithmetic 1.2.1 Carry-Lookahead Addition 1.2.2 Prefix Computations-Segmented Prefix Computations 1.2.3 Carry-Save Addition 1.2.4 Multiplication and Convolution 1.2.5 Division and Newton Iteration 1.3 Matrix Algorithms 1.3.1 Elementary Matrix Products 1.3.2 Algorithms for Triangular Matrices 1.3.3 Algorithms for Tridiagonal Matrices -Odd-Even Reduction -Parallel Prefix Algorithms 1.3.4 Gaussian Elimination 1.3.5 Iterative Methods -Jacobi Relaxation -Gauss-Seidel Relaxation Finite Difference Methods -Multigrid Methods 1.4 Retiming and Systolic Conversion 1.4.1 A Motivating Example-Palindrome Recognition 1.4.2 The Systolic and Semisystolic Model of Computation 1.4.3 Retiming Semisystolic Networks 1.4.4 Conversion of a Semisystolic Network into a Systolic Network 1.4.5 The Special Case of Broadcasting 1.4.6 Retiming the Host 1.4.7 Design by Systolic Conversion-A Summary 1.5 Graph Algorithms 1.5.1 Transitive Closure 1.5.2 Connected Components 1.5.3 Shortest Paths 1.5.4 Breadth-First Spanning Trees 1.5.5 Minimum Weight Spanning Trees 1.6 Sorting Revisited 1.6.1 Odd-Even Transposition Sort on a Linear Array 1.6.2 A Simple Root-N(log N + 1)-Step Sorting Algorithm 1.6.3 A (3 Root- N + o(Root-N))-Step Sorting Algorithm 1.6.4 A Matching Lower Bound 1.7 Packet Routing 1.7.1 Greedy Algorithms 1.7.2 Average-Case Analysis of Greedy Algorithms -Routing N Packets to Random Destinations -Analysis of Dynamic Routing Problems 1.7.3 Randomized Routing Algorithms 1.7.4 Deterministic Algorithms with Small Queues 1.7.5 An Off-line Algorithm 1.7.6 Other Routing Models and Algorithms 1.8 Image Analysis and Computational Geometry 1.8.1 Component-Labelling Algorithms -Levialdi's Algorithm -An O (Root-N)-Step Recursive Algorithm 1.8.2 Computing Hough Transforms 1.8.3 Nearest-Neighbor Algorithms 1.8.4 Finding Convex Hulls 1.9 Higher-Dimensional Arrays 1.9.1 Definitions and Properties 1.9.2 Matrix Multiplication 1.9.3 Sorting 1.9.4 Packet Routing 1.9.5 Simulating High-Dimensional Arrays on Low-Dimensional Arrays 1.10 problems 1.11 Bibliographic Notes 2 Meshes of Trees 2.1 The Two-Dimensional Mesh of Trees 2.1.1 Definition and Properties 2.1.2 Recursive Decomposition 2.1.3 Derivation from KN,N 2.1.4 Variations 2.1.5 Comparison With the Pyramid and Multigrid 2.2 Elementary O(log N)-Step Algorithms 2.2.1 Routing 2.2.2 Sorting 2.2.3 Matrix-Vector Multiplication 2.2.4 Jacobi Relaxation 2.2.5 Pivoting 2.2.6 Convolution 2.2.7 Convex Hull 2.3 Integer Arithmetic 2.3.1 Multiplication 2.3.2 Division and Chinese Remaindering 2.3.3 Related Problems -Iterated Products -Rooting Finding 2.4 Matrix Algorithms 2.4.1 The Three-Dimensional Mesh of Trees 2.4.2 Matrix Multiplication 2.4.3 Inverting Lower Triangular Matrices 2.4.4 Inverting Arbitrary Matrices -Csanky's Algorithm -Inversion by Newton Iteration 2.4.5 Related Problems 2.5 Graph Algorithms 2.5.1 Minimum-Weight Spanning Trees 2.5.2 Connected Components 2.5.3 Transitive Closure 2.5.4 Shortest Paths 2.5.5 Matching Problems 2.6 Fast Evaluation of Straight-Line Code 2.6.1 Addition and Multiplication Over a Semiring 2.6.2 Extension to Codes with Subtraction and Division 2.6.3 Applications 2.7 Higher-Dimensional meshes of Trees 2.7.1 Definitions and Properties 2.7.2 The Shuffle-Tree Graph 2.8 Problems 2.9 Bibliographic Notes 3 Hypercubes