Answering the skeptics: yes, standard volatility models do provide accurate forecasts*
TL;DR: In this article, a voluminous literature has emerged for modeling the temporal dependencies in financial market volatility using ARCH and stochastic volatility models and it has been shown that volatility models produce strikingly accurate inter-daily forecasts for the latent volatility factor that would be of interest in most financial applications.
Abstract: A voluminous literature has emerged for modeling the temporal dependencies in financial market volatility using ARCH and stochastic volatility models. While most of these studies have documented highly significant in-sample parameter estimates and pronounced intertemporal volatility persistence, traditional ex-post forecast evaluation criteria suggest that the models provide seemingly poor volatility forecasts. Contrary to this contention, we show that volatility models produce strikingly accurate interdaily forecasts for the latent volatility factor that would be of interest in most financial applications. New methods for improved ex-post interdaily volatility measurements based on high-frequency intradaily data are also discussed.
Citations
More filters
Posted Content•
TL;DR: In this article, the authors examine the pricing of aggregate volatility risk in the cross-section of stock returns and find that stocks with high sensitivities to innovations in aggregate volatility have low average returns.
Abstract: We examine the pricing of aggregate volatility risk in the cross-section of stock returns. Consistent with theory, we find that stocks with high sensitivities to innovations in aggregate volatility have low average returns. In addition, we find that stocks with high idiosyncratic volatility relative to the Fama and French (1993) model have abysmally low average returns. This phenomenon cannot be explained by exposure to aggregate volatility risk. Size, book-to-market, momentum, and liquidity effects cannot account for either the low average returns earned by stocks with high exposure to systematic volatility risk or for the low average returns of stocks with high idiosyncratic volatility.
3,004 citations
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examined the pricing of aggregate volatility risk in the cross-section of stock returns and found that stocks with high sensitivities to innovations in aggregate volatility have low average returns.
Abstract: We examine the pricing of aggregate volatility risk in the cross-section of stock returns. Consistent with theory, we find that stocks with high sensitivities to innovations in aggregate volatility have low average returns. Stocks with high idiosyncratic volatility relative to the Fama and French (1993, Journal of Financial Economics 25, 2349) model have abysmally low average returns. This phenomenon cannot be explained by exposure to aggregate volatility risk. Size, book-to-market, momentum, and liquidity effects cannot account for either the low average returns earned by stocks with high exposure to systematic volatility risk or for the low average returns of stocks with high idiosyncratic volatility. IT IS WELL KNOWN THAT THE VOLATILITY OF STOCK RETURNS varies over time. While considerable research has examined the time-series relation between the volatility of the market and the expected return on the market (see, among others, Campbell and Hentschel (1992) and Glosten, Jagannathan, and Runkle (1993)), the question of how aggregate volatility affects the cross-section of expected stock returns has received less attention. Time-varying market volatility induces changes in the investment opportunity set by changing the expectation of future market returns, or by changing the risk-return trade-off. If the volatility of the market return is a systematic risk factor, the arbitrage pricing theory or a factor model predicts that aggregate volatility should also be priced in the cross-section of stocks. Hence, stocks with different sensitivities to innovations in aggregate volatility should have different expected returns. The first goal of this paper is to provide a systematic investigation of how the stochastic volatility of the market is priced in the cross-section of expected stock returns. We want to both determine whether the volatility of the market
2,936 citations
Cites background from "Answering the skeptics: yes, standa..."
...In equation (3), shocks to a stock’s own volatility are correlated with shocks to the stochastic volatility factor in the pricing kernel (2)....
[...]
...dmt mt = −rfdt− η t dWt − η t dVt, (2)...
[...]
Posted Content•
TL;DR: In this article, the authors provide a general framework for integration of high-frequency intraday data into the measurement, modeling and forecasting of daily and lower frequency volatility and return distributions.
