An Investigation of Thin-Film Ni–Fe Oxide Catalysts for the Electrochemical Evolution of Oxygen
read more
Citations
Electrocatalysis for the oxygen evolution reaction: recent development and future perspectives
Nickel–Iron Oxyhydroxide Oxygen-Evolution Electrocatalysts: The Role of Intentional and Incidental Iron Incorporation
Earth-abundant catalysts for electrochemical and photoelectrochemical water splitting
Nanoporous BiVO4 Photoanodes with Dual-Layer Oxygen Evolution Catalysts for Solar Water Splitting
Ultrathin metal–organic framework nanosheets for electrocatalytic oxygen evolution
References
Solar Water Splitting Cells
Solar Energy Supply and Storage for the Legacy and Nonlegacy Worlds
Real surface area measurements in electrochemistry
Solution-cast metal oxide thin film electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution.
Photochemical Route for Accessing Amorphous Metal Oxide Materials for Water Oxidation Catalysis
Related Papers (5)
Identification of Highly Active Fe Sites in (Ni,Fe)OOH for Electrocatalytic Water Splitting
Frequently Asked Questions (21)
Q2. Why did the authors choose a scan rate of 10 mV s1?
While low scan rates are desirable for obtaining current−voltage curves for kinetic analysis, the authors chose a scan rate of 10 mV s−1 to limit the overall time spent under oxygen evolution conditions.
Q3. What is the significance of the Raman spectra for NiFe films?
That is, while the Raman bands at ∼475 and ∼555 cm−1 are generated by the same basic structural unit, their relative intensities reflect the local structure around Ni−O which is influenced by factors including the interlayer spacing between Ni−O sheets, the presence of protons or other cations (such as potassium) between the sheets, structural disorder within sheets, and the metal oxidation state.
Q4. What is the effect of the accumulation of bubbles on the electrode surface?
The accumulation of bubbles on the electrode surface caused a drop in the measured current due to coverage of the active sites and/or to the additional ohmic resistance not accounted for by the uncompensated resistance values measured under non-OER conditions.
Q5. What is the redox peak for Ni?
The redox peaks are attributed to the transformation between Ni(OH)2 and NiOOH,14,22 which proceeds as Ni(OH)2 + OH − ↔ NiOOH + H2O + e − in alkaline electrolytes.
Q6. What was the characterization of the NiFe catalysts?
Electrochemical characterization of the Ni−Fe catalysts was carried out in KOH electrolytes (ACS reagent ≥85%, Sigma-Aldrich 221473) with concentrations of 0.1−4.6 M in ultrapure water.
Q7. What was used to protect the objective lens from the corrosive KOH electrolytes?
The authors employed a water-immersion objective (70× mag., N. A. = 1.23, LOMO) which was protected from the corrosive KOH electrolytes by a 0.001-in. thick fluorinated ethylene propylene film (McMaster-Carr) or 0.0005-in. thick Teflon film (American Durafilm); a droplet of water was placed between the objective lens and the film to retain the high illumination/collection efficiencies.
Q8. What pH was used to measure the equilibrium potential for NiFe catalysts?
The equilibrium potential for oxygen evolution at any given pH is therefore (1.23 − 0.098 − 0.059 × pH) V.Two electrochemical cells were used to measure the current− voltage characteristics of the Ni−Fe catalysts.
Q9. What is the underlying feature of the band at 449 cm1?
Previous studies have reported that disordered or doped Ni(OH)2 exhibits a Ni−O vibration that is shifted positively by as much as ∼65 mV of the band at 445− 465 cm−1.
Q10. What are the challenges associated with determining the surface area of catalysts?
The challenges associated with determining the surface area of catalysts have been reviewed by Trasatti and Petrii.21 Extracted values of the specific current density, while reliable for comparing across the Ni−Fe system, should be used with care when comparing to other catalysts reported in the literature.
Q11. What was the effect of the KOH concentration on the redox features of the catalyst films?
Cyclic voltammograms were collected for each electrolyte concentration; measurements were repeated for the high and low concentrations of 0.1 and 4.6 M (pH 13 and 14.7) at the end of the concentration series to verify stability of the catalyst films with changing KOH concentration.
Q12. What was the ohmic contribution of the NiFe electrode?
impedance spectra were obtained at 0 ± 10 mV (vs Hg/HgO) between 1 MHz and 10 mHz, and the ohmic contribution was estimated from the Nyquist plots.
Q13. What is the reason for the absence of these bands?
The absence of these bands is particularly noteworthy because it has been suggested that NiFe2O4 is the cause of high OER activities in mixed Ni−Fe catalysts.
Q14. What was the OER activity of the gold substrates used for electrochemical measurements?
Both smooth and roughened gold substrates were used for electrochemical measurements; the OER activity of these substrates was verified to be negligible compared to that of the films measured in this work (Figure S5, SI).
Q15. What was the first device used for obtaining data for analysis of OER kinetics?
The second was a rotating disk electrode (RDE) apparatus (Pine Instruments) employed for additional electrochemical characterization of Ni−Fe films, particularly for acquiring data for analysis of OER kinetics in the absence of mass transfer effects.
Q16. What is the effect of KOH concentrations on the nickel redox features?
It should be noted that KOH concentrations below pH 12.5 resulted in gradual changes in the nickel redox features and OER current with time.
Q17. What is the effect of Raman spectroscopy on NiO?
it is likely that Raman spectroscopy probes local characteristics of Ni−O not captured by the extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) which, while able to provide the local structure and coordination around Ni, does not readily provide structural information beyond the Ni−O planes of layered nickel (oxy)hydroxides.
Q18. What was the averaged capacitance at the center of the potential window?
The positive and negative capacitance currents at the center of the potential window were averaged and plotted against the scan rate to extract the measured capacitance.
Q19. What is the redox peak for the underlying gold substrate?
The reduction peak observed at 0.22 V is that for the underlying gold substrate (Figure S1, SI); this feature is also present in the case of Ni films but not apparent in Figure 1a due to the significantly higher currents observed compared to that of Fe.
Q20. What is the effect of the oxidation of Ni(OH)2 on the OER?
These observations suggest that suppression of the oxidation of Ni(OH)2 to NiOOH, regardless of the cause, results in higher OER activities.
Q21. How many electrons are transferred per Ni atom in a redox cycle?
As shown in Figure 3c for pure Ni films deposited atop roughened Au substrates, the charge passed during redox is greater than can be accounted for by assuming a one-electron redox reaction; the authors find that 1.2 electrons are transferred per Ni atom in a redox cycle.