and Related Networks 3.1 The Hypercube 3.1.1 Definitions and Properties 3.1.2 Containment of Arrays -Higher-Dimensional Arrays -Non-Power-of-2 Arrays 3.1.3 Containment of Complete Binary Trees 3.1.4 Embeddings of Arbitrary Binary Trees -Embeddings with Dilation 1 and Load O(M over N + log N) -Embeddings with Dilation O(1) and Load O (M over N + 1) -A Review of One-Error-Correcting Codes -Embedding Plog N into Hlog N 3.1.5 Containment of Meshes of Trees 3.1.6 Other Containment Results 3.2 The Butterfly, Cube-Connected-Cycles , and Benes Network 3.2.1 Definitions and Properties 3.2.2 Simulation of Arbitrary Networks 3.2.3 Simulation of Normal Hypercube Algorithms 3.2.4 Some Containment and Simulation Results 3.3 The Shuffle-Exchange and de Bruijn Graphs 3.3.1 Definitions and Properties 3.3.2 The Diaconis Card Tricks 3.3.3 Simulation of Normal Hypercube Algorithms 3.3.4 Similarities with the Butterfly 3.3.5 Some Containment and Simulation Results 3.4 Packet-Routing Algorithms 3.4.1 Definitions and Routing Models 3.4.2 Greedy Routing Algorithms and Worst-Case Problems 3.4.3 Packing, Spreading, and Monotone Routing Problems -Reducing a Many-to-Many Routing Problem to a Many-to-One Routing Problem -Reducing a Routing Problem to a Sorting Problem 3.4.4 The Average-Case Behavior of the Greedy Algorithm -Bounds on Congestion -Bounds on Running Time -Analyzing Non-Predictive Contention-Resolution Protocols 3.4.5 Converting Worst-Case Routing Problems into Average-Case Routing Problems -Hashing -Randomized Routing 3.4.6 Bounding Queue Sizes -Routing on Arbitrary Levelled Networks 3.4.7 Routing with Combining 3.4.8 The Information Dispersal Approach to Routing -Using Information Dispersal to Attain Fault-Tolerance -Finite Fields and Coding Theory 3.4.9 Circuit-Switching Algorithms 3.5 Sorting 3.5.1 Odd-Even Merge Sort -Constructing a Sorting Circuit with Depth log N(log N +1)/2 3.5.2 Sorting Small Sets 3.5.3 A Deterministic O(log N log log N)-Step Sorting Algorithm 3.5.4 Randomized O(log N)-Step Sorting Algorithms -A Circuit with Depth 7.45 log N that Usually Sorts 3.6 Simulating a Parallel Random Access Machine 3.6.1 PRAM Models and Shared Memories 3.6.2 Randomized Simulations Based on Hashing 3.6.3 Deterministic Simulations using Replicated Data 3.6.4 Using Information Dispersal to Improve Performance 3.7 The Fast Fourier Transform 3.7.1 The Algorithm 3.7.2 Implementation on the Butterfly and Shuffle-Exchange Graph 3.7.3 Application to Convolution and Polynomial Arithmetic 3.7.4 Application to Integer Multiplication 3.8 Other Hypercubic Networks 3.8.1 Butterflylike Networks -The Omega Network -The Flip Network -The Baseline and Reverse Baseline Networks -Banyan and Delta Networks -k-ary Butterflies 3.8.2 De Bruijn-Type Networks -The k-ary de Bruijn Graph -The Generalized Shuffle-Exchange Graph 3.9 Problems 3.10 Bibliographic Notes Bibliography Index Lemmas, Theorems, and Corollaries Author Index Subject Index
2,895 citations
"An introduction to parallel algorit..." refers background in this paper
...Multiprocessorbased computers have been around for decades and various types of computer architectures [2] have been implemented in hardware throughout the years with different types of advantages/performance gains depending on the application....