Abstract: This paper provides a general framework for integration of high-frequency intraday data into the measurement, modeling and forecasting of daily and lower frequency volatility and return distributions. Most procedures for modeling and forecasting financial asset return volatilities, correlations, and distributions rely on restrictive and complicated parametric multivariate ARCH or stochastic volatility models, which often perform poorly at intraday frequencies. Use of realized volatility constructed from high-frequency intraday returns, in contrast, permits the use of traditional time series procedures for modeling and forecasting. Building on the theory of continuous-time arbitrage-free price processes and the theory of quadratic variation, we formally develop the links between the conditional covariance matrix and the concept of realized volatility. Next, using continuously recorded observations for the Deutschemark/Dollar and Yen /Dollar spot exchange rates covering more than a decade, we find that forecasts from a simple long-memory Gaussian vector autoregression for the logarithmic daily realized volatitilies perform admirably compared to popular daily ARCH and related models. Moreover, the vector autoregressive volatility forecast, coupled with a parametric lognormal-normal mixture distribution implied by the theoretically and empirically grounded assumption of normally distributed standardized returns, gives rise to well-calibrated density forecasts of future returns, and correspondingly accurate quintile estimates. Our results hold promise for practical modeling and forecasting of the large covariance matrices relevant in asset pricing, asset allocation and financial risk management applications.
2,898 citations
TL;DR: In this article, the authors provide a general framework for integration of high-frequency intraday data into the measurement, modeling, and forecasting of daily and lower frequency volatility and return distributions.
Abstract: This paper provides a general framework for integration of high-frequency intraday data into the measurement, modeling, and forecasting of daily and lower frequency volatility and return distributions. Most procedures for modeling and forecasting financial asset return volatilities, correlations, and distributions rely on restrictive and complicated parametric multivariate ARCH or stochastic volatility models, which often perform poorly at intraday frequencies. Use of realized volatility constructed from high-frequency intraday returns, in contrast, permits the use of traditional time series procedures for modeling and forecasting. Building on the theory of continuous-time arbitrage-free price processes and the theory of quadratic variation, we formally develop the links between the conditional covariance matrix and the concept of realized volatility. Next, using continuously recorded observations for the Deutschemark / Dollar and Yen / Dollar spot exchange rates covering more than a decade, we find that forecasts from a simple long-memory Gaussian vector autoregression for the logarithmic daily realized volatilities perform admirably compared to popular daily ARCH and related models. Moreover, the vector autoregressive volatility forecast, coupled with a parametric lognormal-normal mixture distribution implied by the theoretically and empirically grounded assumption of normally distributed standardized returns, gives rise to well-calibrated density forecasts of future returns, and correspondingly accurate quantile estimates. Our results hold promise for practical modeling and forecasting of the large covariance matrices relevant in asset pricing, asset allocation and financial risk management applications.
2,823 citations
Posted Content•
TL;DR: The third edition has been updated with new data, extensive examples and additional introductory material on mathematics, making the book more accessible to students encountering econometrics for the first time as discussed by the authors.
Abstract: This bestselling and thoroughly classroom-tested textbook is a complete resource for finance students. A comprehensive and illustrated discussion of the most common empirical approaches in finance prepares students for using econometrics in practice, while detailed case studies help them understand how the techniques are used in relevant financial contexts. Worked examples from the latest version of the popular statistical software EViews guide students to implement their own models and interpret results. Learning outcomes, key concepts and end-of-chapter review questions (with full solutions online) highlight the main chapter takeaways and allow students to self-assess their understanding. Building on the successful data- and problem-driven approach of previous editions, this third edition has been updated with new data, extensive examples and additional introductory material on mathematics, making the book more accessible to students encountering econometrics for the first time. A companion website, with numerous student and instructor resources, completes the learning package.
2,797 citations
References
More filters
TL;DR: In this article, a new class of stochastic processes called autoregressive conditional heteroscedastic (ARCH) processes are introduced, which are mean zero, serially uncorrelated processes with nonconstant variances conditional on the past, but constant unconditional variances.
Abstract: Traditional econometric models assume a constant one-period forecast variance. To generalize this implausible assumption, a new class of stochastic processes called autoregressive conditional heteroscedastic (ARCH) processes are introduced in this paper. These are mean zero, serially uncorrelated processes with nonconstant variances conditional on the past, but constant unconditional variances. For such processes, the recent past gives information about the one-period forecast variance. A regression model is then introduced with disturbances following an ARCH process. Maximum likelihood estimators are described and a simple scoring iteration formulated. Ordinary least squares maintains its optimality properties in this set-up, but maximum likelihood is more efficient. The relative efficiency is calculated and can be infinite. To test whether the disturbances follow an ARCH process, the Lagrange multiplier procedure is employed. The test is based simply on the autocorrelation of the squared OLS residuals. This model is used to estimate the means and variances of inflation in the U.K. The ARCH effect is found to be significant and the estimated variances increase substantially during the chaotic seventies.
20,728 citations
TL;DR: In this paper, a natural generalization of the ARCH (Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedastic) process introduced in 1982 to allow for past conditional variances in the current conditional variance equation is proposed.
17,555 citations
Book•
01 Jan 1987
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a characterization of continuous local martingales with respect to Brownian motion in terms of Markov properties, including the strong Markov property, and a generalized version of the Ito rule.
Abstract: 1 Martingales, Stopping Times, and Filtrations.- 1.1. Stochastic Processes and ?-Fields.- 1.2. Stopping Times.- 1.3. Continuous-Time Martingales.- A. Fundamental inequalities.- B. Convergence results.- C. The optional sampling theorem.- 1.4. The Doob-Meyer Decomposition.- 1.5. Continuous, Square-Integrable Martingales.- 1.6. Solutions to Selected Problems.- 1.7. Notes.- 2 Brownian Motion.- 2.1. Introduction.- 2.2. First Construction of Brownian Motion.- A. The consistency theorem.- B. The Kolmogorov-?entsov theorem.- 2.3. Second Construction of Brownian Motion.- 2.4. The SpaceC[0, ?), Weak Convergence, and Wiener Measure.- A. Weak convergence.- B. Tightness.- C. Convergence of finite-dimensional distributions.- D. The invariance principle and the Wiener measure.- 2.5. The Markov Property.- A. Brownian motion in several dimensions.- B. Markov processes and Markov families.- C. Equivalent formulations of the Markov property.- 2.6. The Strong Markov Property and the Reflection Principle.- A. The reflection principle.- B. Strong Markov processes and families.- C. The strong Markov property for Brownian motion.- 2.7. Brownian Filtrations.- A. Right-continuity of the augmented filtration for a strong Markov process.- B. A "universal" filtration.- C. The Blumenthal zero-one law.- 2.8. Computations Based on Passage Times.- A. Brownian motion and its running maximum.- B. Brownian motion on a half-line.- C. Brownian motion on a finite interval.- D. Distributions involving last exit times.- 2.9. The Brownian Sample Paths.- A. Elementary properties.- B. The zero set and the quadratic variation.- C. Local maxima and points of increase.- D. Nowhere differentiability.- E. Law of the iterated logarithm.- F. Modulus of continuity.- 2.10. Solutions to Selected Problems.- 2.11. Notes.- 3 Stochastic Integration.- 3.1. Introduction.- 3.2. Construction of the Stochastic Integral.- A. Simple processes and approximations.- B. Construction and elementary properties of the integral.- C. A characterization of the integral.- D. Integration with respect to continuous, local martingales.- 3.3. The Change-of-Variable Formula.- A. The Ito rule.- B. Martingale characterization of Brownian motion.- C. Bessel processes, questions of recurrence.- D. Martingale moment inequalities.- E. Supplementary exercises.- 3.4. Representations of Continuous Martingales in Terms of Brownian Motion.- A. Continuous local martingales as stochastic integrals with respect to Brownian motion.- B. Continuous local martingales as time-changed Brownian motions.- C. A theorem of F. B. Knight.- D. Brownian martingales as stochastic integrals.- E. Brownian functionals as stochastic integrals.- 3.5. The Girsanov Theorem.- A. The basic result.- B. Proof and ramifications.- C. Brownian motion with drift.- D. The Novikov condition.- 3.6. Local Time and a Generalized Ito Rule for Brownian Motion.- A. Definition of local time and the Tanaka formula.- B. The Trotter existence theorem.- C. Reflected Brownian motion and the Skorohod equation.- D. A generalized Ito rule for convex functions.- E. The Engelbert-Schmidt zero-one law.- 3.7. Local Time for Continuous Semimartingales.- 3.8. Solutions to Selected Problems.- 3.9. Notes.- 4 Brownian Motion and Partial Differential Equations.- 4.1. Introduction.- 4.2. Harmonic Functions and the Dirichlet Problem.- A. The mean-value property.- B. The Dirichlet problem.- C. Conditions for regularity.- D. Integral formulas of Poisson.- E. Supplementary exercises.- 4.3. The One-Dimensional Heat Equation.- A. The Tychonoff uniqueness theorem.- B. Nonnegative solutions of the heat equation.- C. Boundary crossing probabilities for Brownian motion.- D. Mixed initial/boundary value problems.