[...]
...Every location in the array represents a node of the tree: T [1] is the root, with children at T [2] and T [3]....
[...]
...The text by [2] is a good start as it contains a comprehensive description of algorithms and different architecture topologies for the network model (tree, hypercube, mesh, and butterfly)....
[...]
Book•
01 Jan 1984
TL;DR: The authors have divided the use of computers into the following four levels of sophistication: data processing, information processing, knowledge processing, and intelligence processing.
Abstract: The book is intended as a text to support two semesters of courses in computer architecture at the college senior and graduate levels. There are excellent problems for students at the end of each chapter. The authors have divided the use of computers into the following four levels of sophistication: data processing, information processing, knowledge processing, and intelligence processing.
1,410 citations
"An introduction to parallel algorit..." refers background in this paper
...Parallel architectures have been described in several books (see, for example, [18, 29])....
[...]
TL;DR: The success of data parallel algorithms—even on problems that at first glance seem inherently serial—suggests that this style of programming has much wider applicability than was previously thought.
Abstract: Parallel computers with tens of thousands of processors are typically programmed in a data parallel style, as opposed to the control parallel style used in multiprocessing. The success of data parallel algorithms—even on problems that at first glance seem inherently serial—suggests that this style of programming has much wider applicability than was previously thought.
1,000 citations
"An introduction to parallel algorit..." refers background in this paper
...Recent work on the mapping of PRAM algorithms on bounded-degree networks is described in [3,13,14, 20, 25], Our presentation on the communication complexity of the matrix-multiplication problem in the sharedmemory model is taken from [1], Data-parallel algorithms are described in [15]....
[...]
01 May 1978
TL;DR: A model of computation based on random access machines operating in parallel and sharing a common memory is presented and can accept in polynomial time exactly the sets accepted by nondeterministic exponential time bounded Turing machines.
Abstract: A model of computation based on random access machines operating in parallel and sharing a common memory is presented. The computational power of this model is related to that of traditional models. In particular, deterministic parallel RAM's can accept in polynomial time exactly the sets accepted by polynomial tape bounded Turing machines; nondeterministic RAM's can accept in polynomial time exactly the sets accepted by nondeterministic exponential time bounded Turing machines. Similar results hold for other classes. The effect of limiting the size of the common memory is also considered.
951 citations
"An introduction to parallel algorit..." refers background in this paper
...Rigorous descriptions of shared-memory models were introduced later in [11,12]....
[...]
TL;DR: It is shown that arithmetic expressions with n ≥ 1 variables and constants; operations of addition, multiplication, and division; and any depth of parenthesis nesting can be evaluated in time 4 log 2 + 10(n - 1) using processors which can independently perform arithmetic operations in unit time.
Abstract: It is shown that arithmetic expressions with n ≥ 1 variables and constants; operations of addition, multiplication, and division; and any depth of parenthesis nesting can be evaluated in time 4 log2n + 10(n - 1)/p using p ≥ 1 processors which can independently perform arithmetic operations in unit time. This bound is within a constant factor of the best possible. A sharper result is given for expressions without the division operation, and the question of numerical stability is discussed.
864 citations
"An introduction to parallel algorit..." refers methods in this paper
...The WT scheduling principle is derived from a theorem in [7], In the literature, this principle is commonly referred to as Brent's theorem or Brent's scheduling principle....
[...]