- 4.4. The Formulas of Feynman and Kac.- A. The multidimensional formula.- B. The one-dimensional formula.- 4.5. Solutions to selected problems.- 4.6. Notes.- 5 Stochastic Differential Equations.- 5.1. Introduction.- 5.2. Strong Solutions.- A. Definitions.- B. The Ito theory.- C. Comparison results and other refinements.- D. Approximations of stochastic differential equations.- E. Supplementary exercises.- 5.3. Weak Solutions.- A. Two notions of uniqueness.- B. Weak solutions by means of the Girsanov theorem.- C. A digression on regular conditional probabilities.- D. Results of Yamada and Watanabe on weak and strong solutions.- 5.4. The Martingale Problem of Stroock and Varadhan.- A. Some fundamental martingales.- B. Weak solutions and martingale problems.- C. Well-posedness and the strong Markov property.- D. Questions of existence.- E. Questions of uniqueness.- F. Supplementary exercises.- 5.5. A Study of the One-Dimensional Case.- A. The method of time change.- B. The method of removal of drift.- C. Feller's test for explosions.- D. Supplementary exercises.- 5.6. Linear Equations.- A. Gauss-Markov processes.- B. Brownian bridge.- C. The general, one-dimensional, linear equation.- D. Supplementary exercises.- 5.7. Connections with Partial Differential Equations.- A. The Dirichlet problem.- B. The Cauchy problem and a Feynman-Kac representation.- C. Supplementary exercises.- 5.8. Applications to Economics.- A. Portfolio and consumption processes.- B. Option pricing.- C. Optimal consumption and investment (general theory).- D. Optimal consumption and investment (constant coefficients).- 5.9. Solutions to Selected Problems.- 5.10. Notes.- 6 P. Levy's Theory of Brownian Local Time.- 6.1. Introduction.- 6.2. Alternate Representations of Brownian Local Time.- A. The process of passage times.- B. Poisson random measures.- C. Subordinators.- D. The process of passage times revisited.- E. The excursion and downcrossing representations of local time.- 6.3. Two Independent Reflected Brownian Motions.- A. The positive and negative parts of a Brownian motion.- B. The first formula of D. Williams.- C. The joint density of (W(t), L(t), ? +(t)).- 6.4. Elastic Brownian Motion.- A. The Feynman-Kac formulas for elastic Brownian motion.- B. The Ray-Knight description of local time.- C. The second formula of D. Williams.- 6.5. An Application: Transition Probabilities of Brownian Motion with Two-Valued Drift.- 6.6. Solutions to Selected Problems.- 6.7. Notes.
8,639 citations
8,252 citations
"Answering the skeptics: yes, standa..." refers background in this paper
...Meanwhile, it is a well-established fact, dating back to Mandelbrot (1963) and Fama (1965), that financial returns display pronounced volatility clustering....
[...]
Posted Content•
TL;DR: The authors describes the advantages of these studies and suggests how they can be improved and also provides aids in judging the validity of inferences they draw, such as multiple treatment and comparison groups and multiple pre- or post-intervention observations.
Abstract: Using research designs patterned after randomized experiments, many recent economic studies examine outcome measures for treatment groups and comparison groups that are not randomly assigned. By using variation in explanatory variables generated by changes in state laws, government draft mechanisms, or other means, these studies obtain variation that is readily examined and is plausibly exogenous. This paper describes the advantages of these studies and suggests how they can be improved. It also provides aids in judging the validity of inferences they draw. Design complications such as multiple treatment and comparison groups and multiple pre- or post-intervention observations are advocated.
7,222 citations
"Answering the skeptics: yes, standa..." refers background in this paper
...Diebold, F.X. and R.S. Mariano (1995), "Comparing Predictive Accuracy," Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 13, 253-263....
[...]
...…the MSE may be a natural choice when evaluating traditional model forecasts for the conditional mean, it is less7 obvious in a heteroskedastic environment; see, e.g., Bollerslev, Engle and Nelson (1994), Engle et al. (1993), Diebold and Mariano (1995), Lopez (1995), and West, Edison and Cho (1993)....
[...]